The incredible memory of Daniel Hannan
Young Hannan was struck by 'the sense of despair that hung about the country like a cold mist in the late 1970s,' he writes. 'I recall being shocked at the way adults talked. Britain was finished, they were forever telling me. Things were going to the dogs. It was time to emigrate. Remarkably similar to how people talk now, in fact.
'A three-day week, a Conservative government setting prices and incomes, trade union barons being better-known household names than cabinet ministers, double-digit inflation, 83 per cent income tax, power cuts, strikes. It did indeed feel as if Britain was finished.'
Fun fact: Daniel Hannan was seven years old when Margaret Thatcher was first elected on May 4, 1979. It would have been precocious of Hannan that, at a time when his schoolmates were preoccupied by Star Wars and Multi-Coloured Swap Shop , he was fretting about inflation and income policy.
But it's even more bewildering when you consider that Hannan – born, like Paddington, in Peru – didn't move to Britain until he was sent to boarding school in the Cotsworlds at the age of eight, meaning he was learning the name of trade union barons from a poultry farm outside Chaclacayo, 6,300 miles away!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
Labour are engulfed in major online safety furore
It worked for rapper Kendrick Lamar; why not Technology Secretary Peter Kyle? Kyle delivered a quite extraordinary, spittle-flecked response to critics of the Online Safety Act on Tuesday morning. Nigel Farage is on the same side as paedophiles, Kyle spat. Not just any paedos either, the minister said that Farage would be on the same side as Jimmy Savile, were he still alive. Going even further later on, he said that anyone wanting to overturn the controversial legislation is 'on the side of predators'. That includes more than 400,000 people who have signed a petition calling for the Act to be repealed and could expand to organisations like Liberty, Big Brother Watch, Index on Censorship and the parent companies of Facebook and Wikipedia. Even Ian Russell, the chair of the Molly Russell Foundation, a child protection charity, said that the Act was not up to snuff and had to be replaced by something even tougher. Who knew paedophiles had so many allies? Quite why Labour are defending a Tory piece of legislation – the Act was passed by the Conservatives but is only coming into force now – is a question with a couple of answers. The first is a political one. 'Protect our children' has become a potent rallying cry for the right, identifying bogeymen in everyone from asylum seekers to drag queens. This is Labour's counterblast: You're putting children at risk. If you're against us, you're on the same side as child abusers. READ MORE: Labour respond as 400k demand repeal of Online Safety Act As a strategy it could work. Many parents will doubtless be glad to see the Government come down hard on the worst bits of the internet. It will certainly be welcomed by many that unregulated social media companies will be held responsible for removing content like child pornography and blocking children's access to sexual content or instructions for committing acts of self-harm or suicide. There is unlikely to be great amounts of sympathy for arguments about the sanctity of end-to-end encryption or free online speech. The flipside: are Reform UK railing against the Act – which this week enforced age restrictions on adult content – as a means to target the porn-addicted, misanthropic young men likely to make up its youth base at the next election? Quite possibly. (Image: James Manning/PA) The other reason that Kyle and his Labour comrades so aggressively back the Act is that they genuinely believe in it. They do not care about warnings that by introducing strict age checks, people might be pushed into downloading software to evade restrictions and access the darker corners of the internet. Demand for virtual private networks, which allow people to browse the web away from the prying eyes of regulators, is soaring. Kyle, as a rational being, must consider it plausible that the Act could have unintended consequences, though he shows no signs that he does. He seems to believe that the intention of legislation is its effect. He appears to care only about why laws were introduced, not how they work. Keir Starmer's response to criticism of the Act earlier this week took a similar approach: 'I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.' It surely cannot be beyond him that the two are not mutually exclusive. So it was with the SNP's doomed Named Person Scheme. Ministers were warned in 2016 that while the aim of the policy was 'unquestionably legitimate', it would violate people's human rights. It took another three years before it was officially ditched by the Scottish Government. With Donald Trump's sidekick JD Vance threatening consequences for governments insufficiently amenable to his definition of free speech, perhaps Starmer and co might catch up with the laws of unintended consequences sooner rather than later.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Lords accused of trying to block Labour's zero-hours contract ban for ‘bad bosses'
Peers in the House of Lords have been accused of trying to block key protections for millions of workers as they push through major changes to Labour's Employment Rights Bill. The Lords last week voted in favour of several amendments brought forward by Conservative and Liberal Democrat peers which row back on reforms to zero-hours contracts, day-one protections and more. It comes as a blow to the government – which pledged in its 2024 manifesto to end 'exploitative' zero-hours contracts – and sets up a showdown between the Lords and Commons. General secretary of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), Paul Nowak said: 'the sight of Hereditary Peers voting to block stronger workers ' rights belongs in another century. It's plain wrong.' 'They are doing the bidding of bad bosses,' he added, and encouraged the government to 'stand firm.' Under the Lords' amendments, the requirement for employers to offer zero-hours workers a contract would be changed to instead require the worker to ask for the arrangement. Protections against unfair dismissal from day one of employment were also amended, instead bringing the time up to six months. Legislation currently ensures the protections after two years of employment. There were also several amendments to trade union laws voted in, including a requirement for members to actively opt into trade union political funds, rather than opt out. This came alongside another amendment to ensure the 50 per cent turnout threshold for industrial action is not repealed in the bill. The amendments were put forward by Tory peers Lord Hunt, shadow business minister, and Lord Sharpe, alongside Liberal Democrat Lord Goddard. Ministers will address the amendments when MPs return to Commons from summer recess at the start of September. The two houses will then continue to vote on the changes in a process known as parliamentary 'ping-pong' before a finalised version of the bill is agreed upon. Responding to criticism, Lord Hunt said: 'All the evidence shows that workers value and support that flexibility and the diverse job opportunities it continues to create. The world of business – which creates the wealth we need – has repeatedly made it very plain that the Government's proposals go too far and jeopardise that vital flexibility. 'In too many respects the Government's Bill aims to give new powers to the trade unions as organisations, not to the workers themselves, but the Lords amendments would create a better balance. They will protect and create more jobs and serve the working people of Britain well.'
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Tributes paid to former Edinburgh Conservative group leader Christine Richard
Tributes have been paid to former Edinburgh Tory group leader Christine Richard, who has died, aged 82. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Mrs Richard was a colourful and outspoken figure at the City Chambers, a councillor for 12 years and group leader for four of these. Former Tory councillor Lindsay Walls said: "She was a very efficient woman, a good debater in the council chamber, very bubbly and had good connections - she knew a lot of people." Former councillor Christine Richard has died, aged 82 | supplied Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mrs Richard was first elected councillor for Murrayfield in 1984 and served as leader of the Tory group from 1989 until 1993. In 1992 she received an OBE for public service. And she stood unsuccessfully in the first elections for the Scottish Parliament as Tory candidate in East Lothian in 1999. But she later quit the party and joined Labour. She died peacefully on July 10. Her daughter Fiona Fahey was her carer for the last five years. Mrs Richard was born in Yorkshire to a Swiss father and an English mother. She went to Ilkley Grammar School, but instead of going on to university had to get a job and help look after the family after her father died. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She married her first husband, Len, a company chief executive, when she was 21. He was 17 years older and had three sons from his previous marriage. Fiona said: "She took on my dad's three children and then had me, so by 22, she was running a house, working, and had four children." The family moved around quite a bit and came to Edinburgh around 1970, when Len was appointed to printers Morrison & Gibb. Christine Richard with fellow Conservative Malcolm Rifkind on Calton Hill Edinburgh in May 1992. | TSPL Fiona said her mother was always quick to get involved in new situations. 'She very much plunged herself into whatever community she ended up in.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But a few years later the marriage broke up and she married stockbroker John Richard, who had four children, one of them now the Duchess of Northumberland. Mrs Richard was already active in the Conservative Party, as well as working. She held several posts as personal assistant, including to merchant banker Angus Grossart. And later she taught business skills and mentored women who were setting up their own businesses. Her election to Edinburgh District Council came just as Labour won control of the authority from the Conservatives, so she was in opposition all of her time on the council. But she played an energetic part in city politics, including enthusiastic support for the reopening of the former Empire Theatre as the Festival Theatre. Christine Richard was Tory group leader in Edinburgh from 1989 until 1993. Picture: Justin Spittle. | TSPL In 1992, she admitted making nuisance phone calls to her husband's ex-wife and was admonished by the court. An attempt to oust her as group leader failed, but she stood down from the post the following year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She left the Tories and joined Labour in 2002, when Tony Blair was prime minister. Fiona recalled: "She said she stayed in the same place but the parties moved.' She did not seek re-election under her new colours, but she did act as agent for the late Labour councillor Liz Maginnis at the 2007 council elections. And Fiona said another friend was the late Margo MacDonald. 'They had great fun together. They would always pretend to be the worst enemies, but they were the best of friends.' Mrs Richard owned a racehorse, Tre Bonkers, which Fionas said 'won a few trophies'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And after she left the council, she wrote a novel 'Whitewalls' - described as 'a Scottish family saga' - which was published in 2009. Fiona said her mother remained active, out and about, attending events and going to the ballet up until Covid, but after that 'never got back out on the road properly' though she remained 'very witty and chirpy and funny'. 'She did a lot of good, she was quite fearless, she lived her life to the full and she was a very kind, very generous woman. She was passionate about what she did and a real grafter. She was a real character, brimming with stories and very much loved.' The funeral will be at Warriston crematorium on Tuesday, August 5, at 2pm. And an event is planned for the Festival Theatre later in the year to celebrate her life.
