Naval base for Galway could form part of Ireland's first maritime security strategy
A public consultation on the strategy was announced by Tánaiste Simon Harris on Thursday.
Mr Harris, who is also Minister for Defence, said it would map out an approach for the next five years with a particular focus on how to deal with 'emerging threats and vulnerabilities' and the protection of the country's
sub-sea infrastructure
.
Announcing the consultation process during the Dáil's defence question time, he said it will run for four weeks and invite individuals and groups with interest to make a submission.
READ MORE
'The intention is to have a new maritime security strategy approved and published before the end of this year. We're an island nation with one of the largest sea areas in Europe and it's absolutely vital that we have a robust and effective maritime security strategy in place,' he said.
[
Ireland must stop 'free-riding' on security 'gifted by others'
Opens in new window
]
[
Opinion: State needs to invest in Navy and Air Corps
Opens in new window
]
'I think this strategy would be crucial to assessing any
potential threats and vulnerabilities
.'
Mr Harris said there would 'absolutely be a need' for more naval facilities as Fianna Fáil TD John Connolly highlighted the recommendation of the Commission on the Defence Forces for a base for the Naval Reserve in Galway.
'I think this should form part of the strategy,' Mr Connolly said. 'The West coast between Limerick and Donegal really has no coastal cover in terms of maritime defence and this is quite a wide area.'
The Galway West TD pointed out that some of the transatlantic sub-sea cables come through Galway and Mayo.
Mr Harris said he intended to speak directly to the Naval Service and to the Chief of Staff on plans for the expansion of such bases. Ireland's sole naval base is located at Haulbowline, Co Cork.
'Getting this strategy right is so important. We live in a country where around 78 per cent of our energy needs are imported on ships or via pipelines. Around 90 per cent of our trade is transported by sea and 95 per cent of international data and voice transfers are rooted through our undersea fibre optic cables,' he said.
'The majority of transatlantic data passes through the cables situated in Ireland's economic exclusive zone.'
He stressed that strategic planning would be crucial to assessing potential threats and vulnerabilities and urged 'the many people who have an expertise in this, to make their views known'.
'[They should] bring forward their ideas on how we can put in place a strategy that will ensure we really take the critical opportunity to have a new and a robust approach to safeguarding our waters.'
Mr Harris said the Government is also looking at a new national security plan for Ireland more broadly. Co-ordinated by the Department of the Taoiseach, its purpose will be to ensure there are no 'silos' or overlapping pieces of legislation and that 'the maritime situation can also be considered in that context'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
19 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Kneecap trial spotlights challenges for Irish speakers in British and Irish courts
When the case of Kneecap 's Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh was before Westminster Magistrates Court earlier this summer, Ó hAnnaidh's legal team indicated that he might require an Irish-language interpreter for his trial. That trial, if it proceeds to hearing later this year, would be the most high-profile case involving testimony given through Irish in recent history. It is also likely to highlight at least some of the difficulties faced by Irish speakers in courtrooms both in the UK and Ireland. Perhaps the most basic difficulty is securing a right to use Irish at all. Had Ó hAnnaidh been prosecuted in Northern Ireland prior to February, 2024, a 1737 Act of Parliament would have prohibited the use of Irish in court. Even now, following the introduction of the Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Act, there are no procedures in place to protect a right to use Irish in Northern Irish courtrooms. It will be for Northern Ireland 's Justice Minister, Naomi Long, to introduce the guidelines which will give effect to the new Act there. At present, the primary concern is how any procedures would define necessity. Will a person need to demonstrate a certain level of fluency, or that they will suffer a particular degree of prejudice in order to prove it is 'necessary' for them to use Irish during a hearing? Beyond the six counties, the position in Ireland is, on paper, more favourable, with statutory and constitutional protections of the right to speak Irish in court. Yet, even here, the practical challenges and negative impacts of speaking Irish can often deter parties from using it. The most basic obstacle facing Irish speakers across all the UK and Ireland was mentioned by the judge during Ó hAnnaidh's last appearance in court – it can often be difficult to locate an interpreter. In the UK, there is, at least, a National Register of Public Service Interpreters. The register determines who is qualified to interpret court proceedings. It requires interpreters to prove they have an approved qualification, while they must undertake training to act in courtroom settings. READ MORE Yet even with that infrastructure in place, an interpreter was still proving hard to find when Ó hAnnaidh was last in court. No such register is maintained in Ireland and there is no central registration or regulation of interpreters, let alone those sufficiently qualified to act in courtroom settings. As a result, although there is a constitutional and statutory right to speak Irish in court in Ireland, it may be harder to locate a qualified interpreter in Ireland than in the UK – where no such right exists. Even where an interpreter is located, judges and lawyers who are not familiar with interpretation may fail to grasp the potential for crossed wires and bias that result from linguistic differences and the process of interpretation itself. An Irish speaker will not, for example, be able to give the same monosyllabic yes or no answer that an English-speaking witness would. The potential impression of being evasive, vague or contradictory where small differences in language and meaning have tangible legal outcomes is real. In cases where interpreters lack specific courtroom experience, and legal proceedings lack guidelines for how to deal with interpreters, those risks can be realised all too easily. In Australia and the US, researchers have established that linguistic differences and small changes introduced by interpreters, such as hesitating words like 'ah' or 'um', can cause witnesses to appear untrustworthy or evasive. Negative perceptions of those who choose to speak a minority language, including Irish, can also have very real impacts on the choice to use a language in court. The choice to use a language, including Irish, is often seen as political - aligning the speaker (whether rightly or wrongly) with a particular ideology or political group. In such cases, the choice to speak (or refuse to speak) a particular language can be read as a rejection of institutions which operate through another tongue, or as an effort to shame non-speakers. Hardly the note to strike when appealing to a judge or a jury. It is likely Ó hAnnaidh will have to contend with at least some of these negative tropes if his hearing proceeds using an Irish interpreter Minority language speakers can be perceived as difficult; seeking to gain an advantage by inconveniencing the other parties in a trial. Similarly, they can be considered untrustworthy - using the delay interpretation requires to more carefully consider their answers, or to deliberately misunderstand a question to buy time. In Ireland, these perceptions are often based on the assumption that there is no such thing as a person who is more comfortable speaking Irish than English. Yet while English may be dominant in terms of the number of daily users, there are still those who – in the face of the formalities and consequences of the legal process – would rather have the security of the language they know best when they must answer questions on which their liberty or livelihood depend. It is likely Ó hAnnaidh will have to contend with at least some of these negative tropes if his hearing proceeds using an Irish interpreter. In being tried in the UK he will, at least, have the benefit of a system in which interpretation is regulated. On this side of the Irish sea, the case is an opportunity to reflect on why negative tropes concerning Irish speakers persist - inside and outside our justice system. It also presents an opportunity to give practical effect to the official status of Irish in courtrooms across the island. Furthermore, it presents an opening to recognise that the issues impacting Irish speakers are ones which reach through our society – and our justice systems - more broadly. Poor standards of interpretation, as well as the legal profession's lack of training on how to conduct a hearing in which interpreters are involved, are barriers to accessing justice and securing a fair trial. They profoundly impact all our minority language communities – including those navigating the international protection system. Irish speakers, Irish citizens, Irish residents and those seeking to make a life here all deserve a justice system in which the language they speak does not determine the reach of their voice, or the reception of their testimony. Dr Róisín Á Costello is an Assistant Professor at the School of Law, Trinity College Dublin and a practicing barrister.
Irish Times
19 minutes ago
- Irish Times
In Heather Humphreys, Fine Gael faithful think they've found their first president
A successful 2025 presidential election campaign is likely to demand a candidate who can command support within party politics but still foster an identity that exists outside of it. A cascade of nominations for Heather Humphreys from the majority of the Fine Gael parliamentary party started rolling in on Tuesday as soon as she announced her intention to run. But the most vital endorsements came days ago from Independent politicians Michael Healy-Rae, Seán Canney and Noel Grealish. This attracted significant attention in Fine Gael, which knows very few of its party members would be able to attract such support. This is why the current tally at the time of writing of more than 30 endorsements for Humphreys and fewer than 10 for Seán Kelly does a disservice to the MEP and former GAA chief. The Munster vote-getter is well respected within his party, and it wasn't without some anguish that some of his party colleagues declared for Humphreys instead. But the momentum was going one way. The buoyant mood in Fine Gael this week is that of a party that thinks it's found its first ever president of Ireland. Fine Gael was planning to formally launch Mairead McGuinness's campaign in the days before the National Ploughing Championships in Tullamore, which will kick off in the third week of September. The campaign launch date will be kept the same for the new Fine Gael candidate – in all likelihood Humphreys – which the party is presenting as proof that it hasn't lost any time. The time that elapsed between McGuinness dropping out and the party finding two new candidates was so brief, Tánaiste Simon Harris never once found himself in front of a microphone having to account for what his party's plan was now. READ MORE Though the nomination process will technically continue for another week, Fine Gael is already actively planning how its campaign could be altered to suit Humphreys. Some elements of the McGuinness campaign can be transferred to Humphreys who, like the former MEP, shares a penchant for an agricultural show. But under Humphreys, the campaign would shift more towards the themes of community and a shared island. Think Tidy Towns and tolerance. [ Heather Humphreys and Seán Kelly presidential face-off expected as Fine Gael reopens nominations Opens in new window ] Fine Gael is expecting opposition to a Humphreys campaign to try to tie her to Government failings in housing and health over her 10 years at the cabinet table. This was borne out in a press release from Sinn Féin on Tuesday evening, which said 'Heather Humphreys will have to account for 14 years of Fine Gael failure'. Humphreys will face tough questions on aspects of her government record, including her role as director of elections for the failed 2024 referendums, a Green Paper on disability reform that was so controversial it had to be withdrawn, and her reported opposition to an increase in jobseeker's allowance. But Fine Gael figures are confident that Humphreys' time as a minister was 'very impactful but not that controversial' given she never held a portfolio such as health or housing. If its candidate is Humphreys, Fine Gael has enough humility to know that her strength will be that she doesn't seem all that Fine Gael. There used to be a running joke at cabinet that the former minister got on better with Fianna Fáil than she did with her own party colleagues. The reason Humphreys attracted so much support within Fine Gael's parliamentary party is because politicians recognised her ability to attract support from all kinds of people outside it. For example, earlier this year she sat down for a podcast interview with former president Mary McAleese and broadcaster Mary Kennedy. As Humphreys was talking about how much she likes playing the piano, McAleese pointedly interrupted her: 'There's a great Steinway in the Áras.'
Irish Times
19 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘The uncertainty is terrible': Ukrainians fear what peace talks may bring
As talks take place elsewhere over the fate of Ukraine, the feeling on the streets of Kyiv is that things could get much better – or much worse. 'The uncertainty is terrible,' says Lesia Pyniak (34), a researcher for The Reckoning Project, an international team of journalists and lawyers who document and publicise Russian war crimes in Ukraine with a view to prosecution. Andriy Yermak, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy's chief of staff, expressed the uncertainty in a post on the Telegram messenger service. 'How should we understand this?' Yermak wrote, referring to a viral video posted by Russians in the aftermath of Russian president Vladimir Putin's triumphal visit to Alaska. Lesia Pyniak, a human rights researcher for The Reckoning Project, and Ivan Sarancha, who works for the NGO Save Ukraine. Photograph: Lara Marlowe It appears to show an American-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, captured from Ukrainian forces near Zaporizhzhia, flying the US and Russian flags. The message, in the eyes of some Ukrainians, seemed to be: Up yours, Ukraine – the US is our ally now. READ MORE Russia was 'using symbols of the United States of America in their terrorist war,' Yermak wrote. 'Total audacity.' A still from a viral video - also broadcast on Russian state media - showing a captured tank with a US and Russian flag I discussed the confusion with Pyniak and 18-year-old Ivan Sarancha, who ran away from his politically divided family in the Russian-occupied 'Luhansk People's Republic'. He now works for Save Ukraine, the NGO that tries to rescue deported Ukrainian children from Russia. A settlement – which may or may not happen – is on everyone's mind. Ukrainians speculate endlessly on what could be gained or lost. Sarancha predicts the Dnipro river will continue to mark the border between Russian and Ukrainian-held parts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. He thinks Russia will keep Crimea and take all of Luhansk, most of which it controls already. [ Eastern Ukraine mapped: Vladimir Putin demands territory to end Russia's war Opens in new window ] Donetsk is the sticking point, since Putin wants the entire oblast but controls only three-quarters of it. There could be small Ukrainian withdrawals to smooth the jagged front line, but Ukraine is unlikely to relinquish control of the big towns of Kramatorsk and Slovyansk. Asked how he reads US president Donald Trump's erratic behaviour, Sarancha replies: 'I think Trump's love for Putin is unhealthy, but I don't think he works for him. It's hard to explain. Maybe Trump is trying to be impartial.' And the other protagonists? Is Zelenskiy doing a good job? 'I think he is doing okay, all things considered,' Sarancha says. 'I think the scandal in the Oval Office [last February] helped Ukraine. At least it showed Ukraine will not capitulate and will not agree to the conditions they try to impose.' 'I think Zelenskiy's future will depend on what happens and how it works out,' says Pyniak, the human rights researcher. 'It is changing very fast. He's on the knife edge.' And the Europeans? 'I think they are very soft and indecisive, not serious,' was Sarancha's harsh judgment. 'They relaxed after the second World War and stopped worrying about defence.' 'Things would be a lot better if the US and Europe had supported us more with weapons,' Pyniak adds. 'We could liberate Ukraine, go back to our 1991 borders. A frozen conflict is just a postponed war.' While the residents of Kyiv theorise, Zelenskiy may shows signs he might have got the measure of Donald Trump. As reported by the Financial Times, Ukraine has offered to buy $100 billion worth of US weapons, with European money, to finance the security guarantees which must be part of any agreement.
