Kurdish separatist fighters in Iraq begin laying down weapons as part of peace process with Turkey
Advertisement
'Starting today, members of the separatist terrorist organization have begun surrendering their weapons in groups, marking historic developments that signal the end of a dark era,' Bahceli said in a written statement. 'These are exceptionally important days for both Turkey and our region.'
Bahceli, who has traditionally maintained a hardline stance against the PKK, had surprised everyone in October when he suggested in parliament that Öcalan could be granted parole if he renounced violence and disbanded the PKK.
The ceremony took place in the mountains outside the city of Sulaymaniyah in northern Iraq's semiautonomous Kurdish region. The state-run Iraqi News Agency reported that 'the process will take place in stages, with a group of party members initially laying down their weapons ;symbolically.'' The disarmament process is expected to be completed by September, the agency reported.
Advertisement
The PKK has long maintained bases in the mountains of northern Iraq. Turkish forces have launched offensives and airstrikes against the PKK in Iraq and have set up bases in the area. Scores of villages have emptied as a result.
The Iraqi government in Baghdad last year announced an official ban on the separatist group, which has long been prohibited in Turkey.
Journalists were not allowed at the site of Friday's ceremony.
An Iraqi Kurdish political official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that about 30 fighters took part in the ceremony, which took place in the presence of a representative of the Turkish intelligence service and representatives of the Kurdish regional government, Iraq's Patriotic Union of Kurdistan party, and the Peoples' Equality and Democracy Party, a pro-Kurdish party in Turkey.
PKK officials previously said that in order to continue the disarmament process, they want to see Turkey take steps to end 'the regime of isolation' imposed on Öcalan in prison and to allow integration of former militants into the political system.
Associated Press writers Abby Sewell in Beirut and Suzan Fraser in Ankara, Turkey, contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
4 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
UCLA to pay $6.45 million to settle suit by Jewish students over pro-Palestinian protests
UCLA has agreed to pay $6.45 million to settle a lawsuit brought by three Jewish students and a medical school professor who alleged the university violated their civil rights and enabled antisemitic actions during a pro-Palestinian campus encampment hit with violence in spring 2024. Each plaintiff will receive $50,000. About $2.3 million will be donated to eight groups that work with Jewish communities or issues. Another $230,000 will be directed a UCLA initiative to combat antisemitism and the rest of the funds will go toward the legal fees. As part the deal, UCLA has also agreed that it is 'prohibited from knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students, faculty, and/or staff from ordinarily available portions of UCLA's programs, activities, and/or campus areas.' This provision extends to any actions taken on campus, including measures to de-escalate tensions during a protest, for instance, and it includes 'exclusion ... based on religious beliefs concerning the Jewish state of Israel.' That agreement, which would be in effect for 15 years, is awaiting approval from U.S. District Judge Mark C. Scarsi, who is overseeing the case. The organizations to receive the money are: Hillel at UCLA, Academic Engagement Network, the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Federation Los Angeles Campus Impact Network, Chabad of UCLA, Jewish Graduate Organization, the Orthodox Union's Jewish Learning Initiative on Campus, and The Film Collaborative, Inc. for use toward producing a film related to the Holocaust called Lost Alone. The lawsuit stems from the days-long pro-Palestinian encampment that protesters erected on the UCLA quad in front of Royce Hall in late April 2024. Pro-Palestinian activists were demanding the university divest from companies with ties to Israel's war in Gaza. The encampment became a global news story after a melee instigated by pro-Israel counter-demonstrators erupted. UCLA and law enforcement's failure to quickly stop the violence sparked intense criticism. The people involved hurled objects, sprayed irritants and tossed fireworks — attacks that continued for hours until officers from the Los Angeles Police Department and the California Highway Patrol quelled the violence. Calling UCLA a 'hotbed of antisemitism' with a 'rampant anti-Jewish environment,' the students sued the UC regents and several school officials in June 2024, alleging that the encampment blocked their access to part of campus, violating their civil rights. The professor later joined the suit. Among the six individual defendants in the case are former UCLA Chancellor Gene D. Block, who stepped down at the end of July 2024; and Michael V. Drake, president of the University of California. The lawsuit alleged that UCLA provided support to pro-Palestinian activists who 'enforced' what it termed a 'Jew Exclusion Zone,' which segregated Jewish students and prevented them from accessing the 'heart of campus,' including lecture halls. It also alleged that the university's 'cowardly abdication of its duty to ensure unfettered access to UCLA's educational opportunities' violated the students' freedom of speech and other rights. UCLA's outlook over the suit dimmed beginning about a year ago, when the federal judge overseeing the case admonished campus leaders for how they handled the encampment. Scarsi ordered the university to ensure equal access to Jewish students. 'In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith,' Scarsi wrote in the order last July. UCLA faced stronger headwinds after the presidential election, as President Trump embarked on a series of high-stakes challenges to higher education institutions by threatening to pull federal research grants over alleged antisemitism. In March, the U.S. Department of Justice filed court documents in support of the students, arguing that UCLA had tried to 'evade liability' for what transpired on campus. The department's 'statement of interest' filing said that the plaintiffs 'were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith,' calling this 'abhorrent to our constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.' In court filings, UCLA lawyers said campus leaders were not responsible for the actions of protesters and that UCLA officials were focused on de-escalation and safety during the encampment. Pro-Palestinian groups also filed briefs in the case, arguing that the encampment was not antisemitic but anti-Zionist and pointing out that a large segment of its members were Jewish. They also alleged that UCLA's actions in response to the case ended up cutting into academic freedom by limiting campus lessons about Palestinians. After the unrest of spring 2024, UCLA and the University of California enacted several major changes related to security and how protests would be handled going forward. Now, protesters cannot block paths or wear masks if it's to conceal their identity while breaking campus rules, and demonstration areas are restricted, among other changes. UCLA also hired LAPD veteran Steve Lurie to lead the new Office of Campus Safety. On Monday, Lurie announced that LAPD veteran Craig Valenzuela would be UCLA's police chief, effective Sept. 1. Valenzuela, a UCLA alumnus who joined the city's police force in 1996, will take over a department that has not had a permanent chief since May 2024, when then-UCLA Police Chief John Thomas was reassigned before resigning in the fall. Thomas faced blame for the police mishandling of violence at the encampment. Although UCLA has increased protest restrictions, added security officers and quickly shut down some pro-Palestinian events since spring 2024, many on campus have said that demonstration policies are unevenly or sporadically enforced. The concern has been repeatedly voiced at UC and campus forums by pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian campus groups. There was another major change on campus: Julio Frenk — whose German Jewish father fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s — becoming chancellor on Jan. 1. Three months later, Frenk banned Students for Justice in Palestine as a campus organization after a protest the group held in front of a UC regent's house that was vandalized. Frenk also launched a campuswide initiative to combat antisemitism. Times staff writer Libor Jany contributed to this report.
Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
How the War of the Words in Gaza Makes It Harder To Save Lives
Under President Joe Biden, when the U.N. and partner agencies appeared close to declaring a famine had taken hold in Gaza, the U.S. officials who wanted to push Israel to limit its attacks and let in more humanitarian aid would get the edge in the debate, two former U.S. officials familiar with the conversations told me. The new pressure on Israel would work, and more food would reach Palestinians. But it meant there was no famine declaration. That then gave the upper hand in the debate to more hawkish U.S. officials, who used the absence of the 'famine' label to argue for going easier on the Israelis. The cycle would then repeat itself, the former officials said. I granted anonymity to many of the people I spoke to so they could be candid about sensitive deliberations and because, in some cases, they need to keep good relations with various governments involved in conflicts. The use of the word 'genocide' in the Gaza conflict has been especially fraught. Almost since the start of the war, pro-Palestinian activists have accused Israel of committing genocide against the people in Gaza. In the many months since, even some genocide scholars have come to the same conclusion. This week, two Israeli human rights groups made the same allegation. 'Genocide' is a legal concept defined by international agreements and, in some countries, national laws. It is generally considered the gravest offense humans can commit against other humans. The intent of an accused perpetrator is a critical factor taken into consideration when jurists try to determine if a genocide took place, and traditionally, the bar has been high for groups to be labeled as victims of genocide. In recent years, however, many groups who have suffered atrocities have laid claim to that word. They include the victims of the Islamic State, the Uyghurs in China, and the Rohingya of Myanmar. Some Ukrainians have alleged Russia is pursuing genocide against them, while Russia counters that Kyiv has engaged in genocide against Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine. Activists who push to use the term 'genocide' often seem to suggest that if any label short of that is used, it means that a group's suffering doesn't matter. This is unfortunate, Malinowski and others say, because other legal terms that could apply, such as 'war crimes' or 'crimes against humanity,' are still very grave offenses whose perpetrators should be held accountable. A government's decision to accuse another country of genocide often comes down to politics. Israel has far broader, deeper support in Washington than countries such as Myanmar or China. It also bears the history of the genocide of the Holocaust, one reason Israeli leaders are infuriated at growing claims that they are waging genocide against the Palestinians. Israeli leaders argue that Hamas' desire to wipe out Israel is itself an attempt at genocide of the Jewish people. Israel also says it is not deliberately attacking the Palestinian people as a whole. But that becomes harder to argue when civilians are dying both from hunger and what critics say is excessive use of force.
Boston Globe
35 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Marjorie Taylor Greene is first Republican lawmaker to call Gaza crisis a ‘genocide'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Greene's comments were a direct rebuke of one Republican colleague in particular, Rep. Randy Fine of Florida, who has drawn intense criticism for comments he made on social media last week calling the images of starving children in Gaza a campaign of 'Muslim terror propaganda.' Advertisement 'Release the hostages,' Fine wrote, adding, 'until then, starve away.' Fine, a first-term lawmaker who has been outspoken in Congress about his Jewish faith and staunchly pro-Israel views, made the remarks the same day that he was elevated to a seat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the influential panel that focuses on international policy. Fine made his comments before President Donald Trump said there was 'real starvation' happening in Gaza and made commitments to offer additional support to increase aid. Advertisement 'That's real starvation stuff -- I see it, and you can't fake that,' Trump said Monday after a series of meetings with European leaders while in Scotland. 'We have to get the kids fed.' Greene had already started to make her pivot before Trump's comments, as had some others in the MAGA movement. 'Standing with Israel means eliminating every barbaric Hamas terrorist,' Rep. Lance Gooden of Texas wrote on social media, in a quote Greene recirculated. 'It also means rejecting the killing and starvation of children in Gaza.' Earlier this month, she said in a statement that: 'Israel bombed the Catholic Church in Gaza, and that entire population is being wiped out as they continue their aggressive war in Gaza.' The remarks were made after a failed bid, led by Greene, to strip $500 million of American military funding that Congress had approved as part of annual defense support for Israel. The effort failed with only six members, two Republicans and four Democrats, voting in favor. That coalition included Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., the only Palestinian American serving in Congress. The pairing of Greene and Tlaib on the effort to revoke the funding, for Israel's Iron Dome weapons system, was an unlikely one. Greene two years ago led a failed effort to censure Tlaib, accusing her of 'antisemitic activity' and 'sympathizing with terrorists' after the Democrat spoke at a pro-Palestinian protest about the 'dehumanizing conditions' in Gaza and called for 'lifting the blockade' against humanitarian aid. On Sunday, Greene posted on social media that she could 'unequivocally say that what happened to innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th was horrific. Just as I can unequivocally say that what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in .
