Ohio school voucher scheme ruled unconstitutional but stays active during US court appeal
Ohio's EdChoice Scholarship Program will continue for the upcoming school year despite a recent court ruling that declared the program unconstitutional. A stay on the court's decision allows the program to remain in effect while the case undergoes an appeals process.
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost issued a statement reaffirming that families can continue using EdChoice scholarships to enroll children in private schools. 'EdChoice is the law of the land for the coming school year,' Yost said, encouraging families to make school decisions accordingly, as quoted by WFMJ.
Judge rules EdChoice unconstitutional but allows it to continue temporarily
On June 24, 2025, Franklin County Judge Jaiza N.
Page ruled that the EdChoice program violated the state's constitution by diverting funds away from public schools. The program, established to provide scholarships for students from designated public schools to attend qualifying private schools, has faced legal challenges from a coalition of public education leaders.
The coalition, known as Vouchers Hurt Ohio, filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the program.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now
Tips and Tricks
Undo
According to WFMJ, the group argued that EdChoice uses taxpayer money to fund private education, draining resources from the public school system. Judge Page agreed, calling the funding structure unconstitutional. However, she issued a stay on the ruling, allowing the program to remain in operation while the case is appealed.
Legal appeal to proceed in Ohio's Tenth District Court
According to the Attorney General's Office, the state plans to file its appeal with the Ohio Tenth District Court of Appeals on July 23.
During a press conference, Yost was joined by Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman, Representative Jamie Callendar, and several education advocates including Rabbi Eric "Yitz" Frank, president of School Choice Ohio; Aaron Baer, president of the Center for Christian Virtue; Tom Fisher, vice president and director of EdChoice Legal Advocates; and Monica Williams, a parent impacted by the program.
Yost emphasized that the ongoing litigation does not affect parents' current school options.
'Nothing that's happened legally limits their options,' he stated during the conference, as reported by WFMJ.
EdChoice program expansion and financial impact
The EdChoice program, funded through the state budget, has seen significant growth since its inception. According to WFMJ, the initiative began in 2008 as a $42 million program designed to help students in underperforming schools. In the past year, it has grown to more than $1 billion in taxpayer funding used to support students attending private institutions.
The Ohio Department of Development's website states that EdChoice scholarships provide $6,166 per student in grades K–8 and $8,408 per student in grades 9–12.
Program's future likely to be determined by Ohio Supreme Court
As reported by WFMJ, the case is expected to eventually reach the Ohio Supreme Court. Legal experts have indicated that the appellate process could take years to resolve. During that time, EdChoice will remain active, allowing families to continue applying for and receiving scholarships.
The continuation of the program amid legal scrutiny has prompted renewed national attention, as debates surrounding school choice, public funding, and education equity intensify across the US.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
South Korean prosecutors question ex-first lady accused of graft
South Korean former first lady Kim Keon Hee (AP) SEOUL: South Korean prosecutors questioned former first lady Kim Keon Hee on Wednesday over a litany of allegations, including stock manipulation and bribery. The questioning comes as her husband, former president Yoon Suk Yeol, remains in detention over his declaration of martial law in December, which briefly suspended civilian rule before being overturned by parliament. Prosecutors are expected to seek an arrest warrant for Kim following Wednesday's interrogation, which they said began shortly after 10:00 am (0100 GMT). If granted, the warrant would mark the first time in South Korean history that a former president and first lady were both arrested. Kim is accused of colluding with traders to inflate the share price of a company between 2009 and 2012. She also allegedly accepted luxury gifts, including a $2,200 designer handbag, in violation of anti-graft laws. "I sincerely apologise for causing trouble despite being a person of no importance. I will cooperate fully with the investigation," Kim said before entering the special prosecutor's office in Seoul. Kim's questioning drew significant media attention, with local journalists following the vehicle she was in as it made its way to the prosecutors' office on Wednesday. Supporters of Kim and Yoon gathered outside the office, waving national flags and holding signs that read "Investigators must be fair". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Treatment That Might Help You Against Knee Pain (Search Here) Kneepain | Search Search Now Undo Controversy has long surrounded the 52-year-old with lingering questions about her alleged role in stock manipulation. A video filmed in 2022 showing her accepting a Dior handbag from a self-proclaimed fan reignited public criticism. She is also accused of interfering in the nomination process for MPs in Yoon's party, in violation of election laws. Yoon, as president, vetoed three special investigation bills passed by the opposition-controlled parliament that sought to probe the allegations against Kim, with the last veto issued in late November. A week later, Yoon declared martial law. He had claimed the bills were "political propaganda". Yoon, a former top prosecutor, was impeached and removed from office in April over his martial law declaration, prompting the country to hold a snap election in June.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
'I am going to exert my powers': Prosecute minors as adults? Trump warns of federal control in DC after ex-Doge staffer assaulted
'Out of control' Washington under fire: Trump threatens federal takeover of DC after ex-Doge staffer assaulted - 'going to exert my powers' "Out of control" crimes in Washington, DC, have left US President Donald Trump furious as he threatened to federalise the city. The statement from the US president came after a gang of youth attempted a carjacking and assaulted one of the prominent members of the Department of Government Efficiency. Highlighting the issue, Trump on Tuesday said that DC has gone out of control, and youngsters are "randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent citizens." "They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it's going to happen now!" Trump said. He further asserted that the law in the city should be changed to "prosecute these 'minors' as adults, and lock them up for a long time, starting at age 14." He said that the victim, Edward Coristine, nicknamed 'Big Balls,' was "beaten mercilessly by local thugs." "Washington, DC, must be safe, clean, and beautiful for all Americans and, importantly, for the world to see," the US president said. In a post on Truth Social, Trump further threatened that if the situation in DC doesn't improve, then he will take federal control. "If DC doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore," he said in the post. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Trumo added that if such incidents continue to happen, then he will exert his powers and "FEDERALIZE this City." Who is Edward Coristine, and what happened? Edward Coristine, nicknamed 'Big Balls,' was assaulted by a group of teenagers attempting to carjack him and a woman in city's Logan Circle neighbourhood at around 3 am on Sunday. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, the group approached the couple's car and commented on taking it. Coristine asked the woman to sit in the car for her safety and confronted the group. Police said that several of the teens attacked him until officers patrolling nearby intervened. The group fled on foot when the cops approached. Taking cognisance of the matter, police arrested two 15-year-olds from Maryland on charges of unarmed carjacking. Former DOGE head Elon Musk also reacted to Trump's post. Sharing a screenshot of Trump's post, Musk wrote, "A few days ago, a gang of about a dozen young men tried to assault a woman in her car at night in DC." "A @Doge team member saw what was happening, ran to defend her and was severely beaten to the point of concussion, but he saved her. It is time to federalise DC," he added.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trade war: Trump was asked about India's claim on US importing Russian uranium, fertilisers; here's his response
(Photo credit: AP) US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he "doesn't know anything" about the United States importing fertilisers and chemicals from Russia, responding to India's accusation of double standards over Washington's criticism of New Delhi's Russian oil trade. Trump's remarks came during a press conference at the White House, when a reporter asked: 'India says the US buys Russian uranium and fertilizers while criticising them for buying Russian energy. Your response to that?' Trump replied: 'I don't know anything about it. We will have to check.' The comment came after a sharp statement from Trump on Truth Social. He accused India of profiting from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war by purchasing and reselling Russian oil. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!' Trump wrote on X. He did not specify the exact tariff hike but noted that "major actions are being seriously considered." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo India swiftly rejected Trump's accusations, calling them 'unjustified and unreasonable.' In a strong statement, the ministry of external affairs defended India's energy trade with Russia as a strategic necessity arising from the global market disruption caused by the war in Ukraine. 'In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability. India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion,' the MEA said. The statement emphasised that India's imports were focused on ensuring affordable and reliable energy access for its consumers, adding that, 'Unlike our case, such trade [by others] is not even a vital national compulsion.' India also pointed out that Western countries, including the US, continue to import Russian goods such as uranium hexafluoride for nuclear plants, palladium for making electric cars, and fertilisers and chemicals. The ministry of external affairs responded to Trump's warnings of penalties and increased tariffs by criticising what it described as the "double standards" and hypocrisy of both the United States and the European Union. "It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia (despite the Ukraine war)," read an MEA statement issued late on Monday. Trump did not confirm if there would be a 100% tariff but said major actions are being seriously considered. "I never said a percentage, but we'll be doing quite a bit of that. We'll see what happens over the next fairly short period of time," Trump said. Trump had earlier indicated plans to raise the existing 25% tariff rate on Indian goods 'very substantially', citing India's continued purchases of Russian oil as the reason. "Now, I will say this, India went from the highest tariffs ever. They will give us zero tariffs, and they're going to let us go in. But that's not good enough, because of what they're doing with oil, not good," Trump told CNBC. India's imports of Russian oil have surged from a mere 0.2% of its total crude intake before the Ukraine conflict to over 35% in recent months, making Russia its leading supplier. The ministry of external affairs explained that this shift was driven by traditional Middle Eastern suppliers diverting their exports to Europe in the aftermath of the war. India has continued to uphold its ties with Russia despite mounting Western pressure to scale back relations over the Ukraine conflict, citing its long-standing relationship with Moscow and economic needs. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays .
