
Kennedy's new vaccine advisers meet for first time
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new vaccine advisers began their first meeting Wednesday under intense scrutiny from medical experts worried about Americans' access to lifesaving shots.
First on the agenda is an awkward scenario: Kennedy already announced COVID-19 vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, and his new advisers aren't scheduled to vote on whether they agree. Yet government scientists prepared meeting materials calling vaccination 'the best protection' during pregnancy — and said most children hospitalized for COVID-19 over the past year were unvaccinated.
COVID-19 remains a public health threat, resulting in 32,000 to 51,000 U.S. deaths and more than 250,000 hospitalizations since last fall, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most at risk for hospitalization are seniors and children under 2 — especially infants under 6 months who could have some protection if their mom got vaccinated during pregnancy, according to the CDC's presentation.
It's one signal that this week's two-day meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices isn't business as usual.
Another sign: Shortly before the meeting, a Virginia-based obstetrician and gynecologist stepped down from the committee, bringing the panel's number to just seven. The Trump administration said Dr. Michael Ross withdrew during a customary review of members' financial holdings.
The meeting opened as the American Academy of Pediatrics announced that it will continue publishing its own vaccine schedule for children but now will do so independently of the ACIP, calling it 'no longer a credible process.'
The panel, created more than 60 years ago, helps the CDC determine who should be vaccinated against a long list of diseases, and when. Those recommendations have a big impact on whether insurance covers vaccinations and where they're available, such as at pharmacies.
Earlier this month, Kennedy abruptly dismissed the existing 17-member expert panel and handpicked eight replacements, including several anti-vaccine voices. And a number of the CDC's top vaccine scientists — including some who lead the reporting of data and the vetting of presentations at ACIP meetings — have resigned or been moved out of previous positions.
The highly unusual moves prompted a last-minute plea from a prominent Republican senator to delay this week's meeting. Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a physician who chairs the chamber's health committee, said Monday that many of Kennedy's chosen panelists lack the required expertise and 'may even have a preconceived bias' against new vaccine technologies.
In a House hearing Tuesday, Kennedy defended his purge, saying the old panel had been 'a template for medical malpractice.'
Rep. Kim Schrier, a pediatrician and Democrat from Washington state, told Kennedy: 'I will lay all responsibility for every death from a vaccine-preventable illness at your feet.'
Committee will vote on RSV protections
The two-day meeting's agenda on was abruptly changed last week.
Discussion of COVID-19 shots will open the session on Wednesday. Later in the day, the committee will take up RSV, with votes expected. On Thursday, the committee will vote on fall flu vaccinations and on the use of a preservative in certain flu shots.
RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus, is a common cause of cold-like symptoms that can be dangerous for infants.
In 2023, U.S. health officials began recommending two new measures to protect infants — a lab-made antibody for newborns and a vaccine for pregnant women — that experts say likely drove an improvement in infant mortality.
The committee will discuss another company's newly approved antibody shot, but the exact language for the vote was not released prior to the meeting.
'I think there may be a theme of soft-pedaling or withdrawing recommendations for healthy pregnant women and healthy children,' even though they are at risk from vaccine-preventable diseases, said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University who co-authored a recent medical journal commentary criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination decision.
Flu shot recommendations to be debated
At its June meetings, the committee usually refreshes guidance for Americans 6 month and older to get a flu shot, and helps greenlight the annual fall vaccination campaign.
But given the recent changes to the committee and federal public health leadership, it's unclear how routine topics will be treated, said Jason Schwartz, a Yale University health policy researcher who has studied the committee.
Thursday also promises controversy. The advisory panel is set to consider a preservative in a subset of flu shots that Kennedy and some antivaccine groups have falsely contended is tied to autism. In preparation, the CDC posted a new report confirming that research shows no link between the preservative, thimerosal, and autism or any other neurodevelopmental disorders.
Gostin said the agenda appears to be 'a combination of what we would normally expect ACIP to cover along with a mixture of potential conspiracy theories,' he said. 'We clearly are in a new normal that's highly skeptical of vaccine science.'
The committee's recommendations traditionally go to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director. Historically, nearly all are accepted and then used by insurance companies in deciding what vaccines to cover.
But the CDC currently has no director, so the committee's recommendations have been going to Kennedy, and he has yet to act on a couple recommendations ACIP made in April.
The CDC director nominee, Susan Monarez, is slated to go before a Senate committee on Wednesday.
___
Neergaard reported from Washington.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Campaigners welcome vaccine cash pledge but fear cut will see fewer lives saved
The Government could have saved hundreds of thousands more lives if it had maintained the amount of money given to vaccinate children in the world's poorest countries, campaigners have claimed. In 2020, former prime minister Boris Johnson pledged £1.65 billion over five years to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. But now the Government has announced that it will give £1.25 billion between 2026 and 2030. While some have praised the pledge, others have said that a reduction in the amount given to Gavi will lead to fewer lives being saved. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said that the money will help Gavi protect up to 500 million children from some of the world's deadliest diseases such as meningitis, cholera and measles. Announcing the funds at Gavi's global summit in Brussels, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'Gavi's global impact is undeniable. Over one billion children vaccinated, over 18 million lives saved, over 250 billion dollars injected into the global economy. 'I'm immensely proud of the role the UK has played in reaching these milestones. Our ongoing partnership with Gavi will give millions of children a better start, save lives and protect us all from the spread of deadly diseases.' Commenting on the pledge, Adrian Lovett, the ONE Campaign's UK executive director, said: 'This is an important pledge from the UK to Gavi, a vital force in the fight against preventable disease. 'But despite this good news, we are seeing the harsh impact of the Prime Minister's deep cut to overall aid levels. 'The UK's contribution to Gavi could have saved almost 400,000 more lives if it had been maintained at the same level as before. And further impossible choices are looming.' Dr Philip Goodwin, chief executive for the UK Committee for Unicef, said: 'This investment shows the UK's ongoing commitment to global partnerships that protect children around the world from preventable disease. 'However, cuts to the aid budget still pose a grave threat to children. 'We urge the UK Government to maximise this Gavi commitment by also funding other critical health services that make immunisation fully effective.' Elsewhere, GSK and Bharat Biotech announced that the price of the world's first malaria vaccine for children in countries where malaria is endemic will be reduced by more than half, to less than five dollars a vaccine. The jab is expected to be rolled out in 12 endemic countries in Africa through routine immunisation programmes by the end of 2025. It comes as a new report revealed that global vaccination coverage against deadly diseases had stalled in recent decades. The new review, published in The Lancet, concludes that as a result, millions of children around the world are left vulnerable to preventable disease and death. Senior study author Dr Jonathan Mosser, from the University of Washington in the US, said: 'Routine childhood vaccinations are among the most powerful and cost-effective public health interventions available, but persistent global inequalities, challenges from the Covid pandemic, and the growth of vaccine misinformation and hesitancy have all contributed to faltering immunisation progress. 'These trends increase the risk of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, polio and diphtheria.' In May the new aid minister, Baroness Jenny Chapman, said that the days of the British Government acting as a 'global charity' are 'over'. Her appointment followed the resignation of Anneliese Dodds, who quit as development minister in protest at the decision to cut the aid budget to fund increased defence spending.


The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Member of RFK Jr's new vaccine panel withdraws over conflict of interest
A member of the health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr's newly overhauled federal vaccine advisory panel withdrew after a conflict of interest review, a spokesperson has told the Guardian. Dr Michael Ross, who was involved in multiple private healthcare companies, withdrew after review of his financial holdings. Kennedy unilaterally fired all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) in June, arguing they had too many conflicts of interest. Ross was among eight of Kennedy's ideological allies appointed to the committee, after the secretary argued the old members of the committee were subject to too many conflicts of interest. 'Yesterday, Dr Michael Ross decided to withdraw from serving on ACIP during the financial holdings review,' a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said. 'The sacrifice to serve on ACIP varies from member to member, and we appreciate Dr Ross's willingness to go through this rigorous process.' The spokesperson made the comments after Guardian inquiries about conflict of interest disclosures for new members of ACIP. Although the Trump administration and Kennedy developed a conflict of interest tracker specifically for ACIP members, Kennedy's appointees have not been added. The HHS spokesperson did not respond to Guardian inquiries about when and where new, written conflict of interest disclosures would be published. Instead, the spokesperson said the department has, 'comprehensively reviewed all newly appointed ACIP members for conflicts of interests in accordance with federal law, regulations and departmental polices', and that the members were provided 'ethics training prior to discharging their duties'. The new members of the committee were asked to disclose conflicts of interest before the meeting began on Wednesday. The committee chair Dr Martin Kulldorff and committee member Dr Robert Malone omitted widely reported work in vaccine litigation, and nurse Vicky Pebsworth said she was 'asked to read' a statement disclosed ownership of a healthcare stock but said it was below the government ethics office threshold for reporting. Ethics review of the new members was also the subject of Senate testimony on Wednesday. Under questioning by the Democratic senator Patty Murray of Washington, the Trump nominee to head the CDC, Dr Susan Monarez, said she was 'not familiar whether or not the members that are participating in the meeting this week have or have not gone through the ethics review necessary to allow them to participate in those meetings'. 'If it is known that they have not gone through the ethics process and they issue recommendations, would you accept them as valid?' asked Murray. 'If they have not gone through an ethics approval process, they shouldn't be participating in the meetings,' said Monarez.


Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain slashes global vaccine budget, putting millions of women and girls at risk
Britain has slashed its funding for the Gavi global vaccine partnership by 40 per cent in real terms, putting millions of women and girls at risk from cervical cancer and other diseases. The government will now contribute £1.25 billion to Gavi – which facilitates the vaccination of nearly half of the world's children – for the next five years, down from the £1.6 billion pledge given in 2020. It comes as Britain and other western powers have dramatically cut their aid budgets in recent months as they prepare to ramp up spending on defence. Speaking exclusively to The Telegraph, Baroness Chapman, the Minister of International Development said: 'We've had to make some really tough choices. But we've decided as a government that we want to invest in defence, because that's the world we are in. 'When we cut the aid budget, we knew we'd have to cut things that are globally good. Gavi would be something it would be great to put more money into in future and I hope we can, but for today this is a good pledge from the UK,' she said. Britain's funding cut represents a 40 per cent reduction in real terms after accounting for inflation. It will threaten funding for 23 million child vaccinations over the next five years, potentially causing an additional 350,000 deaths, according to estimates by the ONE campaign. Andrew Mitchell, former Conservative International Development Secretary, condemned the government's 'brutal' cut to Gavi, warning it will 'leave Britain less safe and more vulnerable to disease.' In another major blow, the US announced at Gavi's pledge summit in Brussels today that it would cut its support entirely for the organisation. It had given $1.13 billion in the organisation's last funding round. In an inflammatory video message delivered to the summit, US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior accused Gavi of neglecting vaccine safety, and criticised its decision making around Covid-19 immunisation recommendations and the use of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTPw) vaccine in low-income countries. Global vaccine experts rejected the jibe, saying they had 'full confidence' in the DTPw vaccine. Gavi is relying on raising at least $9 billion to support its work between 2026-2030. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, is a public-private partnership that procures and distributes vaccines at significantly reduced prices to the world's poorest countries. It targets diseases such as HPV, malaria, yellow fever, COVID-19, Ebola, measles, and typhoid. It was founded by the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, the World Bank and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000. It has immunised over a billion children worldwide and is estimated to have saved more than 18 million lives. The UK has historically been the organisation's largest sovereign donor. Baroness Chapman, appointed Minister for International Development earlier this year shortly after the UK government cut its aid budget from 0.5 to 0.3 per cent of gross national income – the lowest level in 25 years – said foreign assistance should not just be about 'doing good' but about helping countries to 'stand on [their] own two feet.' However, experts argue that Gavi is one of the best ways to achieve that goal. The International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm), Gavi's innovative funding mechanism which former Chancellor Gordon Brown helped design, is widely regarded as one of the most effective and sustainable aid projects in history. Every dollar invested in Gavi is estimated to generate a $54 return on investment – far outperforming traditional markets like the Dow Jones, which returned $2.26 per dollar over the past decade. Over the past 25 years, 19 countries, including Indonesia and India, have successfully transitioned out of Gavi support and are now donors themselves. The UK government has been a key champion of Gavi's accelerated rollout of the HPV vaccine to adolescent girls in developing countries, aiming to eradicate cervical cancer, which kills around 300,000 women annually. During Gavi's 2026–2030 strategic period, it plans to vaccinate an additional 120 million girls with the HPV vaccine. However, these plans may be scaled back due to the funding shortfall. 'The HPV vaccine is a real game changer in the fight against cervical cancer [...] But again, we have had to make a decision about putting more money into defense. Therefore there's less money to spend on overseas aid,' Baroness Chapman said. The organisation's work does not just benefit its recipients, say experts, but protects all countries from the risk of future pandemics. 'We've learned through Covid that if you have a pandemic, or if you have viruses emerging from other parts of the world, no matter how far away they might be, that none of us are safe, it is a global challenge and Gavi is huge part of that answer,' said Baroness Chapman. Gavi's CEO Sania Nishtar told The Telegraph: 'The UK relationship for GAVI is super important. The UK is where GAVI was born. We've had bipartisan support from both sides of the aisle in the last 25 years. We're very grateful for the pledge at this very difficult moment.'