logo
The AI Race Is Now About Databases — Not Just Big Models

The AI Race Is Now About Databases — Not Just Big Models

Forbes7 hours ago

The real AI race isn't about smarter models anymore. It's about who can serve fast, reliable data to ... More power agents, copilots and real-time decisions. (Photo by Alive Coverage for Snowflake)
When Snowflake announced its $250 million acquisition of Crunchy Data two weeks ago at its annual summit in San Francisco, it was a signal that the battle for AI dominance, which was once the domain of massive language models and advanced GPUs, was shifting straight into what many experts describe as the foundation of AI development: the database layer.
Two weeks earlier, Snowflake rival Databricks revealed its own $1 billion acquisition of Neon, another Postgres-native startup. And right about the same time, American cloud-based software company Salesforce made an $8 billion deal to buy data management provider Informatica.
Taken together, these aren't just high-profile database deals but proof that the AI infrastructure race is moving down-stack. While sophisticated models may still grab headlines, the battle is now increasingly about who can serve AI-ready data, fast, resiliently and at scale.
Despite their limitations, AI tools often produce remarkably human-like results. But these tools, whether in the form of AI copilots, chatbots, or assistants, require lots of data parameters to do that. They demand a steady flow of both structured and unstructured data — fresh, fast and accessible. As one analyst put it, 'AI is stupid without access to good data.' And not just access to a treasure trove of data, but also data orchestration at machine speed.
To access and process data quickly, which is how AI chatbots are able to 'reason,' PostgreSQL — the open-source database powering many traditional web apps and enterprise systems — has become a go-to choice for companies modernizing their data infrastructure because it's reliable, widely used and already trusted in enterprise settings. But as Spencer Kimball, cofounder and CEO of Cockroach Labs, noted in an interview, while Postgres was built for batch jobs, periodic queries and peak load measured in thousands, AI doesn't work like that.
'Retrofitting Postgres for real-time, agent-driven workloads exposes architectural limits. AI agents, copilots and real-time pipelines generate nonstop reads and writes. They require globally consistent data in milliseconds and expect systems to absorb failure without flinching,' Kimball said.
That's why companies like Snowflake are rethinking what the modern database needs to be. For Snowflake, the answer is to embed transactional and AI-ready systems deep into its platform, giving customers a seamless way to support a new generation of intelligent workflows.
At its yearly summit, which had 20,000 attendees this year, Snowflake CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy emphasized a major shift toward 'workflow-native' data platforms. With tools like Openflow, the company is repositioning itself as the connective tissue between corporate data and AI-driven decisions.
The idea, according to Ramaswamy, is to make it easier for companies to tap into and connect fragmented data sources — including on-prem databases, SaaS apps and unstructured streams — into unified pipelines and build real-time workflows on top of them. And Snowflake Intelligence is meant to go a step further.
By layering generative AI atop enterprise data, the platform lets non-technical employees query across their company's information without writing a single line of SQL or needing engineering support. Ask a natural-language question, and an AI agent finds the answer, with context.
Jeff Hollan, head of Cortex AI apps and agents, calls this the next frontier, noting that 'the next generation of apps aren't just data-hungry, but also reasoning-hungry.' That hunger for reasoning is why the database layer is now more critical for enterprises than ever before, Hollan said.
Artin Avanes, head of core data Platform at Snowflake, sees this growing demand for platforms that can support continuous data interaction, not just batch analytics, as a reflection of an industry-wide shift that Snowflake is aiming to lead. 'While faster access to data is great, that's not what you really need,' Avanes told me in an interview. 'You need systems that adapt to how decisions are made in real time.'
That shift is also fueling the rise of Cortex AI, Snowflake's agentic AI framework, which orchestrates data at scale, automates operations and delivers business value in live environments. It's a far cry from the common situation for most organizations today, where many are still trapped in proof-of-concept cycles, according to Vivek Raghunathan, senior vice president of engineering at Snowflake.
'Everyone's experimenting. But very few are scaling responsibly,' he said. 'Part of the challenge lies in the disconnect between what enterprises think AI will do and what it actually requires.'
As Raghunathan further explained, it's an organizational issue. 'Without clear vision and readiness at the infrastructure level,' he noted, 'no amount of AI investment will deliver sustained value.' And that's a reality many enterprise leaders are now coming to terms with.
In fact, according to Fivetran's report on AI and data readiness, 42% of enterprises report that over half of their AI projects have been delayed, underperformed, or failed due to poor data readiness, underscoring the growing gap between AI ambition and architecture.
Snowflake's move to acquire Crunchy Data, Databricks' Neon acquisition and Salesforce's big money deal are all land grabs in the AI foundation layer. They show that vendors no longer want to sit atop the data stack. They want to own it.
For enterprises, that should trigger a serious question: Who do you trust with the foundation of your AI future?
Because as AI moves from experimentation to execution, the companies that win won't just build the smart models. They'll be the ones who control the data stack. What that means is that the database layer isn't the back-end of enterprise AI anymore. It's now the front line.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Verizon told to clarify ambiguous advertising claims after T-Mobile complaint
Verizon told to clarify ambiguous advertising claims after T-Mobile complaint

Android Authority

time9 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Verizon told to clarify ambiguous advertising claims after T-Mobile complaint

Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR The National Advertising Division (NAD) has recommended that Verizon change its marketing language about satellite texting based on a complaint from T-Mobile. T-Mobile has also challenged Verizon's claim of being 'America's largest network,' with the watchdog calling Verizon's advertising 'ambiguous.' Verizon has said that it'll comply with NAD's recommendations. Verizon is once again under the lens for its inconspicuous advertising claims. This time, the Big Red has been pulled up over claims about its satellite texting service and network size following a challenge from rival T-Mobile. The National Advertising Division (NAD), an industry watchdog under BBB National Programs, found some of Verizon's claims to be supported but recommended that the carrier make its advertising clearer for the benefit of consumers. NAD said Verizon's slogan 'conquering dead zones with satellite' is not misleading on its own, but warned that Verizon must improve its disclosures. Specifically, the NAD says Verizon failed to clarify that the satellite texting service only works on select new phone models and under certain conditions. Moreover, T-Mobile also took issue with Verizon's 'America's largest network' claim. While Verizon has based that claim on the number of postpaid subscribers, T-Mobile said the phrase could mislead consumers into thinking it refers to coverage area or geographic reach. NAD recommended Verizon clarify what Verizon means by 'largest.' 'NAD found the phrase 'largest network' to be ambiguous, potentially conveying different messages to consumers. NAD also determined that the term 'postpaid phone connections' may not clearly communicate that it refers to Verizon subscribers,' the organization wrote in a press release shared with Android Authority. NAD made similar recommendations to those of Verizon last year and asked the carrier to discontinue or modify its satellite texting claims based on a previous complaint by T-Mobile. Verizon stated it would comply with the NAD's recommendations. While the NAD does not have the power to enforce changes, companies often follow its guidance to avoid legal or regulatory issues. For customers, the ruling means Verizon ads may soon become more transparent, especially regarding satellite texting and what its 'largest network' claims really mean.

Amazon's bleak job update exposes major AI warning for Aussie workers: 'Will reduce'
Amazon's bleak job update exposes major AI warning for Aussie workers: 'Will reduce'

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon's bleak job update exposes major AI warning for Aussie workers: 'Will reduce'

Thousands of office workers at Amazon and Microsoft could soon be without a job as the two companies invest more heavily in artificial intelligence and outsourcing. Major warnings have been issued in recent months about how AI could create high levels of unemployment in Australia and around the world. Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy wrote a memo to staff that cautioned this tech takeover would likely hit its workforce in the coming years. But he suggested that some who lose their jobs could find new roles in other sectors. 'As we roll out more generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs,' he said. AI warning following 'extraordinary' prediction of job wipe out Centrelink age pension changes coming into effect from July 1 $1,000 ATO school fees tax deduction that Aussies don't realise they can claim 'It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company.' Meanwhile, Bloomberg is reporting Microsoft is gearing up for another round of 'thousands' of job cuts after getting rid of 6,000 roles just last month. During that blitz, the tech company slashed the product and engineering departments; however, this potential new round of cuts could focus more on the sales teams. Microsoft warned back in April that it was looking to use third-party firms to take on software sales rather than do things of Australian companies have started throwing big sums of cash into AI to help improve their products, backend operations, and customer services. But Telstra recently admitted roles would likely be cut in the future due to this new focus. 'Our workforce will look different in 2030 as we develop new capabilities, find new ways to leverage technology, including AI, and we have to stay focused on becoming more efficient,' Vicki Brady said. 'We don't know precisely what our workforce will look like in 2030, but it will be smaller than it is today.' The head of AI leader Anthropic, Dario Amodei, suggested half of all entry-level white-collar jobs could get the flick in the US by 2030. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) said late last year that one in three workers were at risk from AI. Australia's productivity commissioner Danielle Wood isn't convinced the AI bloodbath will be that bad. Still, she didn't deny the workforce matrix we're familiar with now will inevitably go through some big changes. 'Am I going to sit here and say, 'No jobs are going to go?' No, clearly not. There will be some impacts," she told the ABC. She hoped AI would allow people to have more time for "the uniquely human parts of jobs". The Prime Minister has announced a huge summit in August a bid to fix the country's lagging productivity. The government believes AI could be a game-changer in this realm and is keen to explore ways the technology can be deployed across multiple sectors. While the ACTU is on board with AI in certain scenarios, it wants assurances for workers' rights. 'To achieve good adoption of AI, Australia needs responsible regulation which both protects Australian workers and Australian industries from malicious use and theft by overseas big tech," ACTU secretary Sally McManus said. The union is pushing for workers to have the right to refuse to use AI in fields where it would be 'inappropriate or carry undue risk', like in medical decision-making. Finance Sector Union national secretary Julia Angrisano, who has been carefully watching Australia's banking industry adopt new tech, said the roundtable will be a good opportunity to set up some ground rules. 'AI is a fundamental and growing part of the finance sector, but this growth is happening in an almost entirely unregulated and uncontrolled way,' she said. 'The economic benefits and productivity gains of AI must flow on to workers, and not just improve the profits of banks and major companies.' Australian Services Union national secretary Emeline Gaske went as far as saying workers should be 'fairly compensated' for using AI. 'AI will undoubtedly reshape the way we work, but we can't lose sight of the people behind the progress,' she said. 'Workers whose knowledge, experience and judgement are used to train and refine these systems deserve to be recognised."Sign in to access your portfolio

Auto Tariffs Seen Hiking Car Prices by Nearly $2,000 Per Vehicle
Auto Tariffs Seen Hiking Car Prices by Nearly $2,000 Per Vehicle

Bloomberg

time23 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Auto Tariffs Seen Hiking Car Prices by Nearly $2,000 Per Vehicle

Car buyers will bear the brunt of the $30 billion cost of President Donald Trump's tariffs, driving up already high US auto prices by almost $2,000 per vehicle, according to consultant AlixPartners. The firm expects auto companies to pass along 80% of the cost of Trump's tariffs — which it calculates as $1,760 more per car. AlixPartners, as part of its annual global automotive outlook, also cautioned that the administration's anti-electric vehicle policies risk relegating American automakers to bit players in the global EV market.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store