'Disconnected': Province's ER wait numbers not whole story, says top Alberta doc
By the numbers
Article content
In May, the rate was 19.2, in June it was 15.7 and in July it was 20.7.
Article content
At the U of A, it's 17 per cent on the year. The rate in May was 14, but dropped to 12.2 in June before ticking up to 12.9 July.
Article content
The Misericordia Hospital in west Edmonton has a rate of 16.4 per cent on the year, while at the Grey Nuns Hospital in southeast Edmonton, it's 13.2.
Article content
Government figures for July indicate the only Edmonton hospital with 'leaves without being seen' figures at 10 per cent or less was the Stollery Children's Hospital at the U of A site, where just under nine per cent went unseen before leaving.
Article content
At the Sturgeon hospital in St. Albert, figures ran under the provincial average; the LWBS rate is fairly steady over three years, up from seven per cent in 2023 to 8.5 per cent in 2025.
Article content
Article content
A previous survey from the AMA indicated almost one in five Albertans — 18 per cent — surveyed who went to the emergency room left before receiving care, but the province pushed back on the survey, saying the AMA sample size of 1,120 respondents does not reflect the full range of patient experiences or health data.
Article content
One of the challenges Thirsk sees is space. In his 25-year medical career in Alberta, he's seen the number of hospitals in Edmonton stay static at four, while the population has doubled.
Article content
Asked about the 2024 cancellation of the planned South Edmonton Hospital, Jones's ministry said a projected cost of $4.9 billion cost would have made it the most expensive hospital in Canadian history.
Article content
'It would have been an inefficient use of funds that could have been more effectively directed toward expanding existing infrastructure, increasing overall bed capacity, and better meeting the needs of Albertans,' said the ministry in its statement.
Article content
Article content
Improvements slated for the health-care system in the Edmonton Corridor through Budget 2025 include an investment of $180 million over three years for health capital projects, with $2 million for planning new in-patient towers at Grey Nuns Hospital and the Misericordia Hospital, which will eventually add a total of 700 beds, Jones's office said.
Article content
Another $11 million is earmarked for planning for a new, stand-alone Stollery Children's Hospital, which is expected to eventually free up space within the University of Alberta Hospital for redevelopment, 'potentially allowing for the addition of a substantial number of adult in-patient beds,' the statement said.
Article content
Some $3 million is set aside to support plans to expand the Strathcona Community Hospital.
Article content
Of $17 million to develop urgent care centres across the province, two of those are earmarked for Edmonton. Specified for non-critical health needs, they're expected to reduce pressure on hospitals around the province, the ministry said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
12 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: 'New approach' to COVID shots puts Albertans at risk
Article content On June 13, the minister of Primary and Preventative Health Services, Adriana LaGrange, announced 'a new approach to COVID-19 immunizations' to reduce vaccine wastage and 'better align supply with demand … while continuing to protect those at highest risk.' Article content This rationale is a red herring. The 'new approach' drastically limits Albertans' access to the lifesaving COVID vaccine. Wastage? No provincially funded vaccine has been wasted. The COVID vaccine was provided by the federal government for the past four years; 2025 is the first time provinces must order and pay for it. Article content Article content Article content Under the 'new approach,' 240,000 fewer doses of vaccine have been ordered than were given last year. It also limits the venues for vaccine delivery to 13 per cent of the sites that were accessible last year, and drastically restricts who can receive free vaccine. Article content Albertans must register with the vaccine-booking system in advance if they wish to 'register intent' to receive a COVID shot. If more people register than the number of doses ordered, the minister has not provided assurance that the province can acquire more vaccine in time. Article content Pharmacists, who gave 87 per cent of COVID shots last year, have been removed from delivery options. COVID vaccine will be delivered entirely by public health clinics. This decision makes no sense; it instead creates unfair barriers to those who work shifts, lack transportation, or are unable to get to vaccine-delivery locations. Article content Article content The 'new approach' will limit who will receive COVID vaccine free of charge, requiring other Albertans to pay a yet-to-be determined fee. Alberta is the only Canadian jurisdiction that will make its citizens pay for the vaccine. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommends that everyone over the age of 65, health-care workers, pregnant women, and Indigenous people (including Métis) receive the COVID vaccine. Article content Cost is a barrier to many Albertans — particularly low-income families, community-dwelling seniors, and members of racialized and other equity-denied communities. Scientific research and evaluation have shown a clear cost-benefit to immunization of those groups included in the NACI recommendations. Their evidence is that the social and economic benefits of protecting these groups outweigh the costs. Article content The 'new approach' proposes to implement the campaign in four phases, beginning with seniors in group settings like nursing homes, then people compromised with some medical conditions, then all seniors, followed by all other Albertans. Alarmingly, health-care workers will not receive free COVID vaccine and are in the last group to be immunized, if vaccine is still available. Article content This 'new approach' is either a massive failure to plan or an actual plan to fail. Public health experts and common sense indicate that if you want to protect people from a killer disease for which there is a safe and effective vaccine, you should make the vaccine available, easily accessible, and affordable. The 'new approach' weaponizes a policy to do the exact opposite. Article content This 'new approach' creates obstacles to immunization against a serious vaccine-preventable disease that caused over 380 deaths last year — and unfairly disadvantages Albertans who would receive COVID shots free of charge anywhere else in the country. Article content Article content COVID vaccines, including the new non-mRNA product Novavax, are safe and effective and decrease the burden of illness and death for individuals and communities. Albertans, as with all other Canadians, deserve a fair chance to receive COVID vaccine if they want it. Article content Minister LaGrange must commit to follow national Canadian guidelines for free and timely access to COVID vaccine for all Albertans. Will the minister assure Albertans that there will be vaccine available to every Albertan who wants it? Following the 'new approach' will show that, compared to the rest of Canada, the 'Alberta Disadvantage' is real and possibly fatal. Article content Jeffrey Johnson, PhD, professor and former dean, School of Public Health, University of Alberta. Article content Dawn Friesen, MN, assistant deputy minister of Public Health and Compliance (retired). Article content Dr. Tehseen Lahda, pediatric specialist. Article content Dr. Paul Parks, emergency physician, past-president of the Alberta Medical Association. Article content John Church, PhD, professor emeritus, Department of Political Science, University of Alberta. Article content Kathleen Ness, assistant deputy minister of Health Service Delivery (retired), adjunct professor, School of Public Health, University of Alberta. Article content
Cision Canada
4 hours ago
- Cision Canada
The Sidoo Family Giving Foundation Supports Concussion Research at BC Lions Alumni Golf Tournament
VANCOUVER, BC, Aug. 7, 2025 /CNW/ - David Sidoo and Sidoo Family Giving Foundation have donated $5,000 to support brain health and concussion research at the 19th Annual BC Lions Alumni Association (BCLAA) Golf Tournament. The donation is earmarked for HeadsUpGuys, a mental health program at the University of British Columbia (UBC)led by Dr. John Ogrodniczuk, Professor of Psychiatry and Director of UBC's Psychotherapy Program. The organization focuses on men's mental health, especially issues stemming from depression and concussion-related trauma. Dr. Ogrodniczuk, who will attend the tournament, has helped make HeadsUpGuys the world's leading research-informed resource for men's mental health. Their work, rooted in clinical research and lived experience, helps men navigate the lasting effects of head trauma, depression, and emotional struggle—issues that affect countless former athletes. "These players gave everything to the sport," said David Sidoo, a former CFL player himself. "Now it's our turn to support them, especially when it comes to something as serious and often invisible as brain health." Concussions and repeated head trauma have long been a concern in contact sports like Canadian football. But despite growing awareness, research funding remains limited, and many retired athletes continue to suffer in silence from chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and other mental health challenges. Sidoo's contribution builds on years of community involvement and a commitment to health-focused giving through Sidoo Family Giving. His support of the BCLAA Golf Tournament not only honors the legacy of the BC Lions but also addresses a critical, underserved area of player care. "This isn't just a donation—it's about standing up for the health and futures of our athletes," Sidoo emphasized. The BCLAA Golf Tournament has supported HeadsUpGuys for the past three years, reflecting the growing need to prioritize mental wellness in the athletic community. Thanks to generous supporters like Sidoo, this year's event helps fuel life-changing work for current and former players alike. David Sidoo is a former CFL athlete, accomplished entrepreneur, and committed philanthropist. Through the Sidoo Family Giving Foundation, he champions initiatives in education, youth development, health, and, most recently, concussion research and mental health support for athletes. Learn more at HeadsUpGuys, based at the University of British Columbia, is a global leader in men's mental health. The organization provides clinically backed resources, tools, and research to help men navigate depression, trauma, and the long-term effects of concussions.
Ottawa Citizen
6 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Adam: Even now, the PSA test remains highly controversial
Article content I've been thinking about writing this column for about five years, but haven't done so until now because there is a personal element to it. But former U.S. president Joe Biden's recent prostate cancer diagnosis finally pushed me over the line. Article content I don't want to be overly dramatic about it, but it is something of a Shakesperean dilemma: to do or not to do a PSA test for prostate cancer. Article content Article content Article content Research published in 2006 in the Canadian Journal of Public Health (the latest definitive data I could find) showed that 47.5 per cent of Canadian men over 50 had taken a PSA test for prostate cancer in their lifetime. I am one of the 52.5 per cent who haven't done so. A more recent report on American adults issued in 2023 by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, said 38 per cent of men had had a PSA test for prostate cancer within the past year, in that case 2023. Article content My inclination is to take the test, but my family doctor cautions against it, because it doesn't definitively tell whether you have prostate cancer, and after testing and possible treatment, the potential for harm is considerable. Even if the test detects cancer, the disease may never bother you. The psychological and physical damage that may ensue after a test can be devastating, he says. However, my doctor says that if I insist, he'll arrange it, but to help me understand the full implications, he referred me to a report on the subject by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health (CTFPHC). I didn't know about the study, but the findings are sobering. They vindicated my doctor's advice. If you haven't read the report, do so. Article content Article content The CTFPHC is an independent, expert federal body charged with developing national preventive health guidelines for primary care. It examined what would happen if 1,000 men aged 55 to 69 were screened over a 13-year period, and the recommendation was surprising. 'The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health recommends against screening for prostate cancer with the PSA test,' it says. The task force says 'the potential small benefit' from PSA screening is 'outweighed' by 'the potential significant harms of the screening and associated follow-up treatment.' Article content It says that if 1,000 men are screened with PSA, the risk of dying from prostate cancer is five in a 1,000. And among those who are not screened with PSA, the risk of dying from prostate cancer is six in 1,000. Basically, there's little difference in mortality rates. Of the 1,000 men screened, 720 will have a negative test. One hundred and seventy-eight, or almost 20 per cent, will have 'false positives' that will require unnecessary biopsies. One hundred and two men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, but 33, or about one-third of these diagnoses, will not result in symptoms or death in the patient's lifetime. But, because of uncertainty about the progression of the disease, these men will likely seek treatment.
