
Signalgate changed Pete Hegseth — texting scandal made him angrier, paranoid and paralyzed by fear: report
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has become more paranoid, fearful and angry in the wake of the so-called 'Signal-gate' scandal that saw the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic included on a chat platform conversation with top national security officials as a drone strike was underway against Houthi rebels in Yemen, a new report reveals.
Six people told New York magazine that Hegseth was noticeably changed by the ordeal.
They said he seemed angrier, did not bother to shave as often and seemed afraid to make the wrong decision after Signal-gate.
One source said that the Pentagon seemed to stop being 'creative.' Another source said the scandal was 'consuming his whole life' at a time 'when he should have been focused on, you know, our national security.'
Hegseth also began to regularly have his personal lawyer, Tim Parlatore, and his wife, Jennifer, around, which confused foreign officials.
In addition, other news outlets reported that Hegseth had a second group chat going with Parlatore, his wife and his brother and had set up an unsecured internet line in his office.
Word of the embarrassing potential breach of national security broke in March, when then-National Security Advisor Michael Waltz added Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, onto a text chain on the messaging app Signal where the Trump administration's national security team discussed striking Houthi targets in Yemen.
The scandal immediately put Hegseth--who faced a narrow confirmation in the Senate earlier this year due to his views on women in the military, reports of drinking on the job and allegations of sexual misconduct that he vehemently denied--under heavy scrutiny.
In response, Hegseth assailed Goldberg. 'You're talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who's made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again to include the hoaxes of Russia, Russia, Russia,' he said at the time. He said that nobody texted war plans.
That led to Goldberg publishing screenshots of the full text messages, which showed that the administration officials had indeed been texting what looked like war plans.
Earlier this week, Hegseth appeared on Capitol Hill to answer questions about Trump's deployment of Marines to quell anti-ICE riots and demonstrations in Los Angeles. He also faced aggressive questioning about the US having contingency plans to invade Greenland and Panama.
The magazine profiled Hegseth's distress after NBC News reported the story about the plans to 'reclaim' Panama and he told his chief of staff Joseph Kasper that he wanted an investigation. The Pentagon further plunged into disarray when the press reported that the Pentagon had ordered a second carrier into the Red Sea.
Hegseth defended the fact that sending troops to Los Angeles cost $134 million.
The magazine profile went into deeper detail about the dismissal of Hegseth's allies in the Pentagon, including his advisers Dan Caldwell, Darin Selnick and Colin Carroll.
Kasper, Hegseth's chief of staff, believed that Colin tried to get Kasper fired through a report by the Pentagon's inspector general about Kasper's alleged drug use.
'That's what pisses me off the most,' Carroll said. 'I don't want a secretary of defense that can't even f***ing fire people properly and not have it rebound back on his ass. Pete can't even be a good villain.'
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell denied claims of disarray under Hegseth's tenure.
'Claims of chaos at the Pentagon under Secretary Hegseth are false,' he said. 'When members of the legacy media lie, they disrespect the brave servicemembers and civilians who selflessly serve our country.'
At the moment, Hegseth no longer has a chief of staff or deputy chief of staff.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel intercepts Iranian retaliatory missiles
Israel's interceptions of Iranian missiles were seen from Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, the West Bank and Jordan as Iran retaliated for its strikes. Israel Defense Forces said it had also intercepted Iranian drones, after sirens sounded in the Dead Sea and West Bank area


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wetin be di worst-case scenarios on Israel-Iran strikes?
For now di fighting between Israel and Iran dey restricted to di two nations. For United Nations and elsewhere many pipo dey calls for restraint. But what if dem fall on deaf ears? What if di fighting escalate and expand? Dis na just a few possible, worst-case scenarios. What if e drag America inside Upon say US dey deny say dia hand no dey, Iran believe say American forces endorse am and at least tacitly support Israel attacks. Iran fit strike US targets across di Middle East – like dia special forces camps for Iraq, military bases for Gulf, and diplomatic missions for di region. Iran proxy forces - Hamas and Hezbollah – wey many dey feel say no too strong but dia supportive militias for Iraq still dey armed and dey intact. US dey fear say dis kain attacks dey possible and so dem don withdraw some personnel. For dia public message, US warned Iran well-well of di consequences of any attack on American targets. Wetin fit happun if dem kill American citizen, say, for Tel Aviv or elsewhere? Donald Trump fit dey forced to act. Many pipo dey accuse Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu say im wan drag US inside dis mata to help am defeat Iran. Military analysts say na only US get di bombers and bunker-busting bombs wey fit penetrate di deepest of Iranian nuclear facilities, especially for Fordow. Trump bin promise im MAGA constituency say im no go start any so-called "forever wars" for Middle East. But equally many Republicans support both Israel goment and dia view say now na di time to seek regime change for Tehran. But if America come become an active combatant, dat go represent a huge escalation wit a long, potentially devastating consequential tail. What if e drag Gulf nations If Iran fail to damage Israel well-protected military and oda targets, den dem fit always aim dia missiles at softer targets for Gulf, especially kontris wey Iran believe say dey help and assist dia enemies ova di years. Plenty energy and infrastructure targets dey di region. Remember say dem accuse Iran of striking Saudi Arabia oil fields for 2019 and dia Houthi proxies hit targets for UAE for 2022. Since den, Iran don reconcile wit some for di region. But dis kontris dey play host to US airbases. Some also – discreetly – bin help defend Israel from Iranian missile attack last year. If dem attack di Gulf, den dem too fit demand American warplanes to come to dia defence as well as Israel. Israel fail to destroy Iran nuclear capability What if Israeli attack fail? What if Iran nuclear facilities dey too deep, too well protected? What if dia 400kg of 60% enriched uranium – di nuclear fuel dey just a small step away from being fully weapons-grade, wey go enough for ten bombs or so – and dem no dey destroyed? Experts believe say dem hide dem deep for secret mines. Israel fit don kill some nuclear scientists but bombs no fit destroy Iran knowhow and expertise. What if Israel attack convince Iran leadership say di only way of deterring further attacks na to race for nuclear capability as fast as e fit? What if those new military leaders wey dey round di table dey more stubborn more headstrong and less cautious pass dia predecessors wey don die? Di least be say, dis fit force Israel to further attacks, wey go potentially put di region inside continual round of strike and counter-strike. Israelis get one brutal phrase for dis strategy; dem dey call am "mowing di grass". E dey affect global economy Di price of oil already dey go high . What if Iran try to close di Strait of Hormuz, wey go further restrict di movement of oil? What if – on di other side of di Arabian Peninsula - di Houthis for Yemen redouble dia efforts to attack shipping for Red Sea? Dem be Iran last remaining so-called proxy ally dem get a track record of unpredictability and high risk appetite. Many kontris around di world already dey suffer a cost of living crisis. A rising price of oil go add to inflation for a global economic system wey already dey shake under di weight of Trump tariff war. And make we not forget, di one man wey go benefits from high oil prices na President Putin of Russia wey suddenly go see billions more dollars flood into Kremlin coffers to pay for im war against Ukraine. Iran regime fall, go leave vacuum What if Israel succeed for dia long term aim of forcing di collapse of di Islamic revolutionary regime for Iran? Netanyahu claim say im primary aim na to destroy Iran nuclear capability. But im make am clear for im statement yesterday say im big target na regime change. Im tell "di proud pipo of Iran" say im attack na to "clear di path for una to achieve una freedom" from wetin im call dia "evil and oppressive regime". Bringing down Iran goment fit appeal to some for di region, especially some Israelis. But whick kain vacuum e go leave? Wetin go be di unforeseen consequences? Wetin civil conflict for Iran go look like? Many still remember wetin happun to both Iraq and Libya wen dem remove dia strong centralised goment. So, much go depend on how dis war go progress in coming days. How - and how hard - Iran go retaliate? And di kain restraint – if any - wey US fit exert on Israel? Alot go depend on di answer to those two kwesions.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Iran and Israel escalate fears of wider Middle East conflict
The shock confrontation between Iran and Israel has escalated fears of a wider Middle East conflict. Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, striking over 200 targets in Iran, including the Natanz nuclear facility, killing high-ranking Iranian military officers. Iran retaliated by firing missiles at Israel, with both sides claiming varying degrees of success in interception and damage. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Israel had 'begun a war' and warned 'we will show them no mercy', while Netanyahu appeared to incite Iranians to rise against their leaders. The US and UK denied involvement in the Israeli strikes, while concerns rise over potential regional destabilisation and attacks on US interests.