All recruits at BMTC will be trained to fly drones and counter them: Chan Chun Sing
SINGAPORE – All recruits trained at the Basic Military Training Centre (BMTC) on Pulau Tekong will learn to use drone technology and how to counter it, said Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing on Aug 4.
Speaking to the media after his first visit to BMTC since taking over the portfolio in May, Mr Chan said that unmanned technology is proliferating and the SAF needs to know how to use it and fight against it.
Given such developments, soldiers must now be trained to expand their situational awareness, Mr Chan said.
Drone training is not just about tactical or technical skills, he added.
'It's also a larger exercise to train (soldiers) in their three-dimensional spatial awareness, because when they fight the battle, how they apply their weapon systems, they have to think three dimensional, and not just two dimensions.'
The first group of soldiers to learn basic drone skills during basic military training (BMT) enlisted in July, and the SAF is currently developing doctrine on how to evade them.
The goal is to have all soldiers who pass through BMT be trained in these two capabilities starting at the end of 2025, or the beginning of 2026, said BMTC commander Colonel Muhammad Helmi Khaswan on the sidelines of the visit.
The SAF has always used technology to complement its fighting capabilities, Mr Chan said.
Speaking to the media after watching recruits operating a roughly palm-sized drone outfield, Mr Chan said in the past, one soldier could be armed with just a rifle.
But now and in the future, a single soldier operates not just his own rifle but a suite of technologies from drones to robots that will augment his capabilities, he added. 'This is how the SAF will continue to multiply our capabilities using technology.'
However, there are things about the armed forces that have not and must not change, he said.
Some of the very basics of fundamental soldiering skills continue to be emphasised, such as the ability to take care of themselves in a challenging environment.
Also important is soldiers' ability to work as a team to overcome challenges and how they bounce back from adversity.
Mr Chan said: 'All these are important skill sets for any soldier across the SAF, and this is something that the SAF will continue to emphasise on how we build up the resilience and the will to fight for our soldiers.'
Training has evolved
Mr Chan also witnessed recruits doing physical training while fitted with heart rate monitors on their wrists to help monitor their exertion, as well as recruits undergoing physiotherapy at a dedicated centre to recover from injury.
The way soldiers are trained is more personalised now compared with the past when training was done en masse, he said.
Mr Chan said: 'When you do group training, you are training to the average of what that whole group of soldiers, or platoon of soldiers are able to do.
'We are now able to personalize the training. We know each and every soldier's heart rate, how much effort they are exerting, whether they can go further, or they are at the risk of over-straining themselves.'
All this allows the SAF to be more intentional about how it optimises soldier performance – which it is able to do now because of past investments to apply science and data to training methods, Mr Chan said.
There is a 'much faster closing of the loop' in helping soldiers recover now as well, Mr Chan said.
He said: 'So in the past, the way we let soldiers recover is very much on their own, but today, we are much more scientific, much more data-driven on how we allow the soldiers to condition themselves, to recuperate and to recover from any injury.'
This includes maintaining overall physical fitness while recovering from injuries to specific body parts, Mr Chan said.
This approach has wider implications in how the SAF will make use of its finite manpower resources, because each and every soldier is important, he added.
He said: 'The faster the soldier can recover, the more optimal his or her performance is, the better we are able to utilise our manpower resources.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
PLUS Malaysia to trial ANPR toll trial in move toward MLFF
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Toll booths at the Jalan Duta toll in Kuala Lumpur used for internal testing of PLUS Highways' ANPR system. The red circle on the sign indicates a test lane. – Ma laysia could soon introduce a barrierless toll booth system to ease congestion on major highways in efforts to revamp its toll-collection processes and manage traffic congestion. PLUS Malaysia, the country's largest highway operator, will begin targeted public trials of an automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) system in mid-August on the main North-South Expressway, involving thousands of participants, according to an industry source familiar with the trials. These trials, if successful, will form a key component of a nationwide barrierless toll system that could be implemented by 2027. 'This pilot is a crucial step in our shift towards the multi-lane fast flow (MLFF) system. We are starting with ANPR to evaluate its reliability and accuracy in real traffic conditions before rolling out a full-scale system. The aim is to reduce congestion at specific toll lanes and eventually eliminate the need for toll barriers altogether,' the source told The Straits Times. The Works Ministry is proceeding with the MLFF toll-collection system through a direct business-to-business (B2B) model, Deputy Minister Ahmad Maslan told Parliament on Aug 6. 'The government remains committed to implementing the MLFF system via a B2B model, with no financial burden on the government,' he said, addressing recent concerns regarding a previously projected cost of RM3.46 billion (S$1.05 billion) to the government. Another trial – a collaboration between Touch 'n Go and CIMB – on the Kemuning-Shah Alam Expressway involves the installation of gantries and other supporting infrastructure, he added. MLFF solutions typically involve a barrierless toll system that charges vehicles as they pass through gantries without needing to stop, tap a card, or slow down. Singapore's Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) is one example of its implementation. According to the source familiar with the PLUS project, the pilot will involve selected members of the public and marks an early phase in the broader transition to a barrierless toll system. The ANPR trial is an initiative led by the highway concessionaire itself, rather than a government-led rollout. PLUS operates Malaysia's longest highway, the 748km North-South Expressway, and six other highways including the Malaysia-Singapore Second Link or Tuas Second Link – which in total serves more than 1.8 million users daily. Its majority shareholder, Malaysian sovereign fund Khazanah Nasional, owns a 51 per cent stake in PLUS through its UEM Group subsidiary. The remaining 49 per cent of PLUS is held by state pension fund Employees Provident Fund (EPF). Modelled after Singapore's ERP, where vehicles pass seamlessly through a barrierless toll system while being charged accordingly, the planned system in Malaysia will use ANPR and e-payment technology to allow vehicles to pass through toll booths without stopping. PLUS' early trials will begin on the North-South Expressway, involving nine toll plazas between Hutan Kampung and Sungai Dua in northern Penang state. In future, motorists will no longer need to stick their hands out the window to tap their physical payment cards against a scanner, as is still the case at most toll booths for drivers using Touch 'n Go, credit or debit cards. Other motorists use SmartTAG or radio-frequency identification (RFID) in-vehicle units for faster toll payments without cash. Even so, ANPR detection is said to be up to four times faster than RFID based on testing, according to the same source . SmartTAG uses infrared technology to communicate with a sensor at the toll booth, while RFID relies on a sticker on the vehicle's windshield or headlamp that is scanned by overhead readers. Both SmartTAG and RFID still require cars to slow down while passing through dedicated lanes, while this would not be necessary with the MLFF system. To use the system, trial participants must download a mobile app, input their car registration numbers and link a payment method such as a credit or debit card. The ANPR cameras installed at the toll plazas, which are already in use at many shopping mall carparks in Malaysia, will capture vehicle number plates in real time, check them against a centralised database, and initiate payment from the linked account without requiring the vehicle to slow down or stop. For now, vehicles that are part of the August trial will still have to pass through the existing toll booths with barriers to test the ANPR system. These barriers could be removed in future further tests. The app, which is free to use, will detect and process toll payments as drivers pass through the gantries. It will also provide access to travel history, receipts and, eventually, enforcement notices. 'This is not just about eliminating toll booths. The aim is to eventually integrate payment, enforcement and even subsidy eligibility into a single platform. This kind of integration in future will benefit all motorists,' the source familiar with the pilot told ST. Observers say the shift to the ANPR system and app-based payment could significantly cut delays at border checkpoints and toll plazas for those travelling on Malaysia's roads, including Singaporeans, who make more than four million road trips to Malaysia each year. Malaysia has long wanted a barrierless toll system but efforts to roll out a nationwide system have repeatedly stalled due to resistance from some highway concessionaires and regulatory delays. The government's most recent attempt was terminated in late 2024 after it failed to secure buy-in from some toll operators. The contractor involved was criticised for its lack of relevant experience and high cost. In the absence of a functioning national system, major concessionaires like PLUS have begun plans to test their own solutions. Other countries such as Taiwan are already using similar MLFF systems. Malaysia's highways have long been plagued by bottlenecks at toll booths, especially during holiday periods and weekends. Analysts say the planned barrierless system could dramatically reduce congestion and improve the driving experience across the country. Toll plazas are among the biggest bottlenecks on Malaysian highways, noted Professor Ir Dr Ahmad Farhan Mohd Sadullah, a transport expert and vice-chancellor at Universiti Putra Malaysia. 'Long queues, as well as chaotic traffic situations, are observed during peak hours on all lanes in any toll plaza on urban expressways,' he told ST. Toll plazas are among the biggest bottlenecks on Malaysian highways. ST PHOTO: HAZLIN HASSAN Existing toll systems require vehicles to slow or stop for payment and gate control, adding a few seconds of waiting time per vehicle. With high traffic volumes, those seconds add up quickly to form long queues. An MLFF system would reduce severe traffic congestion especially at peak hours as vehicles will no longer be required to stop or slow down in the absence of physical barriers. PLUS' move to test its ANPR system is likely a direct response to delays in the national MLFF roll-out, said Datuk Ahmad Farhan. But whether the new system can deliver depends on overcoming several hurdles, including the ability to trace offenders who fail to register or link a payment method, observers say. Much will also hinge on the strength of the government's regulatory framework and enforcement mechanisms to support the system. On how the system would handle toll evasion, Datuk Seri Ahmad Maslan said on Aug 6 that motorists who fail to pay will receive notices, and future enforcement could include blocking road tax renewals. 'Enforcement remains a critical unresolved issue. Current legislation does not allow toll operators to pursue motorists who exit without paying. Linking unpaid tolls to road tax renewals via the Road Transport Department is under consideration but requires new regulations,' said transport analyst Wan Agyl Wan Hassan and founder of transport think-tank My Mobility Vision.
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox BENGALURU/NEW DELHI - In January, an old post on Elon Musk's social media platform, X, became a concern for police in the Indian city of Satara. Written in 2023, the short message from an account with a few hundred followers described a senior ruling-party politician as "useless". "This post and content are likely to create serious communal tension," inspector Jitendra Shahane wrote in a content-removal notice marked "CONFIDENTIAL" and addressed to X. The post, which remains online, is among hundreds cited by X in a lawsuit it filed in March against India's government, challenging a sweeping crackdown on social media content by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration. Since 2023, India has ramped up efforts to police the internet by allowing many more officials to file takedown orders and to submit them directly to tech firms through a government website launched in October. X argues India's actions are illegal and unconstitutional, and that they trample free speech by empowering scores of government agencies and thousands of police to suppress legitimate criticism of public officials. India contends in court documents that its approach tackles a proliferation of unlawful content and ensures accountability online. It says many tech companies, including Meta and Alphabet's Google, support its actions. Both companies declined to comment for this story. Musk, who calls himself a free-speech absolutist, has clashed with authorities in the United States, Brazil, Australia and elsewhere over compliance and takedown demands. But as regulators globally weigh free-speech protections against concerns about harmful content, Musk's case against Modi's government in the Karnataka High Court targets the entire basis for tightened internet censorship in India, one of X's biggest user bases. Musk said in 2023 that the South Asian nation had "more promise than any large country in the world" and that Modi had pushed him to invest there. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore 'It's either my life or the dog's': NSF rescues lost dog which was hit by car in Bedok Singapore 81 primary schools to hold ballot for Phase 2C of Primary 1 registration Sport Young Lions and distance runner Soh Rui Yong out of SEA Games contingent Singapore Two workers died after being hit by flying gas cylinders in separate incidents in 2025 Singapore 19 drivers nabbed over illegal ride-hailing services in Singapore and across border with Malaysia Singapore Man recruited victim to open bank account, forced him to drink urine after account was frozen This account of the behind-the-scenes battle between the world's richest person and authorities in the world's most populous country is based on a Reuters review of 2,500 pages of non-public legal filings and interviews with seven police officers involved in content-removal requests. It reveals the workings of a takedown system shrouded in secrecy, some Indian officials' ire over "illegal" material on X, and the broad spectrum of content that police and other agencies have sought to censor. While the takedown orders include many that sought to counter misinformation, they also encompass directives by Modi's administration to remove news about a deadly stampede, and demands from state police to scrub cartoons that depicted the prime minister in an unfavourable light or mocked local politicians, the filings show. X didn't respond to Reuters questions about the case, while India's IT ministry declined to comment because the matter was before the court. Modi's office and his home ministry didn't respond to questions. There have been no immediate signs of souring personal relations between Musk and Modi, who have enjoyed a warm public rapport. But the showdown comes as the South African-born entrepreneur, whose business empire includes EV maker Tesla and satellite internet provider Starlink, gears up to expand both ventures in India. Even supporters of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have faced scrutiny of their online musings from police officials newly empowered by the IT ministry to target social media activity. Koustav Bagchi, a lawyer and BJP member, posted an image on X in March that depicted a rival, West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, in an astronaut suit. State police issued a takedown notice, citing "risks to public safety and national security". Bagchi told Reuters the post, which is still online, was "light-hearted" and that he wasn't aware of the takedown order. The chief minister's office and state police didn't respond to Reuters queries. Of the earlier 2023 post, Shahane, the Satara police officer, told Reuters he couldn't recall the takedown order, but said police sometimes proactively ask platforms to block offensive viral content. 'CENSORSHIP PORTAL' For years, only India's IT and Information & Broadcasting ministries could order content removal, and only for threats to sovereignty, defense, security, foreign relations, public order, or incitement. Some 99 officials across India could recommend takedowns, but the ministries had the final say. While that mechanism remains in place, Modi's IT ministry in 2023 empowered all federal and state agencies and police to issue takedown notices for "any information which is prohibited under any law". They could do so under existing legal provisions, the ministry said in a directive, citing the need for "effective" content removal. Companies that fail to comply can lose immunity for user content, making them liable for the same penalties a user might face - which could vary greatly depending on the specific material posted. Modi's government went a step further in October 2024. It launched a website called Sahyog - Hindi for collaboration - to "facilitate" the issuance of takedown notices, and asked Indian officials and social media firms to get on board, memos contained in court papers show. X didn't join Sahyog, which it has called a "censorship portal", and sued the government earlier this year, challenging the legal basis for both the new website and the IT ministry's 2023 directive. In a June 24 filing, X said some of the blocking orders issued by officials "target content involving satire or criticism of the ruling government, and show a pattern of abuse of authority to suppress free speech." Some free-speech advocates have criticised the government's stricter takedown regime, saying it is designed to stifle dissent. "Can a claim that some content is unlawful be termed as indeed unlawful merely because the government claims so?" said Subramaniam Vincent, director of journalism and media ethics at Santa Clara University's Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. "The executive branch cannot be both the arbiter of legality of media content, and the issuer of takedown notices." RED DINOSAUR Court filings reviewed by Reuters show federal and state agencies ordered X to remove around 1,400 posts or accounts between March 2024 and June 2025. More than 70% of these removal notices were issued by the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre, which developed the Sahyog website. The agency is within the home ministry, which is headed by Modi aide Amit Shah, a powerful figure in the ruling BJP. To counter X in court, India's government filed a 92-page report drafted by the cybercrime unit to show X is "hosting illegal content". The unit analysed nearly 300 posts it deemed unlawful, including misinformation, hoaxes, and child sexual-abuse material. X serves as a vehicle for "spreading hate and division" that threatens social harmony, while "fake news" on the platform has sparked unspecified law-and-order issues, the agency said in the report. The government's response to X's lawsuit highlighted examples of misinformation. In January, the cybercrime unit asked X to remove three posts containing what officials said were fabricated images that portrayed Shah's son, International Cricket Council chairman Jay Shah, "in a derogatory manner" alongside a bikini-clad woman. The posts "dishonour prominent office bearers and VIPs", the notices said. Two of those posts remain online. Jay Shah didn't respond to Reuters queries. Other directives went beyond targeting fake news. X told the court India's railways ministry has been issuing orders to censor press reports about matters of public interest. These included February directives seeking the removal of posts by some media outlets, including two by Adani Group's NDTV, that contained news coverage of stampede at New Delhi's biggest railway station that left 18 dead. The NDTV posts are still online. NDTV didn't respond to Reuters queries and the railways ministry declined to comment. In April, police in Chennai asked X to remove many "deeply offensive" and "provocative" posts, including a now-inaccessible cartoon featuring a red dinosaur labelled "inflation", which portrayed Modi and the chief minister of Tamil Nadu state as struggling to control prices. The same month, police demanded the removal of another cartoon that mocked the state government's lack of preparedness for floods by showing a boat with holes. X told the judge the cartoon was posted in November, and it could not "incite political tensions" several months later, as the Chennai police asserted. The post remains online. The state government didn't respond to a request for comment. When Reuters visited the Chennai cybercrime police station that issued these directives, Deputy Commissioner B. Geetha criticised X for seldom acting on takedown requests. X does not "fully grasp the cultural sensitivities", she said. "What may be acceptable in some countries can be considered taboo in India." REUTERS
Straits Times
13 hours ago
- Straits Times
US lawmaker questions Intel CEO's ties to China in letter to company board chair
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Senator Tom Cotton questioned about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's (pictured) disclosures related to investment, professional roles or other ties to Chinese companies. SAN FRANCISCO - US Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair on Aug 6 with questions about the chipmaker's new CEO Lip-Bu Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former company Cadence Design. Writing to "express concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on US national security", Mr Cotton asked in the letter to Intel chairperson Frank Yeary whether the company's board was aware of the subpoenas sent to Cadence during Mr Tan's time there as CEO before Intel hired him. Mr Cotton asked what measures were taken to address those concerns. He also asked whether Intel's board required Mr Tan to divest from chip firms in China linked to the Chinese military or Communist Party, and if Mr Tan adequately disclosed other ties to Chinese companies due to Intel's involvement in the Secure Enclave programme, an initiative designed under the Biden administration to ensure a secure supply of microelectronics for defence. Because of Intel getting federal funding under the initiative, Mr Cotton questioned Mr Yeary in the letter about Mr Tan's disclosures related to investment, professional roles or other ties to Chinese companies. "Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations," Mr Cotton wrote. "Mr Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfil these obligations." In a statement, an Intel spokesperson said, 'Intel and Mr Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the US defence ecosystem.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Recent rail disruptions disappointing and 'we can and will do better': Jeffrey Siow Singapore 'It's either my life or the dog's life': NSF rescues lost dog which was hit by car in Bedok Singapore Migrant workers who saved driver from sinkhole get SCDF awards, mobile data and goodie bags Singapore COE premiums rise in all categories except motorcycles; Cat B at $123,498, highest since Dec 2023 Singapore Hidden vapes and where to find them: Inside ICA's clampdown at land checkpoints Singapore 19 drivers nabbed over illegal ride-hailing services in Singapore and across border with Malaysia World A 'Huawei moment' looms as US gears up to sell AI-in-a-box to South-east Asia Singapore Man recruited victim to open bank account, forced him to drink urine after account was frozen The company said it would address the matters in the letter with the Senator. In April, Reuters reported Mr Tan - himself or through venture funds he has founded or operates - has invested in hundreds of Chinese companies, some of which are linked to the Chinese military. The Intel CEO invested at least US$200 million (S$257.46 million) in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms between March 2012 and December 2024, Reuters found. A source familiar with the matter had at the time told Reuters that Mr Tan had divested from his positions in entities in China, without providing further details. Chinese databases reviewed by Reuters at the time had listed many of his investments as current, and Reuters was at the time unable to establish the extent of his divestitures. Mr Cotton's letter mentioned the Reuters story as a source. Cadence reaches settlements It is not illegal for US citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, even those with ties to the Chinese military, unless those companies have been added to the US Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which explicitly bans such investments. Reuters in April had found no evidence that Mr Tan at the time was invested directly in any company on the US Treasury's list. Separately, last week Cadence Design agreed to plead guilty and pay more than US$140 million to resolve charges for selling its chip design products to a Chinese military university, Reuters reported. The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts. In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Cadence said it was "pleased" to reach settlements with the Justice and Commerce departments. Mr Tan ran Cadence as CEO from 2008 through 2021 and was executive chairman until May 2023. The sales to Chinese entities occurred under his leadership at Cadence, which makes design software and other tools used to create chips. REUTERS
