Irish immigration officials refuse 265 Palestinian visa applications since 7 October attacks
Figures from the Department of Justice show that 1,249 visa applications by Palestinians were made between 1 October 2023 and 30 June of this year.
They include 851 applications for
short-stay C visas
, which allow people to stay in Ireland for up to three months, and 398 applications for
longer-term D visas
, which allow people to work or settle permanently in Ireland and to apply for a residence permit.
According to the figures, 445 Palestinians have been granted C visas since October 2023 while 208 Palestinians have been refused; and a further 288 Palestinians have been granted D visas during the same time-frame, while 57 Palestinians have been refused.
The issue of visas for Palestinians has made headlines in recent weeks
after
The Journal
reported
that visas were refused for dozens of Palestinians from the West Bank who were due to travel to Ireland for a GAA tour this month.
Advertisement
GAA Palestine had plans in place for 47 Palestinians to travel here, including 33 children aged between 9 and 16 years of age.
A total of 152 families in Ireland had signed up to host the group as they were to travel around Ireland.
The figures provided by the Department do not include those for the GAA Palestine group, as they only cover successful applications and refusals up to the end up June.
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan this week rejected criticism from GAA Palestine regarding his department's handling of their visa applications,
insisting that their applications had been assessed
'fairly and accurately'.
'No matter who you are, you have to comply with the immigration rules,' he said. 'I'm not going to change those rules simply because there is media pressure put on me.'
Citizens of Palestine are required to have a valid Irish entry visa before they seek to enter the State.
However, a number of Palestinians have also claimed asylum in Ireland in recent years. This week, Cabinet heard that there were 957 international protection applications by Palestinians in 2024, though the figure dropped to just 65 applications in the first six months of 2025.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
16 minutes ago
- The Journal
Michael Flatley is seeking a nomination for president, High Court told
RIVERDANCE STAR MICHAEL Flatley is to seek a nomination to become Ireland's next president, the High Court has heard. The choreographer's barrister made the announcement during a High Court case he has taken in relation to works carried out at his mansion in Co Cork, the Castlehyde. Barrister Ronnie Hudson notified the court of a 'material change in circumstances' for Flatley, and said he is to move back to Ireland within the next 14 days and look to run in the presidential election this autumn. An affidavit, signed by Flatley's solicitor Maxwell Mooney, was submitted to the court stating that the Irish-American is 'to seek nominations to run for president of Ireland'. Advertisement Only earlier this month , Flatley had been coy about the possibility about standing for president but said he had not made a final decision. The Lord Of The Dance star, who is a duel American and Irish citizen, had told RTÉ Radio One's Brendan O'Connor that he had been approached by many people who asked about his intentions to run. At that point he had 'not made the decision' but said the idea of standing for president was something he 'takes seriously'. 'If I thought that I could be of benefit to the Irish people and maybe more importantly, if I thought I could be a voice of the Irish people. Right now, I don't think they have a voice, not a true proper deep voice that you know that speaks their language,' Flatley told the radio programme. Flatley said he hears concerns from the 'average person on the street' and they are not 'happy right now'. 'Somebody has to speak for the Irish people,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
RTÉ News
16 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Why is France recognising Palestinian statehood and who else has?
French President Emmanuel Macron has announced he will recognise Palestinian statehood, drawing angry rebukes from Israel and the United States and opening the door for other major nations like Britain and Canada, to perhaps follow suit. Below are some details about Mr Macron's announcement, driven by a rising global outcry over starvation and devastation in Gaza amid Israel's war against Hamas militants, as well as other nations' position on having Palestinian statehood recognised. What did Macron say? Mr Macron published a letter sent to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas confirming France's intention to press ahead with recognition and work to convince other partners to do the same. He said he would make a formal announcement at the United Nations General Assembly next month. France is now the first major Western country to shift its diplomatic stance on a Palestinian state, after Spain, Ireland, and Norway officially recognised one last year. Why is this significant? The decision to recognise Palestinian statehood is mostly symbolic, with Israel occupying the territories where the Palestinians have long aimed to establish that state in the West Bank and Gaza with East Jerusalem as its capital. But the move by France, which is home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, could fuel a movement so far dominated by smaller nations generally more critical of Israel. It also makes Israel appear more isolated on the international stage over the war in Gaza, which is suffering from a wave of hunger that the World Health Organization's chief said this week amounts to man-made mass starvation. Israel said it is committed to allowing aid into Gaza, but must control it to prevent it being diverted by militants. It said it has let enough food into Gaza during the war and blames Hamas for the suffering of Gaza's 2.2 million people. Why did Macron do this? Mr Macron had been leaning towards the move for months as part of a bid to keep the idea of a two-state solution alive, despite the pressure not to do so. He decided to do it ahead of a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia on the matter next week to try to sway other countries considering that step, or those that are wavering. What impact could it have on French ties with Israel Ahead of Mr Macron's announcement, Israeli officials had spent months lobbying to prevent what some had called "a nuclear bomb" for bilateral relations. Sources familiar with the matter say Israel's warnings to France had ranged from scaling back intelligence-sharing to complicating Paris' regional initiatives - even hinting at possible annexation of parts of the West Bank. Who could be next? France's decision may put pressure on major countries like Britain, Germany, Australia, Canada and Japan to take the same path. In the immediate term, Malta and Belgium could be the next countries within the European Union to do so. A British cabinet minister said today that Britain supports eventual recognition of a Palestinian state, but the immediate priority should be alleviating the suffering in Gaza and securing a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Germany said today it was not planning to recognise Palestinian statehood in the short term, rather its priority was to make "long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution – Israel and a Palestinian state co-existing in peace. Who else has recognised Palestinian statehood? Last year, Ireland, Norway and Spain recognised a Palestinian state with its borders to be demarcated as they were prior to the 1967 Middle East war, when Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. However, they also recognised that those borders may change in any eventual talks to reach a final settlement, and that their decisions did not diminish their belief in Israel's fundamental right to exist in peace and security. About 144 of the 193 member states of the United Nations recognise Palestine as a state, including most of the global south as well as Russia, China and India. But only a handful of the 27 European Union members do so, mostly former Communist countries as well as Sweden and Cyprus. The UN General Assembly approved the de facto recognition of the sovereign state of Palestine in November 2012 by upgrading its observer status at the world body to "non-member state" from "entity". How did the United States, Israel, and Palestinians react? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the decision by France, one of Israel's closest allies and a G7 member, saying such a move "rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy". Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz described it as "a disgrace and a surrender to terrorism". He added that Israel would not allow the establishment of a "Palestinian entity that would harm our security, endanger our existence". US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States "strongly rejects (Mr Macron's) plan to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly". "This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace," Mr Rubio posted on X. "It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th" - a reference to Hamas' 2023 cross-border attack on Israel that set off the Gaza war. Thanking France, the Palestinian Authority's Vice President Hussein Al Sheikh said Mr Macron's decision reflected "France's commitment to international law and its support for the Palestinian people's rights to self-determination and the establishment of our independent state". The Palestine Liberation Organization recognised Israel's right to exist in peace at the start of the US-backed peace process in 1993 that set up the Palestinian Authority in what Palestinians hoped would be a stepping stone towards statehood. But Hamas and other Palestinian Islamist militants who have long dominated Gaza and frequently clash with Israeli forces in the West Bank reject recognition of Israel.
Irish Times
28 minutes ago
- Irish Times
A conversation begins: How Israelis view Gaza's unfolding hunger crisis
The top headline in Friday's left-leaning Ha'artez daily newspaper was 'The Hunger Disgrace'. The article, which noted that 45 people have died in Gaza this week due to Israel's 'starvation policy', was accompanied by a harrowing photograph of a Gaza mother clutching her undernourished 18-month-old child. Until recently, Ha'aretz was the only mainstream Israeli media outlet giving prominence to the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza . However, a week ago this began to change. A reporter for Israel's most popular TV channel, Channel 12, posted a screenshot of a dialogue among the station's journalists, debating the question of the coverage (or, more accurately, lack of coverage) of the growing hunger in Gaza. The gist of the exchange was that although Israel's military censor imposes no restrictions on such coverage, self-censorship by almost all Israeli journalists, motivated by the need for patriotic coverage in a time of war, has prevented stories of starvation from reaching the Israeli public. The feeling was that such coverage would somehow undermine the war effort and public morale and boost Hamas's manipulation of the humanitarian crisis for its own ends, turning world public opinion against Israel. Many of the hostages who have been released have told stories of how they were starved by their Hamas captors, and some journalists argued that it would be inappropriate or even offensive to talk about the starvation of the Gaza population when food is deliberately withheld from the hostages. Posters of Israeli hostages being held in Gaza displayed outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC. Photograph:The background to these exchanges is the fact that the overwhelming majority of Israelis continue to see Hamas as solely responsible for the suffering of the Gaza population and everything that has happened in the last 21 months. Images of Gaza civilians crossing the border to loot border kibbutz communities and angry mobs surrounding the hostages on the streets of Gaza on October 7th have had a deep impact on Israeli public opinion. This was compounded by a number of hostages relating how their captors ordered them to whisper while in captivity, fearing that if local residents discovered their whereabouts, they would be lynched. Some 64 per cent of Israelis believe that 'there are no innocents' in Gaza, according to a survey published by Jerusalem Hebrew university's aChord Centre last month. This figure rose to 87 per cent among supporters of Israel's ruling coalition. The poll also examined public attitudes toward media coverage of the war in Gaza. It found that 64 per cent of Israelis said domestic media coverage was balanced and did not require broader reporting on the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian enclave. Among coalition voters, 89 per cent held that view, but among opposition voters, only 44 per cent agreed, with 56 per cent of the latter calling for broader coverage. The revelations of the internal debate among Channel 12 journalists opened up the floodgates and this past week, for the first time, the Gaza hunger issue was extensively reported on the daily news programmes and in the print media, often ahead of the ongoing war coverage and ceasefire contacts. The main debate centred on the claims of starvation and the reliability of the statistics put out by the Hamas-controlled health ministry and local NGOs, who many Israelis believe work in tandem with Hamas. Samah Matar holds her son Yousef (6) north of Gaza City on Thursday. Yousef has cerebral palsy and severe malnutrition. He weighed about 29 pounds before the war but now weighs about 20 pounds. Photograph: Saher Alghorra/The New York Times The second question now being openly discussed is Israel's responsibility for the humanitarian crisis. The almost daily casualties at the food distribution centres are reported along with the fact that not enough food is entering the enclave, but Israel is not automatically blamed for this. Prominence is given to the Israeli military claims that hundreds of food lorries are ready on the Gaza border to make deliveries but the humanitarian NGOs are unable or unwilling to assume responsibility for the operation. And the claim that Hamas loots the trucks and stores large amounts of aid in its warehouses is also reported extensively. In recent weeks protests have increased by groups calling for the war to end. A small but vocal group of anti-war protesters have always been a feature of the weekly demonstrations calling for the release of the hostages but many of them are veteran left-wing activists and the protest organisers were concerned that their presence would undermine the mainstream consensus that overwhelmingly supports a deal that will bring home the remaining 50 hostages, 20 of whom are believed to be alive. Increasingly, as the war has dragged on with no end in sight, the two groups have merged and the placards with images of dead or starving Gazan children are now more prominent. The most fervent anti-war protests are organised by Israeli Arabs but a small number of Jewish radicals also participate. In the mixed Jewish-Arab city of Haifa, police arrested 24 protesters at one such gathering this week. Hundreds of Israelis gather in Tel Aviv, marching and protesting against the Israeli government, accusing it of starving Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Photograph: Ori Aviram / Middle East Images via AFP Police described those arrested as rioters, saying they 'did not respond to officers' orders, held up signs and chanted slogans against Israel's actions in the war in Gaza'.
