UK arrests 280 in crackdown on illegal delivery riders
Immigration enforcement officers stopped and questioned 1,780 individuals between July 20 and 27 and 280 people were arrested, the interior ministry said, adding asylum support was being reviewed for 53 of those detained.
The operation was part of a push by the government to tackle illegal migration which also includes new legal requirements for companies to verify workers' immigration status.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing pressure to show voters he can counter illegal immigration with support rising for Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage's Reform UK party.
"This government is making sure rules are respected and enforced," border security minister Angela Eagle said.
As well as the arrests, civil penalty notices were issued to 51 businesses, including car washes and restaurants, which could face fines for employing illegal workers, the ministry said.
Police seized 71 vehicles, including 58 e-bikes, and confiscated 8,000 pounds ($10,751.20) in cash and 460,000 pounds worth of illicit cigarettes.
The interior ministry said immigration enforcement teams would receive a 5 million-pound funding boost for the work tackling illegal working.
Last month, the government struck a new deal with food delivery firms, including Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat, to share information aimed at preventing illegal working.
In the 12 months to July, Britain returned 35,052 people with no right to remain, up 13% on the previous 12 months.
France this week agreed to accept some undocumented migrants who arrive in Britain by small boats with Britain accepting from France an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with family ties in the country.
($1 = 0.7441 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Summer campaign launched to stop bike and car thefts in New Forest
A summer campaign to tackle theft in the New Forest has been launched. Visitors and residents are being urged to take their possessions with them to prevent opportunistic car and bike thefts. The campaign, which kicked off this month, uses posters, leaflets, digital adverts, petrol pump ads, and social media to spread messages to bikers and drivers. Tourists and locals are also being warned not to leave any valuables or belongings in their vehicles. Officers will be focusing on car parks and campsites, engaging with the public to highlight the issue and offer tips on safeguarding their belongings. Councillor Dan Poole, portfolio holder for community, safety, and wellbeing, said: "New Forest District Council, through our community safety partnership of Safer New Forest, are keen to ensure residents and visitors follow these positive steps. "As a partnership, we continue to invest in and provide free bicycle marking schemes to deter incidents of theft and, where stolen, have property returned to its owner." READ MORE: Police and council outline plans to combat anti-social behaviour in Shirley The campaign is supported by New Forest District Council, Camping in the New Forest, and Forestry England, with signage and posters on display for tourists visiting for hiking, cycling, or camping. Officers will patrol beauty spots, collaborating with local businesses to provide resources and advice. Vehicle and bike security checks will be carried out, with advice given to those lacking adequate security. Chief Inspector Scott Johnson, New Forest district commander, said: "The New Forest is a safe and welcoming place to visit all year round, but we're working closely with partners and the community this summer to see a reduction in bike theft and theft from vehicles on previous years. "We want to encourage all tourists and residents to take simple steps to protect their bikes and secure their vehicles to greatly reduce the chances of their possessions from being stolen." Bike theft often occurs when bikes are not securely locked with a robust mechanism or are not registered. Theft from motor vehicles usually happens when items, even non-valuables, are left inside, or doors are left unlocked and windows open.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Thai gallery removes China-focused artworks after 'pressure' from Beijing
STORY: Material about Beijing's treatment of ethnic minorities and Hong Kong has been removed, at China's request, from an exhibit on authoritarian governments at one of Thailand's top art galleries. That's according to its curator and communications seen by Reuters. The artists say it's Beijing's latest attempt to silence critics overseas. SAI: 'We were like quite shocked..." Sai, a Myanmar artist and the exhibit's co-curator, said Chinese embassy staff, accompanied by Bangkok city officials, entered the exhibition three days after it opened and demanded it be shut down. SAI: 'It is such an ironic thing because this exhibition is all about the network of authoritative regimes. And then, while it is exhibiting, the network of authoritative regimes are working together to shut this exhibition down." When Reuters visited the Bangkok Arts and Cultural Centre on Thursday, some works previously advertised and photographed had been removed. Others had been altered, with the words 'Hong Kong,' 'Tibet' and 'Uyghur' redacted, along with names of the artists. 'So we fled before midnight. And then we, and on the 27th, at 8:30 a.m., we landed in London." Sai said he was speaking from overseas, where he fled after Thai police sought to find him. In a July 30 email seen by Reuters, the gallery said due to pressure from the Chinese embassy, 'we have been warned that the exhibition may risk creating diplomatic tensions between Thailand and China." The email added that the gallery had 'no choice but to make certain adjustments,' such as obscuring the names of the Hong Kong, Tibetan and Uyghur artists. Several days later, Sai said the embassy demanded further removals. The Chinese embassy in Bangkok, the foreign ministry in Beijing, and Thailand's foreign ministry did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration referred Reuters to the gallery, which did not respond to an email seeking comment. An exhibit representative said the team had agreed not to comment on the issue. Beijing has denied allegations by rights groups that China carries out a sophisticated campaign of harassment against critics overseas that has often extended into the art world. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warning Labour ‘won't be trusted on renters' rights' as landlord MPs rake in £830k in a year
Labour has been warned the government won't be trusted on renters' rights after it emerged that MPs rake in at least £830,000 a year in rent. Some 83 members of parliament earn a minimum of £10,000 from renting properties, according to the latest register of interests, with Sir Keir Starmer's party leading the pack of mostly residential landlords. The true figure which MPs earn from rent is unknown, but is likely to be higher than £830,000, as 170 registered properties have received rental income in the past year. Campaigners said the number of landlords in parliament was 'shocking' and called for greater scrutiny over what they described as a 'blatant conflict of interest' when voting on legislation that would directly affect them. High-profile ministerial landlords include chancellor Rachel Reeves and foreign secretary David Lammy. Ms Reeves moved to Downing Street following her new role in government. It comes as the government reels from the resignation of homelessness minister Rushanara Ali, who quit over claims she evicted tenants from a property she owns and then increased the rent by several hundred pounds. She was accused of 'staggering hypocrisy' as her department is bringing in legislation to ban landlords who evict tenants in order to sell their property from relisting it for rent for six months. Ms Ali is not Labour's only landlord, nor its most profitable. In fact, many of the most property-rich MPs are members of Sir Keir's party, data from the parliamentary register of interests shows. Tulip Siddiq, Labour's anti-corruption minister who stepped down amid investigations she was gifted a flat by an ally of her aunt Sheikh Hasina, also declares rental income from two properties. MPs have registered income from 170 properties across the UK, with at least £10,000 generated in yearly profits per landlord. But this is probably higher in some cases, considering that average monthly rents are £1,399 in the UK. The majority of these (86 per cent) are residential properties, meaning they are being leased out to private renters, not businesses. Eight MPs have declared that they have stopped receiving rental income at some point in the past year. The figure does not include properties rented by some MPs who charge less than £10,000 a year, such as Sir Keir, who has previously revealed he rents to his sister. The highest concentration of properties rented out are in London, Edinburgh, Guildford and Oxford, with Lib Dem MP Charlie Maynard declaring rent for a house in upstate New York. Some 82 of these are rented out by Labour MPs. Ilford Labour MP Jas Athwal is the most prominent landlord in the Commons, renting 15 residential properties and three commercial, including a private care home. Mr Athwal's rental earnings come alongside his MP salary of £93,904. Mr Athwal came under fire soon after being elected, as his tenants claimed their flats were filled with black mould and ant infestations. He has since stood down from his role as a councillor in Redbridge. The register also shows that one in five Tory MPs – 27 out of 121 – are also landlords, down from 83 in the previous parliament. Former chancellor Jeremy Hunt is the Conservatives' biggest landlord, taking rent from eight residential properties and one office building, partly through his property holding company Mare Pond Properties. In 2023, flats owned by Mr Hunt in Southampton were reportedly rented out for £1,700 to £2,000 a month. Tory MP Sir Geoffrey Clifton Brown is also the landlord of five residential properties, and was among a group of backbench MPs who were accused last year of signing amendments to gut the now-scrapped Renters' Reform Bill. Jae Vail, spokesperson for the London Renters Union, said: "The sheer number of landlords in parliament is shocking. 'During an unprecedented housing crisis, it's a blatant conflict of interest that MPs are making millions from struggling renters – while some even use taxpayer money to cover their own personal rents. Tenants need a government that works for us, not one that profits from our hardship. Until parliament is free of landlord MPs, renters will not trust the government to deliver the bold action we need. It's time for the government to ban landlords from parliament and start working for ordinary people, investing in council housing and capping rents." Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, said 'it probably doesn't reflect well on parliament' that so many MPs are landlords. 'In the longer term, renters risk losing confidence in a political system where those that extract rent from them are hugely overrepresented – and it certainly didn't help the last government's efforts to pass the Renters' [Reform] Bill," he said. A Labour spokesperson said: "There are rightly strict parliamentary rules that MPs must adhere to when renting property. 'Our Labour government is delivering landmark legislation transforming rights and security for renters across the country. Tory MPs opposed it every step of the way, Labour will deliver it." Rishi Sunak's government was accused of watering down planned protections for renters in England, after some Conservative MPs raised concerns they would be too burdensome on landlords. The Independent has also reached out to the Conservative Party and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government for comment.
