Starmer ‘deeply saddened' by death of UK-linked hostage after body returned
The body of Mr Lifshitz, 84, was confirmed as one of four returned to Israel by Hamas on Thursday, as part of an ongoing prisoner exchange under the current ceasefire agreement.
Mr Lifshitz's family, including his British-based daughter, Dr Sharone Lifschitz, had received no information on his whereabouts since the Hamas attack on October 7 2023, when he was taken from Kibbutz Nir Oz.
Sir Keir Starmer said on Thursday: 'I was deeply saddened to hear of the death of Oded Lifshitz after he was taken hostage by terrorists in Gaza, and I extend my heartfelt condolences to his daughter Sharone and his wife Yocheved.
'When I met Sharone in Downing Street, she showed remarkable strength in the face of the most difficult circumstances.
'The news of her father's death is a tragedy. It is my hope that the peace he worked to see in the region through his charity work and activism will be achieved.
'My thoughts are also with the Bibas family, who have faced immense pain as they awaited news of Shiri and her sons Kfir and Ariel.
'We must see all remaining hostages released, and the ceasefire upheld. My government remains committed to working with our international partners to bring an end to this suffering and secure a long-term peace in the Middle East.'
Earlier on Thursday, a statement from Mr Lifshitz's family, released by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum Headquarters, said: 'We received with deep sorrow the official and bitter news confirming the identification of our beloved Oded's body.
STATEMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BY LAWYERS FOR THE BRITISH HOSTAGE FAMILIES
20 February 2025
Today, 20 February 2025, is one of immense sadness, and of failure.It appears that 503 days after they were taken from their homes by Hamas terrorists, the bodies of four people have… pic.twitter.com/B9EKEKZnlY
— Adam Wagner (@AdamWagner1) February 20, 2025
'Five hundred and three agonising days of uncertainty have come to an end. We had hoped and prayed so much for a different outcome.
'Now we can mourn the husband, father, grandfather, and great-grandfather who has been missing from us since October 7.
'Our family's healing process will begin now and will not end until the last hostage is returned.'
Mr Lifshitz was a retired Israeli journalist, a great-grandfather and a grandfather of 11.
His wife, Yocheved, 86, was also taken hostage but was released two weeks later.
Adam Wagner, the lawyer for Dr Lifschitz, 53, of Walthamstow, east London, and other British hostage families, said: 'Today, 20 February 2025, is one of immense sadness, and of failure.
'It appears that 503 days after they were taken from their homes by Hamas terrorists, the bodies of four people have been returned to Israel.
'It is understood that three of those bodies are of Shiri Bibas, and her two little children, Ariel and her baby, Kfir. We are horrified at their deaths.
'The fourth body is believed to be that of Oded Lifshitz, aged 84, whose daughter, our client Dr Sharone Lifschitz, is British, and whose wife, Yocheved… was freed in October 2023, also after being taken hostage.'
Stella Creasy, the MP for Walthamstow, said that she was 'heartbroken'.
In a post on Bluesky on Thursday she described the news as a 'devastating blow'.
'We had hoped for a miracle – to be able to welcome Oded Lifshitz back to his family and to join them in Walthamstow,' she said.
'A man who dedicated his life to fighting for peace between Israel and Palestine, driving ambulances across the border to help.'
She added: 'The news today and pictures (are) a devastating blow. We stand with our neighbour, Sharone Lifschitz, in her grief and in sharing the stories of his work.'
The statement from Mr Wagner described him as someone whose 'life has always been dedicated to peace'.
Fellow British-linked hostage Eli Sharabi was among those freed earlier this month, but his relieved family said he looked 'incredibly frail' and 'the spark was gone from his eyes'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two Labour-run councils 'considering all options' to challenge migrant hotel use
Two Labour-run councils have said they are considering taking legal action to stop the use of hotels to house migrants in their areas after Epping council won a temporary injunction on Tuesday. The leaders of Wirral and Tamworth councils both say they are considering their legal options in the wake of the Epping case, citing similar concerns about the impact of the hotels on their local communities. Epping Forest District Council won an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at The Bell Hotel, after arguing its owners did not have planning permission to use it to house migrants. Politics latest: In a statement, Paula Basnett, the Labour leader of Wirral council, said: "Like many other local authorities, we have concerns about the Home Office's practice of placing asylum seekers in hotels without consultation or regard to local planning requirements. "We are actively considering all options available to us to ensure that any use of hotels or other premises in Wirral is lawful and does not ride roughshod over planning regulations or the wishes of our communities. "Wirral has always been proud of its record in supporting families and those fleeing conflict, but it is unacceptable for the government to impose unsuitable, short-term arrangements that disrupt communities and bypass local decision-making. "If necessary, we will not hesitate to challenge such decisions in order to protect both residents and those seeking refuge." Carol Dean, the Labour leader of Tamworth Borough Council, said she understands the "strong feelings" of residents about the use of a local hotel to house asylum seekers, and that the council is "listening to their concerns and taking them seriously". She pointed out that under the national Labour government, the use of hotels has halved from 402 to 210, with the aim of stopping the use of any hotels by the end of this parliament. But she continued: "Following the temporary High Court injunction granted to Epping Forest District Council, we are closely monitoring developments and reviewing our legal position in light of this significant ruling." Cllr Dean added that they had previously explored their legal options to challenge the use of the hotel but decided against them, as temporary injunctions were not being upheld. However, the Epping ruling "represents a potentially important legal precedent", which is why they are "carefully assessing" its significance for Tamworth. "We fully recognise the UK government has a statutory duty to accommodate people seeking asylum. However, we have consistently maintained that the prolonged use of hotel accommodation may not represent the best approach - either for our local community or for the asylum seekers themselves," she said. "We will continue to work constructively with government departments and all relevant agencies while making sure the voice of our community is heard at the highest levels of government." Last night, Conservative-run Broxbourne Council also announced it was exploring its legal options, and the Reform UK leader of Kent County said she was writing to fellow leaders in Kent to explore whether they could potentially take legal action as well. Use of Epping hotel 'sidestepped public scrutiny' The prime minister and the home secretary are under huge pressure to clear the asylum backlog and stop using hotels across the country to house those waiting for their applications to be processed. Protests have sprung up at migrant hotels across the country. But The Bell Hotel in Epping became a focal point in recent weeks after an asylum seeker housed there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Epping Forest District Council sought an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at the hotel, owned by Somani Hotels Limited, on the basis that using it for that purpose contravened local planning regulations. The interim injunction demanded that the hotel be cleared of its occupants within 14 days, but in his ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary block, while extending the time limit by which it must stop housing asylum seekers to 12 September. Somani Hotels said it intended to appeal the decision, its barrister, Piers Riley-Smith, arguing it would set a precedent that could affect "the wider strategy" of housing asylum seekers in hotels. A government attempt to delay the application was rejected by the High Court judge earlier on Tuesday, Home Office barristers arguing the case had a "substantial impact" on the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, in performing her legal duties to asylum seekers. But Mr Justice Eyre dismissed the Home Office's bid, stating that the department's involvement was "not necessary". Read more: The judge said the hotel's owners "sidestepped the public scrutiny and explanation which would otherwise have taken place if an application for planning permission or for a certificate of lawful use had been made". He added: "It was also deliberately taking the chance that its understanding of the legal position was incorrect. This is a factor of particular weight in the circumstances of this case." Reacting to Tuesday's judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government will "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns". She added: "Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament."
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
US sanctions more ICC judges, prosecutors for probes into alleged American, Israeli war crimes
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on the International Criminal Court for pursuing investigations into U.S. and Israeli officials for alleged war crimes. The State Department on Wednesday announced new sanctions on four ICC officials, including two judges and two prosecutors, who it said had been instrumental in efforts to prosecute Americans and Israelis. As a result of the sanctions, any assets the targets hold in U.S. jurisdictions are frozen. The sanctions are just the latest in a series of steps the administration has taken against The Hague-based court, the world's first international war crimes tribunal. The U.S. has already imposed penalties on the ICC's former chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, who stepped aside in May pending an investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, and four other tribunal judges. In a statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he had taken action against ICC judges Kimberly Proust of Canada and Nicolas Guillou of France and prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal. 'These individuals are foreign persons who directly engaged in efforts by the International Criminal Court to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of either nation,' Rubio said. He added that the administration would continue 'to take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our troops, our sovereignty, and our allies from the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions.' In a separate statement, the State Department said Prost was hit for ruling to authorize an ICC investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan, which was later dropped. Guillou was sanctioned for ruling to authorize the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant related to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Khan and Niang were penalized for continuing Karim Khan's investigation into Israel's actions in Gaza, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, according to the statement.
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
7,000 Christians Have Been Killed in Nigeria This Year, Group Says
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. More than 7,000 Christians had been killed in Nigeria during the first 220 days of 2025, a civil-society watchdog said. This is an average of 35 killings a day, according to the recent report published by the Nigeria-based human-rights NGO International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law (Intersociety). Newsweek has contacted the Nigerian Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and National Human Rights Commission via email for comment. Why It Matters Nigeria has long been an epicenter of Christian persecution, with more Christians killed for their faith in Nigeria than in the rest of the world combined, according to human rights organization Open Doors, which monitors the persecution of Christians around the globe. The violence has displaced at least 12 million Christians since 2009, according to Intersociety. That year marked the start of Boko Haram's insurgency to establish a caliphate in Nigeria and the broader Sahel. In the 16 years since, Intersociety estimates that 189,000 civilians have been killed—125,000 of whom were Christians and 60,000 liberal Muslims. Parishioners leave St. Charles Catholic Church after a Mass in Ngurore, Nigeria, in February 2019. Parishioners leave St. Charles Catholic Church after a Mass in Ngurore, Nigeria, in February 2019. AP What To Know The Intersociety report said that 7,087 Christians were killed in Nigeria between January 1 and August 10, and that 7,800 others were abducted in the same period. The report identified Benue State in Nigeria's Middle Belt as among the hardest hit, with at least 1,100 deaths, including the Yelewata massacre in June, when 280 Christians were killed. "Nigeria is headquartering and providing safe haven for no fewer than 22 embryonic and full grown Islamic Terror Groups in Africa with links or potential links to ISIS, ISIL and World Jihad Fund," the report said. The Middle Belt and northern states are especially volatile, with Islamic militant groups like Boko Haram, Fulani extremists and ISWAP (Islamic State West Africa Province) targeting Christian communities through mass killings, kidnappings and church burnings. While Nigeria legally offers more religious freedom than other countries on Open Doors watchlist, "the biggest threat is from Islamic militants who seek to destroy Christianity and Christians in the region," the organization says. The U.S. Department of State's report on terrorism in Nigeria in 2023 highlighted that ISIS-West Africa (ISIS-WA), Boko Haram and Ansaru are active there, carrying out attacks against Nigerian government and security forces and civilians across the country's northern and central regions. The Nigerian government has previously dismissed some claims about specific groups operating in the country, including in June, when a defense department spokesperson, Major General Markus Kangye, pushed back against the Turkish ambassador's claims that the terrorist group FETO is active. Kangye said that the Nigerian military does not recognize the group and has not received any credible intelligence to support the claim, according to local newspaper The Nigeria Lawyer. Newsweek has contacted Nigeria's National Counter Terrorism Centre, via email, for comment. What People Are Saying Father Dominic Asor, the rector of St. James Minor Seminary, last month: "We must not flee from our vocation because of trials, insecurity or the lure of worldly comfort. God who called us will sustain us, but we must remain faithful and focused. The seminary has not become an endangered species. Apart from the seminaries, where else can you have complete safety? There is no place." Jeff King, president of International Christian Concern, previously told Newsweek: "The persecution of Christians isn't merely a religious issue, it's a human rights crisis affecting millions." What Happens Next The Intersociety report urged international actors to intervene and to consider placing Nigeria on watch lists that could trigger diplomatic or sanctions responses. Open Doors and other monitoring groups continued to document attacks and displacement, which suggested ongoing humanitarian and protection needs for millions of displaced people and for communities reporting repeated violence.
