logo
Dementia may take 3.5 years to diagnose after symptoms begin, but why?

Dementia may take 3.5 years to diagnose after symptoms begin, but why?

Medical News Today20 hours ago
Dementia is a hard disease to diagnose for a number of reasons.A new study has found that people who have dementia are, on average, diagnosed 3.5 years after symptoms first appear. This is even longer — an average of 4.1 years after symptoms first show — for people with early onset dementia. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 57 million people around the world in 2021 were living with dementia — an umbrella term for a group of conditions that impact a person's memory and ability to think and communicate, such as Alzheimer's disease. Dementia is a hard disease to diagnose. There is currently no single test to diagnose the condition, and symptoms of dementia are very similar to those of other diseases. Additionally, for some people, their dementia symptoms are very subtle in the early stage of the disease, making it hard for a doctor to make a complete diagnosis. Over the last few years, researchers have been focusing on finding new ways to help doctors detect and diagnose dementia as early as possible. 'Timely diagnosis of dementia is crucial for several reasons,' Vasiliki Orgeta, PhD, associate professor in the Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences at University College London, explained to Medical News Today. 'First and foremost, early detection empowers individuals and their families to plan ahead, and make informed decisions about their care.' 'From a healthcare perspective, timely diagnosis reduces the strain on healthcare systems by enabling proactive rather than reactive care,' she continued. 'As our global population ages, the prevalence of dementia is rising sharply. Timely diagnosis, therefore, is key to addressing this growing public health challenge.' Orgeta is the lead author of a new study recently published in the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry that reports people who have dementia are, on average, diagnosed 3.5 years after symptoms first appear. This is even longer — an average of 4.1 years after symptoms first show — for people with early onset dementia. The time between symptoms and dementia diagnosisFor this study, researchers analyzed the results of 13 previously published studies, encompassing more than 30,000 participants. Scientists focused on the average time span between when symptoms were first noticed by patients or their family members, to their dementia diagnosis. 'We decided to examine the average interval between symptom onset and final diagnosis of dementia because this timeframe has significant implications for patient outcomes, families, and the overall healthcare system,' Orgeta said. 'Despite increasing awareness, many individuals still face delays of months or even years before receiving a formal diagnosis,' she said. 3.5 years for a dementia diagnosis once symptoms beginAt the study's conclusion, researchers found that dementia diagnosis occurs, on average, about 3.5 years after symptoms begin to show. This timespan average jumped to 4.1 years for participants with early onset dementia. 'The finding that it typically takes 3.5 years to receive a dementia diagnosis — and even longer, 4.1 years, for those with early-onset dementia — highlights a critical delay in the diagnostic journey, during which individuals and their families may be living with uncertainty, and without access to the support and planning resources they need.'— Vasiliki Orgeta, PhD'These findings underscore the urgent need to improve public awareness, enhance training for healthcare providers, and streamline referral pathways,' Orgeta said. Younger age, frontotemporal dementia linked to longer diagnosis timeOrgeta and her team also discovered that participants with a younger age at symptom onset and those diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia correlated with a longer diagnosis time. 'These delays mean that many younger individuals are left without the clarity, support, or medical care they need for years,' Orgeta said. 'Our findings emphasize the need for greater awareness and education among healthcare professionals to recognize the early signs of less common dementias, particularly in younger populations. Improving early detection in these groups is essential to ensure timely support, reduce misdiagnoses, and improve long-term outcomes.' 'We plan to work closely with people affected by dementia and their families, clinicians and policymakers to develop strategies that support earlier identification and more efficient diagnostic pathways — particularly for younger individuals and those with less common forms of dementia like frontotemporal dementia,' she added. What causes a delay in dementia diagnosis? MNT also spoke with Adel Aziz, MD, FAAN, cognitive and behavioral neurologist, assistant professor of neurology at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, and memory specialist at JFK University Medical Center, about this study. 'I would like to stress that experienced clinicians rarely find the concept of delayed dementia diagnosis surprising,' Aziz commented. 'What this meta-analysis adds is a shared language — 'Time To Diagnose (TTD)' — and empirical weights for each contributing factor. By translating anecdotes into measurable variables, it empowers specialists to benchmark performance, tailor interventions, and advocate for policy change.' Aziz explained that delays in diagnosing dementia arise at multiple points: when patients and families postpone seeking help, when primary providers hesitate to refer, and when early cognitive symptoms are misattributed to aging or anxiety.'This multifaceted issue intertwines with social determinants like education, socioeconomic status, minority identity, sex, age of symptom onset, dementia subtype, and the strength of a patient's support system,' he continued.To help lower the time between first dementia symptoms and formal diagnosis, Aziz said it will require community awareness campaigns to demystify dementia signs across diverse populations, provider education programs to train frontline clinicians on early, atypical dementia presentations, policy and advocacy to advocate for insurance coverage of cognitive assessments, and new technologies such as a telehealth cognitive screening for remote areas. 'With these layers of action — spanning public education, clinical training, policy reform, and technological innovation — we can move toward a future where dementia is recognized and managed as early as possible,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can this £350 at-home microneedling treatment really give you smoother, tighter skin?
Can this £350 at-home microneedling treatment really give you smoother, tighter skin?

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Can this £350 at-home microneedling treatment really give you smoother, tighter skin?

When the likes of Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Aniston swear by a cosmetic treatment for its skin-smoothing and tightening results, a beauty buzz inevitably follows. That's just what happened with radio frequency (RF) microneedling. The non-surgical treatment is essentially two skin -rejuvenating technologies (microneedling and radiofrequency therapy) combined. It involves an in-clinic aesthetic practitioner using a device on the skin that creates micro-wounds with tiny needles, while also heating the skin with radio waves to trigger the healing response. Essentially, the treatment boosts the production of collagen and elastin – the proteins that smooth, strengthen and firm our complexions. It has become an A-lister go-to for its age-defying effectiveness, resurfacing and tightening the complexion. But before you book a session at your nearest salon, there are some drawbacks. Primarily, it's very expensive – just one session can set you back hundreds of pounds. It's not painless, either, and there are side effects such as dryness, redness and swelling. So I was fascinated – and frankly, a little alarmed – when I heard beauty device specialist CurrentBody claimed to have packaged this tech into an at-home treatment. On top of that, they claim it comes without any of the in-salon downsides. There was only one thing to do: I simply had to try it for myself. How I tested CurrentBody recommends performing the RF microneedling treatment once a week for eight weeks, so that's exactly what I did. Every Sunday, I used the device on the signs of ageing that bother me the most. I applied the forehead microneedling patch on my deep frown line between my eyebrows, and the eye microneedling patch to my puffy under-eye area. I left them on for more than two hours (as recommended) before using the radiofrequency device on each area, as well as on my sagging jawline. During testing, I assessed the device on the following criteria: Ease of use: I assessed ease of operation and how long it took to use the device per session. Results: I considered whether the treatment delivered noticeable improvements in the appearance of my skin. Value for money: At £350, the treatment is an investment, so I also considered whether the results justify the splurge. Why you can trust IndyBest reviews Sabine Wiesel is a beauty journalist in her 40s who specialises in mature and anti-ageing skincare and beauty products. In her career, she's reviewed everything from the best neck creams to retinol eye creams to find the products that actually make an impact on fine lines. On top of that, she discusses these treatments with dermatologists and aestheticians for their expert insights and advice.

Silentnight airmax mattress topper review: An affordable upgrade for beds past their best
Silentnight airmax mattress topper review: An affordable upgrade for beds past their best

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Silentnight airmax mattress topper review: An affordable upgrade for beds past their best

If you find you're tossing and turning at night, and finding it hard to pick between the suffocating heat of your duvet and the chilly air without it, here's a surprising solution. Silentnight has created a mattress topper that helps air circulate underneath you while you sleep. Designed to bring fresh air in underneath you thanks to mesh sides, the Silentnight airmax should keep your temperature just right all night long. The idea of a mattress topper is basically to breathe new life into your mattress. Whether your mattress is a bit tired or you've picked up a new ache that seems worse when you wake up, a topper may help, and it's a whole lot cheaper than replacing your mattress wholesale. But those are big claims, and the hypoallergenic Silentnight airmax even claims to rejuvenate your existing mattress. Can it actually make that much of a difference? How I tested I tested the Silentnight airmax mattress topper in super kingsize. I trialled it for more than four weeks, totalling more than 200 hours of sleep. Over the years, I've tested a multitude of duvets, pillows and mattress toppers, so I know the exactly what makes for a good night's sleep. When testing this mattress topper, I considered some key factors: Comfort: Comfort is vital for sleep products. I wanted to know if it levelled up my mattress, rather than just acting as a gimmick. And ultimately, I wanted to know if I'd sleep any better than normal Whether it lives up to its claims: I paid close attention to whether I remained temperate all night long, and whether the mesh sides worked their magic. Many products do not live up to expectations If it's worth the money: The Silentnight airmax mattress topper certainly isn't one of the most expensive on the market, but there's no use in spending money on things we don't need. When testing out the mattress topper, I made sure that it enhanced my sleep. Why you can trust IndyBest reviews Zoë Phillimore is a journalist and editor who has worked with IndyBest since 2021. She has written extensively on all things family life and sleep, covering everything from the best mattresses for children and duvets to sleep aids. Zoë has developed a keen eye for spotting the very best, paying meticulous attention to quality materials, affordability and durability.

Unique blood test could catch cancer early
Unique blood test could catch cancer early

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Unique blood test could catch cancer early

A new clinical trial, Enlighten, is assessing a blood test designed to detect 10 different types of cancer in their very early stages. Developed by Proteotype Diagnostics and led by the Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, the test identifies specific proteins in the blood that indicate the immune system's response to initial cancer signs. Unlike other tests focusing on abnormal DNA, Enlighten targets protein levels, which experts believe are more effective for detecting cancer at its earliest stages. The Modernised trial aims to recruit 1,000 patients across various solid tumour types, with 450 already participating, and is running at multiple hospital sites in the UK. Researchers emphasise that early cancer detection, facilitated by such tests, is crucial for improving treatment options and increasing successful outcomes for patients.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store