Reciprocal tariffs will exacerbate stress for MSMEs: Ind-Ra
reciprocal tariffs
will exacerbate stress for medium, small and micro enterprises (MSMEs) but mid-sized corporates have a greater cushion against unanticipated financial shocks. With the worsening of operating conditions owing to the escalation of
tariff war
in April 2025,
Ind-Ra
expects MSMEs to turn more vulnerable, especially in the sectors where the impact of tariff war is negative.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
India stares at a 'water bomb' threat as it freezes Indus Treaty
India readies short, mid & long-term Indus River plans
Shehbaz Sharif calls India's stand "worn-out narrative"
As of March 31, 2024, the agency's analysis suggested that 23 per cent of MSMEs remained stressed compared to 11 per cent for MCs (mid-corporates). MCs are better positioned than pre-COVID levels to manage business cycles.
A study of 1,898 listed and unlisted MSMEs and 1,055 MCs highlights that MCs have a greater cushion against unanticipated financial shocks than MSMEs, given their healthy financial metrics.
"Capex intensity is usually low as MSMEs grapple more with working capital issues than MCs, and need adequate finance at competitive rates to manage those. Additionally, MSMEs - unlike MCs - are largely promoter-driven entities and lack a capable second line of management who have the knowledge and skill sets to bargain with lenders/suppliers/customers," Neermoy Shah, Associate Director - Emerging Corporates at Ind-Ra, said.
Ind-Ra opined that the reciprocal tariffs will exacerbate stress for MSMEs, with revenue below Rs 250 crore and investment in plant and machinery below Rs 5 crore as of March 31, 2024, with moderate to high intensity.
Live Events
The credit profile of these entities has reverted to pre-COVID level, but the improvement has lagged that of MCs with revenues ranging between Rs 250 crore and Rs 1,000 crore as of March 31, 2024.
Ind-Ra believes that any demand slowdown could impact MSMEs more than MCs, although a reduction in interest rates and an improvement in systemic liquidity could provide a cushion.
MSMEs Capex has modestly picked up post-COVID but remains lower than historical levels. Lastly, the lack of improvement in the coverage ratios of MSMEs and the percentage of loss-making MSMEs further highlights the vulnerability of MSMEs to exogenous shocks.
Externally, the sluggish consumption trends and global slowdown in the face of tariff war 2.0 may put a strain on MSMEs operating and credit metrics, Ind-Ra said.
On April 2, US President Donald Trump announced that it will impose reciprocal tariffs on countries with which it has a tariff imbalance.
On April 9, the US administration authorised a 90-day pause on the implementation of most reciprocal tariffs, reverting to a universal rate of 10 per cent on almost all targeted countries, while raising tariffs on most goods from China to 145 per cent. Later on April 16, the US further hiked tariffs on exports from China to 245 per cent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Centre lists ‘ineligible' ration card holders, asks states to remove them
THE CENTRAL government has for the first time prepared a list of ration card holders who may not qualify for benefits such as free food grains since they are either taxpayers, owners of four-wheelers or even directors in companies. The Centre's Department of Food and Public Distribution has arrived at such a list by matching the details of ration card holders with databases of government entities such as the Income-Tax department (taxpayers), Ministry of Corporate Affairs (directors) and Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (four-wheeler owners). The officials said these ration card holders — about 1.17 crore — may not qualify for free food grains under the National Food Security Act (NFSA). Having arrived at this list, it has now directed states to undertake necessary field verification and remove the ineligible ration card holders by September 30. Responding to a query from The Indian Express, an official from the Department of Food and Public Distribution said the Centre 'has helped states by providing this data to identify and remove ineligible beneficiaries so that genuine people in the waiting list can avail the scheme'. The review of ration cards/ beneficiaries list, identification of ineligible/ duplicate ration cards and inclusion of eligible beneficiaries/ households is the responsibility of states, he said. The NFSA dashboard shows that 19.17 crore ration cards have been issued as on August 19, with total beneficiaries across 36 states and Union Territories totalling 76.10 crore. As per rules, all government employees, households with annual income of Rs 1 lakh or more, four-wheeler owners, and taxpayers are ineligible to get free foodgrains. In a letter to Chief Secretaries of all states and Advisors to the UT Administrators, Union Food Secretary Sanjeev Chopra reiterated the government's earlier instructions about discrepancies identified in the Ration Card Management System (RCMS) database. 'These discrepancies were related to beneficiaries who were either duplicate, deceased, or inactive (silent beneficiaires) and State/UTs were accordingly advised to undertake identification and field verification of such beneficiaries,' he wrote in the letter sent to states on July 8, 2025. 'In continuation of this initiative, the Department has undertaken a comprehensive exercise to further strengthen rightful targeting by matching RCMS data with databases of various Government of India entities including the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (MoRTH), and PM-Kisan,' Chopra wrote. 'Based on this inter-ministerial data convergence, the Department has identified a set of beneficiaries who appear in one or more of the above databases and may not qualify as per eligibility norms prescribed by respective States/UTs. These lists will be shared with all States/UTs via API-based integration and will be visible to State officials through the Rightful Targeting Dashboard developed by the Department,' he wrote. 'As you are aware, the responsibility for identification of beneficiaries rests with the State Government. You are, therefore, requested to kindly undertake necessary field verification of such flagged cases and initiate appropriate action for data cleansing, wherever ineligibility is established. This exercise is critical to ensure that the resources under TPDS are directed only towards the eligible households,' said Food Secretary Chopra. 'I am sure that you will appreciate that cleansing the database of ineligible beneficiaries will enable any left-out deserving individuals and families to be included in the system, thus reinforcing the equity and integrity of the Public Distribution System,' he said. 'It is requested that the above exercise be completed expeditiously and latest by 30th September 2025,' Chopra said in the report. In July, the Centre had informed Rajya Sabha that as many as 1.34 crore 'bogus/ ineligible' ration cards had been deleted/ cancelled during 2021-2023. The NFSA, introduced by the then UPA government with effect from July 5, 2013, entitles 67 per cent of households—50 per cent urban and 75 per cent rural— to receive food grains at a subsidised price (rice Rs 3/kg, wheat Rs 2/kg) under the Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS). In absolute terms, the maximum number of people, which can be covered by the NFSA across the country is about 81.35 crore. However, the NDA government has waived the subsidised prices under its Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana, providing free food grains.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cabinet okays bill that seeks to ban ‘online money game'
NEW DELHI: Cabinet on Tuesday approved a bill that seeks to ban "online money game", where users pay a fee or deposit money, proposing a maximum three years in jail or fine of up to Rs 1 crore for those involved in offering, encouraging or inducing players to participate, which also extends to banks facilitating these transactions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the same time, Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, which will be introduced in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, seeks to promote e-sports and online social games where no money is involved. A regulator body is planned to oversee the functioning of the sector, sources told TOI. The proposed legislation defines "online money game" as an online game played by a user by paying fees, depositing money or other stakes in expectation of winning. 2 years' jail, ₹50L fine likely for those advertising online games Online social games have been defined as those that don't involve exchange of money, although users may be allowed to pay a subscription or one-time access fee. Govt has proposed the new law considering unregulated online money gaming platforms pose threats to national and economic security as they use digital wallets and cryptocurrencies for money laundering and illicit money transfer, cross-border data flows without compliance of data protection law, sources said. Moreover, offshore entities are seen to be circumventing tax and legal obligations. The proposed legislation also assumes significance as online money gaming poses serious concerns, including addiction among children and youth, mental health issues, financial losses leading to suicides and lack of uniform regulation across states. Law enforcing agencies face problems in tracking and regulating these platforms, particularly those hosted or operated from outside India. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sources said the govt proposes penalties of up to two years in jail or with a maximum fine of Rs 50 lakh or both for any entity advertising such games in media. For those offering online money games and banks engaged in transactions face violations of the proposed law will be "cognisable and non-bailable" offences. Every subsequent violation after conviction would attract penalties of at least three years' jail and fine of Rs 10-20 lakh. In the case of advertisers, such penalties would be 2-3 years in jail and fine of Rs 5-10 lakh. The bill proposes to hold senior executives of the companies liable, if it's established that the offences have been committed with the consent or connivance or due to their neglect. It also proposes blocking of platforms and money gaming services, if the entities or individuals fail to comply with the law. According to the proposal, the bill seeks to encourage Indian startups to build culturally relevant content, reduce dependence on foreign platforms and promote self-reliance in the digital gaming ecosystem.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Is Rs 1 crore enough to survive in tier 1 Indian city? Harsh financial reality and advice shared by Reddit
Redditors' Advice and Perspectives As living costs in India's major cities continue to rise, many Indians are questioning how much savings are truly sufficient to support a family comfortably. One Reddit user recently asked whether Rs 1 crore in investments, combined with an inherited flat in a Tier 1 city, would allow them to move back to India with a spouse and child. The user, who has spent most of their life abroad, expressed uncertainty about finding a job in India and whether the investment corpus alone could generate enough monthly Redditor shared that their parents own a flat worth around Rs 1.25 crore, which they are set to inherit. They currently have Rs 1 crore in overseas investments and are planning a move back to India with their family. Their key concerns included whether the investment returns would be sufficient to support daily living and how much more they should save before from the Reddit community largely indicated that Rs 1 crore would not be enough to live comfortably in a Tier 1 city without additional income. One user recommended a corpus 30–35 times the expected annual expenses to survive without working. Another highlighted that if the individual plans to rely solely on investments, especially with a child still studying, the amount would likely fall users noted the inherited property's limitations. While the flat has a high market value, it cannot easily be sold if it serves as a primary residence, reducing its usefulness as a safety net. Others suggested that Rs 1 crore might cover 7–8 years of living only if the family is extremely budget-conscious. Comparisons were made to the rising cost of living , with several commenting that Rs 5–10 crore is now the equivalent of what Rs 1 crore used to cover in past decades.A recurring theme in the discussion was the importance of working in India, or remotely for foreign companies to maintain financial stability. Users also advised keeping investments overseas in dollars to hedge against inflation and currency fluctuations. The consensus leaned toward caution: without a steady income, relying solely on Rs 1 crore is unlikely to sustain a family in a major city long-term.
