Italy says no plans to send peacekeeping troops to Ukraine
"There are no plans for national participation in any possible military force on the ground," the statement said, underscoring a unified stance within the coalition.
Meloni convened the talks ahead of a summit of Ukraine-supporting nations in Paris on Thursday, where she called for "solid and effective security guarantees" for Kiev, working alongside European partners and the United States.
Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani later floated the idea of a new NATO mechanism — possibly an "Article 5b" — to safeguard European security and protect Ukraine. NATO's existing Article 5 enshrines the alliance's collective defence principle, treating an attack on one member as an attack on all.
Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini and Defence Minister Guido Crosetto also attended the meeting chaired by Meloni. Salvini, who has previously taken a more Russia-friendly stance than his coalition partners, offered no public comments.
Meloni, in power for two and a half years, has consistently backed Europe's support for Ukraine, though Rome has sent mixed signals in recent weeks over relations with the United States.
Meanwhile, Tajani rejected recent US criticism of European nations as "freeloaders," insisting Italy was doing its part.
"I won't take that word lying down," he said, noting that Italian naval forces are protecting merchant ships in the Red Sea and have shot down several Houthi drones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Russia ramps up use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine, including WWI-era poison gas, 3 European intel services say
What we know about the death of Russia's chemical weapons head The Hague — Two Dutch intelligence agencies said on Friday that Russia is increasing its use of prohibited chemical weapons in Ukraine, including the World War I-era poison gas chloropicrin. The Netherlands' military intelligence and the security service, together with the German intelligence service, found that the use of prohibited chemical weapons by the Russian military had become "standardized and commonplace" in Ukraine. According to the findings, the Russian military uses chloropicrin and riot control agent CS against sheltering Ukrainian soldiers, who are then forced out into the open and shot. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans called for more sanctions against Moscow and continued military support for Kyiv. Brekelmans, who stayed on in a caretaker role after the Dutch government collapsed last month, said he doesn't want to see the use of chemical weapons become normalized. He said on social media, "Drones are dropping the chemical chloropicrin on trenches, driving away and then killing Ukrainian soldiers." Brekelmans said with the use of large-scale chemical weapons, Russia was again showing "its evil face." Lowering the threshold for use "is not only dangerous for Ukraine, but also for the rest of Europe and the world," he said in a statement. Russia has signed up to the Chemical Weapons Convention, which bans the use of chloropicrin and CS as weapons. The convention's watchdog, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, or OPCW, has found several incidents in Ukraine involving CS, but the group hasn't conducted a full investigation, which must be requested by the member states. The executive committee for the OPCW is holding a regular meeting next week, where it's expected to discuss the conflict in Ukraine. Russian authorities didn't immediately comment on the findings, but they have denied using chemical weapons in the past, instead alleging that Ukraine has used the banned substances. According to Ukraine, Russia has carried out 9,000 chemical weapons attacks in the country since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. In December, the head of the Russian military's biological and chemical weapons unit, Lt. General Igor Kirillov, was killed along with his deputy during a blast in Moscow. At the time, an informed source in the Security Service of Ukraine told CBS News, "Kirillov was a war criminal and an absolutely legitimate target, since he gave orders to use prohibited chemical weapons against the Ukrainian military." In 2024, the U.S. State Department said that it had recorded the use of chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Vlad gave his answer to peace, Mr. President: We must re-arm Ukraine
Mr. President, we know you understand that the primary obstacle to peace in Ukraine is Russia's aggression. You said you were 'disappointed' in the conversation with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, and that you 'don't think he's looking to stop.' Putin again insisted he was unwilling to commit to a ceasefire until the 'root causes' of the conflict were addressed. For Vlad, the 'root cause' is the existence of Ukraine. He followed your call with the largest drone and missile strike of the war, killing at least one. So why, Mr. President, is your administration punishing Ukraine? The Pentagon has halted the anti-missile and drone weapons needed to protect the civilians of Kyiv. You remember the desperation on the face of the Ukrainian reporter you touchingly spoke to in the Netherlands, her fears for her husband and her family. Why are we threatening to abandon her? There is a belief, being pushed by twisted ideologues, that helping Ukraine is somehow hurting the United States, and not in our best interest. This couldn't be further from the truth. Officials claim we have a weapons shortage, but many of these arms were already allocated — some were already in Poland. Ukraine is paying for them, partly from seized Russian assets and European grants, a stimulus for our industries to make more. In fact, our military can use that money — and the intelligence it is gathering from Ukraine's successful resistance — to make better drones and anti-missile technology. It builds the foundation of the Golden Dome. But most importantly, Ukraine's fate sends a message to the world about America. Russia is not an economic superpower to be unlocked. It is a dying terrorist state. Putin is willing to spend the blood of his people in a last grasp for empire. If we let him succeed, if we help him succeed, it won't just threaten Europe. It will tell China that our alliances are fickle, our patience short. This is not an either/or proposition, as Elbridge Colby, under secretary of defense, suggests. We don't aid Ukraine instead of fighting China. We aid Ukraine to thwart them. Russia and China share one strategic goal: Oppose the United States. One missile 'saved' in a warehouse today is 50 we'll have to fire in the future because this axis was strengthened. Mr. President, you have had a historic streak of successes. You passed your 'Big Beautiful Bill.' You won cases in front of the Supreme Court. You're forging trade deals. And most importantly, you made the bold move to defang Iran, knowing that it would make the Middle East a safer place. Only bombing its nuclear sites could get the ayatollah to the table. It is the same with Ukraine. Putin only understands strength. He will continue to insult and ignore you if the United States doesn't commit to Kyiv's defense. Reports are that the conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday went well, and that you talked about strengthening the country's air defenses. That's excellent news. The fall of Ukraine is not a disaster that can be blamed on someone else, or explained away as inconsequential. It would destabilize the world, weaken America and reflect negatively on your presidency. Don't walk away.
News24
2 hours ago
- News24
US halts Patriot missiles to Ukraine as Russian airstrikes intensify
Washington has stopped delivering essential military equipment to Ukraine, including 30 Patriot air defence missiles, 8 500 artillery shells, and precision rockets. Ukrainian officials called the decision a 'total shock' and summoned the acting US envoy to emphasise that any delay in military support will only encourage Russian aggression. Military analysts and US senators warn that halting weapons shipments will cost Ukrainian lives and territory, undermine US credibility with allies. A decision by Washington to halt some shipments of critical weapons to Ukraine prompted warnings by Kyiv on Wednesday that the move would weaken its ability to defend against intensifying airstrikes and battlefield advances. Ukraine said it had called in the acting US envoy to Kyiv to underline the importance of military aid from Washington continuing and cautioned that any cut-off would embolden Russia in its war in Ukraine. The Pentagon's decision - tied to concerns that US military stockpiles are too low - began in recent days and includes 30 Patriot air defence missiles, which Ukraine relies on to destroy fast-moving ballistic missiles, four people familiar with the decision said on Wednesday. It also includes nearly 8 500 155mm artillery shells, more than 250 precision GMLRS (mobile rocket artillery) missiles and 142 Hellfire air-to-surface missiles, they said. "The Ukrainian side emphasised that any delay or procrastination in supporting Ukraine's defence capabilities will only encourage the aggressor to continue the war and terror, rather than seek peace," Ukraine's foreign ministry said. The defence ministry said it had not been officially notified of any halt in US shipments and was seeking clarity from its American counterparts. A Ukrainian source familiar with the situation said the decision was a "total shock." Deputy White House press secretary Anna Kelly said the decision was made "to put America's interests first" following a Department of Defence review of military support around the world. "The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran," she said, referring to US bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities last month. NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte said the US needed to take care of its stockpiles but told Fox News that "in the short term, Ukraine cannot do without all the support it can get" when it comes to ammunition and air defence systems. Russian airstrikes Dozens of people have been killed in recent airstrikes on Ukrainian cities and Russian forces, which control about a fifth of Ukraine, have been making gains in the east. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the US Senate foreign relations committee, said the decision risks Ukrainian lives, undermines Washington's credibility and will make it harder to end the war. "This sends a message to not just our allies, like Ukraine and our European allies, but it sends a message to our adversaries, to China, to North Korea, to Russia, that our allies can't count on the United States," she told WKBK radio in her home state New Hampshire. Since US President Donald Trump took office in January, he has softened Washington's position towards Russia, seeking a diplomatic solution to the war and raising doubts about future US military support for Kyiv. READ | Ukraine scrambles to build 'our common interest' as US pares back weapons Trump said last week he was considering selling more Patriot air defence missiles to Ukraine after meeting President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Fedir Venislavskyi, a member of the Ukrainian parliament's national security and defence committee, said the decision to halt shipments was "very unpleasant for us". In an email, the Pentagon said it was providing Trump with options to continue military aid to Ukraine in line with the goal of ending the war. Elbridge Colby, undersecretary of defence for policy, said it was "rigorously examining and adapting its also preserving US forces' readiness." All weapons aid was briefly stopped in February, with a second, longer halt in March. Washington resumed sending the last of the aid approved under the previous administration, of former president Joe Biden, but no new aid to Ukraine has been announced. The Kremlin welcomed the news of a halt, saying the conflict would end sooner if fewer arms reached Ukraine. Kyiv residents expressed alarm at the Pentagon's decision. "If we end up in a situation where there's no air defence left, I will move (out of Kyiv), because my safety is my first concern," said Oksana Kurochkina, a 35-year-old lawyer. On the battlefield, a halt in precision munitions would limit the capacity of Ukrainian troops to strike Russian positions farther behind the front line, said Jack Watling, a military analyst at the Royal United Services Institute. "In short, this decision will cost Ukrainian lives and territory," he said.
