logo
Mum whose baby boy was thrown from car window after she drank rosé on beach & didn't strap him in properly avoids jail

Mum whose baby boy was thrown from car window after she drank rosé on beach & didn't strap him in properly avoids jail

The Sun25-07-2025
A MUM has avoided jail after her baby boy was thrown from a car window and killed as he had not been properly strapped into his seat.
Morgan Kiely, then 19, had been drinking rosé wine with her friend Stevie Steel at Clacton Beach when she got into her pal's Ford Focus with her six-month-old son Harry on July 13, 2022.
3
3
3
However, as they drove away, the car rolled over and ended up on its roof.
In the process of flipping, Harry was thrown from his seat, leaving the vehicle through an open window.
He later died that night from "unsurvivable" injuries, including a skull fracture.
Today, Kiely - now aged 22 - was handed a two-year suspended prison sentence after being found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence.
Steel also previously admitted causing death by careless driving while over the drink drive limit.
While Kiely chose not to give evidence at her trial, a key witness said it was "highly likely" that the straps of Harry's seat had not been secured.
The trial at Chelmsford Crown Court heard how the mum had been a passenger in the front seat of Steel's motor, with Harry in the rear seat directly behind.
The pair of adults had met up at about 3pm and bought three bottles of rosé wine on their way to the beach.
While on the beach for several hours, they were briefly joined by Mitchell Basssett, Steel's former partner.
He offered them a lift from the beach after hearing their plans to continue drinking that evening.
However, they refused.
Judge Robert Jay said: "Alarm bells should have been ringing in your head at that point.
"You knew how much Stevie had drunk. You could and should have taken up Mitchell's offer.
"A mother should not agree to travel with a drunk driver."
The court heard that a distracted Steel hit a parked car while driving on Cherry Tree Avenue in the coastal town.
Steel's Ford Focus had been travelling within the 30mph speed limit but rolled after hitting the static motor, eventually ending up on its roof.
Both women were left hanging upside down by their seatbelts while Harry was thrown from the vehicle through an open window.
Judge Jay said: "This was not an accident that was likely to happen.
"Maybe 99 times out of 100 the car would not have rolled over at this sort of speed and Harry would have survived."
Harry suffered a devastating skull fracture and was treated at the scene for more than an hour before he was rushed to hospital.
Members of the public had come to assist at the scene, including a paediatric nurse.
Despite the best efforts of medical crew to save his life at the hospital, he tragically died at about 9pm that evening.
In the trial, the jury reviewed a 999 call from the scene, an officer's bodycam footage, an expert witness who explained how the child car seat worked, and evidence from Mr Bassett.
Judge Jay told Kiely: "Harry's safety was your responsibility. It should have been your primary concern that day."
He said her negligent conduct that day was a lapse in her otherwise good care of Harry.
"I think that it is obvious to everyone in this courtroom that you were a very good mother to Harry in all respects, and that this was a singleton failure," the judge said.
The court heard Kiely had given up her job as a carer and now has a four-month-old baby.
Benjamin Summers, defending, had read out statements to the court describing Kiely as a "devoted and loving mother" to Harry, and who was "deeply caring".
The court heard she had taken Harry on trips to Liverpool and Scotland in his short life to visit relatives, and had recently returned to work as a carer.
The jury heard from an expert witness earlier in the trial about the child car seat and how it is designed to work.
The witness said it was highly unlikely but not impossible the straps of the seat had been secured in the car.
Mr Summers said: "Dreadful, dreadful, dreadful error, it was, but, we say, not making her grossly negligent at the time.
"We say it is not as simple as saying the failure to secure a child in a car seat, full stop, is enough."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former priest accused of ‘brainwashing' followers in evangelical Church of England cult claims he led on ‘consensus'
Former priest accused of ‘brainwashing' followers in evangelical Church of England cult claims he led on ‘consensus'

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Former priest accused of ‘brainwashing' followers in evangelical Church of England cult claims he led on ‘consensus'

A former priest accused of leading an evangelical cult in the Church of England has denied 'brainwashing' his followers as he stands trial for sexually abusing 13 women. Christopher Brain, who led the rave-style Nine O-Clock Service (NOS) in Sheffield in the 80s and 90s, allegedly surrounded himself with women who wore lingerie or revealing clothes as part of his 'homebase team' who kept his house 'spotlessly clean'. Jurors at Inner London Crown Court previously heard the women – sometimes referred to as 'the Lycra Lovelies' or 'the Lycra Nuns' – were on a rota to help then-Reverend Brain get to bed, and this included performing sexual favours. The 68-year-old denies one count of rape and 36 counts of indecent assault relating to the 13 women between 1981 and 1995. Giving evidence in his own defence on Monday, Mr Brain – who was in a Christian band – admitted he became the unofficial leader of a Christian group known as the 'Nairn Street Community', made up of up of around a dozen people who felt they did not fit into a traditional church congregation. This group later became part of NOS, formed after they heard 'charismatic' evangelical American minister John Wimber speak. His preaching included practices such as 'laying on hands' and speaking in tongues, the court heard. Mr Brain admitted he would be described as the leader of NOS, a congregation which met for 9pm services 'shaped around club culture' at St Thomas' in Crookes, Sheffield, but claimed there were other members of a leadership team. Mr Brain said he "rarely" stood at the front of worships and instead played more of a "producer" role. He admitted he may have been 'overbearing' at times as he led the art and direction of NOS services, which featured music and visual effects. 'I think most of the time I lead on consensus,' he told the jury from the witness box, wearing a black suit and shirt. 'It's also my character style. However when it got to music and direction I could be very direct and be very Yorkshire and straight and I think at times I probably was overbearing.' Asked by his lawyer, Iain Simkins KC, if he was at times 'overly direct', he replied: 'Yeah, by today's standards.' However, he denied 'brainwashing' or 'exerting undue control' over congregation members. Asked by Mr Simkin 'did you turn them into robots to allow you to manipulate them for your own sexual desires', he responded: 'No.' The prosecution allege NOS became a 'closed and controlled' group which he used to 'sexually assault a staggering number of women from his congregation'. The former priest appeared in a 1995 documentary and made admissions to the filmmaker of sexual contact with a number of the female members of NOS, jurors were told. Mr Brain, 68, who denies all charges, insists NOS was not a cult. He accepts that he engaged in sexual activity with some of the complainants, but that it was consensual. The eight-week trial continues.

Residents left baffled by naked man wearing ‘gimp mask' at night
Residents left baffled by naked man wearing ‘gimp mask' at night

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Residents left baffled by naked man wearing ‘gimp mask' at night

A quiet seaside town has been rocked by a naked man reportedly wearing a 'gimp mask' stalking its streets at night. Residents across Lytham have been discussing the mysterious person's identity on social media, after he was first spotted just before 1am on 18 July. He was captured on a car dashcam on Westby Street, in the heart of the Victorian resort. Locals say the clip was then posted on the street's WhatsApp group, with more footage from the night also shared. Clips have since been posted on Facebook and have gone viral. The footage shows a young man calmly striding down the street, naked except for his trainers and black mask. 'It's a gimp mask, I've watched the footage,' said one resident, who requested they did not want to be named. 'I've no idea what he thinks he's doing,' he added. 'In the days after, we saw a young man, fully clothed, walking around the streets, looking up and around, seemingly checking for cameras. 'We think it's the same man.' The resident, who was stood alongside his wife, said he knew of no 'alternative lifestyle' establishments locally which may provide a clue to the mystery. Locals also said Lytham, unlike its close neighbour Blackpool, does not get stag and hen parties visiting the town. Lancashire Police said the incident took place on Westby Street, Cleveland Road and Bannister Street. A spokesman said: 'We are aware of a concerning video circulating on social media of a naked male wearing a face covering walking around Lytham in the early hours of the morning. 'This incident was not initially reported to police and has only been brought to our attention after it has been viewed on Facebook. ' Fylde Rural Task Force are currently conducting CCTV and house‑to‑house inquiries and would like to reassure you that we are taking this matter seriously.'

Hundreds ready to be arrested at mass protest against Palestine Action terror ban
Hundreds ready to be arrested at mass protest against Palestine Action terror ban

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Hundreds ready to be arrested at mass protest against Palestine Action terror ban

At least 500 people are expected to take part in a pro-Palestine protest on Saturday that could see them arrested under terrorism laws for holding up signs. The action, which is planned for Westminster, will force police to confront the impact of a new order proscribing protest group Palestine Action as a terror organisation. Activists who oppose the group's ban will hold up signs on Saturday expressing support for the organisation, an act which is now an offence under section 13 of the Terrorism Act. Organisers from Defend our Juries, who are co-ordinating the action, told The Independent that they were 'very confident' it would go ahead with at least 500 people involved. Protesters plan to sit together and hold up signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'. But the prime minister's spokesperson warned those planning to take part that they may 'yet not know the true nature of this organisation', telling reporters: 'This is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group.' A police source also told The Guardian that anyone demonstrating in support of Palestine Action would be arrested at the weekend. They said: 'However we have to do it, they will be arrested for breaking terrorism laws' Organisers will make a final decision on whether the protest will go ahead tomorrow. The government's proscription of Palestine Action as a terror group is currently being challenged in the High Court, with a court case expected later in the autumn. In a judgement allowing the court case to go ahead, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was 'reasonably arguable' that the proscription 'amounts to a disproportionate interference' of Huda Ammori, the co-founder of the group's, rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Home secretary Yvette Cooper decided to proscribe the group after activists allegedly broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed two military planes with red paint. Court papers said she was hesistant to proscribe the group, but that the CPS advised acting early to minimise the risk of prejudice in the upcoming trial of Palestine Action protesters in November. Describing their planned action on Saturday, Tim Crosland, from Defend Our Juries, said: 'We're just exercising our democratic rights to freedom of assembly. Our plans are online, this is an open transparent campaign against an order that the UN has said is unnecessary. There isn't any secret plot. 'We think at least 500 people will be involved although there is no fool proof way of knowing. Some people are travelling into London from around the country and some people are saying they might come from Holland for it'. He added: 'Holding a sign is in some ways a much more gentle ask than getting onto gantries, or breaking into a base, or anything like that. But because of the [proscription] order that simple act of peaceful protest is an offence under the terror act. We are letting people know that the risks are very very substantial, but if enough of us do it then there is safety in numbers'. In a briefing for protesters, Defend Our Juries advises people that there is a substantial risk of arrest and that the Met Police has arrested people under section 13 of the Terrorism Act. This makes it an offence to wear an item of clothing or display an article that arouses 'reasonable suspicion that [the wearer] is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation'. The document advises people that 'if enough of us take a stand, then it is unlikely any charges will be brought'. Outside of London, some protesters have had their homes raided and technology seized. One 80-year-old woman was arrested at a rally in Cardiff and had her home searched. She said officers removed iPads, a Palestine flag, books on Palestine, and material related to Extinction Rebellion. In the brief, Defend Our Juries warn participants that if they are taking action outside London they should warn any housemates that their homes could be searched. Recommendations also include removing tech from the house, having a decoy phone, laptop or Ipad, and if they are vulnerable to put a note on the front door stating 'I am elderly and will take longer to answer the door'. The prime minister's spokesperson told reporters on Monday that 'those who seek to support this group [Palestine Action] may yet not know the true nature of this organisation, but people should be under no illusions: this is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group. 'We're also clear that their activities do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across this country who continue to exercise their fundamental right to protest on difficult, different issues'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store