vodafone idea: Incremental positives in Vodafone Idea, but funding hinges on AGR clarity: Balaji Subramanian
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
"We will have to see what all steps the government can take without incurring the wrath of the Supreme Court . So, my sense is that one option can be to extend the timeline of the AGR payments , the other one could be slightly more difficult option but that could mean providing some relief especially on the interest and the penalty part of the AGR liability," says Balaji Subramanian, IIFL Capital So, there were a number of positive things to take away from Vodafone's results. So, one was as you rightly said their daily revenue run rate was the highest in a long time. Their aprus were also higher. The subscriber losses have persisted, but the good thing is that at least they are lower than where they used to be. The capex has gone up which is a positive because the rollouts are critical as far as stemming their subscriber losses are concerned. So, there have been a few positives, but these are all incremental positives. What we really need is any relief on the AGR front because that is where the cash flow burden can meaningfully come off and that is what would lend comfort to banks when they decide whether to lend or not.So, on that count a couple of weeks back while the Supreme Court turned down the writ plea of Bharti and Vodafone Idea, the good thing there was that the court also made an observation that should the government go ahead and come out with any relief measures the court will not come in the way, so to that extent it is a positive.We will have to see what all steps the government can take without incurring the wrath of the Supreme Court. So, my sense is that one option can be to extend the timeline of the AGR payments, the other one could be slightly more difficult option but that could mean providing some relief especially on the interest and the penalty part of the AGR liability. So, now the ball is in the government's court and based on how the progress happens on any relief on AGR, that is when the fundraising angle will start probably kicking in.See, I have a cautious stance on the name. This is simply because of the fact that even with an AGR waiver the cash outgo will be fairly meaningful and if you look at what Vodafone Idea's turnaround plan was, the one which they had articulated when they raised funds a little over a year back, was that one, there will be tariff increases which played out, so they did their fundraise in April last year and the tariff hikes were announced towards the end of June, so that happened. The second thing was they said they will be able to successfully complete the equity part of the fundraising. There also they delivered.Where the problem has been was there was an expectation that the AGR dues also will see a meaningful reduction and as a result the debt raise which was also one of the planks of the turnaround strategy, that should also fall into place. But unfortunately, that part of the story has not played out and what we have seen is that even the ARPU increase or rather more precisely the revenue increase after the tariff hikes they have been a little bit underwhelming because there has been a fair bit of downtrading and churn that has happened, so that is where things have not exactly gone as per plan.So, if they manage to get some relief on the AGR burden and the debt funding falls in place, I definitely see a pop in the stock, but after that they will have to again start battling in the marketplace where things are not all that simple because we do have two strong competitors which are way ahead in terms of rollouts are concerned and their cash flow and balance sheet metrics are also quite strong. So, it will be an uphill task for Vodafone Idea even if they manage to get all these things in place.So, I do not really subscribe to what you stated on Starlink completely because if you look at Starlink a couple of weeks back they launched in Bangladesh where if you convert the pricing there into Indian rupees, you can see that their plan starts at around Rs 2900 per month or so. There are two plans. One is at around 2900, the other one is a little over Rs 4000 per month. And in India when it launches, we do not know whether this will be the pre-GST pricing. So, if we are going to have GST also on top, then we are looking at something like a Rs 3500 per month and let us not forget that unlike in certain pockets in the US where they offer the terminal also free of cost, here the terminal is also being charged.So, when I mentioned here, I refer to Bangladesh where the terminal costs around Rs 35,000. So, that means that it is going to be on the fairly expensive side. I do know that Starlink offers $10 plan in Kenya, but let us not forget that in Kenya the conventional fixed broadband plans start at around $20, that is not the case in India where you have the entry level plan of Jio the FTTH plan starts at Rs 399 plus GST. So, even with that we are looking at a Rs sub-500 number and compared to that Starlink is probably six to seven times priced higher. So, at least as things stand, Starlink will be largely restricted to either certain niche high-income population groups or it might be more relevant in areas where it is near impossible to have either a fixed line connectivity or even a 5G FWA connectivity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
A uniform 10% EWS quota across states is quite contentious
The Union Government has been implementing a fixed 10 per cent reservation quota for the economically weaker sections (EWS), exclusively for the general category (GC) population (castes other than SCs/STs/OBCs) in line with the 103rd Constitution Amendment Act in 2019. When it was challenged, the Supreme Court (Janhit case) upheld it in 2022. Most state governments began implementing a 10 per cent EWS quota, irrespective of the percentage of the GC population, which varies from state to state. Ironically, reservations for SCs, STs and OBCs vary across states. Such universality in the EWS quota is QUITE contentious. There are also other contradictions regarding the policy basis of this specific provision. Initial attempts: The quota for EWS began after overcoming the hurdles posed against its implementation in 1989. The then prime minister V P Singh proposed a five to 10 per cent EWS quota. However, this did not materialise. Subsequently, the P V Narasimha Rao government took the initiative forward and in 1991 mandated implementation of 10 per cent EWS quota and 27% OBC quota. The Supreme Court, however, struck down the EBC-quota in the Indira Sawhney case (1992) while upholding the Mandal Commission's recommendation of 27 per cent OBCs quota. The reasons cited was that the EWS quota was made purely on an economic-criterion, which has been contended in the judicial scrutiny of OBCs reservation in various occasions. A further, 10 per cent EWS quota exceeds the 50 per cent ceiling laid down by the apex court (Balaji and other cases). Commission and Amendment: The UPA government in 2006 constituted a S R Sinho Commission to study economic backwardness among the general category (GC) population and recommend specific policy provisions. In its 2010 report, the panel suggested an economic criterion for identifying EWS in the GC population- all persons in BPL families and those with annual income below the non-taxable income tax slab. The NDA Government considered the Sinho Commission report and brought in the 103rd Constitution Amendment Act 2019. When it was challenged in the Janhit case, the Supreme Court in 2022 upheld the 10 per cent EWS quota, following which the Centre laid a less than Rs eight lakh income-criterion for identifying the EWS eligible among GC population. Subsequently, the Union Government's Expert Group retained the criterion. Pending the final verdict, the apex court permitted the criterion. Contradictions: Certain contradictions persist in the implementation of 10 per cent EWS quota. Firstly, its policy basis is itself contradictory; study, methodology and procedures. Kaka Kalelkar chaired the first Commission for Backward Classes (1953-55) and identified BCs on the basis of four indicators-social status, education, government employment and participation in industry, trade and commerce). The B.P. Mandal chaired the second commission (1979-80) devised a three-dimensional (social, education and economic) 11-indicator criterion for identifying backward classes. The thrust was on social, educational and economic dimensions of backwardness. The Mandal Commission conducted a massive survey across 405 districts, including in urban areas. Concomitantly, many state-level committees and commissions for BCs contemplated a rigorous criterion in identifying backward classes. In contrast, the Sinho Commission solely relied on economic criteria without such rigorous study and methodology. Its recommendations are based on its visits to states and Union Territories and interacting with officials and functionaries implementing the welfare policies, experts and civil society organisations. When they were contested, the judicial proceedings did not validate the methodology and procedures conducted for the commissions and committees. In all previous verdicts, the economic-criterion has been contended the most in identifying BCs. However, there is a marked difference vis-à-vis the Sinho panel report. Secondly, the EWS quota exceeding the 50 per cent ceiling is allowed while strictly restricting the SC/ST/OBCs reservation to 50 per cent. The SC/ST quotas are fixed in proportion to the population share in states. Hence, a space for the OBCs reservation quota, at the Centre and in states, is the balance. The OBCs quota is adjusted for the creamy-layer among the OBCs. The OBCs' creamy-layer criteria differ across the Centre and states. In contrast, EWS quota at the Centre and in states is not bound by the above limitations. Of course, exclusion of GC creamy layer benefiting from EWS quota is applicable on the Rs eight lakh income criterion, the basis of which is again contentious (verdict pending). The 10 per cent EWS quota across states shall also follow the same creamy layer criterion. It is not subject to varying income levels across states and differences between the Centre and states. Thirdly, the uniform 10 per cent EWS quota is contentious as the population of SCs, STs and OBCs varies across states. Neither is the EWS quota adjusted to the GC share in a state, nor the EWS creamy-layer income to the state income. When the Centre's 27 per cent OBCs quota is not mandatory across states, then why should the 10 per cent EWS quota be? For instance it makes sense if Uttarakhand implements the 10 per cent EWS quota as more than a quarter of its population come under the GC category, which is not the same case as regards other states, in proportionate terms. BCs are the losers: The OBCs are the losers. Each social category is entitled to equal opportunity. Following democracy's basic principle of proportionate representation, quota should be earmarked in accordance with the population share in the states. The Constitution has ensured that reservations are near to the population share of SCs and STs. However, most Indian states have OBCs that are in excess of 50 per cent of their state population. The OBC quota is around 32 per cent. In many states, around 10 to 15 per cent of the population are in the GC bracket. Quota is earmarked for all the four mutually exclusive social categories-SC/ST/OBC/GC. However, the difference between reservation quota and population share of each indicates it is the highest for OBCs and hence their relative deprivation is higher. As a result, EWSs in GCs are safeguarded more than OBCs, who are historically deprived. (The writer is Associate Professor and Coordinator (Research Cell on Education), CESS, Hyderabad
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Right to privacy not absolute: HC backsnight ban on gaming
The Madras high court on Tuesday upheld the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu's online gaming regulations, which include Aadhaar-based verification, a midnight-to-5am gaming ban, and prohibition of minors from participating, dismissing petitions by gaming companies and ruling that the right to privacy is not absolute when weighed against public health concerns. A division bench of justices SM Subramaniam and K Rajasekar said the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (Real Money Games) Regulations, 2025, were reasonable restrictions aimed at curbing gaming addiction. The ruling reinforces state authority to regulate online gaming and could set a precedent for other states grappling with potential addiction and negative social consequences associated with real money games. The court held that the state was well within its legislative competence to enact the law in the interest of public health, public order, and regulation of trade and commerce. 'More often than not, the first right that is pleaded for in cases such as this is the right to privacy as upheld by the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy case (2017). But it must be essentially understood that the Puttaswamy case did not affirm the right to privacy as an absolute right,' the bench said. It added: 'The character of the right was transformed into a fundamental right thereby immediately bringing within its fold the reasonable restrictions that are available to all other fundamental rights. So the right to privacy carries with it, its own limitations and cannot be claimed in absolute. When put on a scale, a compelling public interest outweighs the right to privacy.' Gaming platforms including Play Games 24x7, Head Digital Works, and Junglee Games India had opposed the mandatory Aadhar verification raising concerns about privacy and questioning if the State's verification methods were compliant with adequate standards of privacy and security. They also contended online skill games were already governed under central law and that Tamil Nadu's regulations amounted to indirect prohibition of legitimate activity. Senior counsels Mukul Rohatgi and Sajjan Poovayya, representing the petitioners, contended that the state law conflicted with the Information Technology Act and intruded into the Centre's domain. The Union government through the Additional Solicitor General ARL Sundaresan, had argued that the central Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 already governed online gaming. It said that the central framework provides for a self sufficient regulation for the online real money games including the standards of due diligence, grievance redressal mechanisms, and age-appropriate access, etc, all of which were intended to provide a harmonised national framework for online real money games of skill. The court rejected these submissions, invoking the doctrine of pith and substance to conclude that the legislation's core objective was 'public health,' placing it within the state's domain. 'In true essence, the Online Real Money Games is a trade activity, which if left unregulated has immediate implications on the health of the public. So, the fundamental purpose of this piece of legislation is to protect public health and regulate trade within the State, which squarely falls within the legislative competence of the State,' the judgment stated. Citing expert committee findings, the court noted at least 47 suicides between 2019 and 2024 linked to online real money gaming addiction. The court observed that night hours saw higher addiction levels, with research showing increased dopamine levels and diminished self-control during that time, justifying the midnight-to-dawn ban. On Aadhaar-based verification, the bench noted such verification was a robust two-step authentication process aimed at confirming age and identity to prevent misuse. 'The scope for manipulation is comparatively lesser,' the court held. The bench said that while real money games like rummy and poker may involve skill, their digital format poses distinct risks, including anonymity, lack of physical cues, and higher potential for addiction. 'The players may not even know against whom the game is played. So it is imperative that the government take adequate steps to streamline and regulate these unexplored waters to ensure fair play and secure the physical and financial safety of the players,' the court noted. On concerns that the law was paternalistic, the court held that protecting public health and well-being is a constitutional responsibility. 'Laws and policies must be shaped with that goal at the core,' it said. The court concluded that the 2025 Regulations were a necessary response to a growing public health crisis and aligned with Article 39 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which mandates the State to frame laws that protect people's welfare.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Uncertainty looms large over Telangana's Waqf Board's future
1 2 Hyderabad: With uncertainty looming over the existence of the Telangana Waqf Board following the amendment of the Waqf Act 2025, the state govt has sought advice legal advice from the advocate general and law department on whether the existing board should continue. According to official sources, the govt has requested guidance on the matter. Meanwhile, the minority welfare department has reportedly directed Telangana Waqf Board chairman Syed Azmatullah Husseni not to convene any board meetings until further orders. The issue came to the fore after chairman Husseni wrote a letter to the chief executive officer of the board last month, requesting that a meeting be convened. As the amended Waqf Act has come into force and there is no stay on its implementation from the Supreme Court , Telangana waqf board CEO Md Asadullah sought the opinion on the matter. Sources noted that the chairman has been forwarding files to the CEO. Officials said that under Section 14 of the amended Waqf Act, the composition of the board has undergone significant changes. While elected members are allowed to complete their terms, all nominated members are required to step down. The state govt is mandated to reconstitute the board in accordance with the new provision of Section 14. "As of now, the board comprises eight members. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Realize novos planos com o banco BV Banco BV Saiba Mais Undo While five are nominated, including the chairman, three are elected, including one from the bar council and two Muthawalis. However, as per the new Act, one Muthawali is allowed, in addition to other elected and nominated members. Moreover, as per the new Act, the elected members should be more than the nominated," a senior official of the minority welfare department said. While the state govt has been adopting a wait-and-watch approach, similar to other states like Karnataka, pending the Supreme Court's verdict on several petitions challenging the new Waqf Act. However, the recent board meetings and decisions taken by the chairman have placed the govt in a fix, prompting it to seek the opinion of the advocate general. However, the chairman, on his part, argued that the last Waqf board meeting was held in October 2024 and several public issues and grievances are still pending. He asserted that it is in the public interest to address these issues. "The board has every power to take up the issues, take decisions and pass resolutions," the chairman informed the govt.
