Teens from upper-income families are far more likely to work summer jobs than poor teens. What's going on?
Twin brothers Alex and Nicolas Alessi and their friend Mason Grant — all 17-year-old rising high-school seniors in the Bay Area — were having a hard time finding jobs leading up to this summer.
'We probably applied to 20 jobs, and we did not get any of them,' Alex said of himself and his brother.
My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him?
Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos
JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding
'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom?
S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here?
Grant, meanwhile, struggled to advance beyond the initial stages of the interview process, including at retailers. 'You need multiple references, experience, past history — and as a high-school kid who's very busy with other stuff, it's hard to get your foot in the door,' he told MarketWatch.
The three friends, seeing a need to connect high-schoolers to work opportunities, recently developed a job board targeting teens called JobMatch, with the twins' father, Tom Alessi, acting as an adviser.
'At our school, our nicknames are the Winklevoss twins and Mark Zuckerberg,' Grant said.
Users anywhere can post jobs and search free. The site is currently being used by hundreds of people in the community, according to the founders, and all three of them have also applied to and landed gigs on JobMatch themselves.
'On any given day you will find them washing cars, pulling weeds, helping people move, etc.,' said Tom Alessi, who leads software engineering for Johnson & Johnson Vision. 'Honestly, it's super lucrative for them.'
Teen employment in the U.S. has been declining for decades — the employment-to-population ratio for 16- to 19-year-olds was 37.9% last July, not seasonally adjusted, down from a high of 59.9% in July 1979, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Many working teens today come from higher-income families that encourage them to seek learning opportunities outside of the classroom.
'A young person from a family with a higher income is more likely to be employed during the summer months than a young person from a family earning less,' according to a Labor Department study posted in 2024.
About 44% of 16- to 19-year-olds from families earning $150,000 or more — roughly the top fifth of U.S. households by income — were employed from June to August 2023, the most recent year for which estimates were available. By contrast, only 27% of teens from families earning less than $30,000, or roughly the lowest fifth of households by income, had summer employment during that time.
Tom Alessi, Alex's and Nicolas's father, has noticed this trend playing out in their high-income community. 'The parents from affluent families — we call them 'snowplows' — are out in front of their kids plowing the 'snow' out of the way,' he said.
Grant, the twins' friend, said he knows a teen whose father was able to connect the teen and his friend with jobs at the golf course where the father is a member. 'I am not saying the kids didn't work hard, but they put it on a silver platter for them,' he said.
The employment gap between teens from high- and low-income families is a longstanding disparity. Kids from higher-income families tend to have greater access to a car or to an adult who can drive them to work, a BLS report from 2000 said. The researchers also noted that 'nonmarket work such as housework and unpaid child care' more often falls to teens in lower-income families, making them 'relatively less available for market work — or available only for specific schedules.'
In addition, some teens from low-income families live in labor markets with fewer opportunities, according to a 2010 report from Northeastern University's Center for Labor Market Studies.
The gap became more pronounced in the 2000s. While teens in every income group experienced sharp declines in summer employment between 2000 and 2008, teens from low-income families experienced the sharpest decline, the Center for Labor Market Studies said. By 2010, 'the employment rate for upper-middle-income white teens was four times as high as that for low-income Black teens,' the center later reported.
Read more: Generation Z thinks it needs $500,000 a year to succeed. What that says about our economy.
Kyle Ross, a policy analyst at the liberal think tank Center for American Progress, wrote in a 2023 report that youth facing barriers to employment 'such as a low-income background, a disability, or low English proficiency' need access to resources that help build the skills and experience necessary to get a job and achieve their future career goals.
One federal law that subsidized youth employment, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, has relied on temporary extensions after expiring in 2020 and may face cuts in the new spending bill in Congress, which may harm youth who need extra support accessing opportunities in the labor force, Ross told MarketWatch. The Trump administration last month announced that it would pause all contractor-operated centers at Job Corps, a WIOA program to train young people from low-income households, by the end of the month, citing 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' (The pause was later delayed by a court order.)
As the economy evolves to demand different skill sets for different kinds of jobs, 'a lot of people end up suffering because they're left out,' Ross said.
Today, young college graduates, older workers and foreign-born workers are competing for jobs that were traditionally held by teens, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Those between 16 and 19 made up 18.7% of minimum-wage workers in 2023, down from 25.4% two decades earlier.
As entry-level wages stagnated over the years, employers incentivized young people to get more degrees. Many jobs once paid a living wage to workers with high-school diplomas, but that has changed. Among full-time workers ages 35 to 44, those who completed high school had average annual earnings of nearly $58,000 in 2023, compared with about $105,000 for those with a bachelor's degree, according to the Census Bureau.
With such a stark wage gap between workers with and without college degrees, more young Americans have shifted their focus to education — including during summers. The share of 16- to 19-year-olds enrolled in school in July has been above 40% every year since 2007 — except in 2013, when it was 39.3% — and hit 48.4% in July 2024, according to calculations using BLS data. That share was just 10.4% in July 1985.
'Over the long term, there's just been more educational upgrading,' said Elise Gould, a senior economist at the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. She also noted that teen employment tends to be higher during stronger business cycles, when opportunities are more abundant and employers are willing to hire people with less experience and do more on-the-job training.
Yet as competition for entry-level jobs heats up, some parents, including those who earn higher incomes, believe that school alone does not prepare teens professionally or financially.
Marilou Davido, a financial planner and vice president of WFA Asset Management, told MarketWatch her kids are 'in a good school district and have lots of opportunities to pad their transcripts' with AP courses. As she and her husband have been saving for college since their children were born, 'I'm not as focused on summer academics because I'm not expecting or needing my kids to get a scholarship for college.'
Related: Brace yourself: This is exactly how much you should have saved for your kid's college by the time they're 5, 13 and 18
Davido said she worries 'that my husband and I spoil our kids. They have much more than I ever did growing up,' she said. So she has pushed her 16-year-old son, Luca, to learn the value of money through work and to recognize that his 'normal' is not shared by everyone else — and will change when he is no longer 'riding Mom's and Dad's coattails.' She also hopes having a job will teach him 'how to talk with his boss, negotiate and compromise.'
Luca refereed hockey games over the winter, earning at least $45 per hour, and recently shucked corn at a fair for $15 an hour plus tips, which he described as 'really good money.' Davido contributes a match equal to his earnings into a Roth IRA she and her husband opened for him, which they hope will compound significantly in the decades ahead.
Luca told MarketWatch that he is required to take a personal-finance course in school. When his parents recently started sharing the actual dollar figures of their household finances, he said, he became worried that he would not be able to support an equivalent lifestyle when he graduates from college.
Luca is saving and investing his earnings from his jobs to have 'a bit more of a head start to buy things and just deal with issues that might come up' as a young adult, he said. By mid-June, he was still looking for a summer job. 'I want to start my financial life. Start making money,' he said.
Other parents also see the opportunity for teen jobs to kick-start a comfortable retirement in the future. Michael Cochran, a financial planner and chief investment officer at BentOak Capital, told MarketWatch he has two children, 13 and 15. For their older son, who works at a tennis pro shop, 'we introduced a Roth IRA 'match' to encourage saving and help instill strong financial habits early,' he said. Their younger son is earning about $100 a week doing tasks around the neighborhood.
Cochran's goal, he said, 'is to demonstrate that consistent work and even modest contributions — and a 'match' from his parents — can lead to meaningful long-term benefits, both through the power of compounding and by building a strong foundation in financial literacy.'
Teen summer employment remains concentrated in jobs as waitstaff, recreation workers, fast-food workers, coaches, child-care workers and construction laborers, according to the Labor Department.
As today's youth face a job market that stands to be disrupted by technologies such as artificial intelligence, some high-income parents are encouraging their children to practice skills that will be useful for starting their own businesses.
'Some of these kids are saying, 'I don't want a traditional job where I make $15 an hour. I don't want a limit on what I can do, or when I can work. I want to make my own rules,' Tom Alessi, the father of the JobMatch co-founders, told MarketWatch.
'I am super frustrated, so is my wife, that the high school doesn't teach any [real-world] skills. They only teach academics for academics' sake,' he said. 'They do not teach these kids that there's another path, if they so choose, like entrepreneurship.' It's fine that many students choose a traditional employment path, he added, but schools are doing students 'a disservice' by not teaching them that 'there's a different way to earn money' besides being an employee.
While Tom is a full-time employee, his wife runs her own business as a physical therapist, he said, adding that 'the kids have always done jobs at her clinic — laundry, cleanup, office work.'
Helping his kids with JobMatch, he added, has felt 'like a traditional startup.' 'It's chaotic. Everybody has ideas,' he said. 'But I'm trying to teach them skills that they're not going to learn anywhere [else]: Here's how you get customer feedback; here's how you shape a product road map; here's how you push out features; here's how long it takes to develop features; here's how you engage with people.'
Grant said starting JobMatch has also opened up networking opportunities to him. 'I want to work, and I want to meet new people,' he said. Nicolas and Alex said that because their parents still provide for their needs, they plan to give 90% of any earnings from their jobs, as well as any cash gifts they receive, to their father to invest for their futures. Their goal, they said, is to start a successful business together. As other teens put school at the center of their goals, the twins are going to college and investing early as 'backups' in case their entrepreneurial efforts don't work out.
What personal-finance issues would you like to see covered in MarketWatch? We would like to hear from readers about their financial decisions and money-related questions. You can fill out or write to us at . A reporter may be in touch to learn more. MarketWatch won't attribute your answers to you by name without your permission.
There's an important market indicator that suggests investors remain wary. It's good news for stocks.
My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life?
What drove stock market's record-breaking week? Don't overlook growing rate-cut expectations.
Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth
20 banks expected to increase their dividends the most following the Fed's stress tests
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto Investors Open Up About $200K Losses to Million-Dollar Mistakes — What Their Stories Teach About Market Psychology
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. When Reddit user mickeyhusti asked the crypto community a simple question—'How much have you lost?'—the flood of responses painted a stark picture of the current market's brutal reality. From six-figure portfolio wipeouts to million-dollar mistakes, the thread became an impromptu therapy session for investors grappling with substantial losses in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and altcoins. The original poster set the tone by revealing their own $200,000 decline from peak portfolio value, expressing shock at Bitcoin's recent dumps and calling Ethereum's performance 'brutal.' What followed was a mix of financial confessions, investment philosophies, and coping mechanisms that reveal deeper truths about crypto market psychology. Don't Miss: Trade crypto futures on Plus500 with up to $200 in bonuses — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – unlock the power of alternative investments including a Crypto IRA within your retirement account. The losses shared ranged from the sobering to the catastrophic. One trader revealed losing nearly everything: 'Started with $90,000, reached $120,000, and now my portfolio is $400... futures...' Another investor reported being down $100,000 'so far,' while a startup employee with no salary shared their panic over a $120,000 loss. Perhaps most dramatic was the investor claiming '$4 years and 10 million USD' in losses, though the community's response suggested skepticism about such extreme figures. These aren't just numbers—they represent real financial stress, with one commenter noting they'd lost 'about 30k and my mental health.' The human cost becomes particularly clear when investors mention working without salaries or facing relationship strain due to investment decisions. Despite the substantial paper losses, a dominant theme emerged around the concept of unrealized versus realized losses. 'Nothing. Haven't sold a dime,' became a rallying cry, with many investors maintaining that losses only become real when positions are closed. This philosophy reflects a deeper investment discipline that separates long-term holders from panic sellers. As one decade-long investor put it: 'Haven't sold so nothing. Been stacking over a decade. Just DCA and enjoy the ride.' The strategy appears to have merit for those with sufficient time horizons. Several investors reported significant gains over longer periods, with one claiming to be 'up 250% (6 figures)' despite daily volatility, and another maintaining they're 'still up 130k' after investing in XRP. Trending: New to crypto? Get up to $400 in rewards for successfully completing short educational courses and making your first qualifying trade on Coinbase. A clear pattern emerged distinguishing Bitcoin performance from alternative cryptocurrencies. Many investors attributed their losses specifically to 'altcoins,' with several transitioning to Bitcoin-only strategies after disappointing experiences with other tokens. 'After dozens of hours here and there, I walked away from alts up a few thousand... It's just not worth the effort and stress,' explained one investor who became a 'Bitcoin maxi.' Another reported earning 'close to 40%' by simply buying $25 worth of Bitcoin weekly. This divergence reflects Bitcoin's relative strength compared to many altcoins, which have failed to recover to previous highs even as Bitcoin reached new records. Ethereum, despite being the second-largest cryptocurrency, remains at September 2022 price levels according to community observations. The discussion revealed growing concerns about crypto's relationship with traditional economic cycles and political events. Several investors expressed worry about how cryptocurrencies might perform during a prolonged recession, questioning the asset class's role as a hedge against traditional finance. Political developments, particularly around the Trump administration and potential tariff policies, emerged as significant concerns. Some investors directly blamed political uncertainty for portfolio declines, while others worried about policy impacts on the broader crypto ecosystem. 'Today feels very much different,' noted one investor. 'Crypto is already a mainstream speculative asset. Has less and less to do with anarchy and financial independence.' The thread illuminated crucial differences between successful and struggling crypto investors. Those reporting gains typically exhibited several common characteristics: Disciplined approach: Regular dollar-cost averaging rather than lump-sum investments at peaks Time horizon: Multi-year investment perspectives rather than short-term speculationRisk management: Only investing money they could afford to lose Emotional control: Avoiding frequent portfolio checking and panic decisions Conversely, those reporting significant losses often described: Investing money needed for short-term expenses Heavy use of leverage and futures trading Emotional decision-making during market volatility Concentration in speculative altcoins rather than established cryptocurrencies Perhaps most revealing were the various ways investors coped with substantial losses. Humor emerged as a common defense mechanism, with jokes about losing body parts, relationships, and sanity alongside financial assets. Others adopted philosophical approaches, viewing losses as tuition for investment education or accepting volatility as inherent to the asset class. 'You know, or at least you SHOULD KNOW, if you speculate on anything's future valuation, it's just that: a SPECULATION,' one commenter emphasized. Some investors completely disconnected from daily price movements, with one stating they're 'not checking my portfolio for many, many years.'The Reddit confessions offer several crucial insights for both crypto and traditional investors: Position sizing matters: The most distressed investors typically had oversized positions relative to their financial capacity. Those who invested only what they could afford to lose showed greater emotional stability. Time horizon discipline: Long-term holders consistently outperformed those making frequent trading decisions, regardless of their technical analysis skills. Asset allocation within crypto: Bitcoin's relative strength compared to altcoins suggests that diversification within crypto may not provide the intended risk reduction. Market cycle awareness: Understanding that crypto markets operate in cycles helps investors maintain perspective during downturns, though past performance doesn't guarantee future results. This community discussion occurs against a backdrop of increasing crypto mainstream adoption, regulatory clarity, and institutional investment. Yet the individual stories remind us that behind market statistics are real people making real financial decisions with real consequences. The thread also highlighted how crypto investment has evolved from early adopter speculation to mainstream asset allocation, bringing both opportunities and risks to a broader population of investors. For investors currently facing significant crypto losses, the community discussion suggests several potential approaches: Reassess position sizes and risk tolerance Consider the difference between speculation and long-term investment Evaluate the role of crypto within overall portfolio allocation Focus on risk management rather than return maximization Seek professional financial advice for significant positions The raw honesty of these investor confessions provides valuable perspective on crypto market psychology and the very human experience of financial volatility. Whether the current downturn represents a temporary setback or a more fundamental shift remains to be seen, but the lessons about investment discipline and emotional management remain universally applicable. Read Next: Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can invest with $1,000 at just $0.30/share. This article Crypto Investors Open Up About $200K Losses to Million-Dollar Mistakes — What Their Stories Teach About Market Psychology originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
When Labor Meets AI: The Next Frontier In Workforce Economics
Industry engineer construction,using smart tablet,control automation robot arm machine intelligence ... More operation construction site,concept business industry 4.0,Artificial intelligence or AI,5G network Even in the mid-20th century, leaders understood that organized labor was not only a bargaining tool but a pillar of economic credibility. Addressing the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America Convention in 1956, Eleanor Roosevelt observed: Nearly seventy years later, her words echo with renewed relevance. As artificial intelligence accelerates in capability and adoption, the definition of work—and the institutions built to protect it—are entering uncharted territory. Labor unions, long a cornerstone of worker advocacy and financial leverage, now confront a systemic test: whether they can not only defend wages and conditions, but credibly guide the transition toward a machine-augmented economy whose disruptions are often invisible until they are irreversible. From their origins in the trades and industrial movements of the 19th century, unions gained influence by organizing workers around shared physical spaces, defined tasks, and predictable employment structures. Over the 20th century, these organizations grew into major political forces, channeling member dues into campaigns, legislation, and collective bargaining aimed at securing better wages, conditions, and protections. But technology has always tested the boundaries of labor. The disappearance of elevator operators—once a common union job—following the introduction of automated elevators in the mid-20th century serves as an early example of how technological efficiency can render once-essential roles obsolete. Today, artificial intelligence presents a far more expansive and systemic challenge. AI is not merely optimizing tasks; it is absorbing entire functions. From logistics to legal review, customer service to manufacturing, AI systems are increasingly performing duties once reserved for human workers, often at higher speeds and lower costs. world. During a conversation at Hamilton College in Upstate New York on April 3, former President Barack Obama remarked that only the most elite coders will be able to keep up with machine-generated code, signaling a broader trend: automation is no longer confined to repetitive tasks. It now threatens knowledge work and professional careers once thought immune to disruption. For unions, this evolution raises urgent questions. The traditional tools of organized labor—strikes, contract negotiations, grievance processes—were designed for human-centered workplaces. As algorithms replace decision-makers and predictive models supplant manual oversight, those tools are being tested. What does collective bargaining look like in a workplace run by artificial agents? How do you negotiate with a system that cannot respond to protest? Some unions are adapting. Contract language in select industries now includes clauses on algorithmic transparency, human review of AI decisions, and mandated re-skilling initiatives. Others are advocating for legislation that treats AI systems as subjects of labor law, requiring disclosure, audits, and ethical use standards akin to workplace safety regulations. In elections to come, we may see political contributions, once focused on wage floors and benefits, that are increasingly focused on supporting candidates who prioritize digital rights and AI governance. Still, many labor organizations remain caught in a reactive posture, confronting displacement after it has already occurred. Unlike prior technological waves, AI does not just replace physical tasks, it replicates judgment, analysis, and communication. Its spread is faster, its learning curve steeper, and its effects less visible until the disruption is complete. The future of organized labor may depend on its ability to reframe its role, not just as a protector of existing jobs, but as a steward of equitable transitions in a machine-augmented economy. Just as elevator operators once gave way to automation, today's workforce may need to accept that some roles will vanish. The question for unions is whether they can still shape what comes next. The German Model: IG Metall and Volkswagen A recent agreement between Volkswagen AG and IG Metall, one of the world's largest industrial unions, offers a roadmap for how labor organizations might not only adapt, but also influence the transformation. Finalized in December 2024 and titled Zukunft Volkswagen (Future Volkswagen), the agreement redefines union relevance in an age of automation. The deal includes a socially responsible workforce reduction of more than 35,000 positions across German plants by 2030. Rather than through layoffs, this reduction will be managed through early retirement, voluntary buyouts, and attrition. In return, Volkswagen committed to a job security guarantee through 2030 for remaining workers, even as automation and electric vehicle production reshape operational needs. The agreement also introduced flexible work models, redistributed development roles within the corporate network, and preserved core manufacturing functions across sites. The union's role extended beyond protection, it also helped co-design the structural transition, ensuring that workers had a voice in how technology would be integrated and labor reallocated. From a financial standpoint, the arrangement allows Volkswagen to realize €1.5 billion in annual labor cost savings while retaining production viability in Germany. It aligns with the company's goal to become the world's leading volume manufacturer of electric vehicles by 2030, without discarding its workforce. Implications for U.S. Labor While the U.S. legal and economic environment differs from Germany's, elements of the Volkswagen AG and IG Metall agreement offer instructive value for American unions navigating the AI era. Sectors including logistics, transportation, customer service, administrative support, and even healthcare are likely to become more vulnerable to automation-driven role reduction. In these fields, labor organizations might consider: From the steam engine to the microchip, labor unions have consistently recalibrated to meet changing conditions. AI represents a steeper curve, but not an insurmountable one. If unions can establish a role not only in defending existing positions but also in shaping the frameworks that govern new ones, it may help them continue to serve as key stakeholders in an evolving economic landscape. In this respect, they have an opportunity to reinforce the aspiration Roosevelt articulated: that collective strength, applied thoughtfully, can help align technological progress with broadly shared prosperity.


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Former Gerry Connolly aide wins Democratic primary in bid to replace him in US House seat from Virginia
Fairfax County Supervisor James Walkinshaw will be the Democratic nominee in the upcoming special election to replace the late Virginia Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly, district party officials announced Saturday after a party-run primary. Walkinshaw will face Republican Stewart Whitson, who also won a party-run nominating event Saturday. Connolly had represented Virginia's 11th district in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. for 16 years before he died of cancer in May. He endorsed Walkinshaw, who served as his chief of staff for more than a decade, shortly after he announced he wouldn't be seeking reelection. The special election to fill Connolly's seat will be held on Sept. 9. Walkinshaw will be heavily favored as Democratic Kamala Harris won the district by 34 points in the 2024. Connolly comfortably held the seat since his first election in 2008. Walkinshaw has served on the board of supervisors since January 2020, where he also chairs the board's legislative committee. In his endorsement, Connelly had called appointing Walkinshaw chief of staff was 'one of the best decisions I ever made.' 'We need a strong representative, experienced in addressing national issues that affect our community, who can stand up to Trump and lead from day one. I believe James Walkinshaw is that leader,' Connolly wrote. Whitson is an Army veteran and former FBI agent who works in federal affairs at a conservative think tank. Walkinshaw and a collection of allied outside groups dominated spending on advertisements for the primary, helping him stand out in the crowded field. Pro-Walkinshaw advertisers accounted for more than half of the total ad spending for the race, about $2 million, according to the ad tracking firm AdImpact. Just one of those groups, a liberal super PAC called 'Protect Progress,' spent nearly $1 million on ads boosting Walkinshaw's campaign and touting his connections to Connolly.