First ladies are leading the way in writing wrongs
At the Alaska summit on Friday, Putin walked all over the supine US president. He did receive, however, a letter from the Slovenian-born first lady, which addressed Russia's malevolent treatment of Ukrainian children and implored Putin to do his best to protect them.
Melania is not the only president's wife to have taken to her writing desk in an effort to end the Ukraine war.
President Zelensky avoided a repeat of his disastrous Oval Office meeting with Donald Trump, and he softened his landing by handing over a letter from his wife, Olena Zelenska, thanking her opposite number for her efforts in sparing the lives of Ukrainian children. "It's not to you, it's to your wife,' a smiling Zelensky told Trump, in a considerably more convivial atmosphere than the one in February that saw him mugged in front of the world's cameras.
In bygone centuries, when foreign relations depended on the back and forth of handwritten entreaties, often in legal French, it was known as 'letter diplomacy'. Today, it could be termed 'Smythson diplomacy' – and decent stationery is all the more commanding in an era of the dashed-off WhatsApp. If it helps stop the carnage in conflict zones, all power to the first ladies' elbows.
It is very easy to mock Melania's missive to Putin: its glutinous semi-literacy, its use of vague euphemisms and its refusal to call a spade a spade. Take this for example this sentence, alluding to Putin's abduction of 20,000 Ukrainian children – for which he has been indicted as a war criminal: 'A simple yet profound concept, Mr Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government and ideology.'
Never mind that Putin, white nationalist, imperialist and would-be heir to Peter the Great, doesn't share these sentiments. Melania knows there was no point in further riling the Russian leader – not that he was the intended audience. The letter was meant for her husband, and those Republicans with a conscience. Polls show that GOP supporters' attitudes to Russia and its brutalisation of Ukraine are hardening.
Trump has said his wife is 'very neutral' on Ukraine. No one believes that. Melania, 55, who grew up in Slovenia, the most western-leaning part of what was communist Yugoslavia, made a point of posting her thoughts and prayers for the people of Ukraine on X immediately after Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022.
Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general, has shared Trump's own reports of how the first Lady has tried to remind her husband what he's up against in the Kremlin. Rutte recalls the US leader telling how 'I'd get home, I'd say: 'First lady, I had the most wonderful talk with Vladimir. I think we're finished.' And then I'll turn on the television, or she'll say to me one time: 'Wow, that's strange because they just bombed a nursing home…''
The ease with which Putin can sway Trump with a handshake, an impish grin and a private, five-minute chat is terrifying. This means that it's vital that as many voices as possible, from European leaders to his wife, remind the US president that Putin is an evil, lying megalomaniac – and that you won't get a Nobel Prize by sucking up to him.
Olena Zelenska also has form when it comes to exercising soft-power diplomacy. In April 2022, Ukraine's first lady posed serenely for Vogue magazine. She certainly looked like glossy mag material in un smoking in white silk, but spoke about the grim reality of the Russian invasion for Ukraine's women and children.
First lady diplomacy is not new: JFK employed Jackie Kennedy as a potent tool of soft-power. Nancy Reagan sought to speed the end of the Cold War, Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush and championed women's rights.
But none of them was in the pivotal position that Melania now finds herself. This is for the simple reason, that none of them was married to a US commander in chief so in thrall to dictators. May your inkwell never run dry, Melania.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Account tied to Trump nominee posted conspiracy theories about Epstein, the 2020 election and Covid, report says
A social media account tied to President Donald Trump 's controversial pick to take over the Bureau of Labor Statistics has a history of posting various far-right conspiracy theories – the latest eyebrow-raising report to emerge about what is often a nonpartisan nominee. Last week, Trump announced he would nominate Erwin John 'EJ' Antoni III, the chief economist at The Heritage Foundation, the conservative group that created Project 2025, to replace former BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer. A surface-level review of Antoni, 37, shows that he is a loyal Trump supporter who has aligned himself with the current administration's ideals – contributing to Project 2025, bashing former president Joe Biden's record, and even being a 'bystander' at the January 6 attack on the Capitol. But a more in-depth look at Antoni's history online indicates that a now-deleted X account, which once used Antoni's name, posted theories about Jeffrey Epstein's death, Covid-19's origins, and the validity of the 2020 presidential election, according to WIRED. A website archive of the account 'PhDofbombsaway,' shows that it used the name 'Dr. Erwin J. Antoni III,' 'Dr. J.,' as well as 'Dr. Curtis LeMay,' – an apparent reference to the Air Force general largely credited with planning and executing mass bombings on Japan during World War II, as well as advocating for nuclear weapon usage. The account's profile picture was of a fiery mushroom cloud, not unlike the one associated with nuclear weapon detonations. 'All or nothing. Do it die,' the account posted in late November 2020 in response to a tweet encouraging Republicans to stand up to 'fraudulently mailed machines.' The account consistently re-posted false claims about election fraud and theories about stolen ballots from prominent accounts. On January 5, 2021, hours before the attack on the Capitol, the account posted a reference to violence in the Bible while responding to a tweet from Trump in which he encouraged Republicans to 'fight.' 'Samson has his arms around the temple pillars, and although he may not survive, he will bring it all down on his enemies,' it posted, referring to the story of Samson receiving strength from God to rise up against his enemies. Last week, photos of Antoni outside the Capitol on January 6 circulated online. The White House confirmed Antoni was present as a 'bystander' who wandered over to see coverage of it on the news. Other posts from the account indicate the person running it was ingrained in far-right rhetoric and conspiracy theories. In November 2019, the account responded to a person theorizing about Epstein's death by suicide, claiming, 'Epstein didn't kill himself.' That theory was widely circulated among far-right communities online and continues to be a central part of concerns about government transparency around Epstein. Later that month, the same account replied to a tweet that seemed to make a sexual innuendo about former vice president Kamala Harris with its own. 'She does her best work when life brings her to her knees,' the account wrote. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Antoni declined to comment to Wired. While the account has since been deleted, Antoni remains present online with an X account that mostly posts Trump-aligned views of the economy or economic data. But his nomination has been subject to criticism even before NBC News reported his presence at the Capitol, or Wired reported about his alleged former X account. The president previously fired McEntarfer, a career civil servant, after expressing dissatisfaction with the BLS's job numbers reports. Trump insinuated, without evidence, that McEntarfer had manipulated the numbers to make the president look bad because the figures did not line up with Trump's rhetoric about the economy. Some economists and lawmakers have expressed concern that Trump's new nominee could be more inclined to alter BLS numbers to appease the president. While there is no rule about who may be the BLS commissioner, they are typically expected to be nonpartisan, given that the BLS is an independent fact-checking arm of the Department of Labor. Upon announcing Antoni's nomination, the president vowed that his nominee would 'ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE.' Antoni previously tweeted, calling for a 'better' way to collect and disseminate BLS data and criticizing the current method of doing so. Antoni's nomination will require Senate confirmation. So far, at least two Democratic senators have called for the Senate to reject Antoni's nomination.
Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
What happens next as Donald Trump plans Putin-Zelensky talks over Ukraine war
Donald Trump has claimed to be organising a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky in an attempt to reach a peace deal. The Mirror looks at what could happen next Keir Starmer said today European and US leaders are drawing up "robust" plans to defend Ukraine if a peace deal is struck with Moscow. Less than 24 hours after crunch White House talks, the Prime Minister and French President Emmanuel Macron chaired a meeting of the 'Coalition of the Willing'. Earlier this year Mr Starmer insisted that Britain is prepared to put boots on the ground and planes in the air in the event of a deal to end the three-year conflict. After the meeting wrapped up, A No10 spokesman said the PM had told those on the call "there was a real sense of unity and shared goal of securing a just and lasting peace for Ukraine" during meetings with President Trump. READ MORE: Donald Trump issues Putin 'VERY severe consequences' warning if Ukraine war doesn't end The PM also said the Coalition's military planning teams will "meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees and prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended". Here The Mirror looks at what could happen next. What happened at the White House? European leaders flanked Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky for crunch talks at the White House on Monday evening in an unprecedented show of unity. Donald Trump updated them on the US-Russia summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday where the Russian tyrant was given the red-carpet treatment. European allies had feared a repeat of the Ukrainian wartime leader's first visit to the Oval Office back in February where he was ambushed by Mr Trump and Vice President, JD Vance. But Monday's high-stakes meeting was a far more cordial affair with promises of further talks. Keir Starmer left the White House saying there had been a 'real significant breakthrough' in security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a peace deal. The Prime Minister also said there had been 'real movement' on the next stage of negotiations. What happens next? One of the key takeaways from Monday's meeting was Mr Trump's claim to be brokering a one-to-one meeting between Ukraine's Zelensky and Mr Putin. If the meeting goes ahead - and it's a big if - it will only be the second time the pair have met and the first since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine back in February 2022. READ MORE: The German Chancellor has suggested the meeting could take place within two weeks - but there has been no public commitment from the Kremlin so far. The French President, Emmanuel Macron, has suggested they should meet in a 'neutral country' and said he was pushing for Geneva, in Switzerland. The US President has then proposed a 'trilateral' meeting to follow - between the United States, Russia and Ukraine to discuss next steps. What did the 'Coalition of the Willing' discuss? European leaders are busy at work on military planning in the event of a peace deal. A group of 30-plus nations - the Coalition of the Willing - have signed up to help defend Ukraine if a deal is struck. Its aim is to act as a deterrent for future attacks from Moscow. Keir Starmer has previously said he is willing to put UK troops on the ground and planes in the sky as part of any peacekeeping force in Ukraine. On Tuesday, the Prime Minister and Mr Macron updated the countries on talks at the White House as they chaired a meeting of the group. During the meeting Mr Starmer said military planning teams will soon meet with US teams to 'strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees' to Ukraine. What is the US prepared to do? European allies have long insisted the US is vital to guaranteeing Ukraine's security. Donald Trump swerved a question in the Oval Office on Monday on whether the US would be willing to put boots on the ground in Ukraine to help secure any peace deal. He suggested on Tuesday the US would offer air support to Ukraine, bragging that there was no other country with the 'kind of stuff we have'. Will there be a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv? Downing Street has always insisted Putin has never been serious about the prospect of peace. That appeared evident when Moscow's drones and missiles rained down on Ukraine - even as European leaders met at the White House to discuss the possibility of an end to three-year war. Reports also suggested Putin's price for peace would be for Ukraine to hand over land the Kremlin does not occupy - something Mr Zelensky has dismissed. The US President himself said on Tuesday it is 'possible he [Putin] doesn't want to make a deal'. The coming weeks will be crucial but it is clear European leaders are pushing to ramp up sanctions to turn the screws on Moscow's war machine once again if talks collapse.
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in U.S. elections?
Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. Only states and the U.S. Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the U.S. is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. States are responsible for administering their votes under the U.S. Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. Presidents in the U.S. have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are U.S. citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.
