One hospitalized in Central City New Orleans shooting
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — A person has been hospitalized following a shooting which happened in the Central City area of New Orleans on Wednesday, May 14.
According to the New Orleans Police Department, the shooting, which occurred at the intersection of South Galvez Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, was reported around 8:10 p.m. with confirmation around 8:35 p.m.
Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office warns of phone scam
One victim had reportedly been shot at least once and was then taken to a local hospital by EMS.
No further information was provided.Reward renewed in unsolved Algiers murder from 2020
Shaw impresses in Spring Game against John Ehret Thursday night
Edna Karr, Destrehan football square off in spring game
House GOP Agriculture bill advances out of committee
Why flags are flying at half-staff Thursday
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Gone too far': GOP lawmakers rally around Trump after Musk raises Epstein allegations
House GOP lawmakers are accusing Elon Musk of going "too far" after he suggested President Donald Trump was "in the Epstein files." "Hopefully we never have to answer questions about tweets like that from Elon again," said Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, calling Musk's comments "not helpful." "Elon crossed the line today," Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital, Musk referenced late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in relation to Trump Thursday as part of a larger tirade against the president and Republican leaders over their budget reconciliation bill. House Gop Targets Another Dem Official Accused Of Blocking Ice Amid Delaney Hall Fallout The tech billionaire accused Republicans of adding to the national debt — currently nearing $37 trillion — with legislation they've called Trump's "big, beautiful bill." Read On The Fox News App "Time to drop the really big bomb. [Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Musk wrote on X. "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, said Musk had "gone too far." National Debt Tracker: American Taxpayers (You) Are Now On The Hook For $36,214,501,400,213.64 As Of 6/5/25 "There's just no need for this," Nehls said. "Those conversations should be taking place behind closed doors." Some Republicans argued that any damning information about Trump and Epstein would have already been revealed if it existed. "What I would say is, if Joe Biden had Donald Trump in the Epstein logs, there's no question it would have come out during the campaign," Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., told Fox News Digital. "So, I don't know what's prompting it. I think it's all unfortunate." Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., questioned why Musk would let his young son, nicknamed "X," around Trump if he believed he was closely associated with a pedophile. "The Biden administration would have put it out. There's nobody that Democrats hate more than Donald J. Trump, and he's handing them their lunch every day. So, I don't put much faith into it," Burchett said. "Why would he let his kid hang out with the president if that was true? That just doesn't make any sense. And now he's calling for his impeachment. I mean, it's just going off to the deep end." Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., who is leading a task force on declassifying federal investigations, including Epstein's, told reporters she did not think Musk's suggestion held water. "Speaking to Jeffrey Epstein, I will be very specific that I do believe that if President Trump was in the Epstein files, they would have released it during the primary, and they didn't," Luna said. Meet The Trump-picked Lawmakers Giving Speaker Johnson A Full House Gop Conference "So, the fact is, is that I do not believe that President Trump is in the Epstein files, the way that it's being implied, but either which way, this is why we continue to push for transparency." Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., however, stood apart in his answer in calling for more transparency into the Epstein files. "Facts will bear out whatever they will," Norman said. "The Epstein files are bound to come out, and let it come out. We ought to see it. America has a right to know, just like they do with the John F. Kennedy files, the Bobby Kennedy files." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt attributed Musk's tirade to Trump's bill, which is focused on working- and middle-class tax relief and not benefiting Musk and his companies enough. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again," Leavitt said. Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., told Fox News Digital, "I could not tell you what Elon Musk's motivations are, but I can tell you what we're going to do, which is avoid a $4 trillion tax increase on the American people. And while it's well-known the two men were acquainted, a source familiar with the matter pointed out that Trump had kicked Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club. Trump had permanently banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago for hitting on a teenage daughter of a club member, according to a book, "The Grifter's Club." "The administration itself released Epstein files with the President's name included. This is not a new surprise Elon is uncovering. Everyone already knew this," the source said. "If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hang out with him for six months and say he 'loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?'" Fox News Digital has also reached out to Musk for comment via his office at article source: 'Gone too far': GOP lawmakers rally around Trump after Musk raises Epstein allegations
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Greenfield man sentenced to prison for armed robbery in Northampton
NORTHAMPTON, Mass. (WWLP) – A Greenfield man who threatened a store owner with a knife after stealing alcohol from two Northampton businesses has been sentenced to state prison. Springfield man arrested after six-hour standoff on Byers Street According to the Northwestern District Attorney's Office, Keith Shaw, 49, pleaded guilty Thursday in Hampshire Superior Court to charges of armed robbery and shoplifting related to two incidents in June 2024. Prosecutors said Shaw stole $165 worth of alcohol from one package store and $79 from another. When the owner of one of the stores attempted to stop him, Shaw brandished a knife and made threats. Shaw was sentenced to three years in state prison for armed robbery and a concurrent one-year sentence in the Hampshire House of Correction for shoplifting. 'The second incident escalated quickly from a shoplifting offense to an armed robbery when Mr. Shaw threatened the store owner with a knife,' ADA Covington said in a statement. 'Fortunately, no one was injured.' Covington also credited the Northampton Police Department's Detective Bureau for its thorough investigation, which led to Shaw being identified and charged in both cases. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Biggest scandal in American history' or a 'distraction': A look at Trump's autopen claims
President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into the Biden administration's use of an automatic signature pen, alleging that Joe Biden wasn't aware of many of his presidential orders and appointments. "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history," Trump said in a memorandum Wednesday directing the probe. Biden denied the allegations, calling them "ridiculous and false." 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations,' Biden said in a statement Wednesday, referring to the massive GOP bill to advance Trump's agenda. Here's a look at what's known — and what isn't — about the allegations Trump has referred to on social media as "the biggest scandal in American history," how they started and what might come next. An autopen is a device that replicates a person's signature or writings. Variations of it have been around for centuries — Thomas Jefferson got one in 1803 that he used to make copies of his correspondence. They're often used for mass reproductions of signatures on items like diplomas, and there are now digital versions. They can, according to 2005 guidance from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel. 'The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law,' the guidance said. 'Rather, the President may sign a bill ... by directing a subordinate to affix the President's signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.' They have. President George W. Bush — who had requested the guidance from the Justice Department — did not wind up using an autopen for official actions, but both Biden and President Barack Obama did while they were traveling. USA Today reported in 2017 that Obama used an autopen to issue dozens of pardons the previous year while he was on vacation in Hawaii. Biden, meanwhile, signed a funding extension for federal aviation programs via autopen while he traveling to San Francisco in 2024, CNN reported at the time. That's unclear. There is no official record of Biden's using an autopen for official government business. Trump's memorandum says, 'The vast majority of Biden's executive actions were signed using a mechanical signature pen, often called an autopen, as opposed to Biden's own hand.' Trump has offered no evidence to support the claims. He has, but he maintains it wasn't for anything important. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One in March, Trump at first said that 'I never use' an autopen before he acknowledged that he had. On Thursday, he said that "I think it's very disrespectful to people when they get an autopen signature" but that he does use one to respond to letters. "I'd like to do it myself," he said, but he added that he gets thousands of letters a week and it's "not possible to do." Trump's memo directs "The Counsel to the President, in consultation with the Attorney General and the head of any other relevant executive department or agency (agency), shall investigate, to the extent permitted by law, whether certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state and unconstitutionally exercise the authorities and responsibilities of the President." It also orders a probe into "the circumstances surrounding Biden's supposed execution of numerous executive actions during his final years in office," including "policy documents for which the autopen was used." Asked by NBC News whether he has any evidence that anything specific was signed without Biden's knowledge or that someone in the Biden administration acting illegally, Trump said, 'No, but I've uncovered, you know, the human mind.' 'I was in a debate with the human mind, and I don't think he knew what the hell he was doing,' he said Thursday, referring to his debate with Biden last year. The Justice Department declined to comment when it was asked whether the investigation into the autopen issue is a criminal one. The White House counsel's office does not conduct criminal probes. The House Oversight Committee is also investigating Republican allegations about Biden's using the autopen. 'Who was making the decisions? Who was authorizing his signature? Was it him?' committee chair James Comer, R-Ky., asked last month. The Justice Department guidance from 2005 hasn't been directly challenged in court, but a ruling last year involving presidential pardon powers lent some weight to the finding. A unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said presidents don't have to issue written or signed pardons for them to be implemented. 'The plain language of the Constitution imposes no such limit, broadly providing that the President 'shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.' The constitutional text is thus silent as to any particular form the President's clemency act must take to be effective,' the ruling said. While it's unclear how Trump came to seize on the allegations, right-wing media has focused on them for months, fueled in large part by a study from the conservative Heritage Foundation that accused the Biden administration of extensive autopen use, largely based on the timing of when Biden signed documents compared with when he was traveling. Some of the findings also came from an analysis of the signatures in the Federal Register. A National Archives spokesperson told the fact-checking website Snopes in March: 'At the beginning of each administration, the White House sends a sample of the President's signature to the Federal Register, which uses it to create the graphic image for all Presidential Documents published in the Federal Register.' Trump's memorandum doesn't give any indication of what might result from the investigation. Trump has already revoked scores of Biden's executive actions — including about 80 on his first day in office — and he has suggested before that the use of an autopen could be used to challenge some of the pardons Biden issued. 'The 'Pardons' that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to the pardons Biden gave to members of the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. There's no evidence that Biden wasn't aware of those pardons — he'd discussed the possibility he would sign off on them in a Jan. 8 interview with USA Today and later issued a lengthy statement explaining why he'd signed them. While the Constitution give the president unique powers to issue pardons, it makes no provision for subsequent presidents to rescind them. Jeffrey Crouch, a politics professor at American University and author of the book 'The Presidential Pardon Power,' told NBC News in March that 'Biden's pardons are highly unlikely to be revoked somehow because of the apparent use of an autopen.' In his statement Wednesday, Biden said, 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false." Trump told reporters Thursday that "I don't think Biden would know" if he signed something. This article was originally published on
