
Pornography showing women being choked should be banned, Government told
The Government will clamp down on pornography which shows women being choked after a review found the content can have 'devastating' real-world consequences.
Videos showing the practice are rife on pornography sites and have helped established it as a sexual norm, a review of the industry led by Conservative peer Baroness Gabby Bertin said.
Non-fatal strangulation is already an offence in its own right, but it is not illegal to show it online.
Downing Street suggested it would 'act swiftly' to address gaps in the law around choking pornography, but stopped short of saying it would be banned.
Writing in the report, which was commissioned under Rishi Sunak's government, Baroness Bertin said there had been a 'total absence of government scrutiny' of the pornography industry.
The Tory peer referred to worrying anecdotal evidence from teachers about students asking how to choke girls during sex.
People acting out choking in their sex lives 'may face devastating consequences', she said in the review.
' Evidence shows that even a small amount of pressure to the neck can harm the brain, and there is no safe way to strangle a person,' she added.
'I do not think Government should take the risk of allowing this content to be legal, given what we know about how much pornography exposure can influence sexual behaviour,' she said.
Responding to the concerns in a written statement, technology minister Feryal Clark said the Government would take 'urgent action to ensure pornography platforms, law enforcement and prosecutors are taking all necessary steps to tackle this increasingly prevalent harm'.
Baroness Bertin's review also recommended that videos considered too harmful for certification in the offline world should not be available online, ending the 'disparity' between the two.
Welcoming the report's recommendations, Andrea Simon, director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, said: 'For too long, the porn industry has been free to profit from sexual violence against women and children, shaping collective behaviours and expectations about sex in a deeply harmful way.
'We know these companies are profiting enormously from sexual violence, and until they are forced to clean up their act, they won't.
'We know that tech company algorithms are serving harmful content to boys and young men when they aren't necessarily seeking it, because extreme content drives engagement and therefore revenue.
'(The Government) cannot continue to ignore the immense harms arising from the current state of the porn industry which puts business over women and girls' safety.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'To deliver our mission to halve violence against women and girls, we must interrogate the link between violent pornography online and dangerous behaviours offline which this important review highlights.
'We have already announced we will ban the creation of intimate deepfakes without consent and, from next month, under the Online Safety Act, platforms will have to proactively tackle illegal content including extreme pornography and sexual abuse material.
'But further action is needed to address the review's shocking finding that graphic strangulation is increasingly appearing in pornography, despite being illegal, and is becoming normalised in real life.
'We will urgently ensure that platforms, law enforcement and prosecutors take all necessary steps to tackle this disturbing harm.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Corruption watchdog makes massive call about Brittany Higgins' $2.4MILLION taxpayer-funded compensation payout - as she gets job after 'medically unfit to work' claims
There was 'no corruption issue' found with the $2.4m taxpayer-funded compensation payout handed to Brittany Higgins after just one day of deliberation, the corruption watchdog has reported.

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd called to act on 'existential crisis' of abuse
Plaid Cymru's Adam Price, the first out-gay man in his party to be elected to national office, warned prejudices based on sex, race and sexual orientation have been reinvigorated. He told the Senedd: "It is getting worse by the day, and it really represents an existential crisis for our democracy and our society." Mr Price said: "For our democracy to be effective, it has to be diverse. "Diversity trumps ability. "It's a piece of evidence in social science." The former Plaid Cymru leader called for a focus on representation of trans women and men, a community "under siege," to ensure their voices are heard in the Senedd. Mr Price highlighted harmful comments below news stories involving him in recent weeks. "That certainly won't deter me and I hope it won't deter anyone else," he said. "But we've got to do something about it collectively, haven't we?" Labour's Hannah Blythyn expressed concerns that Wales could go backwards in terms of equality of representation at the next Senedd election. Ms Blythyn told Senedd members: "I very much made an active decision when I had the opportunity to stand in this legislature because of the make-up – that there were more women here, that it was more representative." Jane Hutt, Wales' social justice secretary, acknowledged the rise of abuse, harassment and intimidation towards politicians, candidates and campaigners. She outlined voluntary diversity and inclusion guidance for political parties which aims to ensure democratic bodies are truly representative of all the people of Wales. Ms Hutt said safety costs will be exempt from spending limits for Welsh elections. Conservative Altaf Hussain warned guidance on equal representation risks crossing a dangerous line. He said: "Equality of access cannot come just by bureaucratic diktats or targets." Plaid Cymru's Sioned Williams said progress on underrepresentation of women in politics has slowed, warning the voluntary guidance was published "far too late." "Wales belongs to everyone," she said. "Everyone must have a voice in our nation's future."

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Land value tax in Wales could replace council tax and rates
The former first minister said the Welsh Government continues to explore the feasibility of LVT as used in countries such as Denmark and Singapore. Professor Drakeford has long supported a LVT, arguing those who have the privilege of ownership should pay something back for that privilege. LVT is levied on the value of the land rather than the property itself. Proponents argue LVT is easier to collect, more efficient and difficult to avoid, while discouraging speculation and encouraging people to bring idle land back into use. Professor Drakeford told the Senedd: "I am anxious to see this discussion move beyond the theoretical and into the realms of the practically possible. He explained that the Welsh Government has invited tenders to test approaches to valuing land, with submissions for every aspect of the work. The finance secretary said: "I want to use the coming months to test the boundaries of what might be possible in the next Senedd term. "Let's open the door to more radical, fundamental and progressive reform in the future." He added: "The current system is unfairly weighted against those who experience difficulty in paying. "I want to shift the focus from harmful escalation towards supportive prevention." He stated ministers will introduce a new council tax appeals process by April 2026 that will be "easier to navigate and provide a better, modern system for taxpayers". Peter Fox agreed that council tax is regressive by nature "and that it will never really become a fair local tax". Mr Fox accused the Welsh Government of increasing tax on families "by stealth" through underfunding councils which, in turn, pass on the shortfall to people. He called for reform of the "outdated and flawed" funding formula. Professor Drakeford replied: "Almost every local authority in Wales will agree that the formula needs revision – nobody can agree on how that should be done. "The 22 local authorities each believe that the formula uniquely disadvantages them."