logo
Trump's nomination for NASA leader boasts business and commercial spaceflight experience during a period of uncertainty for the agency

Trump's nomination for NASA leader boasts business and commercial spaceflight experience during a period of uncertainty for the agency

Yahoo10-04-2025

Jared Isaacman, billionaire, CEO and nominee to become the next NASA administrator, faced questions on April 9, 2025, from members of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation during his confirmation hearing for the position.
Should the Senate confirm him, Isaacman will be the first billionaire – but not the first astronaut – to head NASA. Perhaps even more significant, he will be the first NASA administrator with significant ties to the commercial space industry.
As a space policy expert, I know that NASA leadership matters. The head of the agency can significantly shape the missions it pursues, the science it undertakes and, ultimately, the outcome of America's space exploration.
At 16 years old, Isaacman dropped out of high school to start a payment processing company in his basement. The endeavor succeeded and eventually became known as Shift4.
Though he found early success in business, Isaacman also had a love for aviation. In 2009, he set a record for flying around the Earth in a light jet, beating the previous record by more than 20 hours.
While remaining CEO of Shift4, Isaacman founded another company, Draken International. The company eventually assembled the world's largest fleet of privately owned fighter jets. It now helps to train U.S. Air Force pilots.
In 2019, Isaacman sold his stake in Draken International. In 2020, he took Shift4 public, making him a billionaire.
Isaacman continued to branch out into aerospace, working with SpaceX beginning in 2021. He purchased a crewed flight on the Falcon 9 rocket, a mission that eventually was called Inspiration4. The mission, which he led, represented the first private astronaut flight for SpaceX. It sent four civilians with no previous formal space experience into orbit.
Following the success of Inspiration4, Isaacman worked with SpaceX to develop the Polaris Program, a series of three missions to help build SpaceX's human spaceflight capabilities. In fall 2024, the first of these missions, Polaris Dawn, launched.
Polaris Dawn added more accomplishments to Isaacman's resume. Isaacman, along with his crewmate Sarah Gillis, completed the first private spacewalk. Polaris Dawn's SpaceX Dragon capsule traveled more than 850 miles (1,367 kilometers) from Earth, the farthest distance humans had been since the Apollo missions.
In December 2024, the incoming Trump administration announced its intention to nominate Isaacman for the post of NASA administrator.
As NASA administrator, Isaacman would oversee all NASA activities at a critical moment in its history. The Artemis program, which has been in progress since 2017, has several missions planned for the next few years.
This includes 2026's Artemis II mission, which will send four astronauts to orbit the Moon. Then, in 2027, Artemis III will aim to land on it.
But, if Isaacman is confirmed, his tenure would come at a time when there are significant questions about the Artemis program, as well as the extent to which NASA should use commercial space companies like SpaceX. The agency is also potentially facing funding cuts.
Some in the space industry have proposed scrapping the Artemis program altogether in favor of preparing to go to Mars. Among this group is the founder of SpaceX, Elon Musk.
Others have suggested canceling NASA's Space Launch System, the massive rocket that is being used for Artemis. Instead, they argue that NASA could use commercial systems, like SpaceX's Starship or Blue Origin's New Glenn.
Isaacman has also dealt with accusations that he is too close to the commercial space industry, and SpaceX in particular, to lead NASA. This has become a larger concern given Musk's involvement in the Trump administration and its cost-cutting efforts. Some critics are worried that Musk would have an even greater say in NASA if Isaacman is confirmed.
Since his nomination, Isaacman has stopped working with SpaceX on the Polaris Program. He has also made several supportive comments toward other commercial companies.
But the success of any of NASA's plans depends on having the money and resources necessary to carry them out.
While NASA has been spared major cuts up to this point, it, like many other government agencies, is planning for budget cuts and mass firings. These potential cuts are similar to what other agencies such as the Department of Health and Human Services have recently made.
During his confirmation hearing, Isaacman committed to keeping the Artemis program, as well as the Space Launch System, in the short term. He also insisted that NASA could both return to the Moon and prepare for Mars at the same time.
Although Isaacman stated that he believed NASA had the resources to do both at the same time, the agency is still in a time of budget uncertainty, so that may not be possible.
About his relationship with Musk, Isaacman stated that he had not talked to Musk since his nomination in November, and his relationship with SpaceX would not influence his decisions.
Additionally, he committed to carrying out space science missions, specifically to 'launch more telescopes, more probes, more rovers.'
But since NASA is preparing for significant cuts to its science budget, there is some speculation that the agency may need to end some science programs, like the Hubble space telescope, altogether.
Isaacman has received support from the larger space community. Nearly 30 astronauts signed a letter in support of his nomination. Former NASA administrators, as well as major industry groups, have signaled their desire for Isaacman's confirmation.
He also received the support of Senator Ted Cruz, the committee chair.
Barring any major development, Isaacman will likely be confirmed as NASA administrator by the Senate in the coming weeks. The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation could approve his nomination once it returns from a two-week break at the end of April. A full vote from the Senate would follow.
If the Senate does confirm him, Isaacman will have several major issues to confront at NASA, all in a very uncertain political environment.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Wendy Whitman Cobb, Air University
Read more:
Polaris Dawn mission to Earth's orbit will test SpaceX's capabilities for a commercial space program
SpaceX Inspiration4 mission sent 4 people with minimal training into orbit – and brought space tourism closer to reality
What does the NASA administrator do? The agency's leader reaches for the stars while navigating budgets and politics back on Earth
Wendy N. Whitman Cobb is affiliated with the US School of Advanced Air and Space Studies. Her views are her own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Musk can both hurt each other in their feud. Here's how.
Trump and Musk can both hurt each other in their feud. Here's how.

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Musk can both hurt each other in their feud. Here's how.

An explosive breakdown in the relationship between President Donald Trump and his biggest political donor turned part-time employee, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, has been foreshadowed since their alliance first took shape. When Trump brought Musk along for the ride as he moved back into the White House, the looming question was always how long the two could possibly stay in sync. After all, neither the most powerful person in the world nor the richest person on Earth is known for keeping his ego in check. The main thrust of the Trump-Musk feud boils down to who can assert dominance over the other. In the intense back-and-forth that had everyone glued to their screens Thursday, we saw bullies used to getting their way desperately trying to find leverage over each other. But unlike the flame wars of old, where internet trolls would hurl insults at each other across message board forums, Trump and Musk can do serious damage to each other in the real world — and to the rest of us in the process. Musk first gained access to Trump through his vast fortune; he donated almost $300 million during last year's election and hasn't been afraid to throw his money around in races this year. Though he said in May he would be 'spending a lot less' on funding political races, he has also been quick to threaten pumping money into the midterms should lawmakers back the massive budget bill currently working its way through the Senate. And Musk has made clear that he expects a return on his investments, having already snidely claimed on his X platform that Trump would have lost and Democrats would have taken Congress without his backing. Trump is reportedly more focused on the midterms than he was during his first term, worried that a new Democratic majority would lead to more investigations and/or a third impeachment. While he's already sitting on $600 million to help hold on to a GOP majority, Musk's money could throw a spanner in the works, especially if he follows through on his public musing about bankrolling a third party to 'represent the 80% of Americans in the middle.' Though Trump has his own social media platform, Truth Social, X remains a much louder microphone to amplify Musk's messaging to the right, including his supposed 'bombshell' about Trump's presence in the Jeffrey Epstein files. (Musk provided no evidence for the claim and Trump has previously denied any involvement with Epstein's criminal behavior.) Trump, in turn, has threatened Musk's lucrative government contracts, which would include billions of dollars funneled toward his SpaceX company, as well as the subsidies that Tesla receives for its electric car production. Musk responded by warning about cutting off access to SpaceX launches, which would potentially cripple NASA and the Defense Department's ability to deploy satellites. But that would prove a double-edged sword for Musk, given how large a revenue stream those contracts have become. By Thursday evening, Musk had already backed down from his saber-rattling about restricting access to the Dragon space capsule, but he could change his mind again. That he made the threat in the first place has raised major alarm bells among national security officials. The Washington Post reported Saturday that NASA and the Pentagon have begun "urging [Musk's competitors] to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft" to lessen his chokehold on the industry. Notably, Trump isn't alone in his fight against Musk, though as ever those wading into the brawl have their own motives. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon took the opportunity to launch a broadside against Musk. 'People including myself are recommending to the president that he pull every contract associated with Elon Musk,' Bannon told NBC News on Thursday night. Bannon requested that 'major investigations start immediately' into, among other things, Musk's 'immigration status, his security clearance and his history of drug abuse.' There are already several federal investigations of Musk's companies that have been underway for years, which critics had previously worried might be stonewalled due to his influence with Trump. While the extremely public breakup makes for high drama and more than a little schadenfreude, the pettiness masks a deeper issue. The battle Musk and Trump are waging is predicated on both wielding a horrifying amount of unchecked power. In a healthy system of government, their ability to inflict pain on each other wouldn't exist, or at least such an ability would be severely blunted. Musk being able to funnel nearly unlimited amounts of spending into dark money super PACs is an oligarchical nightmare. Trump using the power of the presidency to overturn contracts and launch investigations at a whim is blatant authoritarianism in action. In theory, there are still checks to rein each of them in before things escalate much further. Musk's shareholders have been unhappy with his rocky time in government, and the war of words with Trump sent Tesla's stock price tumbling once more. Trump needs to get his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' passed into law and — next year — ensure Congress doesn't fall into Democrats' hands. Trump and Musk have incentives, then, to stay in each other's good graces despite their wounded pride. Trump made clear to NBC News in an interview Saturday that he has no real interest in patching things up with Musk, warning that there will be "very serious consequences" if his one-time ally funds Democratic campaigns. Even if the two eventually reach a détente, it's unlikely to be a lasting peace, not so long as one feels his authority is challenged by the other. The zero-sum view of the world that Trump and Musk share, one where social Darwinism and superior genetics shape humanity, doesn't allow for long-term cooperative relationships. Instead, at best they will return to a purely transactional situationship, but one where the knives will gleefully come back out the second a new opening is given. Most importantly, there is no protagonist when it comes to the inciting incident in this duel, as a total victory won't benefit the American people writ large. Trump wants Congress to pass his bill to grant him more funding for deportations and to preserve his chances of staying in power. Musk wants a more painful bill that will slash the social safety net for millions. No matter what the outcome is as they battle for supremacy over each other, we're the ones who risk being trampled. This article was originally published on

The NASA science missions that would be axed in Trump's 2026 budget
The NASA science missions that would be axed in Trump's 2026 budget

Washington Post

time27 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

The NASA science missions that would be axed in Trump's 2026 budget

President Donald Trump's fiscal 2026 budget request, if approved by Congress, would kill many of NASA's plans for robotic exploration of the solar system. Gone, too, would be multiple space-based missions to study Earth, the sun and the rest of the universe. Among the planets that would get less attention are Venus, Mars and Jupiter. But the planet facing the biggest drop in scrutiny from space is our own. The Trump budget proposal calls for reducing Earth science funding by 53 percent.

These Two Galaxy Clusters Are About to Smash Into Each Other—Again
These Two Galaxy Clusters Are About to Smash Into Each Other—Again

Gizmodo

time32 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

These Two Galaxy Clusters Are About to Smash Into Each Other—Again

Roughly 2.8 billion light-years from Earth, two galaxy clusters are engaged in a cosmic tussle. These enormous structures last collided about a billion years ago, but now, it appears they're going back for round two. The galaxy clusters involved in this scuffle are part of a larger system—a 'combined' galaxy cluster—called PSZ2 G181. In a study published in The Astrophysical Journal in April, researchers analyzed new observations of PSZ2 G181 that suggest its constituent clusters are poised to smash into each other for a second time. Major collisions between galaxy clusters are generally considered rare, according to the European Space Agency (ESA), but repeated collisions are decidedly more unusual. What's more, PSZ2 G181's total mass is uncharacteristically low compared to other combined galaxy clusters that have resulted from collisions, adding another layer of peculiarity to the findings. Astronomers know the individual galaxy clusters that make up PSZ2 G181 crashed into each other once before thanks to previous radio observations, according to a NASA statement. That work revealed parentheses-shaped regions of diffuse radio emissions on the outskirts of the system. These structures most likely formed as a result of the initial collision a billion years ago. This new study, led by Andra Stroe, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard & Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, further validates the idea that a previous collision occurred. The researchers analyzed new observations of PSZ2 G181 from two X-ray observatories—NASA's Chandra and the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton. Their study identified a bridge of cool gas connecting the two clusters, which probably resulted from gas stripping during the first collision, according to their report. Over the last billion years, the two clusters have drifted apart and now sit roughly 11 million light-years away from each other. This is the largest separation between these kinds of structures that astronomers have ever seen, according to NASA's statement. But Stroe and her colleagues found evidence to suggest these galaxy clusters are now on a collision course again. The team uncovered three more shock fronts aligned with the previous axis of collision—a potential early sign of a second, oncoming crash. The discovery of this rare event provides new insight into the dynamics of merging galaxy clusters—particularly those involving low-mass systems, which are underexplored. As the researchers note, finding radio emissions from low-mass clusters like PSZ2 G181 is challenging, but 'with the advent of new-generation radio telescopes and surveys, we may be uncovering the 'tip of the iceberg,' they state in their report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store