Senate Republicans' new SNAP proposal prompts concern for Alaska GOP
A GOP-backed proposal that would shift some of the cost of food assistance to states for the first time is drawing renewed concern in the party, as critics argue the effort could lead to states cutting benefits on their own.
Republicans are pushing to pass the proposal — which could see states with higher payment error rates covering a greater share of benefit costs under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — as a part of the broader spending cuts and tax package in the coming days. But that doesn't mean some Republicans aren't concerned about the measure.
'Our big thing is the data to be used, the data to be used on the error rate,' Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska.) told The Hill on Friday. 'So, that's important to make sure that the data is as accurate and reflective of the year you're judging as possible.'
Numbers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed Alaska's payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — reached above 60 percent in fiscal year 2023. The national average hit 11.68 percent.
Sullivan noted the state has seen much lower payment error rates prior to the pandemic and is on a path to improving those figures, noting new numbers are expected soon. But he added, 'It's still higher than our traditional error rate, and as you know, the cost share is based in part on that.'
According to the Alaska Beacon, the state's error rate hiked after state officials said they violated federal rules in order to continue feeding people amid a significant backlog in applications.
Under the initial plan crafted by the Senate Agriculture Committee, Republicans sought to require states to cover some SNAP benefit costs if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent.
It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent.
However, Senate Republicans tweaked the plan after facing a setback when their 'state cost-share' proposal was rejected by the chamber's rules referee as part of a megabill the party hopes to pass in the coming days.
A release from the agriculture committee said the updated plan would allow states to choose the payment error either fiscal year 2025 or 2026 to 'calculate their state match requirement that begins in Fiscal Year 2028.'
For the following fiscal year, the 'state match will be calculated using the payment error rate from three fiscal years prior,' the committee said, adding a 'state must contribute a set percentage of the cost of its SNAP benefits if its payment error rate exceeds six percent.'
Asked about further potential changes to the plan, Agriculture Committee chair Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) said Friday that negotiators 'worked really hard to try and get a situation that worked for as many people as we could, and I think we've achieved that.'
'Alaska is a unique state, unique situation, so I know that everybody's trying to work hard to accommodate situations that don't fit,' Boozman said Friday afternoon. 'So, I haven't heard of any changes, and I'm sure that, you know, [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune [(R-S.D.)] will grab me if that comes about.'
'On the other hand, he is trying to make it such that members can get their particular worries taken care of,' he said.
Under a special process Republicans are using to pass the bill, they can move the legislation through the chamber with a simple majority. But with staunch Democratic opposition, they can only afford a few GOP defections to pass the bill, given their 53-seat majority.
Asked briefly about the party's SNAP proposals later, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) told The Hill, 'We're still in trouble on SNAP.'
'The implementation is still next to impossible for us,' she said.
Republicans say the states' cost-share proposal would incentivize states to improve their error rates. But Sullivan and Murkowski aren't the only Republicans who have voiced concerns about the effort in recent weeks.
Originally, the House plan called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its initial version of Trump's megabill, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 percent and 25 percent.
However, the proposal was dialed back after concerns from other Republicans, including Sens. Tommy Tuberville (Ala.) and Jim Justice (W. Va.) over the measure.
Asked if he's meeting with Boozman or Thune on the matter, Sullivan also told The Hill on Friday evening that he's 'meeting with everybody.'
'For me, it's just important to get the data as close to the date that you're judging,' Sullivan said, adding that he expects Alaska to see a notable drop in its error rate in a coming report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
4 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump on who should be prosecuted for Iran intel leaks
All times eastern Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Senate convenes over President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
I rented a stranger's pool with Swimply — and I'd do it again
I don't have a pool — heck, I don't even have a backyard — but a quick visit to Swimply can change that for a few hours at a time. Consider the platform to be a scaled-down, sun-soaked version of Airbnb rentals. With a few taps in an app on your phone, you can reserve someone's pool all to yourself. It's a shortcut to a private afternoon swim or the pool party your living quarters just can't provide, all without the hassle of buying an above-ground pool or the long-term financial commitment of building an in-ground pool. Creeped out? I get it. Slipping into your best swimsuit at a stranger's house isn't quite the same as renting out a vacation home for the weekend. Plus, there are more traditional avenues to securing a cooling dip in a pool, such as swim club memberships, joining a fitness center or, you know, traveling for a vacation. Despite these alternatives, I was still intrigued by Swimply and wanted to see if it could provide the relaxing, accessible getaway it claims to. So, I reserved four hours at a pool about 30 minutes from my cramped apartment. Here's my honest review of the experience, from booking in the app to sipping a cold one while submerged in pristine (albeit rented) waters. Swimply Swimply is a platform dedicated to short-term pool rentals. As long as you can get past the idea of swimming at a stranger's house, it's an accessible shortcut to beating the heat for a few hours. Simple booking process Everything about Swimply works through an app. It's not complicated. Search for hosts in your area via a list or a map, then book their pool for an hourly fee. Where I live, most pools were between $70 and $150 per hour. There were outliers — like this glorified kiddie pool for $35 per hour (which is definitely not 5 feet deep) and this ludicrous backyard lazy river for $215 per hour — but the majority of the options were the kind of backyard setup you'd be jealous of on a hot day. I ended up booking 'Welcome To Paradise,' an in-ground, saltwater pool in a beautifully landscaped backyard with generous seating, all for $135 per hour. I then added the heated pool amenity for an extra $25 per hour because, although it's hot in the Northeast this time of year, a warm pool is just that much more inviting. Once I selected a time slot on my chosen day, the app requested a few additional details, including a headcount for my group and the reason for our stay. That triggered a message to my host, who answered the next morning and confirmed I was all set. Welcoming host Prev Next On the day of my reservation, I was running a half hour behind schedule. I let the host know via the in-app messaging system, and he responded in three minutes, assuring me there was no issue. He also let me know where to park at his house, what temperature the pool was and asked if I had any music preferences for the speaker system. Once my wife and I walked into the backyard, the host came outside to say hello and let us know how to access the restrooms. A door to the house was clearly labeled as such and led directly through a laundry room and into a full bathroom. Heading inside was probably the most awkward aspect of the entire experience, but I didn't mind it. I used the restroom twice and never felt as if I was invading their space or being surveilled. Beyond that interaction, I didn't hear a peep from the host. It truly felt like I was getting the private reservation I sought. An oasis as advertised We've all been through experiences where reality didn't live up to the pictures, and this was probably my biggest fear going into this test. Sure, the images on the listing looked immaculate, but when I showed up, would I be greeted by a pool full of leaves, walkways covered in weeds and nosy neighbors wondering what the heck was going on over the fence? None of that was the case. Everything lived up to the expectations the listing gave me. The pool was clean too. Its temperature sat at a perfect 88 degrees Fahrenheit and the loungers, hammocks and cabana helped me relax. The towels, made of Turkish cotton, dried quickly and felt cozy. I brought a variety of snacks from home, but if I hadn't, there were a few provided on the poolside table. And though there were neighbors out using their own pools, the property was large and landscaped well enough to provide privacy. There's no escape from some nuisances While my Swimply experience gave me a relaxing afternoon I couldn't have achieved in my own home, it might not fit everyone's definition of 'paradise.' Yes, I felt the sun's warmth and heard the birds chirping — but only when the leaf blowers and construction trucks at a nearby renovation died down. Then there's simply the premise of Swimply: I was swimming in a stranger's pool while they were home. Truthfully, it didn't seem that weird to me. My wife, however, was less enthused. She tagged along to catch some rays (and because she's a good sport), but this wasn't an experience she'd sign up for regularly, which is understandable. Pricing and availability come with caveats My Swimply experience would have cost $640 for four hours. That's not cheap at all. To get a little more value out of my next booking, it would have to be for a larger event with more people. Because while $640 for two people to sit by a nice pool for an hour is kind of silly, $640 for me and 15 of my closest friends to have an awesome pool party sounds like a blast. Unfortunately, Swimply charges more based on how many people are in your group. For the pool I booked, the price skyrockets to $240 per hour for 6 to 10 guests to $350 per hour for 11 to 15 guests and then to $475 per hour for 16 to 20 guests. I can understand a slight increase to account for the added noise and upkeep that extra people come with, but to triple the rate is borderline absurd. Even if you were to sign up for the $20 per month Swimply Premium membership that cuts down on fees and kicks back 10% in app credits for every booking, there are a lot better ways to spend nearly $2,000, including a swim club membership that would last far longer than four hours. Then there's availability. I'm in the suburbs of New York City, so there are ample options for me to book. But bouncing around the map and checking other parts of my home state of New Jersey revealed fewer options. It's nice to think there's a relaxing getaway right around the corner thanks to Swimply, but that's not going to be the reality for all users. I sat down to write this review after a couple of weeks of digesting my experience with Swimply, and it just so happened to be during an extreme heat wave on the East Coast. Maybe the temps are getting to me, but I find myself wanting to go back to a pool. It's neat that I have that option just a few taps away on my phone. If you can get past the mental block of walking into a stranger's backyard, give Swimply a look if only to see what's available around you. There's no cost to download the app. From there, you might just find a mini oasis that's too good to pass up the next time you want to get away, even if just for a few hours. Related article The 15 best kiddie pools for babies and toddlers, starting at $12 What is Swimply? What is Swimply? Swimply is a short-term rental platform for pools. Think of it like an Airbnb, but instead of booking someone's house while you travel, you get only their backyard and pool while you escape the heat that has hit your home. Swimply also has categories for tennis, pickleball, basketball, pets and indoor spaces. The inventory is smaller for those bookings. How does Swimply work? How does Swimply work? Users create an account on the app, then browse their area for pools to rent. Reservation details include time slots, group sizes and requested amenities. From there, all communication with the host is done in the app. CNN Underscored has a team of skilled writers and editors with several years of experience testing, researching and recommending products who ensure each article is carefully edited and products are properly vetted. We talk to top experts when applicable to make certain we are testing each product accurately, recommending only the best products and considering the pros and cons of each item. For this article, associate testing writer Joe Bloss actually reserved a pool via Swimply and spent hours enjoying and analyzing its offerings. Bloss is an experienced product testing writer for CNN Underscored who has often written honestly about his experiences, including that time he attempted to become a 5K runner when he hates running.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Tina Kotek to OR lawmakers: ‘Your work is not done' on transportation bill
PORTLAND, Ore (KOIN) — After the Oregon Legislative Session concluded for the year late Friday night, Governor Tina Kotek held a press conference the following morning acknowledging 'major progress' in certain areas. However, she had choice words to say on the transportation bill which has yet to pass. State lawmakers faced a mountain of bills this session, coming in at 2,200. This marks the most in a quarter-century, running the gamut from important issues such as housing and education to trivial matters such as cleaning up administrative language. Gov. Kotek said she came into this legislative session with 'clear priorities for the state,' including working to solve the homelessness crisis, housing supply issues, mental health and addiction treatment, improving schools, as well as dedicated funds for wildfire fighting and prevention. Kotek signs bill bringing Portland a 'step closer' to an MLB stadium 'We had success in all of those areas,' she said. 'We made progress, it was good work, it was bipartisan progress, particularly in the area of housing. A lot of work together – Republicans and Democrats to work on our housing ad homelessness crisis – and we have more work to do.' However, issues began to arise when House Rules Committee discussed the amendment to HB 3402, looking to bridge the ODOT's funding gap, after a . ODOT has said if its $350 million shortfall is not addressed, several hundred jobs will be on the chopping block. The new amendment featured bumps to registration and titling fees, with a 3-cent increase to the gas tax, allowing for all that money to go to ODOT. Meet Yang Hansen: The Portland Trail Blazers' newest draft pick Republicans largely said working Oregonians don't want more taxes. This led lawmakers to 'not produce anything on transportation that we need in the state' by Friday night, concluding the legislative session two days before it constitutionally had to end, according to Kotek. 'Republican leadership in both the House and Senate refused to provide that collaborative procedural motion to move a bill that had the votes forward to pay for basic transportation services in our state,' she added. 'What didn't happen was support from Republican leaders who just wanted to go home. So here we are.' Kotek previously stated that the possible ODOT job cuts include roles like incident response teams and maintenance crews, which would be 'unacceptable' for Oregonians. Without the funding, ODOT could face 700-800 layoffs on Monday. Given this, Kotek said she is not giving up on the bill, telling lawmakers, 'your work is not done.' 'Legislators will be hearing from me,' she said. 'Because all 90 lawmakers and all the communities they represent depend on the Oregon Department of Transportation to support vital services. This conversation will continue.' Another bill centering on banning student cell phones in schools statewide also did not pass. But Kotek noted she is still considering making that happen. What's more, with 30 days to sign bills into law, the governor can choose to call lawmakers back into a special session. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
