'We need to be involved': Pasifika candidates running in Auckland local election
Photo:
New Zealand Electoral Commission
There are former Pacific candidates and new faces putting their names forward for this year's Auckland local government election in Aotearoa.
The
final confirmed list of candidates
is out.
In the Manukau ward, Councillor Lotu Fuli, one of three current Auckland councillors of Pacific descent, has also served on the local board and is seeking re-election.
"Currently, we only have three Pasifika councillors at the governing body table, the mayor and 20 councillors. Out of 21, only myself, Councillor Bartley and Councillor Filipaina, who's half Samoan, sit around that very important decision-making table," Fuli said.
She said she feels the weight of responsibility of her role.
"I know that I'm here in this space to speak up and advocate for them, because with all due respect to the mayor and to our other councillors from other areas, they don't know what it's like for a Pasifika person growing up in Aotearoa New Zealand - in Manukau, in Otara, in Papatoe, in Magele [Māngere], or Otahuhu or Maungakiekie, Glen Innes. They don't know because they haven't lived that experience.
"They haven't lived that struggle, and so they can't really, truly relate to it."
Twelve individuals have put their names forward for the mayoralty, including current mayor Wayne Brown. Ted Johnston is the only mayoral candidate with Pasifika links.
Each Auckland ward has a set number of council seats. For example, in Manukau, there are only two seats, currently held by incumbents Alf Filipaina and Lotu Fuli.
In the Manurewa-Papakura ward, there are two seats, and in Maungakiekie-Tāmaki there is one, held by Josephine Bartley. For local board nominations, the number of seats varies.
Those elected make decisions about things like community funding, sports events, water quality, and even dog walking regulations.
Vi Hausia, one of the youngest Pacific candidates this year, is running for the Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board (Papatoetoe subdivision. He said he was born and raised in south Auckland.
"Growing up I've always had the sense of, 'oh, it is what it is. It's always been like that'. And then you get a bit older and you realise that actually things isn't 'is what it is'. It's been as a result of people who make decisions in important forums, like local board."
Safety and strengthening youth engagement are issues for him.
"Ensuring that when kids come out of high school there's a strong pathway for them to get into work or into training, whether that's a vocational training like builder apprenticeship or university, because that's the link to ensure that our people, particularly our Pacific people, are engaged within our society, and are able to to find who they are and to be able to contribute back to society."
He said Māori and Pasifika youth are overrepresented in the statistics of high school leavers who come out of high school and there's quite a high number of people who go straight onto welfare.
"So we've got a responsibility on the local board as well as central government, to be able to understand what the issues are, and to ensure that young people are having the opportunity to be able to be the best versions of themselves."
Another current Auckland Councillor Josephine Bartley said it iss vital that Pasifika are at the table.
"It's important because if you look at the make-up of the city, we have a large percentage of Pasifika, and we need to be active. We need to be involved in the decision-making that affects us, so at a local board level and at a city council, at a governing body level."
She said she is hopeful voter registrations will go up.
"It's always difficult for people to prioritise voting because they have a lot on their plate.
"But hopefully people can see the relevance of local government to their daily lives and make sure they're enrolled to vote and then actually vote."
Reflecting on Pacific representation in mayoral races, Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board chairperson Apulu Reece said the 2022 race, where Fa'anana Efeso Collins came second to now-mayor Wayne Brown, could have had a different outcome.
Apulu said it is time to stop blaming communities for low turnout and instead question the structure.
"There's probably some value or truth in the fact that we needed to get more people out voting for Efeso and Māori and Pacific people often too busy to worry about the voting paper that they've left on the fridge.
"But I want to twist that and and ask: why didn't the white people vote for Efeso? Why is it always put on us Pacific people and say 'oh, it's your fault?' when, actually, he was one of the best candidates out there.
"In fact, one of the candidates, the palagi [Pākeha] lady, dropped out so that her supporters could vote for Wayne Brown.
"So no one talks about the tactics that the palagis (Pākeha) did to not get Efeso in.
"That's his legacy is us actually looking at the processes, looking at how voting works and and actually dissecting it, and not always blaming the brown people, but saying, 'hey, this system was built by Pākeha for Pākeha."
There is a total of 12 mayoral candidates, 80 council ward candidates, 386 local board canddiates and 80 licensing trust candidates.
Voting papers will be posted in early September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
37 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Ban on protesting outside homes rebalances freedom of expression and privacy rights
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has announced protesting outside someone's home will become an offence. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government's ban on protesting outside someone's home will rebalance the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy, a law professor says. But another academic has questioned whether a new law is necessary, and says police may struggle to enforce it. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced on Friday protesting outside someone's home would become an offence, punishable with a fine or jail time. While it would apply to all residences, Goldsmith said there had been increased reports of demonstrations targeting the homes of public figures like MPs, judges and other officials. Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis said current laws around protests only related to public settings. "Protests that take place outside someone's home really do intrude into a sort of domestic sphere where people usually feel they should be able to exist unperturbed and unthreatened," he said. "So this particular change in the law will help to restrike that balance." Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Geddis said the change would plug a legal gap highlighted by a Supreme Court ruling nearly two decades ago. The 2007 case, Brooker v Police, involved a man who was convicted of disorderly behaviour for standing outside a police officer's house playing the guitar and singing protest songs against her, he said. But the Supreme Court found his behaviour was not disorderly. "The Supreme Court said that disorderly behaviour only applies to the public consequences of your behaviour, how that affects the public place. "And just because it's intruding into someone's private home, that's not a consideration as to whether the protest is covered by disorderly behaviour," he said. It meant the balance between people's rights within their home and people's rights to protest in public was "out of whack", Geddis said. One of the judges noted the court's finding could lead to more protests outside people's homes, and Parliament would need to consider that at some point, he said. "It turns out he was right." Victoria University law professor Steven Price said police may find it hard to enforce the new law. Goldsmith said it would be tightly targeted and prohibit "unreasonable disruptions", but Price said the independent police watchdog's review of policing protests found officers struggled to make a call on that. "What the IPCA had to say about that ... is that police have trouble on the ground having to make fine distinctions about what's an unreasonable disruption and what's not, and that seems a fair point to make," he said. "But on the face of [Goldsmith's] press release, it doesn't really solve the problem." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Love this City: Love the Waitākere Ranges!
Harrumph, say NZ First's Shane Jones and Hobson's Pledge. They call it 'co-governance'. But that wasn't how most people in the room saw it. And the room was packed, with dozens of people filling the public gallery and spilling into a second room. Members of the iwi were there, many carrying photographs of those who had gone before. Students from Kelston Girls' College turned up and made a strong contribution to the singing. Members of other iwi, the local boards and many others. The deed formalises a partnership between the iwi and the council that has been a long time coming. Even the final formal presentation and debate took much of the day. The council also voted to establish a forum to give effect to the partnership. That didn't find favour with everyone: the vote was 15-7. These decisions were made by the council's policy and planning committee, which comprises the mayor, all the councillors and two members of Houkura, the Independent Māori Statutory Board. As reported last week, the Waitākere Ranges and Whau local boards had already endorsed the proposals. The original Act of Parliament allowing for the deed was passed into law in 2008, which prompted a 'confession' from one of the Houkura members seated at the council table. Tau Henare, a National Party MP back then, said he remembered 'someone had stood up and said we don't need this bill, it can be looked after in the Annual Plan'. Henare looked ruefully at the crowd. 'Silly man,' he said. 'That man was me.' Tau Henare: "That silly man was me." Photo / RNZ Greg Presland, chairman of the Waitākere Ranges Local Board, reminded the councillors that much of the land on the western edge of the city had been 'taken without agreement'. 'It's impossible to read the history without understanding the enormity of the loss.' His local board colleague Sandra Coney explained that the heritage area, which includes the regional park, was the largest indigenous forest in the city, by far. At 17,000 hectares, it's the same size as the Hunua Ranges, but that forest has a lot of pines. She also gave the council a short history lesson: when Auckland was looking for a 1940 centennial project, options were put to a public vote. A harbour bridge? A new children's hospital? The people chose what became Auckland Centennial Memorial Park, in the heart of the ranges. Always been special, always will be, that was her message. And now the tangata whenua were being recognised. Councillor Alf Filipaina told her, 'Sandra, it's always good to see you as one of the OGs.' Original gangstas, he explained for the benefit of anyone unfamiliar with the term. Filipaina and Coney are both inaugural members of the SuperCity's governing body in 2010. Coney stood down in 2016 and is retiring from the local board this year. Filipaina is seeking another term. (The governing body has four other OGs: Sharon Stewart, who is retiring, and Christine Fletcher, Mike Lee and Wayne Walker, who are standing again.) Deputy Mayor Desley Simpson wanted to make sure everyone understood a few things properly. 'Is this a co-governance arrangement?' she asked. No, explained senior council official Michelle Chen. The new body will be an 'advisory forum'. It will not have decision-making powers, which stay where they are currently. The council owns most of the land and will remain in charge of it. 'Will this affect public access?' Simpson asked. No, said Chen, who also explained that the heritage area would include public land managed by the council and Crown land managed by the Department of Conservation (DoC). It won't include other public land, such as Watercare areas and schools. And it won't include private land. The deed provides the iwi with various ways to engage with the area: helping to create a vision, a strategic plan and specific workplans, and helping to monitor progress. The Heritage Area Forum will provide a mechanism for all this, and will consult widely and hold its meetings in public. It will have three members from the local boards, two from the governing body of the council, five from the iwi and one from DoC. That's a slight change from the original proposition, designed to pacify opponents of iwi getting too much of a say in things. The iwi is in a minority on the forum. Despite this, councillor Ken Turner, who represents the area and said he had lived there all his life, was not convinced. He described the deed as 'not all bad, now', so he would vote for it, but he could not support the plan to set up the forum. Julie Fairey suggested that supporting the deed was like buying a car, while setting up the forum was like taking the car for a drive. 'Why would you buy a car and not want to drive it?' She was perhaps remembering that Turner is a mechanic by trade. Mike Lee asked, 'Is the balance of the committee right, given the council owns most of the land?' Wayne Walker elaborated on that. 'Why not have more council AC members? Is the council providing all the funding?' Richard Hills, chairing the committee, said, 'We pay for it now. We own it, we're going to keep owning it, so of course we'll keep paying for it.' He added, 'Why are certain people so upset about what is essentially just working together? Kanohi ki te kanohi.' Richard Hills: 'Why are certain people so upset about what is essentially just working together?" Jo Bartley said, 'My eye keeps twitching whenever I hear certain people speak around this table. What are you scared of? Recognising tangata whenua's connection to the land?' Shane Henderson said he also didn't understand the opposition to the forum. 'It strengthens the Treaty partnership and it gives more democracy to all Aucklanders.' Presland noted that, back in 2008, public opinion in Auckland was 80% in favour of iwi involvement in preserving the ranges. 'Latterly, there have been two camps,' he said, 'but that seems largely to be based on the perception it will affect property rights.' Which it doesn't. Tau Henare took up this theme when he talked about a string of dog whistling. 'It doesn't affect private property, that was always a dog whistle. It doesn't mean co-governance, that's another dog-whistle from people who have no understanding of what this is about.' Mostly, the debate was respectful. There was a big audience in the room, after all, who had turned up in good faith and expected to be treated respectfully. But in the end, it was leading Te Kawerau ā Maki member Edward Ashby who nearly lost it. Ashby sits on Houkura, but had recused himself on this issue, and has been deeply engaged in the struggle to get the Deed of Acknowledgment signed since 2008. 'I'm looking forward to the day my forehead will heal, from where I've been banging it against the wall,' he muttered, before declaring, for the benefit of anyone who wanted to stop the whole process, that the deed was promised in the act. 'People who say different can take those views and stick them where the sun don't shine.' 'It's an honour to be in the room with all the iwi here today,' said Angela Dalton. She talked about 'Ed's relentlessness and resilience' and said, 'It is an historic day.' 'It's for the park,' said Ashby. 'It's not for the iwi, it's for the outcomes for the regional park.' Councillors Sharon Stewart and John Watson joined Lee, Turner and Walker in voting against the forum. The mayor and all others voted in favour, while Maurice Williamson was absent. But it's not over. DoC and the iwi must now formally declare their support, which both are expected to do. Then it will come back to the governing body of the council, which does not have Houkura members, for a final decision on the forum. Growing for everyone Auckland Council helps to organise 104 community gardens around the city. How many public community gardens do you think there are in Auckland? That's public land where locals can grow food? The answer is 104. A massive number. The programme is run by the council's community innovation team, in part as a response to growing poverty in the city. As Te Tāpui Atawhai Auckland City Mission has recently reported, one in four children in Auckland is food-insecure: on a daily basis, they don't receive enough nutrients to thrive. It's one in three for Māori children and one in two for Pasifika children. The City Mission distributes 2000 food parcels a month, and many marae, church and other agencies and community groups run food banks too. But while it's necessary, no one thinks that's a good way to address poverty. The council is involved in a more sustainable solution, 'where communities are inspired and enabled to share kai grown in their own backyards, on church land, on approved council sites, and even in the ocean, where rangatahi are being taught how to dive and fish for kaimoana to feed their whanau'. Sunita Kashyap, the manager of community innovation at the council, says: 'We face a significant inequity challenge that we need to tackle together as a community. Growing and sharing kai is a mechanism for people to lead climate and wellbeing action from the ground up, creating a future where communities thrive together - now and for generations to come.' The council's climate plan, Te Tāruke-ā-Tāwhiri, backs him up. One way to look at the climate crisis is as a 'force accelerator': it makes every bad thing worse. Poverty is an obvious example. The climate plan argues for 'the importance of supporting locals to plant food forests and grow vegetables, protecting soil and reducing food-related emissions while creating a resilient, low-carbon food system'. The Tumoana Dive Programme, teaching kids to harvest kaimoana, has been running since 2012. Led by Donovan Busby, it starts with safety training. 'The rangatahi are taught how to be lifeguards first in a 5m-deep pool in Henderson,' says Busby. 'They develop confidence before they go near the ocean. We mitigate the risks first, and it becomes a lot easier. 'At a practical level, we're giving them tools so they can provide kai for their whānau. Rangatahi are gifted a rod and tackle, and the Henderson and Massey local boards supply them with wetsuits. They treat their wetsuits like taonga.' It's not just about fishing. Through the programme, the kids 'deepen their connections to whakapapa, build their indigenous knowledge and life skills, embrace their potential, and rise as leaders in their communities'. There's a Gardens for Health video. You can find out more at OurAuckland . More Barnes dancing People walking every which way: a Barnes dance on Queen St. Photo / Jason Oxenham A Barnes dance is what happens at a lights-controlled intersection when all the pedestrians cross at once. The name doesn't come from social dances in a barn, although the allusion to that phenomenon is intentional. Barnes dances are named after New York traffic superintendent Henry Barnes, who introduced them to the city in 1962. He called them pedestrian scrambles. New York's freeway overlord Robert Moses didn't approve because they held up traffic, but New Yorkers loved them. 'Barnes has made people so happy they're dancing in the streets,' wrote one reporter. Thus, 'Barnes dances' was born. And so, according to Barnes himself, was the phrase 'dancing in the streets'. He believed it was the first recorded use of the term; Marvin Gaye and others wrote the song in 1964. Anyway, Auckland has some, and it's getting another one. Auckland Transport is about to trial the phase on the intersection of Victoria St and Nelson St, to match the existing Victoria St Barnes dances on Queen St and Federal St. The move is linked to a larger innovation, to allow cyclists to use the pedestrian phase legally on all three Victoria St intersections, without having to dismount. This has been trialled successfully in Dunedin and Christchurch, and will be trialled for a year in Auckland. It comes at the same time as the long-awaited opening of the last section of the Victoria St cycleway. This runs from Albert Park to Federal St, where it joins the rest of the cycleway to College Hill, and is part of the larger makeover of Victoria St, also nearing completion, called Te Hā Noa. All good news, but I can't help thinking AT planners must be stuck in a well somewhere. Have they been into the city? On the existing Barnes dance intersections, most cyclists and scooterists already use the pedestrian phase, because it's safer for them. Why 'trial' the new approach only on some Barnes dance intersections, when it's already the norm on all of them? Ah, but is it dangerous for pedestrians? It doesn't have to be. The rule of the road is, or should be, that the most vulnerable get the most protection. Cyclists should always give way to people walking and not ride fast or too close when going past. And now the full Te Hā Noa cycleway is open, everyone on Victoria St will be safer. Stitching for Palestine Stitch for Palestine, this Saturday at the Ellen Melville Centre. Feeling helpless in the face of the horrors of Gaza? Stitch for Palestine is a group of Auckland women, including Palestinians, who stitch together as a way to share their solidarity. They're having a session this Saturday, 10am-2pm, at the Ellen Melville Centre in the central city. Dorita Hannah from Stitch Palestine says it will be 'a communal art project that brings people together to create a Palestinian flag made from 20 keffiyehs with hand-embroidered patterns'. 'Through the timeless art of tatreez, we will celebrate the richness of Palestinian culture, share stories and uncover the meanings woven into every symbol.' Hannah adds that they're not experts. 'But the collective act of this living artwork in-process is stitched not only with thread but with conversation, connection and care.' Everyone's welcome. To sign up for Simon Wilson's weekly newsletter, click here, select Love this City and save your preferences. For a step-by-step guide, click here.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Amend away, amend away
Dunedin Labour MP Rachel Brooking has run a few marathons in her time, and she put in another long-distance effort in the House this week. She wasn't keeping count, but by my tally she delivered 31 speeches this week — and it would have been 32 but for her having to leave for the airport on Thursday afternoon to catch the last convenient flight home. As would be expected, it was the Resource Management Act which dominated Brooking's week, although she also found the time to delve into the inner workings of the Local Government (Water Services) Bill, and the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill as well. It was the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill which kept Brooking going for most of the week though. The relevant minister, Chris Bishop, has been labouring with a heavy cold all week and his heart must have sunk as Brooking — armed with pens, post-it notes and slabs of drafts and amendment papers — rose to her feet on Tuesday afternoon. Parliament is blessed with many MPs who can pick the minutest bone with any word or sentence — the Greens' Lawrence Xu-Nan and Bishop himself when in Opposition spring to mind — but few are as forensic and diligent as Brooking when it comes to working through clauses and sub-clauses. And she had plenty of material, the minister having just that morning tabled a substantial amendment paper. So substantial, in fact, that what Brooking suspected had happened was that the version of the Bill reported back from select committee — and not as yet agreed to by Parliament — had been used as the template for the soon to be amended again Bill. "This is a terrible way to make laws," Brooking lamented. "It's very frustrating, when you have been through a select committee process and have asked about the wording of different phrases and made amendments in the select committee process, to see that all upended on the day of the committee stage of the Bill." Bishop, to his credit, was somewhat repentant about that: "In mitigation, most of the changes in the Amendment Paper have been publicly announced, in some cases, a couple of months, if not earlier, than today. So members have had a good opportunity to kick those issues around." As it turned out, they were about to do a lot more kicking ... and not without good reason, as the Bill — now an Act — attempted to achieve a heck of a lot within its many pages. The much-criticised RMA is due to be axed next year: in the meantime the Amendment Act makes a many short-term changes to time frames for consent processing in areas such as infrastructure, renewable energy, farming and consenting after natural disaster. It is very broad in some places and narrowly specific in others — such as allowing the demolition of Wellington's Gordon Wilson flats and allowing Auckland to develop land around its railway stations. A lot of this is reasonable, Brooking agreed, in her third reading speech. "Labour was supporting this Bill when it was introduced and even at the second reading, despite having concerns about some of the changes that were made at select committee," she said. "But something happened on Tuesday morning. That was that a very large Amendment Paper was dropped and it made significant changes to the Bill. Changes that we were not even able to debate in this House because government members chose to stand up and close the debate on these very important aspects." Brooking then proceeded to give the government a stern and emotional telling off for its terrible law making ... none of which was enough to stop it being passed by lunchtime Thursday. Best supporting actor Taieri Green list MP Scott Willis also deserves an honorable mention in despatches for his efforts this week. Not only did he put his shoulder to the wheel with a succession of interventions on the aforementioned RMA Bill, he also had a crack at Science minister Shane Reti during Question Time on Thursday concerning job losses in the sector. Answering Willis' question about how many jobs had been lost in the sector since the formation of the government, Reti conceded that 134 jobs were to go with the disestablishment of Callaghan Innovation — the point that Willis was trying to make — but Reti also highlighted a Stats NZ survey which suggested a recent increase of people working in the sector. Which is not the same as jobs being lost, a point Willis soon made ... as well as pointedly asking if those laid-off scientists would be heading to the airport departure lounge post-haste. "I think that scientists who have been disestablished through part of the reforms will have a skill set that will be able to be applied in other parts of the science sector," Reti replied — which is true, but which also side-stepped the question of in which country's science sector that might be.
