logo
6 Steps to Reset a Demotivated Team

6 Steps to Reset a Demotivated Team

How often has your team changed lately? A new member joins. A key player exits. Roles shift. Strategy evolves. A conflict brews. Performance dips. Today's teams are in constant flux —reshaped by both internal dynamics and external pressures. And yet many leaders push forward without pausing to reset after a team change.
The best leaders know that success isn't static—it requires regular renewal. Whether driven by restructuring, relationship tensions, demotivation, or strategic pivots, there comes a moment when a team needs more than a tweak. It needs a relaunch.
Based on our collective work with hundreds of teams over the past decade, we offer a roadmap for getting your team back on track.
1. Reassess: Diagnose before you act
Leaders often rush to make changes without first diagnosing the underlying issues, only to find the problems worsen. Before jumping into action, consider these questions:
Is the team aligned on purpose, goals, and priorities?
Are there unresolved conflicts or trust issues?
Has motivation, engagement, or well-being dropped?
Are there external pressures impacting performance?
Does the team have the right resources?
Is there a shared commitment to investing in relationships?
Are there issues with your leadership style or perceived fairness?
Not all team members will feel comfortable speaking openly, especially in group settings or directly with you. Cultural norms, personal history, and power dynamics can all shape how people express concerns. In addition to one-on-one conversations, consider using anonymous pulse surveys, or have one trusted member of the team compile unspoken themes and report them to you. And if the team's psychological safety allows, host a structured dialogue where members can share their perspectives in a respectful, inclusive way.
The goal isn't to force openness—it's to uncover what's really going on in a way that works for your team. Only then can you address the root causes and relaunch with intention.
Take one leader we worked with at a European tech company. He believed a loss of motivation had caused his team to get complacent, diminishing their performance. We asked him to dive a little deeper into what might really be going on that could perhaps be unspoken. An anonymous team diagnostic revealed a deeper issue: A recent reporting restructure had left several members feeling overlooked and undervalued, driving their disengagement. Once the true cause surfaced, the leader could take targeted action to rebuild trust and reenergize the team.
While individual conversations are helpful for diagnosis, the reset must happen together. Leaders often rely too heavily on private, bilateral talks, unintentionally reinforcing fault lines. The real work lies in building the team's capacity to face hard truths— collectively.
2. Reconnect: Build trust and psychological safety
If your team has been through turbulence, chances are trust has taken a hit. For example, we recently worked with a senior leader at a pharmaceutical company who dismissed a team-composition change as 'just one person' and that it was 'more or less the same team.' But the reality was different: While only one team member was replaced, the new person was dismissive and made sarcastic comments, which fundamentally distorted the whole team's power dynamics and diminished psychological safety.
Relaunching starts with rebuilding psychological safety by creating an environment where people feel safe to speak up, share their experience, challenge ideas, and even engage in a ' good fight ' now and then. Here's how to begin:
Lead with vulnerability by conducting a team check-in to understand how team members are faring both personally and professionally.
Encourage open dialogue through structured team retrospectives. Allow each member to speak about their experience and ideas and be heard and acknowledged by others. Share your own lessons learned and what you'll do differently.
Allow for constructive feedback through a structured team process where feedback is considered a shared responsibility.
3. Reenvision: What's our job to be done?
What is your team's purpose? What does the future hold? What is at stake? Teams rally around clear, inspiring visions, especially during periods of change. Frame the relaunch as an opportunity to realign on the 'what,' not just to react to problems.
While leaders often assume their team is aligned on purpose and strategy, that's not necessarily the case, and it's important to make the implicit explicit. We worked with the CFO of a German manufacturing company who had attempted a relaunch but been unsuccessful. She had skipped this reenvision step because her team members insisted that the vision was 'clear,' when in reality, they weren't on the same page.
To get the alignment you need, be transparent about challenges while focusing on the future:
Clarify the overall vision and strategic map to get there. Align on a few key outcomes that define success in the short and long term.
Reaffirm the team's purpose and value to the organization and to customers.
Set a forward-looking tone that inspires optimism and agency.
4. Recontract: Clarify the team's ways of working
Misalignment often stems from confusion about roles, priorities, and how team members will actually collaborate. During a relaunch, renew and redefine key elements of what McKinsey refers to as the ' team operating system ': 'the building blocks for the way team members collaborate, create change, and support one another.' Consider:
Roles and responsibilities: Ensure everyone knows what's expected of them. This encompasses both written and unwritten expectations of who specifically is responsible for which deliverables.
Decision-making processes: Clarify who makes which decisions and how input is gathered.
Team norms and expectations: Consider which behaviors are expected, what the optimal cadence is for meetings and collaboration, and when you'll engage in feedback. It's especially critical to regularly realign and reinforce these expectations when working across borders, boundaries, and time zones.
We worked with the leadership team of a fast-moving consumer goods company's EMEA region on realigning their meeting practices. They were suffering from meeting proliferation, where their entire days were spent sitting in meetings, leaving little time to get 'actual work' done. We challenged them to be as specific as possible, considering questions like: Who must really be in the room, and who can receive the minutes afterward? What preparation is expected? What are our practices for virtual and face-to-face meetings, including length, how to ensure all voices are heard, and how much time to spend on checking in? And after the meeting itself, is there time for debriefing and sensemaking? After going through that exercise, the team created—and upheld—new standards, and meeting quality improved dramatically.
5. Reenergize: Build on successes
It's easy to fall back into old patterns. To make the relaunch stick, focus on quick wins that demonstrate positive movement and reinforce the new behaviors. Identify one or two visible, achievable objectives that can be met in the first 30 to 60 days and recognize team members for doing so. Small successes build confidence and reinforce positive team dynamics. A team's energy is shaped by its daily interactions, successes, and failures. Relaunching is a great time to introduce or refresh rituals that foster alignment and engagement. Here are some ideas:
Bi-weekly check-ins: Schedule short, focused team meetings to align on priorities.
Wins and learnings reviews: Celebrate progress and reflect on lessons after completing important milestones.
One-on-one coaching: Prioritize regular leader–team member touchpoints with the purpose of having a growth-oriented, developmental conversation. Equally important are the peer-to-peer coaching conversations where colleagues help each other with expansive questions aimed at strengthening skills.
A supply chain team we worked with took time to acknowledge the progress they were making on active listening. They gave encouraging feedback to a team member who had previously been dominating conversations and had practiced stepping back in meetings. This encouraged him to continue the journey, propelling the team forward. These moments of positive reinforcement shape and reinforce team culture.
6. Readjust: Sustain momentum
A relaunch is not a one-time event—it's an ongoing process, and the steps aren't always linear. Keep the momentum by:
Tracking progress against the team's new goals and priorities.
Providing micro-feedback frequent, brief, and targeted, and holding each other accountable to new ways of working.
Regularly reassessing and adjusting what's working and what's not, including roles and responsibilities, decision-making processes, and team norms.
The executive board of a logistics solution company we worked with found itself in a situation where members were frustrated with one of their peers, resulting in an us-versus-him dynamic. But we found that the reality was more complicated. The team was consistently violating an initially agreed-upon norm of turn-taking and sharing the airtime in discussions. The flipchart that featured this agreement had been pushed to the corner of the room and subsequently forgotten. The simple act of asking them to revisit those norms launched the reset. We asked them to evaluate themselves: 'On a scale of 1–10, how well are you doing on your initial agreement to take turns and share the airtime?'
. . .
Like any living systems, teams need regular care, attention, and intentional renewal to thrive. Relaunching a team isn't a sign of failure—it's a sign of leadership. By pausing to reassess, reset, and realign, leaders can reenergize their teams, strengthen trust, and build the clarity and momentum needed for sustained performance in an ever-changing environment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PLTR: UBS Picks a Winner in the Palantir vs. AMD AI Showdown
PLTR: UBS Picks a Winner in the Palantir vs. AMD AI Showdown

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

PLTR: UBS Picks a Winner in the Palantir vs. AMD AI Showdown

Aug 11 - The AI race is heating up, and UBS analysts just put two big names under the microscope, Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD). Both recently posted solid earnings, but UBS sees them on different paths. Palantir delivered a milestone quarter, crossing $1 billion in revenue for the first time. Sales jumped 48% year-over-year, fueled by its AI Platform and steady flow of government contracts. Big wins included a US Navy project with BlueForge Alliance and a new partnership with Accenture (NYSE:ACN). Cash reserves climbed to $6 billion, and the stock is up a staggering 147% this year. Still, UBS flagged its lofty valuation and kept a "Neutral" rating. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. AMD is splashing out in its own AI. Its quarterly revenue increased by 32% to $7.685 billion on the back of a spike in gaming and AI/data center sales. Contracts such as those that see it supplying Nokia with EPYC processors underscore its ever-growing outreach. The competitive advantage of AMD against Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) is the reason why UBS analyst Timothy Arcuri is bullish on the stock with a "Buy" rating and a price target of $210. Concisely, UBS admires the potential of Palantir but is more inclined toward AMD with its superior risk-reward in the current market of the frenzy of artificial intelligence. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Small US Firms Paying Trump Tariffs Face a $202 Billion Hit
Small US Firms Paying Trump Tariffs Face a $202 Billion Hit

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Small US Firms Paying Trump Tariffs Face a $202 Billion Hit

(Bloomberg) -- Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park Small US companies, the source of more than half of the country's job creation in recent years, are struggling to comply with President Donald Trump's new tariffs and cope with growing financial strains clobbering them from higher import costs. Last week's country-specific levies varying from 10% to 50% landed with a one-two punch: additional red tape issued by Customs and Border Protection, and a need to increase customs bonds — guarantees that companies must buy from surety providers to ensure the government receives its tariff revenue, other taxes and any potential penalties. Big firms often have in-house resources to handle such administrative changes and costs, but compliance and forecasting in the new tariff regime are 'where the smaller companies are really struggling,' said Erin Williamson, vice president of US customs brokerage at Levallois-Perret, France-based Geodis, a leading global logistics firm. 'They may not have that internal compliance group or the infrastructure to really sit back and say, 'OK, this is going to be the impact to us. How do we pivot?'' Williamson said in an interview Friday. Trade Tracker: Follow Every Trump Tariff and Its Economic Effect The US Chamber of Commerce estimated this month that the country has about 236,000 small-business importers — those with fewer than 500 employees. The goods they bought from abroad were worth more than $868 billion in 2023. Based on an estimate before Trump's duties took effect Aug. 7, the combined annual tariff hit to those companies is $202 billion, according to the chamber, the nation's largest business lobbying group. That works out to about $856,000 per firm a year. Consumer Prices Through June, businesses in the US absorbed more than half the cost of Trump's tariffs, with the rest picked up by foreign exporters and American consumers, according to a research note Sunday from Goldman Sachs economists. In coming months, the burden will shift away from importers and the share shouldered by consumers will rise to 67%, it said. Until then, the National Retail Federation is echoing the US Chamber's concerns, posting on its website a series of stories about entrepreneurs who worry they won't be able to withstand Trump's plan to reconfigure the global trading system using tariff barriers. 'Small businesses especially are grappling with the ability to stay in business,' NRF Vice President for Supply Chain and Customs Policy Jonathan Gold said in a statement last week. The NRF and Hackett Associates produce a monthly outlook in their Global Port Tracker that forecasts a sharp drop in US imports starting in September after first-half gains — a turnaround tied to Washington's 'hither-and-thither approach of on-again, off-again tariffs,' Hackett Associates Founder Ben Hackett said. 'Boxed Out' On Monday, Trump reiterated that the levies are benefiting the economy. 'Tariffs are making our Country Strong and Rich!!!' he posted on Truth Social. White House spokesman Kush Desai said American businesses small and large 'have been unfairly boxed out of foreign markets for decades due to one-sided 'free' trade arrangements that left American industries and workers behind,' he said. Trump has used tariffs and economic leverage, Desai said, 'to rewrite the rules of global trade and ensure fairer access for American industrial and agricultural exports to countries that in total have a $32 trillion economy and 1.2 billion people.' QuickTake: Who Loses the Most From Trump's Tariffs? Who Wins? For US businesses, though, it's not just the higher duties they're paying that matter, 'it's the operational disruption and uncertainty the new measures risk creating,' said John Denton, secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce. 'Even multinational companies with sophisticated trade compliance functions are struggling to understand what tariff rate will apply to shipments given the complex web of measures now in place — as well as continued uncertainty about how core provisions will be enforced,' Denton said. 'Clearer Guidance' He urged the Trump administration to 'provide clearer guidance on implementation — particularly to ensure that small businesses aren't damaged by red tape alone.' A lack of clarity in the implementation of Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs has already sown confusion. A ruling by the CBP to impose tariffs on some gold imports — announced privately in a letter to a Swiss refiner on July 31 and made public Friday — sent bullion futures in New York soaring to a record. Then, prices tumbled just as quickly after the Trump administration suggested imports of gold bars wouldn't face tariffs after all. 'We used to have a pretty simple trade policy: Most countries had most-favored nation status so you had the same tariff for every country pretty much, and Customs had a pretty simple job,' Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, a distinguished professor at the City University of New York, said during an interview with Bloomberg Television on Friday. 'What we're seeing is a symptom of trade policy that is too complex for the bureaucracy we have to handle it.' --With assistance from Hadriana Lowenkron, Alex Tanzi and Alister Bull. (Adds Trump's social media post in 11th paragraph) Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie Digital Nomads Are Transforming Medellín's Housing ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Elon Musk confirms shutdown of Tesla Dojo, ‘an evolutionary dead end'
Elon Musk confirms shutdown of Tesla Dojo, ‘an evolutionary dead end'

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk confirms shutdown of Tesla Dojo, ‘an evolutionary dead end'

Elon Musk confirmed over the weekend reports that Tesla has disbanded the team working on its Dojo AI training supercomputer, just weeks after announcing he expected to have Tesla's second cluster operating 'at scale' in 2026. 'Once it became clear that all paths converged to AI6, I had to shut down Dojo and make some tough personnel choices, as Dojo 2 was now an evolutionary dead end,' Musk posted on X, the social media platform he owns, on Sunday. 'Dojo 3 arguably lives on in the form of a large number of AI6 [systems-on-a-chip] on a single board.' After bringing its first Dojo supercomputer to life and powering it with a mix of Nvidia GPUs and in-house-made D1 chips, Tesla had planned to build a second Dojo factory – referred to by Musk as 'Dojo 2' – that would have been powered by a second-generation D2 chip. It appears the D2 chip under development has been shelved along with the broader Dojo project as Tesla shifts its focus to its AI5 and AI6 chips, which are being manufactured by TSMC and Samsung, respectively. The AI5 chip is primarily built to power FSD, Tesla's driver assistance system, while AI6 is designed for both onboard inference – meaning, it promises to power self-driving in cars and autonomous capabilities in humanoid robots – and large-scale AI training. 'It doesn't make sense for Tesla to divide its resources and scale two quite different AI chip designs,' Musk posted late Friday evening. 'The Tesla AI5, AI6 and subsequent chips will be excellent for inference and at least pretty good for training. All effort is focused on that.' He added that for a supercomputer cluster, it makes more sense to put 'many AI5/AI6 chips on a board, whether for inference or training, simply to reduce network cabling complexity & cost by a few orders of magnitude.' 'One could call that Dojo 3, I suppose,' he said. Musk has talked about Dojo since 2019, reiterating that Dojo would be a cornerstone of Tesla's mission to achieve full self-driving and commercialize humanoid robots. Talk of Dojo halted around August 2024 when Musk began touting Cortex instead, a 'giant new AI training supercluster being built at Tesla HQ in Austin to solve real-world AI.' It's not clear if Cortex is still in the works. TechCrunch has reached out to Tesla to learn more, as well as to inquire about the fate of the Dojo facility Tesla had invested $500 million to build in Buffalo, New York. The shift in strategy comes at a time when Tesla is experiencing falling EV sales and significant brand damage after Musk's forays into politics. Musk has worked to convince investors that Tesla still has a future in autonomy, despite a slow and limited robotaxi launch in Austin this past June that resulted in numerous reported incidents of the vehicles exhibiting problematic driving behavior.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store