Trump takes aim at city and state climate laws in executive order
In a Tuesday executive order, Trump instructed the Department of Justice to 'stop the enforcement' of state climate laws, which his administration has suggested are unconstitutional or otherwise unenforceable.
The president called out New York and Vermont, both of which have passed 'climate superfund' laws requiring major fossil fuel companies to help pay for damages from extreme weather.
'These State laws and policies are fundamentally irreconcilable with my Administration's objective to unleash American energy,' the executive order says. 'They should not stand.'
He also targeted the dozens of lawsuits brought by states, cities and counties against big oil in recent years, accusing the industry of intentionally covering up the climate risks of their products and seeking compensation for climate impacts.
The move left advocates outraged.
'This order is an illegal, disgusting attempt to force everyday people to pay for the rising toll of climate disasters, while shielding the richest people in the world from accountability,' said Aru Shiney-Ajay, executive director of the youth-led environmental justice group the Sunrise Movement.
The new order came as Trump touted new moves to revive the coal, the dirtiest and most expensive fossil fuel.
It also followed a March meeting at the White House where fossil fuel executives reportedly lobbied Trump to give them immunity from climate litigation. Days earlier, 200 environmental, consumer advocacy and social justice groups had urged top congressional Democrats to block attempts from big oil to gain legal immunity, the Guardian reported.
Oil interests applauded the new move from the president. 'Directing the Department of Justice to address this state overreach will help restore the rule of law and ensure activist-driven campaigns do not stand in the way of ensuring the nation has access to an affordable and reliable energy supply,' Ryan Meyers, senior vice-president of top US fossil fuel lobby group American Petroleum Institute, said in a statement.
But advocates say the order is an an anti-democratic attack on municipalities' climate action, which serve a crucial role in counterbalancing Trump's anti-environmental agenda.
'Make no mistake: this executive order isn't about energy independence or economic security – it's about ensuring billionaire polluters never have to face a jury of ordinary Americans,' said Cassidy DiPaola, communications director of Make Polluters Pay, which backs the climate superfund laws. 'The American people deserve better than a government that protects polluters' profits over people's lives.'
Fossil fuel companies poured $96m into Trump's re-election campaign and affiliated political action committees, as he pledged to roll back environmental regulations and loosen regulations on the industry. This was slightly less than the $1bn Trump requested from the sector in an infamous meeting at his Mar-a-Lago club last spring, but still constituted record levels of spending.
Trump pledged to attack climate lawsuits, which he has called 'frivolous', on the campaign trail. And during his first term, his administration filed influential briefs in the cases supporting the oil companies.
But environmental lawyers question the validity of the new executive order.
'This illegal and unconstitutional order panders to the biggest polluters on the planet and shows Trump's utter hypocrisy on states' rights,' said Jason Rylander, legal director of the climate law institute at the conservation organization Center for Biological Diversity. 'Trying to sic the justice department on state officials who are protecting their people from pollution will fail because the US attorney general has no power to declare state laws illegal.'
In recent months, rightwing groups have launched campaigns attempting to shield oil companies from city and state climate accountability. Some have ties to Leonard Leo, who is known as a force behind the Federalist Society, which orchestrated the ultraconservative takeover of the American judiciary and helped select Trump's supreme court justice picks.
A truck parked outside a major fossil fuel conference last month in Houston warned that city and state policies and lawsuits 'are threatening America's pro-consumer energy dominance', linking to an op-ed from a group with links to Leo. The new executive order echoes this sentiment, saying the litigation and laws 'threaten American energy dominance and our economic and national security'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia expects India to keep buying its oil and seeks China-India-Russia talks
NEW DELHI, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Russia expects to continue supplying oil to India despite warnings from the United States, Russian embassy officials in New Delhi said on Wednesday, adding that Moscow hopes trilateral talks will soon take place with India and China. U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an additional tariff of 25% on Indian goods exported to the U.S. from August 27, as a punishment for buying Russian oil, which constitutes 35% of India's total imports compared with a negligible 0.2% before the Ukraine war. "I want to highlight that despite the political situation, we can predict that the same level of oil import (by India)," Roman Babushkin, the charge d'affaires at the Russian embassy in India, told a press briefing. He predicted India and Russia would find ways to overcome Trump's latest tariffs in their "national interests". Trade talks between India and the U.S. broke down over the opening up of India's vast farm and dairy sectors, as well as its purchases of Russian oil. The total tariff announced on Indian goods entering the U.S. is 50%. The Indian foreign ministry did not immediately reply to an emailed request for comment. It has previously said the U.S. decision to single out India for Russian purchases was "extremely unfortunate". Russia's Deputy Trade Commissioner Evgeny Griva on Wednesday said buying oil from Russia is "very profitable" for India, which will not want to change its supplier. On average Russia gives a 5%-7% discount to Indian buyers, he said, adding that Russia has a "very, very special mechanism" to continue oil supplies to India. In addition, he said Russia had started accepting Indian rupee payments for its goods after the resolution of issues that had trapped billions of dollars worth of funds in Indian banks. As tensions between Washington and New Delhi rise, high-profile visits from New Delhi and Beijing in recent weeks have raised hopes on the part of the Asian neighbours that ties damaged by a 2020 border clash can be repaired. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi plans to visit China for the first time in over seven years later this month. The planned visit was reported by Reuters last week, even as other high profile exchanges, including Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's two-day visit to New Delhi, concluded. At the same time, Russia is trying to revive long-standing plans for a trilateral meeting with India and China to help them forge a "greater Eurasian partnership". "As far as the trilateral is concerned, we are quite hopeful that this format will be resumed sooner rather than later because its importance is not questioned," Babushkin said. "This is closely linked to the Russian initiative of the establishment of the greater Eurasian partnership," Babushkin said. Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet Modi in New Delhi by the end of year, he said. Putin, Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping are also expected to all attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation starting August 31.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump is ready to ‘crush' the Russian economy if Putin doesn't meet with Zelensky, says Lindsey Graham
Sen. Lindsey Graham has said that Donald Trump is ready to 'crush' the Russian economy if Vladimir Putin refuses to meet with Volodymyr Zelensky in the coming weeks to discuss an end to the Ukraine war. Graham has reportedly been pressuring Trump for months to support a sweeping sanctions bill designed to punish the Kremlin by placing massive tariffs on any country that continues to buy Russian oil and gas, thereby indirectly helping to bankroll its invasion of its western neighbor state. The legislation would most obviously hurt rival superpowers China and India, who currently account for 70 percent of Russia's energy exports and would face 500 percent U.S. tariffs if it were to be enacted. The Independent 's Owen Matthews has argued that Zelensky's European allies have already missed their opportunity to hold Putin to account by starving Russia of fossil fuel revenues. However, the senator believes there is still time. 'If we don't have this thing moving in the right direction by the time we get back, then I think that plan B needs to kick in,' Graham told the Associated Press in a phone interview this week. His bipartisan bill has been endorsed by 85 of his fellow senators to date, but does not have the expressed support of the White House. Graham argues that its moment may come when the upper chamber of Congress reconvenes in September following its summer recess. Graham said he had spoken to Trump on Tuesday, a day after he hosted several European heads of state and senior officials at the White House, including Zelensky, Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, Friedrich Merz, Giorgia Meloni, Ursula von der Leyen and Mark Rutte. 'Trump believes that if Putin doesn't do his part, that he's going to have to crush his economy. Because you've got to mean what you say,' Graham told reporters in his home state after his call with the president. 'There will come a point where if it's clear that Putin is not going to entertain peace, that President Trump will have to back up what he said he would do. And the best way to do it is to have congressional blessing.' Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal, the top Democrat in support of Graham's bill, has warned against excessive optimism regarding the prospects of a peace deal, given that the Russian leader emerged from his Alaska summit with Trump last week without making any definite commitments, suggesting he could be employing 'rope-a-dope' tactics. 'The only way to bring Putin to the table is to show strength,' Blumenthal told the AP. 'What Putin understands is force and pressure.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
DC food delivery drivers are being swept off the street in police crackdown: ‘Widespread fear amongst community members'
President Donald Trump has unleashed federal officers and the National Guard on the streets of Washington, D.C. ostensibly to combat "violent gangs" and other criminals, but videos appear to show agents harassing and detaining food delivery workers, leaving the capital's immigrant population wary. A recent NBC News report documented a D.C. resident's shock when — after ordering food from Uber Eats — he went outside to determine why his delivery driver hadn't made it to his house, only to find the driver surrounded by federal agents. 'I stepped into the street, I looked down and see lights in the direction, like police lights, in the direction of where my driver was,' Tyler DeSue told NBC News. 'It was my driver by himself and, like, nine different officers all wearing different uniforms. ... Most of them had face coverings on.' The agents reportedly took the driver, named Sidi, into custody after questioning him about his vehicle's registration and his immigration status. Sidi asked for an Arabic translator as he was unsure of why he was being detained, but a Homeland Security Investigations agent informed him no one with them spoke Arabic and thus could not tell him why he was being detained in a way he could understand. According to the report, Sidi is not the only delivery driver to face harassment at the hands of Trump's federal agents. Videos and eyewitness accounts of agents stopping drivers have been making the rounds online and are being discussed in delivery driver chat groups, according to the report. During a normal day in the District, delivery drivers typically criss-cross the city picking up orders, some in their cars and others on small scooters with attached delivery boxes. But locals are reporting that fewer drivers are on the streets since the crackdown began. 'The number of people who come to pick up orders has diminished,' Clarissa Vasquez, who works at a Columbia Heights restaurant, told NBC News. 'We are at 4% of the people who come to pick up food.' Some of the drivers may have left D.C. to take orders in nearby Virginia and Maryland, where they're less likely to run into federal agents. Atenas Estrada, a program director with Amica Center for Immigrant Rights in D.C., said the center is aware of the reports concerning delivery drivers. She told NBC News that the threat of detainment can lead to fear among both undocumented and documented migrants. 'What I am seeing, personally, is widespread fear amongst community members. People, you know, making decisions or avoiding places that they perhaps would not otherwise avoid or leave,' Estrada told NBC News. Trump launched his federal patrols after Edward Coristine, aka 'Big Balls,' one of DOGE head Elon Musk's staffers, was attacked by a group of teenagers from Maryland. Despite Trump's insistence that D.C. is rife with violent crime, official statistics from the Metropolitan Police Department show a 30 percent decrease in violent crime since the same time last year. The president has accused the MPD of reporting 'fake crime numbers' to 'create a false illusion of safety' in a Truth Social post. He suggested that a probe into the department's numbers may be underway. 'This is a very bad and dangerous thing to do, and they are under serious investigation for so doing!' Trump wrote. down by 35 percent, marking the lowest its been in 30 years.
