logo
What is Deportation Depot? Ron DeSantis' plan for the second ‘Alligator Alcatraz' type facility

What is Deportation Depot? Ron DeSantis' plan for the second ‘Alligator Alcatraz' type facility

Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration is preparing to open a second immigration detention facility dubbed 'Deportation Depot' at a state prison as a federal judge decides the fate of the state's holding center for immigrants at an isolated airstrip in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Florida Governor Ron DeSantis gestures during a news conference Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, in Tampa, Fla. (AP Photo/Chris O'Meara)(AP)
DeSantis announced Thursday that the new facility is to be housed at the Baker Correctional Institution, a state prison about 43 miles (69 kilometers) west of downtown Jacksonville. It is expected to hold 1,300 immigration detention beds, though that capacity could be expanded to 2,000, state officials said.
After opening the Everglades facility last month, DeSantis justified building the second detention center by saying President Donald Trump's administration needs the additional capacity to hold and deport more immigrants.
'There is a demand for this,' DeSantis said. 'I'm confident that it will be filled.'
ALSO READ| Florida plans 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention center
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has trumpeted Republican governors' efforts to expand their immigration detention capacity, calling Florida's partnership a model for other state-run holding facilities.
Plans to open the facility in two to three weeks
DeSantis touted the relative ease and economy of setting up the northern Florida facility at a preexisting prison, estimating the build-out cost to be $6 million. That's compared to the hundreds of millions of dollars the state has committed to construct the vast network of tents and trailers at the south facility in the rugged and remote Florida swamp.
'This part of the facility is not being used right now for the state prisoners. It just gives us an ability to go in, stand it up quickly, stand it up cheaply,' DeSantis said of the state prison, calling the site 'ready-made.'
It could take two to three weeks to get the facility operational, according to Kevin Guthrie, the director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, the agency in charge of building the immigration facilities.
The state had announced plans to "temporarily" close the prison in 2021, due to persistent staffing shortages.
'A building that's been dormant now for a couple of years is going to have some unforeseen challenges,' Guthrie said when estimating the construction timeline.
Among the renovations needed: air conditioning, which is not required under Florida's standards for its prisons, despite the state's sweltering climate.
ALSO READ| After Alligator Alcatraz, DHS plans a 'Speedway Slammer' in Indiana for the 'worst of the worst'
Florida National Guard to staff the site
Staffing at the site will be handled by the Florida National Guard and state contractors 'as needed,' DeSantis said. The state's National Guard had been called on to help run the state's prisons for more than two years due to chronic staff shortages, before being mobilized to support the state's immigration enforcement efforts.
DeSantis had previously floated plans to open a second detention facility at a nearby Florida National Guard training facility known as Camp Blanding, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) southwest of Jacksonville. The long-standing military installation was a major U.S. Army training facility during World War II and serves as a 'continuity of government' site for Florida's executive branch, according to the facility's website.
But announcing the plans Thursday, DeSantis said the Baker facility was a better fit because of its available capacity and proximity to a regional airport.
'Blanding does have air capacity, but probably not a big enough runway to handle large planes,' DeSantis said.
Everglades facility faces civil rights lawsuit
DeSantis pledged that detainees at the new facility will have 'the same services' that are available at the state's first detention center.
Attorneys for detainees at the Everglades facility have called the conditions there deplorable, writing in a court filing that some detainees are showing symptoms of COVID-19 without being separated from the general population. Rainwater floods their tents and officers go cell-to-cell pressuring detainees to sign voluntary removal orders before they're allowed to consult their attorneys.
'Recent conditions at Alligator Alcatraz have fueled a sense of desperation among detainees,' the attorneys said in the court filing.
Conditions at the hastily built detention center were outlined in a filing made Wednesday ahead of a hearing Monday over the legal rights of the detainees. Civil rights attorneys want U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz to ensure that detainees at the facility have confidential access to their lawyers, which the lawyers say they haven't had.
The state of Florida disputed claims that detainees' attorneys have been unable to meet with their clients. Since July 15, when videoconferencing started at the facility, the state has granted every request for a detainee to meet with an attorney, and in-person meetings started July 28, state officials said. The first detainees arrived at the beginning of July.
ALSO READ| Foul play? Massive fire on Miccosukee Indian Reservation days after they join fight against Alligator Alcatraz
Attorneys for detainees also wanted the judge to identify an immigration court that has jurisdiction over the detention center so that petitions can be filed for the detainees' bond or release. The civil rights attorneys say they've been told regularly that federal immigration courts in Florida don't have jurisdiction over the detainees held in the Everglades.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chinese FM Wang Yi to visit India from Aug 18-19, will meet Jaishankar and NSA Doval
Chinese FM Wang Yi to visit India from Aug 18-19, will meet Jaishankar and NSA Doval

First Post

time43 minutes ago

  • First Post

Chinese FM Wang Yi to visit India from Aug 18-19, will meet Jaishankar and NSA Doval

During his one-day visit, Yi will meet NSA Doval to hold the 24th round of the Special Representatives' (SR) Talks on the India-China boundary question Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will visit India on Monday ahead of External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's visit to Moscow. File photo/AP The Ministry of External Affairs on Saturday confirmed Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's visit to India. He will be on an official trip to New Delhi from August 18-19 at the invitation of National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. Yi's visit to India comes at a time when India and China have been taking a series of steps in recent months to improve bilateral relations. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has also announced Yi's trip to India. Chinese Ambassador to India Xu Feihong said, 'From August 18 to 20, Member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, Minister of Foreign Affairs and China's Special Representative on the China-India boundary question Wang Yi will visit India.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD MFA:From August 18 to 20, Member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, Minister of Foreign Affairs and China's Special Representative on the China-India boundary question Wang Yi will visit India and hold the 24th Round of Talks Between the Special… — Xu Feihong (@China_Amb_India) August 16, 2025 What will Wang Yi do in India? During his one-day visit, Yi will meet NSA Doval to hold the 24th round of the Special Representatives' (SR) Talks on the India-China boundary question. The Chinese foreign minister is also slated to meet External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar during his visit. India-China relations Relations between the two Asian giants have been thawing since an agreement last October on patrolling their Himalayan border, easing a five-year standoff that had hurt trade, investment and air travel. Earlier this year, China resumed the Kailash-Mansarovar Yatra and India resumed giving visas to Chinese tourists. The two sides are also likely to resume direct flights within weeks. Later this month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to visit China to attend the SCO Summit, his first visit since 2020, when India-China relations sharply deteriorated following Chinese incursions in the Himalayas, including the deadly Galwan Valley clash that left 20 Indian soldiers dead.

Friendly summit with no ceasefire: Putin disarms Trump, neutralises sanctions threats at Alaska summit
Friendly summit with no ceasefire: Putin disarms Trump, neutralises sanctions threats at Alaska summit

First Post

time3 hours ago

  • First Post

Friendly summit with no ceasefire: Putin disarms Trump, neutralises sanctions threats at Alaska summit

Before the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska, Donald Trump warned of 'severe consequences" if Russia did not agree to a ceasefire at the meeting. However, beaming Putin managed to get away with no ceasefire and no consequences. The shadows of the two leaders are cast on a wall behind their podiums. Reuters Before US President Donald Trump headed to Alaska, he issued a stern warning against his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. After reassuring Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump at that time warned that Russia would face 'severe consequences' if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire in the Ukraine war at the Alaska Summit. However, while speaking to the reporters after the talks in Alaska, neither of the leaders mentioned the word ' ceasefire'. After the whole saga was over, one question remained in everyone's mind. Will Trump follow through with his 'severe consequences' threat, or did Putin manage to play his charm on him? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While speaking to the reporters on Wednesday, Trump hinted at imposing 'severe economic sanctions' if Putin did not agree to a truce during the Alaska meeting. 'If the first one goes OK, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump told reporters in Washington. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin, President Zelenskyy and me, if they'd like to have me there.' When asked if Russia would face consequences if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire after the summit, the Republican firebrand gave an affirmative response. 'Yes, they will … very severe consequences," Trump remarked. However, the story was different. No ceasefire, no consequences The Alaska summit conveyed a surprisingly amicable atmosphere, with Putin praising 'friendly' talks and Trump reciprocating warm remarks, despite the brutal war ongoing in Ukraine. Putin effectively defused the threat of fresh US sanctions, delaying punitive measures unless Moscow shows greater willingness to resolve the conflict. Putin managed to manoeuvre the issue tactfully. During the presser after the talks, we saw Putin massaging Trump's ego with words of praise. He acknowledged Trump's rhetoric that the Russia-Ukraine war would not have happened if the Republican firebrand were in the White House. At the same time, he also issued a stern warning to Ukraine and its allies. He warned the West and Ukraine not to 'torpedo the nascent progress,' subtly shifting pressure onto them to temper military aid and political support for Kyiv. The absence of a ceasefire deal or firm commitments ensured the status quo remained, with hostilities continuing unabated. Trump's mixture of welcome hospitality and economic warnings produced no immediate sanctions escalation, granting Putin a diplomatic reprieve. Not only this, after the meeting, Trump floated the idea of security guarantees to Ukraine outside the framework of NATO, effectively shutting the Alliance's door in Ukraine's face. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD So Bolton was right? While speaking to CNN after the meeting, former US National Security Adviser John Bolton declared that 'Trump did not lose' the Alaska Summit but Putin 'clearly won,' adding that 'Trump didn't come away with anything, except more meetings.' Putin, meanwhile, 'has gone a long way to reestablishing the relationship, which I always believed was his key goal,' Bolton said. 'He escaped sanctions. He's not facing a ceasefire. The next meeting is not set. (Ukrainian President Volodymyr) Zelensky was not told any of this before this press conference. It's far from over, but I'd say Putin achieved most of what he wanted. Trump achieved very little,' he added. Bolton predicted something of this sort during his conversation with Firstpost earlier this week. At that time, Bolton insisted that Putin ' had already won' before the Alaska talks, a criticism refuted by Trump later. Trump's former advisor insisted that while the Potus considers Putin a 'friend', the Russian leader is more strategic about his ties with the American counterpart. 'Putin doesn't see Trump as his friend. He sees them as somebody that he thinks he can manipulate in true, true fashion of a former KGB agent. And I think he's been pretty successful with it," Bolton told Firstpost. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'It is a big win for Putin to come to the United States. He's a pariah leader of a rogue state that committed unprovoked aggression against Ukraine.' 'On Friday, he's going to get to stand next to the President of the United States and get his picture taken on territory that used to be Russian. Nobody in Russia has missed the fact that we bought Alaska from Russia in 1867. So it's what Trump can do. I think a lot of people are going to be watching. But the main thing is to see if Putin emerges with Trump thinking that they're friends again,' Ambassador Bolton concluded, and it looks like Trump still thinks Putin is a 'friend'.

DOJ sues California to end enforcement of emissions standards for trucks
DOJ sues California to end enforcement of emissions standards for trucks

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

DOJ sues California to end enforcement of emissions standards for trucks

The US Department of Justice said on Friday it has sued California in a bid to end the state's enforcement of emissions standards for trucks. The DOJ said it filed two complaints this week in federal courts against the California Air Resources Board on the state's enforcement of preempted emissions standards through its so-called " Clean Truck Partnership " with heavy-duty truck and engine manufacturers. "These actions advance President Donald J. Trump's commitment to end the electric vehicle (EV) mandate, level the regulatory playing field, and promote consumer choice in motor vehicles," it said in a statement. Earlier this week, four major truckmakers, including Daimler and Volvo, also sued the state to block it from enforcing the strict emissions standards Trump declared void in June. Trump, a Republican, is trying to curb California's power under the federal Clean Air Act to set tighter pollution limits than federal law requires, and Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom's ability to promote electric vehicles to fight climate change. "President Donald Trump and Congress have invalidated the Clean Air Act waivers that were the basis for California's actions. CARB must respect the democratic process and stop enforcing unlawful standards," said Adam Gustafson, the DOJ's acting assistant attorney general for the Environment and Natural Resources Division.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store