
Semi driver found guilty in fatal 2020 crash at rural Manitoba highway intersection
Sukhbir Singh was charged with one count of dangerous driving causing death after he drove through a stop sign along Highway 13 in the rural municipality of Grey, about 70 kilometres southwest of Winnipeg, and collided with a pickup truck in February 2020.
He was previously convicted of dangerous driving in this case, but in 2023, an appeal court decided the original trial judge misinterpreted photo evidence, leading to a miscarriage of justice and an unfair trial.
The appeal court overturned Singh's conviction and ordered a new trial.
In a May 14 decision, Associate Chief Justice Shane Perlmutter of the Manitoba Court of King's Bench also found Singh guilty.
Singh was driving a semi-trailer truck south on Highway 13 around 6 a.m. on Feb. 28, 2020, and drove through a stop sign at the Highway 2 intersection, the decision said.
He was working as a delivery driver and had a valid licence to operate a semi-trailer truck.
Road signs indicate that drivers on Highway 13 are required to stop at this intersection, while those on Highway 2 are not, the legal filing said.
Andrew Labossiere, 34, was driving his pickup truck east on Highway 2 and hit Singh's semi on the passenger side as he entered the intersection.
Labossiere's truck was pushed into the southwest ditch and he died.
'Enhanced duty': Crown
The Crown argued commercial semi drivers "owe an enhanced duty" to other road users. The prosecutor said Singh's actions were a "marked departure" from the standard of care expected of a driver in his position, the decision said.
Singh did not testify during the trial. His defence lawyers did not dispute that he had failed to stop at the intersection, nor did they argue that he hit the breaks too late to prevent the collision.
His defence argued that the Crown's case is based on the presence of functioning warning signals — such as flashing lights, visible stop lines and unobstructed rumble strips — but evidence doesn't prove their presence at the time of the accident.
The evidence included in Perlmutter's decision showed the stop sign had a red flashing light, but the flash pattern, wattage and how far it illuminated at the time of the crash were unknown. There is a reflective warning sign 250 metres before the intersection, with two rumble strips on the highway near this point.
Police testified that the road was well-maintained throughout the winter and no ice was on it at the time, the decision said.
The evidence included in Perlmutter's decision says Singh was sober and had gotten enough sleep. Cellphone analysis showed he was on an 18-minute phone call before the crash, but it wasn't clear if he was using a hands-free device.
An accident reconstruction expert testified that Singh was going 85 km/h when the collision happened, and he hit his breaks 1.5 seconds after impact already occurred. The expert said Singh began to react a second before impact, but didn't have enough time or distance to prevent the crash.
While the Crown argued Singh owed a greater duty of care as a semi driver, Perlmutter said it was "unnecessary" to decide on those grounds.
Instead, his decision was based on his view that a "reasonable person" would be "highly attentive to their surroundings" while driving a semi on a dark winter morning.
"Mr. Singh's failure to perceive and react to all of the warnings was a marked departure from the standard of care expected of a reasonable person in Mr. Singh's circumstances," Perlmutter wrote.
The judge said he was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Singh deviated from the level of care owed to other motorists and found Singh guilty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
27 minutes ago
- National Post
NHLPA says acquitted hockey players should get to 'return to work' after sex assault verdict
Five former world junior hockey players acquitted in a high-profile sexual assault case will remain ineligible to play in the NHL, according to the league. This move has drawn backlash from the NHL Players' Association (NHLPA), which says the players deserve to return to work. Article content On Thursday, in a London, Ont., courtroom, Justice Maria Carroccia found Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart and Michael McLeod not guilty, more than seven years after an allegation of group sexual assault emerged involving members of the 2018 Canadian world junior hockey team. Article content Article content Despite the verdict, the players' conduct is still under review, and they are still sidelined according to a statement from the NHL. Article content Article content 'The allegations made in this case, even if not determined to have been criminal, were very disturbing and the behavior at issue was unacceptable,' the league said. 'We will be reviewing and considering the judge's findings. While we conduct that analysis and determine next steps, the players charged in this case are ineligible to play in the League.' Article content The decision drew criticism from the NHL Players' Association, which argued that the league was ignoring due process and overstepping its authority under the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). Article content In a statement, the NHLPA said that the players were acquitted of all charges, and that 'after missing more than a full season of their respective NHL careers, they should now have the opportunity to return to work. Article content 'The NHL's declaration that the Players are 'ineligible' to play pending its further analysis of the Court's findings is inconsistent with the discipline procedures set forth in the CBA.' Article content Article content They added, 'we are addressing this dispute with the League and will have no further comment at this time.' Article content Article content The case first drew major attention in 2022, when Hockey Canada settled a civil case. It resulted in a broader scandal surrounding Hockey Canada, which triggered widespread scrutiny of how sexual violence is handled in sport, the loss of corporate sponsorships, and forced the resignation of top Hockey Canada executives. Article content Since 2022, Hockey Canada has suspended all players involved in the case from sanctioned programming, and those suspensions remain in effect pending the outcome of an internal appeal process. Article content In a lengthy statement, Hockey Canada said it would not comment further due to the ongoing appeal of a previous adjudicative panel decision that had examined whether players breached the organization's code of conduct. Article content 'To ensure that we do not interfere with the integrity of the ongoing appeal … we are not able to comment further at this time,' the statement said.


CTV News
27 minutes ago
- CTV News
Williams Lake crash caught on camera ‘could have been much worse,' police say
This dash cam video provided by the BC Highway Patrol shows a crash involving two drivers who weren't wearing seatbelts, one of them impaired.


CTV News
27 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tesla Cybertruck sustains $3K in damages after man threw rocks at windshield: Edmonton police
The Edmonton Police Service says this man threw rocks at the windshield of a Tesla Cybertruck in Edmonton on July 12, 2025. (Supplied) Edmonton police are searching for a man they say threw rocks at a Tesla Cybertruck earlier this month. The man threw rocks at the windshield of a parked Cybertruck at 11:05 p.m. on July 12, the Edmonton Police Service said. The vandalism resulted in $3,000 in damages, EPS added. Edmonton police released images from the Cybertruck's camera and are asking the public for help to find him. Anyone with information is asked to call police at 780-423-4567 or Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477.