Opinion - Four months in, Trump is cementing his legacy for better or worse
After only four months in office, the outlines of Donald Trump's legacy to the country are already emerging.
George Washington's legacy was as the father of his country. Abraham Lincoln was remembered for preserving the nation after a wrenching civil war. Even Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal took time to implement.
Donald Trump, in contrast, is in a hurry.
The first convicted felon (for the right or wrong reasons) to serve as president, his legacy is set in advance by the many charges and allegations he has faced, including two impeachments. Combined with what appears to be huge conflicts of interest in how he and his family have accumulated great wealth from his time as president, the standards of conduct have surely been corrupted.
The Trump family business is earning billions in new contracts in the Middle East arising from Trump's visit there — an impressive public relations success. If Jared Kushner had been anyone else's son-in-law, would the Saudis have given his fund some $2 billion and potential access to some of the possibly $1 trillion in U.S. investment being discussed with Riyadh?
Trump may accuse former President Joe Biden of leading a 'crime family.' But even if that were true, the monies would be pitiful compared with what Trump is raking in.
Bitcoin and crypto have been huge windfalls in which investors have been promised or received ringside seats at Trump events.
The parade celebrating the Army's 250th anniversary is estimated to cost at least $45 million. It coincides with Trump's 79th birthday, making people wonder about the real reason for the spectacle. And donors will reportedly receive special attention during the parade through a 'VIP experience.'
Even if it violates all perceptions of conflicts of interest, none of this may be illegal or a crime. However, if a president is gaining so much wealth — or at least if his family is for the time being — how will future presidents behave?
The old expression of coming to Washington to 'do good and end up doing well' has been elevated by orders of magnitude.
In terms of foreign policy, Trump has been everywhere. Although negotiations over Gaza failed, in that Israel has increased the scale of violence by occupying much of the strip, the others are in flux.
Trump took credit for the Indo-Pakistani cease-fire after terrorist attacks in Kashmir, attributed to Islamabad, provoked Indian and then Pakistani retaliation. But negotiations over ending the Ukraine War and preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons are far from settled, despite the administration's very optimistic reports.
Will this act of diplomacy serve as a catalyst or a deterrent to future presidents? On the one hand, activism can be positive. On the other hand, if it fails — and it may well — new administrations and Congress will take note.
But perhaps most significant to Trump's legacy is what he has done in expanding executive power and in perhaps irreversibly changing the Republican Party to the MAGA party.
The flurry of executive orders has challenged the system in terms of volume and tests of the Constitution. Birthright status for citizenship and constraints in applying due process to individuals who are in the country illegally are among the most politically visible. However, tariffs and cutting banking regulations could have far more profound economic effects.
The Savings and Loan banking crises of the 1990s and the 2007 to 2008 financial meltdown, which were caused by a failure to oversee and regulate financial instruments that became monetary weapons of mass destruction, must not be forgotten. And the 1929 financial collapse, likewise, allowed the purchase of stocks on margin, turning debt into a time bomb.
In American politics, Trump has accelerated the negative trends of distrusting the government and the collapse of civility and compromise on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue — both of which have been in play since the Vietnam War. The bile and anger that both sides of the political aisle express are grave threats to the republic and possibly impenetrable barriers to restoring decency and competence to governing.
Clearly, these failings were in place long before Trump. He did not cause them. But he surely exploited and intensified them.
What's next?
It may well be that Trump tries to win a third term. He could run as vice president, much like Russian President Vladimir Putin ceded the presidency to Dmitri Medvedev for a term, but not the reins of power.
Whether this is constitutional or not, it could be the most lasting legacy of the Trump era. We will see.
Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at Washington, D.C.'s Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He is co-author of the forthcoming book, 'The Arc of Failure: Can Decisive Strategic Thinking Transform a Dangerous World.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk
Federal officials at NASA and the Pentagon moved swiftly this week to urge competitors to Elon Musk's SpaceX to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft after President Donald Trump threatened to cancel Space X's contracts and Musk's defiant response. Government officials were especially stunned after Musk responded to Trump with a salvo of his own: SpaceX would stop flying its Dragon spacecraft, a move that would leave the space agency with no way to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings
Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings originally appeared on TheStreet. Now that was a real lulu. The dictionary tells us that the slang term "lulu", which dates to the 1850s, can be used to describe a person or thing "outstanding for some quality." 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰 That quality can be positive or negative, and for Lululemon () it translated into about 5 pounds of oy vey in a two-pound bag. Shares of the Vancouver athleisure giant nosedived on June 6 after it beat Wall Street's first-quarter-earnings expectations but slashed its full-year guidance, citing a 'dynamic macroenvironment' that included increased competition and the impact of the Trump administration's tariffs. "The current tariff paradigm has brought uncertainty into the retail environment," Chief Executive Calvin McDonald told analysts during the earnings call. "As consumers try to assess the impact they will have on daily life, as businesses evaluate these impacts as well, I believe we are better positioned than most to navigate the near term while also maintaining our focus on investing in our growth potential over the long term," he added. Chief Financial Officer Meghan Frank said Lululemon estimated a thinner operating margin, which measures profitability by dividing a company's operating income by its net sales for the full year. It now expects a narrowing of 1.6 percentage points, compared with the previous estimate of 1 point, "all driven by the net impact of tariffs." More Retail Stocks: Halloween retailer sounds warning consumers need to hear Target expands same-day delivery to 100s of retailers Walmart makes surprise cuts as it looks at tariff price hikes "We are planning to take strategic price increases, looking item by item across our assortment as we typically do, and it will be price increases on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature," she said. Comparable sales in the quarter rose 1% from a year earlier, missing analysts' forecasts calling for a 3% increase. The result reflects a 2% decrease in the Americas and a 6% increase internationally. "We're definitely not happy where the growth is in the U.S., but relative to the market and our performance versus others, pleased that we're putting on share, pleased with the reaction to the newness and with the mix of newness that's coming," McDonald said. Lululemon is known for advanced athletic apparel, particularly its workout leggings, and it is said to use "holistic guerrilla marketing" to make customers feel that they are part of a community. In April, President Donald Trump unleashed a broad range of tariffs that he has since paused and rebooted several times, causing widespread confusion among companies and consumers and in the markets. Several retailers have reduced or withdrawn their guidance and indicated that they would raise prices due to the uncertainty surrounding the tariff regime. Meanwhile, Trump said that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick would travel to London along with U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer on June 9 for renewed trade talks with China, adding that "the meeting should go very well."Lululemon's stock sank nearly 20% on June 6. The shares are off 31% in 2025 and down roughly 18% from a year earlier. Several investment firms issued research reports on Lululemon following the earnings report, including Needham, which lowered its price target to $317 from $366 and affirmed a buy rating on the shares, according to The Fly. The company posted fairly lackluster Q1 results, though the selloff in the stock seems "aggressive" relative to the size of management's guidance cut, the investment firm said. That's particularly since the guidance reduction is mostly tariff-driven, and also considers that management struck an encouraging tone about how new products are performing, Needham said. Lululemon's domestic business remains sluggish, however, while international comparable-sales growth slowed in Q1, likely raising questions about the growth algorithm going forward, Needham added. Telsey Advisory analyst Dana Telsey pared the firm's price target on Lululemon to $360 from $385 and maintained an outperform rating. The Q1 results "nicely topped" the Wall Street consensus and the company's guidance, Telsey said. Consumers continue to respond well to newness and new-product launches, Tesley added. BMO Capital lowered its price target on Lululemon to $250 from $302 and maintained a market-perform rating. The company reported what the investment firm called a slight top- and bottom-line beat to estimates, with better gross margins partly offset by a miss of estimates for selling, general and administrative expense. But looking ahead, BMO Capital said, management guided in Q2 "materially below" estimates and pared the fiscal 2025 outlook for gross margin and earnings due to tariffs and markdowns. This marks the first time the company has lowered its fiscal-year earnings forecast at Q1 since fiscal 2014, BMO Capital analysts reboot stock price target after earnings first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
The White House is challenging the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's assessment that President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending package will raise the federal deficit by trillions of dollars throughout the next decade. The national debt, currently $36.2 trillion, tracks what the U.S. owes its creditors, while the national deficit measures how much the federal government's spending exceeds its revenues. So far, the federal government has spent more than $1 trillion more than it has collected this fiscal year, according to the Department of the Treasury. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued an analysis Wednesday predicting that the so-called "big, beautiful, bill" the House passed in May would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. But according to the White House, the CBO's analysis is based on a faulty premise because it assumes that Republicans in Congress will fail to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Rather, the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) forecasts that the tax and spending measures would independently reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion. Senate Weighs Trump's 'Big, Beautiful, Bill' As Policy Group Backs Cbo, Projects $3 Trillion Debt Increase Read On The Fox News App Additionally, the White House argues that the measure, coupled with other initiatives like tariffs and other spending cuts, will lead to reducing the deficit by at least $6.6 trillion over 10 years. The "big, beautiful, bill" has faced criticism from figures including SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who labeled the measure an "abomination" and argued that the bill would increase the federal deficit. The measure now heads to the Senate, where lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-K.Y., have voiced opposition to the legislation. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Resistance From Republican Senators Over Debt Fears Meanwhile, OMB Director Russell Vought told lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee Wednesday that he believed the CBO's analysis was "fundamentally wrong." "It will lead to reduced deficits and debt of $1.4 trillion," Vought said. "It will reduce mandatory savings of $1.7 trillion. I don't think the way they construct their baseline, not only does it not give a fair shake to economic growth, but it fundamentally misreads the economic consequences of not extending the current tax relief." Failure to pass Trump's tax package would trigger a recession, according to Vought. "We'll have a recession," Vought told lawmakers. "The economic storm clouds will be very dark. I think we'll have a 60% tax increase on the American people." Meanwhile, the White House has accused the CBO of employing those who've contributed to Democratic campaigns, even though CBO Director Phillip Swagel served in former President George W. Bush's administration. Price Tag Estimate For House Gop Tax Package Rises To $3.94T "I don't think many people know this: There hasn't been a single staffer in the entire Congressional Budget Office that has contributed to a Republican since the year 2000," Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. "But guess what, there have been many staffers within the Congressional Budget Office who have contributed to Democratic candidates and politicians every single cycle since. So unfortunately, this is an institution in our country that has become partisan and political." The CBO director is appointed according to the recommendations of the House and Senate Budget Committees. Then-Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming, first recommended Swagel in 2019, and then Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, recommended Swagel again in 2023. The CBO did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital on OMB's analysis or claims from the White House about the office being full of staffers who've backed Democrats. Fox News' Deirdre Heavey contributed to this report. Original article source: Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
