Does Nayib Bukele's campaign against democracy give a blueprint for Trump?
Since president Nayib Bukele launched a sweeping crackdown on gangs, Escobar has advocated for the tens of thousands locked up without due process. She points to a photo of Geovanni Aguirre, a childhood friend and trade unionist who worked in San Salvador's mayor's office. He disappeared into the prison system in 2022.
'The threat is real,' said Escobar. 'There are activists and unionists in prison. There are others with arrest orders out for them. Yes, we are afraid.'
This is the dark side of the 'Bukele model', which extols an ultra hardline approach to crime spearheaded by a populist leader – but also entails an assault on civil society and democratic institutions, and the accumulation of near absolute power. All with soaring approval ratings.
It has made Bukele, 43, the envy of populist authoritarians worldwide, including many in and around the Trump administration. 'President Nayib Bukele saved El Salvador,' TV host Tucker Carlson gushed after interviewing him. 'He may have the blueprint for saving the world.'
But El Salvador's embattled civil society and independent press – the only counterweights to Bukele's power that remain – warn the regime may yet take a still darker turn.
'Bukele still benefits from his popularity, but El Salvador could go the way of Nicaragua, where public opinion has swung against the regime,' said Pedro Cabezas, an environmental defender. 'And then it comes down to military control.'
Fears that Donald Trump might take cues from Bukele spiked last month when he deported more than 200 migrants to Cecot, El Salvador's mega-prison, and then defied the supremecourt when it ordered that his administration 'facilitate' the return of one of them, Kilmar Ábrego García.
Related: The El Salvador mega-prison at the dark heart of Trump immigration crackdown
For Salvadorians, this was reminiscent of Bukele's actions back in 2020, when he defied a supreme court ruling to stop detaining people for violating quarantine during the pandemic.
Some now see this is a turning point.
Over the following years Bukele went on to march the army into the legislature to intimidate lawmakers; fire judges who opposed him; modify the electoral system in his favour; and start a state of exception, suspending Salvadorian's constitutional rights, which shows no sign of ending.
Bukele followed the authoritarian playbook – with great success. Last year Salvadorians voted to give him an unconstitutional second consecutive term.
All of this has to be seen in the context of what life was like under the MS-13 and Barrio 18 gangs, said Amparo Marroquín, a professor at the Central American University. 'The levels of violence were brutal, especially in the poorer neighbourhoods. It paralysed the social life of the country.'
By locking up 85,000 people without due process, many of whom likely have nothing to do with the gangs, Bukele provided a brutal solution. The gangs' territorial control was broken, homicides fell, and many Salvadorians enjoyed a kind of freedom they had not experienced for years.
On the outskirts of San Salvador, one taxi driver pointed to the side of the road. 'The gangs dumped bodies here like it was nothing,' he said. 'Sometimes in pieces, over hundreds of metres.'
'It used to be that every time you left home you ran the risk of being robbed or even killed,' he said. 'The president changed that.'
Bukele has ridden this wave of relief, with approval ratings consistently around 80% – even if this figure masks an undercurrent of fear.
'Around the same number say they would be afraid to express an opinion that was not aligned with the president,' said Noah Bullock, executive director of Cristosal, a human rights organisation. 'And nobody in this country has any doubt that the government can do whatever it wants to whoever it wants.'
One veteran of El Salvador's civil war, who asked not to be named, said he lost a teenage son to a gang shooting in 2010, and that he had been happy to see the gangs brought low.
'But now the soldiers bother us. I don't feel safe, I don't know how to explain it,' he said, searching for the words. 'It's like there are more gangsters with credentials in their hands.'
Now the only counterweights to Bukele's power that remain are civil society organisations and the independent press – and he is turning the screws on both.
Bukele has portrayed both as political enemies working against him and the Salvadorian people, and the message has been faithfully amplified by his media machine.
'Bukele is like an antenna,' said Cabezas, the environmental defender. 'Then there are the repeater antennae: the ministries, the legislative, all the institutions of the state. And then comes the army of trolls.'
At the same time, Bukele pressures civil society through regulations, audits and exemplary persecution, such as in the case of five environmental defenders who were at the forefront of El Salvador's campaign to ban metal mining – which Bukele recently overturned.
'These leaders are known at the national and even international level,' said Cabezas. 'Now, imagine you are someone who doesn't have that kind of profile, and you see the state persecuting them. You'd wonder what they would do to you.'
Cristosal found that 86% of civil society organisations in El Salvador now self-censor to avoid reprisals.
Meanwhile journalists are subject to harassment and targeted with spyware.
'It has become normalised for security forces to demand journalists' phones in the streets, to threaten them with arrest, or even hold them for a time,' said Sergio Arauz, president of El Salvador's association of journalists.
Trump's freezing of USAID, which supported 11 media outlets in El Salvador, and various civil society organisations, was a gift to Bukele.
Yet the government stops short of all-out repression – and journalists continue to produce damaging investigations into corruption and the negotiations Bukele's government held with the gangs.
'I think Bukele understands that there is an international cost if he attacks journalists too much, and the question is whether he is willing to pay that cost,' said Marroquín.
'When you cross that line, there is no going back,' added Marroquín.
When Bukele was in the Oval Office last month, denying that he could return the wrongly deported Ábrego García, Trump was sat next to him, visibly admiring the spin and aggressive handling of the press.
Related: Bukele-mania: El Salvador strongman's crime clampdown excites regional right
'Sometimes they say that we imprisoned thousands,' said Bukele, as he defended his mass incarceration spree. 'I like to say that we actually liberated millions.'
Trump smiled and asked: 'Who gave him that line? Do you think I can use that?'
To what extent Trump wants to emulate the 'Bukele model' is an open question, but it's far from clear Bukele's methods would work in the US, which both lacks a social crisis of the gravity of El Salvador's gangs and still has a range of formal checks on Trump's power, from the independent judiciary to the federal system.
'American democracy is more resilient – but Americans should not take it for granted,' said Juan Pappier of Human Rights Watch. 'Bukele managed to destroy the Salvadoran democracy in two or three years. And putting institutions back to together is a daunting task.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Reforms allowing Bukele to rule El Salvador indefinitely spark criticism
El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, has been condemned by opposition politicians and human-rights groups over recent constitutional reforms which could pave the way for him to rule indefinitely. But despite the criticism the reforms have attracted, they appear to have the backing of the Trump administration, which has rejected parallels between Bukele's government and dictatorships in the Latin America region. A U.S. government spokesperson has defended the decision by El Salvador's legislative assembly to scrap presidential terms. El Salvador's legislative assembly, where Bukele's New Ideas party holds a supermajority of 54 out of 60 seats, on Thursday voted to approve a series of constitutional reforms which could pave the way for Bukele to govern indefinitely. The reforms allow indefinite presidential reelection, extend presidential terms to six years and eliminate run-off elections. The move sparked criticism, with the Washington Office on Latin America saying that the legislative assembly 'has ceased to be an autonomous body and acts fully aligned with the interests of the Executive Branch, without allowing dissent or democratic debate.' Amnesty International has also condemned the reforms. 'This practice seeks to concentrate power in the executive branch and increases the risk of human rights violations and the imposition of future reforms without regard for the population and its rights,' said César Marín, Amnesty's deputy regional director for the Americas. However, a U.S. government spokesperson appeared to dismiss such concerns, telling the Spanish news agency EFE: 'The Legislative Assembly of El Salvador was democratically elected to advance the interests and policies of its constituents. The decision to make constitutional changes is theirs. It is their responsibility to decide how their country should be governed.' The spokesperson added: 'We reject the comparison of El Salvador's democratically based and constitutionally sound legislative process with illegitimate dictatorial regimes elsewhere in our region.' The comments, which have been reposted by Bukele on X, have been criticized by human rights groups. '[This] unqualified endorsement of constitutional reforms that allows Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele to remain in power indefinitely is an affront to anyone, anywhere, who supports democracy and civil rights,' the Latin America Working Group, an advocacy organization, told the Miami Herald. 'It is irrelevant that the legislative assembly passed the reforms—in six hours and without public debate—it doesn't make the President any less of a dictator similar to other regimes in the region,' the group added, describing the Trump administration's. comments as an 'outrage.' The International Federation for Human Rights also expressed concern about the comments. 'Comparing the Salvadoran process favorably to 'dictatorial regimes' elsewhere in the region distracts from the real danger posed by democratic backsliding in El Salvador itself,' the federation said. 'The international community should not ignore signs of autocratization simply because the process is conducted by elected officials. 'FIDH urges the Salvadoran authorities to uphold the rule of law, ensure genuine separation of powers, and preserve the integrity of democratic institutions. We call on international partners to remain vigilant and consistent in defending democratic norms and human rights throughout the region,' the federation added. Bukele won El Salvador's election in a landslide victory last year, receiving over 80% of votes, despite a constitutional ban on immediate reelection. Bukele was allowed to run after the Supreme Court—controlled by his allies—ruled in 2021 that it was his human right to do so. The support from Washington comes amid a notably strong relationship between Bukele and U.S. President Donald Trump. Earlier this year, the Trump administration paid Bukele's government $6 million to detain hundreds of Venezuelan deportees in the country's megaprison known as CECOT, where extreme overcrowding, poor sanitary conditions, and violence have been documented. When the two leaders met at the White House in April, Trump repeatedly praised Bukele for doing a 'fantastic job' and for his 'effective' crackdown on crime, while Bukele lauded Trump for his 'remarkable' efforts to reduce illegal immigration. Trump himself has hinted at running for a third term, despite its being prohibited by the U.S. Constitution. He told NBC in March that there were 'methods' which would allow him to run for a third term, adding: 'I am not joking.' In an interview with CNBC's Squawkbox on Tuesday, Trump conceded that he will 'probably not' seek re-election, though he added: 'I'd like to run,' claiming: 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had.'
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Trump administration arrests 'worst of the worst' criminal illegal immigrants in enforcement sweep
Immigration agents on Tuesday arrested some of the "worst of the worst" illegal immigrant criminals across the country, as the Trump administration continues to target criminal illegal immigrants for deportation. At least five men arrested had convictions for various offenses. "Every one of these men left a victim behind – scarred, addicted, terrified and worse," said Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. "The Biden administration turned a blind eye. Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, we're taking these lowlifes off the streets. DHS will continue to swiftly arrest, detain, and remove the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens— Americans deserve to feel safe in their own country." Tuesday's arrests include Cristian Brayan Aleman-Leiva, from El Salvador, who has convictions in Virginia for possession of a firearm, concealed weapon and petit larceny. Jose Javier Romero-Hernandez, a Mexican citizen, was convicted of first-degree burglary, domestic assault and battery by strangulation, domestic assault with a dangerous weapon, threatening an act of violence, and malicious injury or destruction of property in Oklahoma. In Texas, Juan Ignacio Amaya-Hernandez, also from Mexico, was convicted of indecency with a child, authorities said. Elin Edicson Ochoa-Hernandez, from Honduras, has a conviction in Texas for alien smuggling. Manuel De Jesus Lopez-Marroquin, from Guatemala, was convicted in New Jersey of distribution of heroin, possession of a controlled dangerous substance, and hindering. The Trump administration has ramped up operations targeting illegal immigrants with criminal records, particularly in cities like Los Angeles, where local officials have demanded the raids stop. "In L.A., we have been going after the worst of the worst," Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said during a June appearance on "Hannity." "They're murders. They're people who've been perpetuating assault, trafficking human beings and drugs and been devastating these communities for years." "Those are the people we're going after," she added.
Washington Post
5 hours ago
- Washington Post
U.S. plans to ease human rights criticism of El Salvador, Israel, Russia
Leaked drafts of the State Department's long-delayed annual human rights reports indicate that the Trump administration intends to dramatically scale back U.S. government criticism of certain foreign nations with extensive records of abuse. The draft human rights reports for El Salvador, Israel and Russia, copies of which were reviewed by The Washington Post, are significantly shorter than the ones prepared last year by the Biden administration. They strike all references to LGBTQ individuals or crimes against them, and the descriptions of government abuses that do remain have been softened. The draft report for El Salvador, which, at the Trump administration's urging, has agreed to incarcerate migrants deported from the United States, states that the country had 'no credible reports of significant human rights abuses' in 2024. The State Department's previous report for El Salvador, documenting 2023, identified 'significant human rights issues' there — including government-sanctioned killings, instances of torture, and 'harsh and life-threatening prison conditions.' Several Venezuelans whom the Trump administration sent to the Salvadoran prison said they were subjected to repeated beatings. The leaked draft reports for El Salvador, Israel and Russia underscore how the Trump administration is radically rethinking America's role in global human rights advocacy. The documents also are consistent with internal guidance circulated earlier this year by State Department leaders who advised staff to truncate the reports to the minimum required by statutory guidelines and executive orders signed by President Donald Trump, and to remove references to government corruption, gender-based crimes and other abuses the U.S. government historically has documented. The State Department declined to address questions about the leaked documents reviewed by The Post. 'The 2024 Human Rights report has been restructured in a way that removes redundancies, increases report readability and is more responsive to the legislative mandate that underpins the report,' a senior State Department official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to brief the news media, said Wednesday. 'The human rights report focuses on core issues.' This official said the Trump administration would bring a new focus to some issues, including backsliding on freedom of expression in some countries allied with the United States, even as the administration has itself faced criticism on free-speech grounds for seeking to deport foreigners studying in the United States who have criticized Israel's conduct in Gaza. U.S. diplomats have compiled the State Department's annual human rights reports for almost 50 years. Their findings are considered the most thorough and wide-ranging of their kind and are routinely relied upon by courts inside and outside the United States. The human rights reports are congressionally mandated to be sent to lawmakers by the end of February. Public release typically happens in March or April. The State Department is yet to officially release this year's reports, which cover activities and observations made in 2024. Current and former U.S. officials say most of this year's reports were nearly completed when the Biden administration transitioned out in January. The drafts for El Salvador and Russia are marked 'finalized,' while the draft for Israel is marked 'quality check.' All were edited in the last few days, the documents show. It is unclear whether the reports eventually transmitted to Congress and released to the public will mirror the drafts. The internal guidance circulated by State Department leaders earlier this year instructed diplomats responsible for drafting reports to remove references to numerous potential human rights violations, including governments that had deported people to a country where they could face torture, crimes that involve violence against LGBTQ people and government corruption. The internal guidance was written by Samuel Samson, a Trump political appointee at the State Department. Samson, initially little known in Foggy Bottom, attracted attention after writing an article for the agency's Substack in May criticizing Europe for what he alleged was the continent's descent into 'a hotbed of digital censorship, mass migration, restrictions on religious freedom, and numerous other assaults on democratic self-governance.' Samson was tasked with reviewing the country reports for El Salvador, Israel and Russia. While all three reports continue to describe human rights abuses in those countries, each was whittled down considerably from a year before and all bear significant changes to the language used to describe alleged abuses. The draft prepared for Israel, for instance, is 25 pages long; last year's report was more than 100 pages. Meanwhile, a comparison of the documents covering El Salvador shows the Trump administration downplaying the country's history of prison violence, emphasizing that there has been a reduction overall while stating that purported deaths were under government review. Trump has expressed fondness for El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, and hosted him in the Oval Office earlier this year after the administration secured an agreement to deport people to the country's notorious CECOT megaprison. The Salvadoran Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Scrutiny of corruption and judicial independence also is significantly scaled back in the draft report for Israel. The 2023 report compiled by the Biden administration addresses the corruption trial of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, another of Trump's international allies, and judicial overhaul efforts, which critics say threatens the independence of the country's judiciary. The Trump administration's draft report for Israel makes no mention of corruption or threats to the independence of Israel's judiciary. Previous human rights reports also have mentioned Israeli surveillance of Palestinians and restrictions of their movement, including an Amnesty International finding on Israel's use of 'experimental facial recognition system to track Palestinians and enforce movement restrictions.' This issue is not addressed in the draft report either. The Israeli Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The draft reports examined by The Post contain no reference to gender-based violence or violence against LGBTQIA people. Keifer Buckingham, who worked on these issues at the State Department until January, said it was a 'glaring omission' in the case of Russia, where the country's Supreme Court had banned LGBTQIA organizations and labeled them 'extremist,' with raids and arrests last year. The Russian Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Buckingham chastised Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who as a U.S. senator for many years was a vocal defender of human rights. 'Secretary Rubio has repeatedly asserted that his State Department has not abandoned human rights, but it is clear by this and other actions that this administration only cares about the human rights of some people … in some countries, when it's convenient to them,' said Buckingham, who now works as managing director at the Council for Global Quality. During his time on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Rubio praised the State Department's annual human rights reports. In 2012, he said 'the world has been a better place [for two centuries] because America has strived to defend these fundamental human rights both at home and abroad.' 'The State Department's annual human rights report sheds light on foreign governments' failure to respect their citizens' fundamental rights,' he said a statement then, adding that it was important for the world to know that 'the United States will stand with freedom-seeking people around the world and will not tolerate violations against their rights.' U.S. officials have repeatedly pointed to a speech given by Trump during a visit to the Middle East in May as an example of the new way Washington relates to the world, with an emphasis on sovereignty over universal rights. Speaking in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Trump had criticized 'Western interventionists … giving you lectures on how to live or how to govern your own affairs.' This shift of the U.S. role in promoting human rights has coincided with a change in U.S. promotion of democracy. In a cable sent in July, Rubio instructed diplomats to no longer publicly comment on other countries' elections, including making an assessment of whether the election was 'free and fair,' unless there is a 'clear and compelling U.S. foreign policy interest to do so.' The move was a shift from long-standing U.S. practice — even under Rubio himself. The secretary had personally congratulated world leaders in Trinidad and Tobago and Ecuador for conducting 'free and fair' elections since January. Last month, the Trump administration tightened sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, stepping up a feud with the Brazilian government for the prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally, for his alleged role in a violent coup plot in 2022. In announcing those sanctions, the U.S. Treasury Department invoked the Magnitsky Act, a law that allows the American government to impose penalties on foreign nationals accused of corruption and human rights violations. In a statement, Rubio said that Moraes had committed 'serious human rights abuse, including arbitrary detention involving flagrant denials of fair trial guarantees and violations of the freedom of expression.' Moraes has said that the court would not yield to foreign pressure, but on Wednesday eased some house arrest restrictions on Bolsonaro. Clara Ence Morse and Meg Kelly contributed to this report.
