RedotPay partners with Circle to support crypto-to-fiat transfers
Crypto payments firm RedotPay has teamed up with Circle to join the Circle Payments Network (CPN) and power payments into Brazil.
The move facilitates the direct transfer of cryptocurrency into Brazilian bank accounts, with an automatic conversion to Brazilian Real (BRL) upon receipt.
The CPN serves as a global connector for financial institutions, providing the infrastructure necessary for executing cross-border payments with the advantage of real-time settlement.
The company aims to improve the accessibility of global payments by offering reduced transaction costs and bypassing the traditional settlement period.
RedotPay CEO and co-founder Michael Gao said: 'By integrating with Circle Payments Network, RedotPay is addressing two major pain points that have historically hindered cross-border payments in emerging markets.'
Circle Product VP Sunil Sharma stated: 'We designed Circle Payments Network as a foundational coordination protocol for the always-on economy to connect financial institutions who share our vision of empowering emerging economies and modernising the global financial system. This is the next chapter in Circle's evolution, and RedotPay's customers will now have access to frictionless global payments.'
RedotPay has launched a new feature titled "Send Crypto, Receive BRL" as the initial phase of the CPN integration to eliminate the complexities associated with cross-border payments, enabling instantaneous crypto-to-fiat deposits into Brazilian bank accounts.
To support the launch, RedotPay has introduced a temporary $0 fee structure to incentivise usage.
The Brazil payment channel is now accessible to RedotPay users through the company's mobile application, compatible with both iOS and Android platforms.
Gao added: 'We are pleased to deliver a new stablecoin-based payment solution that effectively resolves these challenges. With our launch in Brazil, we remain committed to deliver innovative payment solutions that are faster and more affordable, so as to drive mass adoption of crypto payments and empower families and businesses to participate seamlessly in the global economy.'
This follows RedotPay's Series A funding round in March, which helped garner $40m.
"RedotPay partners with Circle to support crypto-to-fiat transfers " was originally created and published by Electronic Payments International, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Circle rally, EchoStar bankruptcy report, IonQ acquisition
Here are some of the stories Wall Street is watching on Monday, June 9. Circle's (CRCL) post-IPO rally has given the Ark Fintech Innovation (ARKF) fund a big boost. EchoStar (SATS) is considering bankruptcy according to a report from the Wall Street Journal. IonQ (IONQ) is acquiring a UK quantum startup called Oxford Ionics. Stay up to date on the latest market action, minute-by-minute, with Yahoo Finance's Market Minute.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Apple finally fixing its confusing naming system?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. It's that time of the year when rumours about Apple's next operating system updates start flying. True to form, we've seen plenty of speculation about big visionOS-inspired UI design changes in iOS 19 and macOS 16. But is that what the next systems will even be called? It's now being suggested that Apple will overhaul its OS naming conventions and will brand the next generation of software by year rather than release number. That would mean that instead of iOS 19, macOS 16, WatchOS 12 and visionOS 3, we would see the releases of iOS 26, MacOS 26, WatchOS 26 and visionOS 26. If that change sounds familiar, that might be because it's like what Samsung did with its flagship Galaxy S phones back in 2020. It's about time Apple made the same move. Apple's operating systems currently all have different numbers because they were all launched at different times. iPhones are currently on iOS 18, Macs on MacOS 15 and Vision Pro, which was released just last year, is on visionOS 2. The rumour about a change in branding comes from a credible source. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has been right about many Apple rumours in the pasts. He writes: "Apple will use the upcoming year rather than the current one. Though its next operating systems will launch around September 2025, they'll be named for 2026 — not unlike how car companies market their vehicles. If Apple keeps the strategy, the following set of releases will carry the 27 moniker." The move would bring consistency to Apple software branding and make it easier for both customers and developers to know what release each OS is on. There would be no more having to remember each system's number since you would just have to know what year it is. For the moment, it seems Apple isn't considering the same change for its hardware, so the next iPhone will presumably be the iPhone 17 as expected (and iPhone 17 Air if the rumours are true). But why stop at software? I'd say it makes sense to apply the same logic to devices. Gurman compares the move to car manufacturers, but it's hard not to also recall how Samsung made a change like this with its hardware. Apple's rival jumped from the Galaxy S10 in 2019 straight to the S20 in 2020. And it was an ingenious move. Not only did it make it easier for customers to remember what phone they have and identify the current model, but Samsung leap-frogged over Apple in the process. Apple was on iPhone 11 at the time. By turning the Galaxy S11 into the Galaxy S22, it suddenly made it sound like Samsung was ahead. The South Korean tech giant usually releases new Galaxy models in January, while Apple launches iPhones in September. If Apple called the next generation iPhone 26 instead of iPhone 17 it could beat Samsung at its own game and would always be a few months ahead. That might sound petty, but numbers can be powerful in branding. Just remember how Microsoft chose the name Xbox 360 to avoid being seen as a generation behind PlayStation. I'm sure some fans like the iPhone release number tradition, but Apple's already played fast and loose with that by skipping iPhone 9 so it could launch iPhone X on the phone's 10th anniversary, and it would have to repeat that move if it wants to release an iPhone 20 in 2027. Let's just ditch the release numbers and go with the year. You know it makes sense, Apple. You can see the best deals on Apple's current iPhone lineup below. Also see our pick of the best camera phones for other options. What do you think? Should iPhone 17 become iPhone 26? Let us know in the comments section below.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple's iPhone rebrand reveals a company in crisis
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Three years ago we got the iPhone 14, two years ago we got the iPhone 15, and last year we got the iPhone 16. Who knows what we're getting this year? Well, actually, for the first time in a long while, that joke might not be applicable in 2025, with Apple heavily rumoured to be jettisoning its naming conventions for iOS, and potentially the iPhone itself. Somewhat confusingly, Apple has been strongly rumoured to be ditching skipping straight from iOS 18 to iOS 26 when revealing the next generation of its mobile software at WWDC today. After nearly 20 years of consecutive numbers, the company has allegedly decided to name it after the coming year. And some have suggested the same change could hit the iPhone, with the iPhone 16 being followed by the iPhone 26. As one Redditor succinctly puts it, "This both makes a lot of sense and makes no sense at the same time." This potential major rebrand comes at a curious time for Apple, one in which the company is arguably on the defensive. Apple Intelligence, announced to much fanfare at last year's WWDC, is fast approaching 'disaster' status, with several features yet to materialise and the whole debacle allegedly causing tension in the company. And then there are the more existential questions facing the brand. As the iPhone approaches its twentieth birthday, the whole thing feels less and less innovative every year – to the point that the iPhone 16 launch left us unusually underwhelmed. The tech world seems all too aware that the world is ready for the next 'iPhone moment' to come along and transform the landscape, which might explain the ridiculous amount of hype that met the news of Jony Ive joining OpenAI, with a supposedly revolutionary new device imminent. Apple might have hoped the advent of Vision Pro might provide that next 'iPhone moment', but alas, it wasn't to be. The hugely expensive headset has already been declared a flop by several corners of the internet after Apple sharply cut back production at the end of last year. All of which to say is that Apple isn't exactly feeling its freshest in 2025, and the iOS and potential iPhone rebrand seems to confirm that the company knows it. Apple is hardly known for simple naming conventions, but it's notable that it has chosen now to cut the iOS title's ties with the original iPhone launch in 2007, as though the company is eager to show that it's looking forward, not back. Time will tell what Apple is planning to reveal at WWDC tonight, but for my money, it'll take more than a new name and a refreshed design for Apple to get people excited about the future of the iPhone. With its rivals circling and its AI efforts flailing, perhaps the next 'iPhone moment' won't come from Apple at all.
