Bill targeting ESG for farmers advances to next NC House committee
A farmer harvests soybeans. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service photo by Brandon O'Connor.
The North Carolina House Agriculture and Environment Committee voted Wednesday to approve legislation targeting socially responsible lending in agriculture, moving the measure to the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee.
Sponsors explain House Bill 62, the 'Farmers Protection Act,' as a measure to prevent banks and credit unions from using discriminatory practices against farmers in the state.
It's sponsored by Reps. Neal Jackson (R-Moore, Randolph), Jimmy Dixon (R-Duplin, Wayne), Jennifer Balkcom (R-Henderson), and Karl Gillespie (R-Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Macon).
Rather than race or gender, the bill targets 'ESG' — short for 'environmental, social, governance,' a method for evaluating sustainability performance.
The proposal purports to ban banks and credit unions from denying service to agriculture producers based on their greenhouse gas emissions, use of fossil-fuel derived fertilizer, or use of fossil-fuel powered machinery, according to the bill text.
'It says you cannot deny cancel financial services based upon a farmer's ESG score or rating,' Jackson said. 'Figure it based upon if they have good credit or not, but not based upon their ESG score.'
The House Judiciary 1 Committee approved the legislation at the end of February.
Rep. Pricey Harrison (D-Guilford) reminded members of the earlier discussion, where Jackson offered the bill is a preventative measure.
'You indicated in that discussion that there wasn't any evidence of this happening right now among North Carolina banks and with North Carolina farmers, but it was part of a national effort anticipating what might happen,' she said.
Mark Swallow spoke during the bill's public comment section as a representative of Democracy Out Loud.
He said there's a reason ESG exists — as a protective measure, not a punitive one.
'It's meant to make sure, as the climate is changing, that we can survive in it, including farming,' he said. 'To try and de-incentivize bankers, you should be incentivizing farmers to do what they need to do to live up to those standards, because if they want to continue farming, they need to make those changes.'
On Wednesday, the committee also voted to advance HB 164, 'Protect North Carolina Sawmills,' to the House Rules Committee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
35 minutes ago
- Associated Press
How AirCarbon Is Turning Greenhouse Gases Into Ocean-Friendly Plastic Alternatives
As World Oceans Day approaches on June 8, 2025, we are reminded of the urgent need to protect our blue planet. This year's theme, 'Sustainable Fishing Means More,' highlights the growing demand for innovation to preserve marine ecosystems and fight climate change. Among the most promising breakthroughs in ocean-inspired sustainability is AirCarbon®, a regenerative, carbon-negative material created by Newlight Technologies. The Science: From Microbes to Materials AirCarbon® was born from an extraordinary scientific discovery. While researching oil spills, scientists observed oceanic microorganisms consuming methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and naturally producing Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) within their cells. This polymer mimics the characteristics of polypropylene, a common plastic, but with a critical difference: PHB is biodegradable and renewable. Newlight Technologies scaled this biological process into a commercially viable innovation. Using air and greenhouse gases dissolved in water, they produce AirCarbon®, a plastic alternative now used in cutlery, straws, eyewear, leather substitutes, and more. With over 50 patents and more than a decade of R&D, AirCarbon® offers an elegant, market-driven solution to reduce plastic waste and climate impact. AirCarbon® isn't just a promising innovation—it's already making waves across industries. Companies like Nike and H&M have partnered with Newlight Technologies to incorporate AirCarbon® into sustainable fashion collections, while Shake Shack, Target, and Ben & Jerry's have piloted its use in foodware to reduce single-use plastic waste. In hospitality, Marriott International has adopted AirCarbon® utensils in select locations, and in the automotive space, Sumitomo Chemical is exploring its potential for carbon-negative materials. These partnerships demonstrate AirCarbon's versatility and growing role in helping brands meet their environmental commitments. Scaling Sustainability In recent developments, Newlight announced plans for a $1.1 billion manufacturing facility in Manitoba, Canada, further expanding their capacity to meet the demand for sustainable materials. This follows a $125 million equity round led by GenZero, reinforcing the company's path toward industrial-scale impact. As governments and corporations seek actionable ways to meet ESG targets, AirCarbon® stands out as a proven alternative—both technologically and environmentally sound. Featured on the RENEWables Podcast To explore the deeper implications of this breakthrough, Mark Herrema, Co-Founder & CEO of Newlight Technologies, joined the RENEWables podcast. In Episode #36, Herrema shares the origin story of AirCarbon®, the challenges of scaling biological innovation, and how circular economy principles can guide the future of materials. 'AirCarbon is not just about replacing plastic—it's about capturing carbon, restoring balance, and rethinking how we interact with the natural world.' — Mark Herrema Don't miss this powerful to the full episode of RENEWables featuring Mark Herrema here: RENEWables #36: AirCarbon ®Share the episode with your network to help elevate solutions that matter this World Oceans Day. Visit 3BL Media to see more multimedia and stories from BioStar Renewables
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Supreme Court rules Ohio woman's ‘reverse discrimination' case should proceed
The U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo by Ariana Figueroa/States Newsroom) In a unanimous decision Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court has sided with an Ohio woman who claimed she was the victim of reverse discrimination by her employer. The justices determined the lower courts improperly forced her to clear a higher burden of proof and sent the case back for further hearings. In 2019, after working at the Ohio Department of Youth Services for 15 years, Marlean Ames applied for a promotion. Instead, she claims her supervisors 'conspired' to demote her and move her to a different facility. The woman who got the job Ames wanted, and the man who took her old job both identify as LGBTQ+. Ames is straight. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In 2020, Ames filed a lawsuit in federal court claiming her supervisors discriminated against her on account of her sexual orientation. The district and appeals court both sided with the agency — Ames had not shown the 'background circumstances' to demonstrate her bosses punished her because she was straight. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected that background circumstances rule. Writing for the majority, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stated it 'cannot be squared with the text of Title VII or our longstanding precedents. And nothing Ohio has said, in its brief or at oral argument, persuades us otherwise.' Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 holds that employers may not discriminate on the basis of 'race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.' Importantly, Jackson wrote, the text draws no distinction between members of majority and minority groups. 'By establishing the same protections for every 'individual' — without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group — Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,' Jackson wrote. She added that the Circuit Court erred by rigidly enforcing an evidentiary standard, when court precedent holds there should be greater flexibility in proving discrimination cases. Jackson noted Ohio 'barely contests' the arguments Ames leveled against it. The state argued Ames' Title VII claims would've failed even if they cleared the background circumstances test. But Jackson insisted that sits outside the scope of the case. 'We granted review to consider the validity of the 'background circumstances' rule, and we reject that rule for the reasons set forth above,' she wrote. 'We leave it to the courts below to address any of Ohio's remaining arguments on remand.' Following the ruling, both sides of the case portrayed it as a win. For Xiao Wang, a law school professor at the University of Virginia who represented Ames, that argument was straightforward. 'When Congress passed this law, it said, look, don't discriminate,' Wang said, 'don't consider race, don't consider religion, don't consider sex, or some of these other characteristics.' He argued the decision 'reiterates and affirms' that message. 'If someone has a case, they're subject to the same legal standards, and the same legal treatment as everyone else,' Wang argued. Meanwhile Ohio Attorney General spokesman Dominic Binkley emphasized the fact that the Supreme Court didn't decide the underlying discrimination claim. 'We are glad that the court agreed with what Ohio has said all along: 'It is wrong to hold some litigants to a higher standard because of their protected characteristics.'' Still, he said, 'the court made clear that this case is not over,' referring to the opinion stating Ohio's remaining arguments could be handled when they're sent back to a lower court. 'We look forward to fully pressing those arguments as the case moves forward,' he said, 'because the Ohio Department of Youth Services did not engage in unlawful discrimination.' An Ohio Department of Youth Services spokesman declined to comment citing pending litigation. As the case was considered by the Supreme Court, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed an amicus brief in the case, urging the court not to entertain Ames' arguments. The LDF's Assistant Counsel Avatara Smith-Carrington, warned the decision doesn't shift the balance and grant majority groups some new advantage in court. 'Of course everyone is protected by Title VII,' she said in a statement. 'However, there is a persisting legacy of discrimination targeting Black people and other historically marginalized groups that cannot be ignored.' Equality Ohio downplayed the decision's potential impact. In a statement, the group's former legal director Maya Simek, cast it as a 'technical and narrow correction.' 'What's most important here is what the Court didn't do,' she added. 'It did not undercut or call into question the landmark Bostock decision, which affirms protections for LGBTQ+ people under federal employment law.' Equality Ohio Executive Director Dwayne Steward insisted, 'This ruling doesn't roll back rights or erase hard-won protections. What it does is quietly reaffirm that Title VII means what it says: all workers are protected from discrimination.' Drexel University Law Professor D. Wendy Greene has written extensively on anti-discrimination law and heads up the school's Center for Law, Policy, and Social Action. She argued the most important factor going forward will be judicial perception. When a judge believes racism is exceptional rather than commonplace, she said, workers of color often have to meet or exceed the evidence required by the 'background circumstances test.' By the same token, if a judge believes 'reverse discrimination' is the norm, litigants get greater leeway to make their case. 'These perceptions often shape judicial decision-making and the evidentiary burdens in intentional discrimination cases — with or without an express 'background circumstances' evidentiary requirement,' she explained. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Business Upturn
3 hours ago
- Business Upturn
L&T issues Rs 500 crore ESG bonds under SEBI's new framework
Larsen & Toubro (L&T) has become the first Indian corporate to issue an ESG bond under the Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) newly introduced ESG and sustainability-linked bond framework. The ₹500 crore issuance marks a significant milestone in India's sustainable finance journey, with HSBC acting as the sole lead arranger. 'We take pride in leading the transition to sustainable finance under SEBI's new ESG framework,' said a senior spokesperson from L&T. 'This bond issuance reinforces our steadfast commitment to sustainable development and responsible business practices while aligning our finances with environmental targets.' Advertisement The SEBI framework, announced on June 5, is aimed at enhancing transparency, accountability, and alignment with international ESG standards. It requires issuers to disclose sustainability goals, obtain external assessments such as Second-Party Opinions (SPOs), and provide post-issuance reporting. Clear Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and measurable targets are also mandated to track ESG outcomes. As part of the bond deal, L&T has committed to reducing the intensity of fresh water withdrawal and greenhouse gas emissions—steps aligned with its broader goals of achieving water neutrality by 2035 and carbon neutrality by 2040. 'We are pleased to partner with L&T on the first INR Sustainability Linked Bond under SEBI's guidelines, reinforcing our commitment to supporting the Clean Energy Transition in India. We look forward to partnering with corporates across sectors looking to navigate the paths toward their sustainability goals,' said HSBC India.
