
STEPHEN DAISLEY: Dangerous cranks? The kale munchers didn't like that, either
You've been forced to talk about the Scottish Greens and are struggling for a suitable description. There are a number of adjectives that would seem to apply but, mindful of your granny's admonitions, you want to avoid using 'language'.
Russell Findlay was struck by just this dilemma at First Minister's Questions when speaking about the impact of the Bute House Agreement on energy policy.
' John Swinney personally brought the Greens into government,' he reminded the chamber, 'These dangerous fanatics want to shut down all oil and gas production—'
A wounded howl went up from the kombucha corner and Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone scolded the Scottish Conservative leader to be more respectful.
She had a point. Whatever you think of dangerous fanatics, they don't deserve to be compared to the Scottish Greens.
Findlay had another go: 'Sorry, these dangerous… cranks.'
The kale-munchers didn't like that either, earning the Tory chief a withering rebuke from the PO. For all Johnstone's cool-hippy-aunt energy, the slightest hint of rudeness and it's like Mrs Bridges from Upstairs Downstairs just discovered the under-house parlour maid flashing her ankles to the footman.
The Scottish Tory leader struggles to rein it in at Holyrood
'Mr Findlay!' she gasped. If the clerk had smelling salts on hand, she would have huffed the lot in one go.
Findlay had the look of a man weighing up whether to push further or cut his losses.
He tried again: 'These dangerous… ideologues.'
The PO let that one stand. So now we know the proper parliamentary term to insult the Scottish Greens. I reckon I'll stick with the most insulting term of all: 'Scottish Greens'.
The Swinney-Russell exchanges were a reminder that Nicola Sturgeon continues to loom large over the Scottish Government. Not literally, of course. That would require her to turn up on occasion. But in manner, style and tone it very much remains her show.
Findlay proposed that, in light of the decision to cease crude oil processing at Grangemouth, the First Minister reverse his presumption against new oil and gas exploration. Swinney assured the workers that they had his 'solidarity'. That's a relief, because banks accept mortgage payments in solidarity.
He added that ministers would 'support the individuals that are affected'. Shutting down an industry then offering help to the workers facing redundancy. There could scarcely be a better definition of politics.
'The SNP used to say 'It's Scotland's oil', Findlay said. 'Now they want to just stop oil.'
Hiyo! It was a pun, you see, because of Just Stop Oil. At least Findlay sounded impressed with himself. I shouldn't nitpick. Dad jokes are pretty advanced for a parliament where some struggle to speak in complete sentences.
Swinney dismissed Findlay's line of questioning, noting that 'the Conservatives are involved in a pivot and want to deny the climate challenges we face'. Here he broke out some familiar moves: the vertical karate chop (used to emphasise a point), the reverse jazz hands (his trademark reasonable-to-a-fault gesture), and the prayerful palms ('let's all come together and see that I'm right').
The First Minister recalled that Findlay had backed climate targets then hailed Kemi Badenoch's 'refreshingly honest' call to dump them. Findlay was guilty, Swinney charged, of 'barefaced dishonesty'.
'It's quite something to be lectured by a career politician about barefaced dishonesty when he's built a career on it,' Findlay shot back.
Well, that set the Presiding Officer off again, and it was another round of tongue-lashings for the lot of them.
If Swinney was so concerned about emissions, Findlay argued, he would back nuclear. Swinney sniffed that Hinkley C nuclear power plant, due for completion this year at a cost of £34 billion, now wouldn't be online until 2031 and the bill had risen to £46 billion.
So said the head of a government that promised two ferries by 2018 for £97 million and delivered them in 2025 for £400 million. If the First Minister is going to throw stones in glass houses, he should get a price and timescale in writing from the glazier.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Stephen Colbert's The Late Show cancelled after 8 years as fans fume at decision
The popular US late night talk show host previously comically "backed" Scottish independence in one of his 2014 skits The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will disappear from TV screens in a year's time after being cancelled. Stephen rose to fame presenting the satirical news show The Colbert Report on Comedy Central from 2005 until 2014. He succeeded David Letterman as presenter of The Late Show on CBS, a subsidiary of Paramount Global. On July 17, CBS announced that The Late Show will end its " historic run" in May 2026 at the end of the broadcast season. "We consider Stephen Colbert irreplaceable and will retire the 'THE LATE SHOW' franchise at that time," a CBS spokesperson said. "We are proud that Stephen called CBS home. He and the broadcast will be remembered in the pantheon of greats that graced late-night television." The broadcaster explained the reasoning behind the move, stating: "This is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. "It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount." Colbert himself delivered the news to his viewers during Thursday's programme, announcing: "Before we start the show, I want to let you know something I found out just last night. Next year will be our last season. "The network will be ending 'The Late Show' in May." Supporters flocked to social media to voice their outrage over the programme's axing. "I'm absolutely not ready to NOT have Stephen Colbert on my TV at night," one fumed on X, previously Twitter, while another said: "CBS letting Stephen Colbert go is BS! Boycott CBS," reports the Mirror. Back in 2014, Colbert comically backed Scottish independence and even played out the famous scene from Braveheart of Mel Gibson on his programme - with a minor edit to the dialogue. "Folks, any time people are angrily demanding something and I don't entirely understand why, I am with them," Colbert said in a night segment on The Colbert Report. "I stand with my secessionist brothers... Today, I, Stephen Colbert, am a proud Scotsman. Ich bin ein Edinburgher." He added: "They may take our lives, but they will never take our freedom to calculate pension benefits, rates of inflation or earnings. Whichever is higher." Multiple viewers have speculated that the programme's termination could be connected to the broadcaster's recent legal agreement with President Trump, considering Stephen's vocal condemnation of the President. Paramount Global is presently combining with Skydance Media, a transaction that needs approval from the Federal Communications Commission. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. "Just days after Paramount announces it settles the lawsuit Trump brought against them, they announce they are cancelling Stephen Colbert. Can't help but think the cancelling of Stephen Colbert's show was part of the settlement that Paramount agreed to. It's so obvious," one viewer remarked. Another expressed their unease: "I'm not going to pretend that Stephen Colbert is perfect or anything, but it really does not sit right with me that this news comes just after Paramount settled with Trump and in the midst of merging with Skydance Media. This just feels like textbook censorship, plain and simple."

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
John Swinney's plan can't be the final word on independence
IT is welcome that the SNP is foregrounding independence again with John Swinney's three-point independence plan. For the past couple of years, the SNP has given the impression that it has been coasting on the independence issue and waiting for some game changing development in the Westminster political scene that would do most of the heavy lifting on independence. John Swinney's new plan, unveiled in The National, is an attempt to reignite the independence debate, and that alone makes it a positive development. You don't achieve independence by not talking about independence. You may be sensing by now that I am attempting to make a meal out of some very thin gruel, and you would be correct. This plan contains nothing that is substantially new or exciting, it's not going to change the political agenda, and it's unlikely to spark off the mass enthusiasm necessary to carry Scotland to independence. The bottom line here is that independence can only be achieved through mobilising the grassroots and creating a mass popular movement. You cannot 'manager' your way to independence by issuing instructions from on high. The fatal flaws in John Swinney's plan are twofold. Firstly, you cannot create a mass movement from the top down, and the SNP leadership has failed to engage with the wider independence movement in the development of this plan. That lack shows very clearly and has much to do with the resounding 'meh' with which this plan has been received. The grassroots movement feels no ownership of it. The other flaw is that hoary old problem: What does the [[SNP]] propose to do when the people give it yet another Holyrood mandate for an independence referendum and [[Westminster]] says no? This plan does not address that key point. No British Prime Minister is ever going to agree to facilitate another Scottish independence referendum. David Cameron only agreed to the 2014 referendum because he was convinced that the result would be an overwhelming and crushing victory for the No campaign which would permanently destroy both the credibility of [[Scottish independence]] as a political idea and return the [[SNP]] to the margins of Scottish politics where it had languished for most of the 20th century. No future British prime minister will repeat Cameron's mistake. That said, the First Minister is correct in asserting that independence can only be achieved through a referendum. Independence requires the demonstration that it is the democratic will of a clear majority of the people of Scotland, and any attempt to assert Scottish independence without such an unequivocal democratic mandate is doomed to failure. John Swinney's plan speaks of reasoned arguments as to why there should be another independence referendum, correctly pointing out that with a million new voters on the electoral register since 2014 and another 600,000 who voted in 2014 having passed away, a generation has effectively passed already. But this rests upon the misconception that we are dealing with principled opponents who are sincere in their arguments. The 'once in a generation line' was never more than a convenient excuse. Once a generation has passed, the Westminster parties will simply shift the goalposts again as they did in 2021 when we learned that winning a pro-independence majority in Holyrood was not, after all, sufficient to bring about another independence referendum. The real question here is: How does Scotland bring about a referendum in the face of a persistent veto from Westminster? This plan does not address that point, but the only feasible answer has to be some variation on a de facto referendum combined with a willingness to engage in institutional disobedience when Westminster refuses to recognise the outcome of that de facto referendum, as it most assuredly will. The First Minister is quite correct in his assessment that unless Scotland returns a pro-independence majority of MSPs to [[Holyrood]] at the next Scottish elections, then independence will be off the table entirely. That would be a particularly perilous state of affairs for Scotland given that the next Scottish parliament will be the parliament we have at the next [[Westminster]] general election, when on the current state of opinion polling the hard right English nationalists of Nigel Farage are quite likely to form the next British Government. Not only Scotland's hopes of independence, but also the Scottish parliament itself, can only be kept alive if Scotland returns a pro-independence majority to Holyrood in 2026 and a substantial majority of pro-independence MPs at the next Westminster general election. John Swinney's plan is a start. It kicks off the conversation on independence, and it contains some positive points, such as the focus on independence being the key to lower energy bills for Scots, but the plan is only a start, it cannot be the final word. Much more work needs to be done to fashion a compelling and exciting case for independence. Has Brian Leishman been paying attention to the Labour Party this century? Brian Leishman, the suspended Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, has said that he hopes to continue as a Labour MP, saying that he loves the Labour party and adding: "I genuinely believe that it is the most likely vehicle to equalise society and redistribute power and wealth." Has he been paying even the slightest bit of attention to the Labour Party this century? Clearly not. The only way Leishman will ever be welcome back in the [[Labour Party]] will be for him to become obedient lobby fodder for Keir Starmer who is willing to tell the Scottish media that cutting benefits for disabled people and throwing [[Grangemouth]] workers out of their jobs is really a sign of how Starmer is taking the correct "tough decisions" for the public good. Look at Michael Shanks, Brian – that is your future in the Labour Party. Starmer has intensified a rightward movement of the [[Labour Party]] which was already apparent under Tony Blair. Starmer is hell bent on taking Labour into the political terrain previously occupied by the Tories before Brexit drove them collectively insane. The Prime Minister has again displayed his intolerance of left-wing Labour MPs by once more removing the Labour whip from veteran left winger Diane Abbott, because it's unacceptable to the modern Labour Party that a working class black woman should have the temerity to lecture white men about racism.


STV News
2 hours ago
- STV News
Kneecap 'thank' John Swinney as Hydro show sells out in hours
Kneecap have issued a 'very special thank you' to Scotland's First Minister after tickets for their first ever OVO Hydro show sold out in hours. In a social media post, the band said: 'Glasgow SOLD OUT in a few hours. 'A very special thank you to our Head of PR in Scotland Mr John Swinney….best in the business.' Earlier this week, the controversial rap group announced their 'biggest run of shows ever' across Scotland, Wales and England. Tickets for the Kneecap's O2 Academy show earlier in July sold out in just over a minute after the group were axed from the TRNSMT line up. John Swinney previously said comments made by the band were 'unacceptable' after a video at a 2023 gig appeared to show one member saying: 'The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.' Rapper Mo Chara has also been accused of terrorism offences related to a Hezbollah flag he allegedly held up on stage. The First Minister called for them to be axed from the Scottish music festival as a result, and their cancellation came after safety concerns were raised by Police Scotland. STV News During Kneecap's O2 Academy show earlier this month, Mo Chara, whose real name is Liam O hAnnaidh, asked the crowd: 'What's your First Minister's name?' He then added: 'They stopped us playing TRNSMT but they can't stop us playing Glasgow.' Swinney later said that he 'welcomes' the band performing in Scotland, adding: 'They've got to make their contribution to the music scene.' The Belfast group, who perform in Irish, have been an outspoken critic of the war in Gaza and said the ongoing Met Office investigation is linked to their views on Palestine. The group were investigated by Avon and Somerset Police after a member of Kneecap suggested during their Glastonbury set that fans 'start a riot' outside O hAnnaidh's upcoming court appearance, before clarifying: 'No riots, just love and support.' Police said on Friday it will be taking 'no further action' due to 'insufficient evidence'. Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the band's comments were 'clearly inciting violence'. The group have said they have been a target of 'political policing' in the UK. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country