Irish immigration officials refuse 265 Palestinian visa applications since 7 October attacks
Figures from the Department of Justice show that 1,249 visa applications by Palestinians were made between 1 October 2023 and 30 June of this year.
They include 851 applications for
short-stay C visas
, which allow people to stay in Ireland for up to three months, and 398 applications for
longer-term D visas
, which allow people to work or settle permanently in Ireland and to apply for a residence permit.
According to the figures, 445 Palestinians have been granted C visas since October 2023 while 208 Palestinians have been refused; and a further 288 Palestinians have been granted D visas during the same time-frame, while 57 Palestinians have been refused.
The issue of visas for Palestinians has made headlines in recent weeks
after
The Journal
reported
that visas were refused for dozens of Palestinians from the West Bank who were due to travel to Ireland for a GAA tour this month.
Advertisement
GAA Palestine had plans in place for 47 Palestinians to travel here, including 33 children aged between 9 and 16 years of age.
A total of 152 families in Ireland had signed up to host the group as they were to travel around Ireland.
The figures provided by the Department do not include those for the GAA Palestine group, as they only cover successful applications and refusals up to the end up June.
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan this week rejected criticism from GAA Palestine regarding his department's handling of their visa applications,
insisting that their applications had been assessed
'fairly and accurately'.
'No matter who you are, you have to comply with the immigration rules,' he said. 'I'm not going to change those rules simply because there is media pressure put on me.'
Citizens of Palestine are required to have a valid Irish entry visa before they seek to enter the State.
However, a number of Palestinians have also claimed asylum in Ireland in recent years. This week, Cabinet heard that there were 957 international protection applications by Palestinians in 2024, though the figure dropped to just 65 applications in the first six months of 2025.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Simon Harris ‘eager' to progress trade talks to avoid further tariffs
Tánaiste Simon Harris has said he is 'eager' to see further progress on trade talks around certain sectors, including the drinks industry, as a wave of US tariffs takes effect. Mr Harris said that while some areas have been agreed as exempt from tariffs between the European Union and the US, he wants to 'tease through the detail' of other areas, citing the pharma sector in particular. US President Donald Trump's tariffs took effect from Thursday, with exporters in Ireland facing a new 15% rate applying to imports to the US. There is huge potential and scope for the EU and the US to work together in the interests of patients, their economies, and the pharma industry It is not yet clear whether the drinks industry will be exempt from the new wave of tariffs. The Tanaiste said it is 'absolutely essential' to maximise the number of areas that can apply zero-for-zero tariffs. 'Whilst there are some areas that have already been agreed as exempt from tariffs between the US and the EU, I'm very eager to see more progress made in more areas, including for the drinks industry, which is an important part of the Irish economy,' Mr Harris said in a statement on Thursday. 'We'll also need to continue to work in the time ahead to tease through the detail in relation to particular sectors. 'From a pharma point of view, my position remains the same, as does the position of the European Union. 'There is huge potential and scope for the EU and the US to work together in the interests of patients, their economies, and the pharma industry. 'In many ways, the EU and the US are interdependent when it comes to pharma. In the very first instance, it's vital that the US keeps its agreement in terms of a tariff rate of no higher than 15% on the pharma industry. 'But actually, in the time ahead, it's important that we seek to further improve that. US pharma companies need to have a base in the European Union – and Ireland has been a very constructive, very good home for those businesses. They've done very well in Ireland. Freight trucks at Rosslare Europort in Co Wexford, Ireland (Niall Carson/PA) 'We need to continue to make sure that nothing happens that causes disruption to the industry or to global supply chains. So, there's much work to do in the weeks and months ahead. 'We also must continue to control what we can control and continue to make our country, and our European Union, as competitive as possible, as good a location as possible to invest in and create jobs. 'We must also look for other opportunities to diversify markets for Irish business. While we want to continue to do business with the US and indeed want to grow business. It is important that we take every opportunity to identify new markets.' He said the Government will publish a new Market Diversification Action Plan this month.
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Netanyahu to convene security cabinet as Israel plans full occupation of Gaza
ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu is reportedly pushing ahead with plans for a full military occupation of Gaza, defying mounting opposition and warnings over the escalating humanitarian disaster. Netanyahu is expected to present the plan to his security cabinet later today, after holding closed-door consultations with senior security officials, including Defence Minister Israel Katz and military chief Eyal Zamir. Israeli media have reported that the proposal would see Israeli forces take full control of the Gaza Strip, reversing the 2005 withdrawal that ended permanent military and settler presence there. The move comes as ceasefire talks with Hamas have stalled and humanitarian conditions in Gaza deteriorate further. Israel has waged war on Gaza since October 2023 and killed more than 60,000 people in the process, most of them women and children. In the past week alone, at least 80 people were killed by Israeli strikes, and eight more reportedly died of starvation. The EU and the UN have both warned that an expansion of Israel's military campaign would worsen what they describe as an unfolding famine in the besieged territory. Despite growing global pressure to reach a ceasefire and widespread outrage over images of starving children, Netanyahu remains undeterred. Reports suggest he is preparing to escalate the assault even further . Israel says it controls more than 75% of Gaza already. Netanyahu argues a full occupation is necessary to defeat Hamas and free the remaining Israeli hostages. But Israeli critics warn that a full-scale invasion could endanger the hostages still held in Gaza. Israeli opposition At least 50 hostages remain in Gaza, with Israeli officials believing only 20 are still alive. Their families and many former senior military leaders have warned that any full-scale offensive would likely result in their deaths. Advertisement Israelis protest against the government for the return of the hostages. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Thousands of Israelis have taken to the streets in recent days, demanding an end to the war and a deal for the hostages' release. Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid said occupying Gaza would be 'a very bad idea' and could cause the hostages to 'die of hunger, beatings and torture.' International criticism has intensified. The UN, EU, and multiple governments have warned that an invasion could lead to catastrophic consequences, with senior UN officials stressing there is no military solution to the conflict. China has called on Israel to halt 'dangerous actions,' while countries like the UK have signalled they may soon recognise a Palestinian state if a ceasefire isn't reached. Despite this, Netanyahu's government, which relies on far-right ministers advocating for Jewish settlements in Gaza, appears determined to press on. Some Israeli analysts suggest the proposal may be aimed at appeasing those hardliners rather than representing a fully executable plan, especially given growing reports of friction between Netanyahu and Israel's military leadership. Gaza in crisis Meanwhile, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to deteriorate. This week, more Palestinians were shot while waiting for food. In northern Gaza, at least 20 people were killed by Israeli fire while waiting for UN aid trucks. Another 20 were wounded under similar circumstances near Rafah, in the south. Palestinians surround a truck with food and humanitarian aid as it moves along the Morag corridor near Rafah. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo European Commission Executive Vice President Teresa Ribera said that what we are seeing 'is a concrete population being targeted, killed and condemned to starve to death.' 'A concrete population is confined, with no homes, being destroyed, no food, water or medicines, being forbidden to access, and subject to bombing and shooting even when they are trying to get humanitarian aid. Any humanity is absent, and no witnesses are allowed,' Ribera said. If it is not genocide, it looks very much like the definition used to express its meaning. Netanyahu continues to frame the war as a fight for Israel's survival. 'We are not giving up on any of our missions,' he said Tuesday, referring to the defeat of Hamas, the return of hostages, and the goal of ensuring Gaza 'never again poses a threat to Israel.' With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Extra.ie
2 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Irish are evenly split on whether taxes should be lower or higher
More than a third of Irish taxpayers believe taxes are too high and should be lowered even if it means fewer or diminished public services. The results of a new European Commission survey on public attitudes to taxation reveal 35% of Irish people favour lower taxes. However, attitudes are split almost evenly on the issue, as 34% stated they prefer higher taxes if it means more or better public services. A further 25% said they thought that both taxes and public services should stay at the same level. Pic: Getty Images The Eurobarometer poll surveyed the attitudes of almost 25,800 citizens across the 27 EU member states on taxation, including over 1,000 people in the Republic. Asked what taxes should be reduced first, two-thirds of Irish respondents (67%) said those on wages, followed by those on housing (24%). Only 17% of Irish respondents said they would support a reduction in VAT, the second lowest rate within the EU, where the average is 37%. The relatively low level of support for a reduction in VAT rates among Irish taxpayers is interesting, given the long-running campaign by the tourism industry for the VAT rate on the sector to be lowered from 13.5% to 9%. Pic: Shutterstock Conversely, when asked what taxes should be increased to pay for public services, almost half (49%) said taxes on tobacco and alcohol, followed by taxes on investment income (33%) and taxes on business (26%). In general, Irish respondents were largely in agreement that people in the Republic paid taxes in proportion to their income and wealth, with 76% holding such a view. The Eurobarometer poll also revealed that 47% of us found filing their tax returns relatively easy. Income tax was identified as the most complicated tax to calculate and pay by 30% of Irish respondents. Pic: Shutterstock On a negative note, only 36% said they believed they received adequate support for filing their tax returns – the fourth lowest rate in the EU – while half said support levels were inadequate. The report also highlighted that two-thirds of Irish taxpayers (67%) would favour a minimum level of tax being imposed on the wealthiest individuals based on their wealth and not just their income, with 22% claiming such a policy would have too many drawbacks in terms of loss of competitiveness and flight of capital. More than three-quarters of us (77%) also supported large multinational companies being required to pay a minimum amount of tax in the country where they operate. A majority of Irish taxpayers were positive towards taxation being used for environmental purposes, with 62% supportive of using taxes to discourage the usage or consumption of environmentally harmful goods and polluting energy sources. However, 39% of Irish people said they would oppose taxes on air travel being increased – the fourth highest rate in the EU after Cyprus, Estonia and Malta – although a narrow majority of EU taxpayers would support such a measure. The survey showed 42% of Irish respondents said they had either a good or very good understanding of their country's taxation system – the seventh highest rate and above the EU average of 35%. It also revealed that Irish citizens are more likely than any of their European counterparts to have bought tobacco abroad in the previous 12 months, at 21%, while 15% also said they had bought alcohol online from a retailer in another country over the same period, which was the second highest rate after the Netherlands at 16%. Overall, almost four out of 10 respondents across the EU supported lower taxes even if it meant a reduction in public services. Among those in favour of higher taxes, almost half said they would first increase taxes on tobacco and alcohol. The report concluded: 'By assessing and understanding EU public opinion on this topic, the European Commission is better able to shape its taxation policy around the needs and priorities of EU citizens.'
