What is the coalition of the willing?
– What is the coalition of the willing?
At least 31 countries have signed up to help defend a peace deal in Ukraine, once one is struck, in an effort to ward off a future attack by Russia.
The UK is among those 'willing', with the Government prepared to put 'boots on the ground and planes in the air', Sir Keir said when he unveiled plans for the coalition at London's Lancaster House in March.
But it is not the first of its kind.
Former US president Bill Clinton suggested in 1994 that sanctions could be imposed by a 'so-called coalition of the willing', to quell North Korea's nuclear ambitions, and his successor George W Bush announced a similar alliance in the early-2000s to disarm the then-Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.
– Who has signed up?
Leaders from the UK, France, Germany, Finland and Italy have all indicated their willingness to defend a peace deal in Ukraine.
They joined Donald Trump, who has not signed up to the coalition, and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House this month.
A total 31 countries are in the coalition, according to the Government's National Security Strategy 2025. Beyond Europe, it has attracted support from the Canadian and Australian prime ministers Mark Carney and Anthony Albanese.
– Will British troops go to Ukraine?
After Sir Keir's commitment to put 'boots on the ground and planes in the air together with others' to militarily defend a peace deal, No 10 unveiled its support for a Multinational Force Ukraine, in an effort to help regenerate Ukraine's own armed forces.
Military chiefs have previously met in Paris to agree a strategy for the force, and to coordinate plans with the EU, Nato, the US and more than 200 planners from 30 international partners.
And in Washington, European leaders discussed early-stage proposals for a security guarantee, similar to Nato's article five principle – that an attack one member is an attack on the entire bloc.
– What has the coalition achieved?
'The coalition of the willing has been successful in advocating for Ukraine and communicating with Trump and the US administration during its outreach to Russia,' says Edward Arnold from the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) think tank.
'Moreover, it has undertaken lengthy military planning and has established a leadership and command structure. However, much remains uncertain, especially the nature of any agreed ceasefire or whether a broader peace process is on the cards.'
But the US's commitment is 'far from certain', he told the PA news agency, and warned that 'European planners cannot progress the planning until the US position is agreed'.
– What is Nato's role?
Nato's Mark Rutte has attended meetings of the coalition of the willing, and Mr Trump appeared pleased with his efforts at their meeting when he described the secretary general as 'a great, great political leader'.
But Mr Arnold warned that an article five-style mutual defence deal could amount to 'de facto' membership of the bloc for Ukraine, something which Russian president Vladimir Putin 'is unlikely to agree to'.
He said: ''Nato article five-style' guarantees are being talked about but Nato is a unique alliance which is not able to be replicated for Ukraine.
'Moreover, if any coalition of the willing member signed a mutual defence clause with Ukraine, and then Ukraine was attacked further, that could conceivably draw that Nato member into direct conflict with Russia, thereby potentially triggering article five.'
Sir Keir has welcomed 'some sort of article five-style guarantees', which he said 'fits' with some of the coalition's work, and Mr Trump who met Mr Putin in an Alaska summit claimed Moscow will 'accept' multinational efforts to guarantee Ukraine's security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
6 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data. – How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK? The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. – How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers? It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210. – Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation. – Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement? Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier. Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers. The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'. – What is the Government saying since the legal ruling? Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'. She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels. – What options does the Home Office have now? Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex. The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis. The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September. – Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel? The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August. After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels. But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors. The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
STV News
6 minutes ago
- STV News
Glasgow facing £80m financial black hole even with 10% council tax rise
Glasgow City Council is facing a significant £110m budget gap by 2028. Even if the local authority increases council tax by 5% for the next two years, it would still face an £80m black hole. More than £65m of the shortfall is from pressure associated with homelessness, the council's latest financial outlook report said. It comes amid weak economic growth and a downturn in business across the UK and 'significant challenges' in public funding for the Scottish Government. Glasgow's finance director, Robert Emmott, said housing and homelessness remains one of the council's biggest expenses. It was previously reported that Glasgow houses around 4,000 asylum seekers, which the council warned in April is putting too much pressure on the city's services. It was also reported that a decision by the previous UK Government to speed up the processing of asylum claims had led to more people presenting as homeless in Glasgow. Nevertheless, councillors agreed in March to cover the cost of a UK Government decision to speed up the processing of asylum claims for another year. Unless policy changes, the costs of that decision will rise to £43m in 2025/26 and £66m in 2026/27. Mr Emmott's latest report said a 'pause' in both asylum dispersal to Glasgow and the requirement to house asylum applicants from outwith Scotland would reduce estimated costs to £36m in 2025/26 and then to £13m in 2026/27, if implemented from October 2025. Glasgow's city administration committee report will recommend seeking more money and further help from the UK and Scottish Government's on the impact of homelessness within the city. Glasgow City Council has been asked for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What does a true Brit feel when we commemorate the war or fly the St George flag? Depends on the Brit
Are we, to echo Keir Starmer's now infamous phrase, 'an island of strangers'? No. But there is a deep cultural divide in this country, a cultural dissonance we don't discuss but should. Witness the row about the Wythall Flaggers, the group that has erected numerous St George's flags in the Worcestershire village to parade its patriotism. What does it mean? Is it laudable patriotism or a nod to the hard-right, anti-migrant politics that is fast becoming mainstream? Is it inclusive or exclusive? 'We have members of the community of all ethnicities and religions stopping by and praising what we are doing so please don't call this racist,' say the organisers. Maybe that is so, but certainly different people will look at those flags and take different meanings from them, feel different emotions. That's pretty much our island story now. We are the same, but we're different. The VJ commemoration last week, led by King Charles, spoke to that. There was all the pomp and circumstance you might expect, but a few hours before Britain and others marked the victory over Japan at the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire, there was, in Delhi's historic Red Fort complex – and much noted in British/Indian households – a very different celebration to mark India's 78th birthday as a free nation. There was no mention of the victory over Japan, or the tremendous part played by Indian soldiers in securing it. Instead, one of the heroes honoured was Subhas Chandra Bose (no relation), who created the Indian National Army (INA) from Indian soldiers taken prisoner by Japan, and fought against the British when Japan invaded northeast India in 1944. The INA achieved little on the battlefield, but Indians see the INA as comparable with the American and Irish struggle to secure freedom from British rule. When the British court-martialled three of Bose's officers after the war for forswearing their original allegiance and 'waging war against His Majesty the King Emperor', Indians – far from turning against them, and accepting the British depiction of them as 'Japanese-inspired fifth columnists' – turned on the British. Their defence described them as patriots and converted the court martial into a Britain versus India battle. Even Gandhi, the great champion of non-violence, eulogised Bose, describing how 'the hypnotism of the INA has cast its spell upon us … His patriotism is second to none'. Indians can be accused of ignoring the truth that Japan behaved with unprecedented cruelty, but many here can and will argue that Britain is also doctoring history when it claims, as during Friday's celebration, that the war against Japan was a war for freedom. No mention there that Japan was attacking Britain's Asian colonies and Britain had no intention of giving these Asians freedom. There's also dissonance as we discuss immigration. The story now is that while Europe has always welcomed migration, it cannot cope with such vast numbers of uninvited guests. But that, too, raises eyebrows among various diaspora who call Britain home. That immigrants are coming in large numbers from lands this country has no connection with cannot be denied. But this picture of Europe traditionally welcoming migrants distorts the truth: while Europe has coped with internal migration from other European countries, and some former colonies, it has largely been a people-exporting continent. As the historian Alfred Crosby put it: 'European migrants and their descendants are all over the place.' While they mostly live in their own continent, Europeans 'have leapfrogged around the globe'. Migration has long gone both ways. We in the various diasporas know this. Between 1820 and 1930, more than 50 million Europeans leapfrogged so successfully from their continent that they created what Crosby calls Neo-Europes, 'lands thousands of kilometres from Europe and from each other'. At the beginning of the 19th century, these lands were almost wholly non-white, but by the end the great majority of people were Europeans. In 1800, North America had fewer than 5 million white people, southern South America fewer than half a million, Australia had 10,000 and New Zealand was still a Māori country. As a result of the wave of European migration in the next century, Crosby wrote, Australia's population was almost all European in origin and that of New Zealand about nine-tenths European. We hear the debate about migration and raise an eyebrow. We know the context. In April 1990, the late Norman Tebbit waded into this very British dissonance with his cultural test, the 'Tebbit test', suggesting that immigrants who support their native countries rather than England in cricket are not significantly integrated into the UK. But that was always nonsense. We are one nation, but, apart from on very rare occasions, there are no UK cricket, football or rugby teams. The English don't support Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland, and their respective fans largely reciprocate. Many a Scot has been known to temporarily support whomever might humiliate England. Yet they all belong. In rugby and cricket there is one Irish team, with the Northern Irish playing alongside their southern neighbours. So we are not an island of strangers, but neither are we close to, or even seeking, cultural homogeneity. There are points of view and differing perceptions shaped by varying experiences and different shades of history, and frankly it's all a bit of a hodgepodge. But then, families are like that. People will hold patriotic ceremonies, and fly patriotic flags, but all of it will always invite numerous interpretations, as does the idea of patriotism. You can worry about that if you like, but I think it's all quite healthy. Mihir Bose is the author of Thank You Mr Crombie Lessons in Guilt and Gratitude to the British.
