
Counter-demonstration against anti-refugee protest in Falkirk planned
Concerns have been raised by anti-racism campaigners about the protest, which has drawn support from members of Britain First and Great British National Protest.
Campaign group Stand Up To Racism Scotland confirmed they have organised a peaceful counter-protest to 'stand in solidarity' with refugees and to show that they are welcome.
READ MORE: BBC radio host quickly cuts off caller after 'complicit in genocide' comments
A spokesperson for the group said: 'We reject the scapegoating and myths that say that refugees pose a threat to communities and we reject the attempts by this group to demonise refugees in an attempt to further their own racist or far-right agenda.'
They added: 'There is no place for racism, hatred and division in Falkirk.'
Speeches from members of the local community, trade unionists, local campaigns, faith groups and others are all planned at the counter-protest.
The anti-refugee demonstration comes as a surge of protests have taken place across the UK in the wake of misinformation spread by senior politicians, including the Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage, and Conservative Robert Jenrick.
On Monday, Reform UK claimed migrants from Muslim countries posed a threat to women's safety in Britain, with the party's only female MP, Sarah Pochin, claiming asylum seekers hold 'medieval views'.
Jenrick also prompted anger over the weekend after he claimed mass migration was putting women and children at risk.
Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman has criticised other UK parties for contributing to growing hostility towards refugees.
(Image: Christian Gamauf)
She said instead of challenging the ideas of the far right, far too many politicians have tried to defeat them by imitating them, no matter how many times this tactic has failed.
Chapman said: 'Time and again, we've seen centrist politicians usher in more brutal immigration systems, water down environmental policies, and stigmatise minorities, but the result has only given legitimacy to the toxic rhetoric of the far right. It has helped to fuel these awful protests and the bigotry that they are built on.
'People across Scotland need real change to improve their lives in the face of a broken economic system that entrenches inequality. We need real investment in public services, and action to lower daily costs like energy, rent, and bus and train fares.
'The Scottish Greens will always stand firm in solidarity with communities being targeted, and against racism and prejudice. Solidarity with all those standing up to the far right this weekend.'
The campaign coalition Together with Refugees added that the people targeted have already suffered unimaginably, having fled for their lives from countries such as Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria.
A spokesperson said: 'Now, due to unacceptable delays and a broken system, they are housed in hotels, a collective target of hostility, banned from working, with limited control over their lives or futures. Believing they will at last be safe and protected, they are then faced with further persecution and fear.'
Chief Inspector Alex Hatrick, Falkirk's policing area commander, said: 'We are aware of a planned protest and counter protest in Falkirk on Saturday, August 16.
'A proportionate policing plan is in place to ensure public safety and minimise disruption.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Theologian in Jenrick xenophobia row says pair ‘could work together'
The theologian who accused Robert Jenrick of xenophobia on the BBC has invited the shadow justice minister to work with him to ease tensions over migration rather than 'ramping up anti-immigrant sentiment'. Dr Krish Kandiah's comments on Radio 4's Thought for the Day, raising concerns about Jenrick's remarks about the safety of his daughters because of small boat arrivals, caused a row after a complaint from the shadow justice secretary, with the item being retrospectively edited by the BBC. Kandiah expressed concern about the current atmosphere relating to migration and said he was extending an olive branch to Jenrick in the hope the two men could work together on the issue. The initial remarks by Kandiah, who heads the Sanctuary Foundation refugee charity, prompted an angry response from Jenrick. The BBC said it had removed 'some of the language used' by Kandiah from a version of Thought for the Day posted online, saying it was not appropriate for the faith-based radio segment. In his statement, Kandiah said: 'Mr Jenrick, I want your daughters and mine to be able to walk down the road safely and without fear. I worked with you when you were housing minister and the UK welcomed over 200,000 people from Hong Kong. 'I was grateful for your support and compassion during that time. I would love to find a way we could work together to de-escalate the fear and anger many are feeling in our country. I believe we need to focus on the real challenges that are making people worried – housing, jobs and the cost of living – rather than ramping up anti-immigrant sentiment.' In last weekend's Mail on Sunday, Jenrick cited a series of recent crimes he said had been committed by asylum seekers, writing: 'When I see these stories, I can't help but think that it could have been one of my three young daughters. I certainly don't want my children to share a neighbourhood with immigrant men with backward views who broke into Britain illegally, and about whom we know next to nothing.' In his Thought for the Day contribution, Kandiah quoted this passage from Jenrick, adding: 'These words echo a fear many have absorbed. Fear of the stranger. The technical name for this is xenophobia.' While the government has not criticised Jenrick's tone, and say the current row is a matter for the BBC, some MPs and others have said Kandiah's description was accurate. The Labour MP John McDonnell said: 'Jenrick has become the byword for political opportunism. There is no prejudice he won't pander to and no harm to our community he won't risk to further his political career.' Siân Berry, the Green MP for Brighton Pavilion and a former co-leader of the party, condemned Jenrick for his comments and the government for not speaking out against them. 'It is 100% xenophobia, drawing on stereotypes to create unnecessary and inaccurate fears,' she said. 'If you can't call that xenophobic or racist without the person in question kicking off at you, then I don't know what we've learned from the last 80 years. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'Robert Jenrick knows exactly what he's doing when he is pushing these buttons, and he does need to be called out on it by everybody possible. I'm daily frustrated by the fact that the Labour government is playing along and not standing up for real British values. 'What is [a] Labour government for if it isn't to create a political discourse that backs up what British values really stand for. We're not a country that rejects immigrants in the way that some people on the right and the far right would like us to.' Jacqueline McKenzie, the head of immigration and asylum at Leigh Day solicitors, called Jenrick's comments 'appalling'. She said: 'Not only are his comments xenophobic and without substance, but this is the sort of language that fuels racist tension in an otherwise cohesive society and causes the sorts of attacks on migrants and those who work with them as we are now seeing, and which fans the flames which led to last summer's riots. 'It is irresponsible for a senior member of the opposition to make such statements. Whereas there are a few high profile cases of asylum seekers who have been arrested for sexual offences, this is not at all representative of those who claim asylum, the vast majority of whom go on to prove that they have fled persecution.' Jenrick's office has been contacted for comment.


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Theologian behind Jenrick xenophobia row says they ‘could work together'
The theologian who accused Robert Jenrick of xenophobia on the BBC has invited the shadow justice minister to work with him to ease tensions over migration rather than 'ramping up anti-immigrant sentiment'. Dr Krish Kandiah's comments on Radio 4's Thought for the Day, raising concerns about Jenrick's remarks about the safety of his daughters because of small boat arrivals, caused a row after a complaint from the shadow justice secretary, with the item being retrospectively edited by the BBC. Kandiah expressed concern about the current atmosphere relating to migration and said he was extending an olive branch to Jenrick in the hope that the two men could work together on the issue. The initial remarks by Kandiah, who heads the Sanctuary Foundation, a refugee charity, prompted an angry response from Jenrick. The BBC said it had removed 'some of the language used' by Kandiah from a version of Thought for the Day posted online, saying it was not appropriate for the faith-based radio segment. In his statement, Kandiah said: 'Mr Jenrick, I want your daughters and mine to be able to walk down the road safely and without fear. I worked with you when you were housing minister and the UK welcomed over 200,000 people from Hong Kong. 'I was grateful for your support and compassion during that time. I would love to find a way we could work together to de-escalate the fear and anger many are feeling in our country. I believe we need to focus on the real challenges that are making people worried – housing, jobs and the cost of living – rather than ramping up anti-immigrant sentiment.' In last weekend's Mail on Sunday, Jenrick cited a series of recent crimes he said had been committed by asylum seekers, writing: 'When I see these stories, I can't help but think that it could have been one of my three young daughters. I certainly don't want my children to share a neighbourhood with immigrant men with backward views who broke into Britain illegally, and about whom we know next to nothing.' In his Thought for the Day contribution, Kandiah quoted this passage from Jenrick, adding: 'These words echo a fear many have absorbed. Fear of the stranger. The technical name for this is xenophobia.' While the government has not criticised Jenrick's tone, and say the current row is a matter for the BBC, some MPs and others have said Kandiah's description was accurate. The Labour MP John McDonnell said: 'Jenrick has become the byword for political opportunism. There is no prejudice he won't pander to and no harm to our community he won't risk to further his political career.' Siân Berry, the Green MP for Brighton Pavilion and a former co-leader of the party, condemned both Jenrick for his comments and the government for not speaking out against them. 'It is 100% xenophobia, drawing on stereotypes to create unnecessary and inaccurate fears,' she said. 'If you can't call that xenophobic or racist without the person in question kicking off at you, then I don't know what we've learned from the last 80 years. 'Robert Jenrick knows exactly what he's doing when he is pushing these buttons, and he does need to be called out on it by everybody possible. I'm daily frustrated by the fact that the Labour government is playing along and not standing up for real British values. 'What is [a] Labour government for if it isn't to create a political discourse that backs up what British values really stand for. We're not a country that rejects immigrants in the way that some people on the right and the far right would like us to.' Jacqueline McKenzie, the head of immigration and asylum at Leigh Day solicitors, called Jenrick's comments 'appalling'. She said: 'Not only are his comments xenophobic and without substance, but this is the sort of language that fuels racist tension in an otherwise cohesive society and causes the sorts of attacks on migrants and those who work with them as we are now seeing, and which fans the flames which led to last summer's riots. 'It is irresponsible for a senior member of the opposition to make such statements. Whereas there are a few high profile cases of asylum seekers who have been arrested for sexual offences, this is not at all representative of those who claim asylum, the vast majority of whom go on to prove that they have fled persecution.' Jenrick's office has been contacted for comment.


The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sturgeon: Some gender reform critics are driven by prejudice
She also revealed she had received horrific abuse in recent days, saying "people who call themselves feminists, standing up for women's rights" had laughed at her miscarriage and wished for her to be raped. READ MORE Ms Sturgeon has undertaken a number of media interviews and public events in recent days following the publication of her memoir, Frankly. In the book she writes that she should have considered pausing her bid to change the law. MSPs passed the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill in December 2023, aiming to speed up and simplify the process for a trans person to obtain a gender recognition certificate and change their legal sex. Under the current system, the process takes at least two years, involves a medical diagnosis and is only available to those aged 18 and over. Holyrood's Bill would have cut the waiting time to six months, lowered the age threshold to 16, and scrapped the need for a medical diagnosis — often described as self-identification. Before it could become law, the then Conservative Secretary of State for Scotland, Alister Jack, blocked it using the first-ever order under Section 35 of the 1998 Scotland Act. First Minister John Swinney has since ruled out revisiting the legislation, saying it is beyond the powers of the Scottish Parliament and his government 'quite simply cannot proceed with it'. During a discussion with broadcaster Kirsty Wark, Ms Sturgeon was asked about the language she used to describe some critics of her gender reforms, including calling them transphobic. The Glasgow Southside MSP conceded that this had closed people out of the conversation, but said she had always caveated her remarks by making clear it was not true of all opponents. 'I am not saying everybody falls into this activity, but I am sorry, I do not care what side of this debate you are on, I defy anybody to say that there are not supporters of Trump, of Putin, of Erdoğan, and people here, supporters of people like Farage, who fall into these categories and have chosen to take on this issue. 'It is the soft underbelly of other prejudice. And I am sorry, I find it really hard to believe that even people who passionately disagree with me cannot see that.' Ms Wark told Ms Sturgeon that as first minister her job should have been to bring people together, asking if she had been 'inclusive enough in these conversations'. 'Probably not, no,' Ms Sturgeon replied. 'I do not think I was.' She added: 'The debate is toxic on both sides of this debate. It is not all one way, and sometimes it is presented as if it is. 'I have had, just in the last couple of days — and I do not spend a lot of time looking at the bowels of social media — occasion to see people on the other side of this debate. Not faceless bots, but real people. 'People who call themselves feminists, standing up for women's rights, saying things about me such as, when I described my miscarriage experience the other day, 'I have not laughed as much in years,' and accusing me of making it up. People saying they hope I am raped in a toilet. 'So these are the kind of things that go in both directions at the end.' READ MORE While she insisted not all opponents of gender reform are transphobic or homophobic, Ms Sturgeon said she had been worried that pausing the legislation would have meant 'giving in to that', but added: 'I might have been wrong, and I probably was wrong about that.' Speaking later to journalists, Ms Sturgeon said the abuse she had received made her concerned for the state of democracy. She said she had not contacted police over the comments. 'Of course, allegations of criminality should be reported to the police, but I think in terms of online abuse, sometimes we just have to kind of all take a step back and stop doing it, rather than think that the recourse is always to go to the police. 'I do not look at it very often. I try not to, but it makes me deeply concerned, not for myself so much as for the state of democracy. 'I speak to young women, young men as well, who are interested in politics, who would love to think about going into politics, but actually think that they could not do it because of the abuse. 'And if we carry on down that road, then democracy is in an even worse state than sometimes it appears it is right now. 'As a frontline politician for three decades, I am not without responsibility for the state of public discourse. "I have got to take my share of collective responsibility, but I think we have also all got to just stop shouting abuse at each other, and take a step back and try to find a way of disagreeing, but doing it a bit more agreeably than we seem to be capable of right now.'