Lawsuit against Trump balloons in size as foreign students face rising risks
The lawsuit, filed in Georgia but covering students nationwide, comes as a result of thousands of students across the country being notified that their student visas and/or their legal status through the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System database (SEVIS) had been revoked, including many in Massachusetts.
An order on the lawsuit on Friday granted those plaintiffs a preliminary injunction and stated that their lawsuit is likely to succeed in proving that the Trump administration was 'acting arbitrary, capriciously, and not in accordance with the law' when it revoked students' legal status.
The status of international students' visas is tracked through the SEVIS database. A SEVIS legal status allows a foreign student to remain in the United States, while a student visa allows a person to study in the country.
In response, over 100 lawsuits were filed, with more than 50 of the cases ordering the Trump administration to temporarily undo the actions, according to Politico.
Five international students — including two from Worcester Polytechnic Institute — filed a separate federal class action lawsuit in New Hampshire federal court that aims to represent more than 100 students in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Maine and Rhode Island who had their F-1 student immigration status revoked by the Republican administration.
Last week, it looked like the Trump administration would reverse course as federal officials said it would reinstate the legal status of international students.
However, they also said they were working on a new policy for international students studying in the U.S. to provide a framework for SEVIS legal status terminations.
The new guidance, which was released a few days later, allows foreign students to have their legal status revoked for a variety of reasons, including 'exceeded unemployment time.'
Read more: 'Games of chicken': Trump reversing foreign student legal status raises concerns
'ICE tried to 'fix' the problem it created, and made it worse,' said Charles Kuck, an immigration attorney who is leading the lawsuit that now represents 351 foreign students who lost their legal status.
'They have not walked them back. They left all these students with status gaps, did not restore all the students, and are, again, revoking SEVIS again for some of those who had been reinstated,' Kuck said.
In Massachusetts, foreign students have been especially targeted at Harvard University.
Harvard was issued an ultimatum by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in an April 16 letter: it could refuse to respond to its demands and lose its Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification allowing international students to study there — 27% of its undergraduate and graduate population — or give up information about its foreign student population.
Harvard said it provided DHS 'information required by law' about foreign students' illegal activity and records, but didn't state what information was given.
Given ongoing pressures, admitted international students will be allowed to accept admission at Harvard University and at a foreign institution as a 'backup plan.'
The lawsuit representing 351 students was originally filed April 14, according to Kuck. To become a class action, it still needs a judge's approval, he said.
The lawsuit aims to have the court state that students' legal status and student visas be reinstated to the 'exact immigration and legal position they were in as of March 25, 2025,' according to the filing.
It also aims to have the court declare that the termination of students' SEVIS records were 'arbitrary, capricious and unlawful,' declare the revocation of valid visas to be unlawful and order the federal government to remove any inaccurate or defamatory information about the students from 'systems of record.'
The lawsuit is unique because it 'attacks the legality of the 'fix' and also addresses the visa revocation,' according to Kuck.
The lawsuit claims that ICE had 'no authority' to terminate students' SEVIS records and that the revocations have caused 'imminent concrete and preventable harm,' according to the lawsuit.
It further claims that the new policies by the federal government created a slew of legal issues.
'A visa revocation should not, legally, impact a student's immigration status in the United States, yet such a revocation will be treated by ICE in a manner that constructively terminates that student's status by cutting off the ability to work, to study, and to change immigration statuses within the United States," the lawsuit reads.
'My face was on the ... truck': Harvard report details climate of fear for pro-Palestine students
'Willing to capitulate': Cracks emerge in Harvard's resistance to Trump over DEI
Harvard hands over foreign student info to feds amid threat from Trump admin
An ultimatum for Harvard: Provide info on foreign students or lose them
An alum bought a closing Eastern Mass. college. Here's what he plans to do with it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
This Woman Is Going Viral For Hilariously Explaining The Brutal Truth About The US's Student Loan Crisis
I doubt it'll come as a surprise to anyone under 45, but according to nearly "one in six adult Americans" has federal student loan debt, and the New York Times reports that millennials hold the bulk of that debt. Back in May, President Trump resumed collections on previously defaulted student loans, which had been paused since 2020. Combined with the government allowing loan servicers to report late payments to credit bureaus again (which had also been on pause), the New York Times said that millions of people have seen their credit scores drop, and "a record number of borrowers are [now] at risk of defaulting by the end of the year." Student loans have continued to be a point of contention politically as well, with many conservatives arguing against student loan forgiveness, saying it's akin to getting something for free. However, younger people contend that the loans are predatory, unaffordable, and feel impossible to pay off, sometimes even after they've been making regular payments for years. Zoë Tyler, aka thezolyspirit, recently went viral in a video where she jokingly laid out exactly what the student loan crisis looks like in reality. Zoë started out the video satirically, in a perfect mid-Atlantic accent, with a text overlay that says, "What boomers think the student loan crisis is...": "Oh, yes," she said, "Well, I, I know I said I would pay back those student loans, but I... I've decided I don't want to," she said with a smile. "I don't ever want to grow up. I want to stay a child forever." @thezolyspirit / Via Then, she switched immediately back to her normal speaking voice with a text overlay that says "What it actually is..." as she began imitating a one-sided phone call. "Hi, yes, um — so, I have my student loan pulled up here — I've been making the minimum payment on time for 10 years, and I now owe more than I took out. So I just… I was wondering what's that about?" she asked. @thezolyspirit / Via "The interest accrues faster than you can pay it off? Oh, that's…that's you guys are able to do that." "What is the interest, by the way? I can't… It's 13%? Okay. That makes sense, that…that it would be that." Then, Zoë begins a new conversation. "Hi! I just graduated, and I noticed that my student loans are way more than I originally took out. It was accruing interest while I was at school? Uh. Hmm. But it says the principle is more than I took [out]..." @thezolyspirit / Via "When I graduated, you combined the accruing interest into the principle, so now… I took out $55,000, and it's saying that it accrued $20,000 while I was at school. So now, instead of taking the 10% interest off of $55,000, you're taking 10% interest off of $75,000? Wow!" @thezolyspirit / Via The video ended with Zoë signing off the call. "All right, well, uh, thank you. What was your name, sir? One more time? Beelzebub? Okay, thank you." People in the comments were quick to back Zoë up, pointing out that they'd had similar experiences with their own loans. "I borrowed $17k and they want $60k back. They need to be fr lmao," said one person. "My husband, after paying for 13 years, checked his student loan breakdown. Turns out, of the 350$ a month he has been paying on time for 13+ years, only .16 CENTS a month goes toward the principle balance." "atp my student loans are an issue between the government and god." Others pointed out how much costs have changed since the baby boomers were in school. "Tuitions and Fees have gone up 133% since the 80s." U.S. News & World Report confirms this statistic, with the qualifier that it is in regard to in-state tuition and fees at public national universities, and is not adjusted for inflation. "My FIL [father-in-law] paid for his college and his living expenses for the entire year by working an entry level construction job in the summer. No way anyone could do that now-a-days. A summer job wouldn't even cover books and fees." The conversation made its way over to Twitter (X) as well, when the video was shared with the comment, "A TikTok that explains the student-loan crisis better than any politician or journalist can, in 93 seconds." Quoting a response to the original tweet, they also said, "This is not 'basic finance,' these are exploitative non-negotiable terms which makes this a form of predatory lending." "If you get a 7-year car loan and make the minimum payment every month, the loan will be paid off in 7 years... It's literally only student loans that are like this." Unsurprisingly, there were commenters who felt that borrowers were the ones responsible for their debt. "Crying about being responsible for your choices just shows how out of touch that generation is," said one person. "What this tik tok explains really well is that people didn't learn the right things in college." "Do not sign don't understand. Especially don't do that and then try to make it other people's problem." But others pushed back, pointing out that people took these loans out when they were still teenagers, usually with a promise that going to college would help them earn more money later. "Worst part is people will see this and say 'well you as a 17/18 y/o should have realized how predatory it was.'" "Telling 18 year olds that they have to go to college to be successful and not fully explaining to them what loans are like is diabolical." "a lot of us were just shuffled through a line and told to sign a sheet of paper so we could go to school, all with minimal explanation of any of it." And finally, this commenter summed it up best: "But make sure you pay them off whilst also buying a house, paying for a wedding, and having children all whilst earning proportionally less than they ever did because wages are stagnant, ok? You can do it if you just cancel your Netflix." You can see Zoë's full video below: @thezolyspirit / Via And now I have to know: What do you think? Are you still paying off student loans? Do you feel they should be forgiven, or at least reduced after a decade of payments? Let us know in the comments. And if you'd like to remain anonymous, you can use the form below.
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Brazil's Lula announces $5.5 billion in credits for exporters hit by US tariffs
SAO PAULO (AP) — The Brazilian government on Wednesday unveiled a plan to support local exporters affected by a 50% tariff imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump on several products from the South American nation. Dubbed 'Sovereign Brazil," the plan provides for a credit lifeline of 30 billion reais ($5.5 billion), among other measures. Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva described the plan, which includes a bill to be sent to Congress, as a first step to help local exporters. Congressional leaders attended Wednesday's ceremony, a first in months, in a sign of growing political support for the leftist leader in response to Trump's tariffs. Other measures announced by the Brazilian government include postponing tax charges for companies affected by U.S. tariffs, providing 5 billion reais ($930,000) in tax credits to small and medium-sized companies until the end of 2026 and expanding access to insurance against cancelled orders. The plan also incentivizes public purchases of items that could not be exported to the U.S. 'We cannot be scared, nervous and anxious when there is a crisis. A crisis is for us to create new things,' Lula said. 'In this case, what is unpleasant is that the reasons given to impose sanctions against Brazil do not exist.' Trump has directly tied the 50% tariff on many imported Brazilian goods to the judicial situation of his embattled ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is currently under house arrest. ___ Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY Rep. Elise Stefanik demands to know if Gov. Hochul knew massive prison strike was brewing: ‘Why did she refuse to act?'
ALBANY – Upstate Rep. Elise Stefanik is calling on Gov. Kathy Hochul to come clean about this year's massive corrections workers strike and whether she knew about the brewing 'powder keg' in state prisons. The Republican North Country rep, in a statement first obtained by The Post, said Hochul 'must immediately address' a new report by the prison workers' union largely blaming the state for allegedly ignoring warning signs of the simmering crisis and strike threats. 'What did she know, when did she know it, and why did she refuse to act?,' Stefanik writes in the statement. 3 North Country Rep. Elise Stefanik is attacking Gov. Kathy Hochul over her handling of the illegal corrections officers strike earlier this year. Hans Pennink Thousands of corrections officers illegally walked off the job in February, requiring Hochul to deploy over 6,000 National Guard troops to supplement staffing shortages in the problem-plagued facilities. The memo from the state Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Association issued last week alleged its leadership had showed a top Hochul aide a video of members threatening to strike at an annual meeting weeks earlier, and were told the issue would be raised to the governor. 'The deterioration of prison conditions statewide and the indifference of the State's elected leaders to cries for help from the rank-and-file pushed staff to the breaking point, and then they broke,' the union memo reads. Stefanik — who is widely believed to be mounting a Republican challenge to Hochul in next year's gubernatorial election — slammed the Democrat for allegedly failing to act to prevent the strike. 'The union representing Correction Officers stated they warned Kathy Hochul before their strike that prisons were a dangerous powder keg, a strike was imminent, and that lives of officers were at risk. Hochul did nothing,' Stefanik wrote. 3 Rep. Elise Stefanik says Hochul 'did nothing' to respond to a 'powder keg' in the state prisons pre-strike. AP While the Hochul administration declared an end to the strike in early March, upwards of 2,000 National Guard troops remain to backfill staffing holes at the facilities, which are 4,000 to 5,000 personnel short of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervisions' ideal staffing level, Commissioner Daniel Martuscello wrote in a recent court filing. The department was already suffering from staffing shortages even before the strike, a report from the state comptroller's office said last month. A spokesperson for Hochul, in response to Stefanik's statement, accused the congresswoman of condoning the illegal strike and called the corrections officers' demands 'unrealistic.' 'Unlike Congresswoman Stefanik, Governor Hochul does not condone breaking the law. Corrections officers who joined the illegal work stoppage earlier this year knowingly put both the incarcerated population and their fellow officers at risk. Walking off the job because an unrealistic list of demands isn't met is unacceptable and illegal,' a rep for Hochul's office wrote in a statement. 3 A spokesperson for Gov. Kathy Hochul called illegally striking corrections officers demands 'unrealistic'. Hans Pennink 'Instead of issuing empty statements, Governor Hochul will keep focusing on real reforms that improve conditions for everyone in DOCCS facilities, including incarcerated individuals and the employees who serve there,' the statement said. The Hochul rep emphasized that corrections workers have received a pay bump since the strike. The spokesperson also noted that the state tried to pause the requirements of a solitary confinement law that the agency claimed it was unable to implement considering its dire staffing levels, but a court ordered them to resume. A spokesperson for NYSCOPBA declined to comment saying the report speaks for itself. The union also declined to share the video it says showed the Hochul administration official in February. The union, which found itself at odds with its members during the illegal strike is up for contract negotiations with the state in May 2026, per its memo.
