Two men charged with possessing Molotov cocktails at LA protests
Federal prosecutors announced charges Wednesday against two men accused of possessing Molotov cocktails during recent protests in Los Angeles in response to immigration raids.
According to an affidavit filed with a complaint by prosecutors, Emiliano Galvez, 23, threw a Molotov cocktail over a wall where sheriff's deputies were attempting to control a crowd. The other man charged, 27-year-old Wrackkie Quiogue, was allegedly holding the incendiary when Los Angeles Police Department officers approached him. Quiogue then apparently threw it away.
Prosecutors also announced charges against two others for throwing water bottles, beer cans and other objects at federal officers.
Quiogue appeared in court on Tuesday, and the other three defendants are expected to appear in court in the coming days.
'When protesting crosses the line into violence, the penalties will be severe,' said United States Attorney Bill Essayli in a press release announcing the charges. 'We will not relent in dispensing swift justice to criminals who take advantage of our country's freedoms to engage in lawlessness.'
The complaint against Galvez also alleges that he was in the United States illegally, claiming he had overstayed a tourist visa issued in 2014. It said Galvez was arrested for being unlawfully present in the United States on June 9, and then identified as the individual seen in photographs throwing the device at a protest two days earlier, based on his tattoos.
The protests in Los Angeles were triggered after Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids at several local businesses, before spreading to the areas around federal buildings where people arrested in the raids were believed to be detained.
In response, President Trump has deployed National Guard troops and mobilized Marines to assist in quelling the protests, against the wishes of California officials including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D) and Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).
Newsom and Bass have blamed Trump's move as inflaming the protests. Democratic senators grilled Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the legality of the deployments at a Wednesday hearing.
Bass for the first time declared a curfew on Tuesday for the portion of downtown where the protests had been most concentrated. Hundreds of people were arrested overnight, mostly over failure to disperse.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump moves to merge wildland firefighting into single force, despite ex-officials warning of chaos
BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday ordered government agencies to consolidate their wildland firefighting into a single program, despite warnings from former federal officials that it could be costly and increase the risk of catastrophic blazes. The order aims to centralize firefighting efforts now split among five agencies and two Cabinet departments. Trump's proposed budget for next year calls for the creation of a new Federal Wildland Fire Service under the U.S. Interior Department. That would mean shifting thousands of personnel from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Service — where most federal firefighters now work — with fire season already underway . The administration has not disclosed how much the change could cost or save. Trump in his order cited the devastating Los Angeles wildfires in January as highlighting a need for a quicker response to wildfires. 'Wildfires threaten every region, yet many local government entities continue to disregard commonsense preventive measures,' the order said. The Trump administration in its first months temporarily cut off money for wildfire prevention work and reduced the ranks of federal government firefighters through layoffs and retirement. The order makes no mention of climate change, which Trump has downplayed even as warming temperatures help stoke bigger and more destructive wildfires that churn out massive amounts of harmful pollution. More than 65,000 wildfires across the U.S. burned almost 9 million acres (3.6 million hectares) last year. Organizations representing firefighters and former Forest Service officials say it would be costly to restructure firefighting efforts and cause major disruptions in the midst of fire season. A group that includes several former Forest Service chiefs said in a recent letter to lawmakers that consolidation of firefighting work could 'actually increase the likelihood of more large catastrophic fires, putting more communities, firefighters and resources at risk.' Another destructive fire season is expected this year, driven by above-normal temperatures for most of the country, according to federal officials. A prior proposal to merge the Forest Service and Interior to improve firefighting was found to have significant drawbacks by the Congressional Research Service in a 2008 report. But the idea more recently got bipartisan support, with California Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla and Montana Republican Sen. Tim Sheehy sponsoring legislation that is similar to Trump's plan. Before his election last year, Sheehy founded an aerial firefighting company that relies heavily on federal contracts. In a separate action aimed at wildfires, the Trump administration last month rolled back environmental safeguards around future logging projects on more than half U.S. national forests. The emergency designation covers 176,000 square miles (455,000 square kilometers) of terrain primarily in the West but also in the South, around the Great Lakes and in New England. Most of those forests are considered to have high wildfire risk, and many are in decline because of insects and disease .
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Geraldo Rivera: Sen. Padilla's removal a ‘bad look'
(NewsNation) — NewsNation correspondent-at-large Geraldo Rivera said Thursday he believes Democratic California Sen. Alex Padilla's removal from a DHS press briefing in Los Angeles was rough handling and was a 'bad look' for the law enforcement officers who restrained him. 'The United States senator has a right, even if it's a stunt, to get in front of a camera and have a dialogue with Kristi Noem,' Rivera said. Video shared of the incident shows Padilla being restrained by law enforcement and forced out of the room and him later being pushed to the ground and handcuffed. In the video, Padilla is seen interrupting the conference held by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, looking to ask her questions. FBI head Patel suing MSNBC columnist over nightclub hopping claims DHS accused Padilla of failing to identify himself and stated that he 'lunged toward' Noem. However, in the video, Padilla identifies himself as he moves toward the front of the room. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said the agents who removed Padilla acted 'completely appropriately' in assisting Secret Service officials. Noem later said in a post on X that she and Padilla met for 15 minutes after the conference and exchanged phone numbers to talk more later. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge invokes monarchy talk while mulling Trump's National Guard deployment
A federal judge warned at a Thursday hearing that accepting the Trump administration's assertion he has no authority to review the president's National Guard deployment in Los Angeles is a slippery slope. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said he hoped to rule later in the day on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) request to immediately restrict the troops' power on the ground, suggesting federal law at minimum required President Trump to alert the governor. The judge repeatedly emphasized that Trump is exercising presidential authority — not a king's — and the role comes with limitations. 'That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' Breyer said. 'It's not that a leader can simply say something and then it becomes it. It's a question of is a leader, a president or the governor, following the law as set forth in both the Constitution and statutes,' he continued. 'That's what a president, a governor or any leader must act under. Otherwise, they become something other than a constitutional officer.' Breyer seemed willing to agree with Newsom that Trump's deployment was legally defective, but it's still a question as to whether the judge will enjoin the president's directive or give the administration a chance to institute it the proper way. At the same time, Breyer appeared skeptical of blocking at this stage the 700 Marines sent to assist the several thousand guard members deployed. The Trump administration argues Breyer has no authority to review Trump's deployment of the National Guard because it is in the president's sole discretion. Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate argued that Trump was not required to seek approval from Newsom in mobilizing the guard, calling the governor 'merely a conduit.' The president does not have to call up a governor and 'invite them to Camp David' for a negotiation summit to call up the National Guard in their state, he said. 'There is one commander in chief of the armed forces, and when the president makes a decision, the states are subservient to the president's decision,' Shumate said. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) contend that Trump was required to receive Newsom's consent before deploying the National Guard. 'They suggest, your honor, that there are no guardrails,' Nicholas Green, a lawyer for the state, said. Amid the legal battle, Trump said Thursday that he 'doesn't feel like a king.' He was responding to questions about 'No Kings' demonstrations expected around the country this weekend, which are set to coincide with a military parade marking the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved,' Trump said. Breyer during the hearing kept returning to monarchy talk, trying to determine how he could side with Trump without giving him unchecked power. 'What makes America great, different, is our Constitution and our robust discussion of views of the citizens,' the judge said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
