logo
East Ayrshire councillors urged to object to major new wind farm

East Ayrshire councillors urged to object to major new wind farm

The National9 hours ago
Unlike normal planning applications, larger wind farms are considered by the Scottish Energy Consents Unit within the Scottish Government.
The council is merely a consultee, albeit a major one.
On Friday, the council's planning committee will be asked to approve its position on the application by Renewable Energy Systems (RES), for 21 turbines at Pencloe, north-east of New Cumnock.
READ MORE: Reform UK hiring staff in England to write Holyrood manifesto
Each turbine would stand up to 180 metres to blade tip, with the project expected to generate up to 126 megawatts of electricity – enough to power tens of thousands of homes.
If approved, the scheme would include associated infrastructure such as new access tracks, a substation, borrow pits, and temporary construction compounds.
The wind farm would operate for 35 years before being decommissioned.
One of the most eye-catching elements is the developer's commitment to a £12.6 million community benefit fund over the lifetime of the project, equating to £6000 per installed megawatt per year.
RES has also pledged to explore opportunities for local contracts during construction and operation.
However, the report to councillors highlights several areas of concern. Planning officers note potential visual impacts on nearby settlements including New Cumnock and Kirkconnel, as well as cumulative effects when considered alongside other wind farms in the area.
There are also outstanding issues relating to ecology, ornithology, and cultural heritage, which statutory consultees are still assessing.
Planning officers have recommended that if the Scottish Ministers approve the Pencloe scheme, it should come with a detailed set of conditions.
These include a Construction and Environmental Management Plan, strict controls on traffic management and measures to protect peat, watercourses and local habitats.
Developers would also need to agree restoration and decommissioning plans before work begins.
Statutory consultees have added their own stipulations.
READ MORE: Just 7 per cent of Edinburgh TV Festival panellists based in Scotland
Transport Scotland has asked for traffic assessments and safeguards to minimise disruption on the A76.
Sepa has requested robust plans for water crossings and peatland disturbance, while NatureScot is reviewing potential impacts on protected species and bird populations.
The council has also asked for ongoing monitoring of noise and shadow flicker for nearby homes, alongside financial guarantees to ensure site restoration at the end of the wind farm's operational life.
Despite these challenges, the project is seen as having the capacity to make a 'meaningful contribution' towards decarbonisation and energy security.
Councillors on the Planning Committee will consider the recommendations from officials on Friday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers
Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers

North Wales Live

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Live

Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers

Transport can be expensive whether that's air fare, petrol money or train travel. With the latter, passengers in the UK are being warning that ticket prices could rise by as much at 5.5% in the next round of price hikes. The July Retail Prices Index (RPI) figure, which is frequently used to calculate the annual rise in rail travel costs, will be revealed on Wednesday, August 20, and that could mean higher fares for passengers in England. Meanwhile, Transport for Wales are offering £1 rail fares for a short period of time, you can read more here. Transport organisations have been left furious by the potential rise in next year's railway fares, which they have condemned as "outrageous". Just last year the Department for Transport confirmed costs would rise by 4.6%, but it looks like they may rise again. RPI is an inflation measure - released monthly - which is utilised to gauge the change in the price of retail goods and services. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here. It wasn't employed in 2022 or 2023, but it was in 2024, when the Department for Transport confirmed costs would rise by 4.6% - one percentage point above last July's RPI figure. These alterations to fares took effect on March 2 this year. The Government has yet to announce how it will calculate next year's railway fare increase, although banking firm Investec has predicted this year's July RPI figure at 4.5%, meaning costs could leap by 5.5% in March 2026. Bruce Williamson, of campaign group Railfuture, raged there was "no justification" for the massive increase. He said: "What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any." He continued: "It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and on to our congested road network, which is in no one's interest. "One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. "But I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to passengers, which I think is wrong." Around 45% of fares across Britain's railway network are regulated by either Westminster or the Scottish and Welsh governments. This encompasses season tickets for most commuter routes, certain off-peak return fares and flexible tickets for journeys around major urban areas. Railway operators determine increases for unregulated fares, though these are expected to closely mirror changes in regulated ticket costs. Ben Plowden, chief executive of Campaign for Better Transport, argued that costly fares were "putting people off" using trains. He continued: "Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. "Our survey found that 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise. "As the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways, it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable." An open return ticket from Cardiff Central to Edinburgh will set you back a whopping £239.50 (with a booking fee) if you buy the ticket in advance on Trainline. However, you can find return flights from Cardiff airport to Edinburgh airport with Ryan Air for over half of the price at £108 on Skyscanner. The Department for Transport has confirmed that "no decision" has been made regarding fares for the upcoming year. A spokesperson stated: "The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. "No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers."

Sign up for our new, free newsletter from Scottish Energy Experts
Sign up for our new, free newsletter from Scottish Energy Experts

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Sign up for our new, free newsletter from Scottish Energy Experts

Three writers, who previously wrote the Three Engineers column, will focus in on Scotland's energy landscape for this new newsletter, which will be free to receive for both subscribers and casual readers of The National. The experts are: Simon Forrest, CEO of world-leading marine energy firm Nova Innovation Dick Winchester, oil industry veteran known for his regular writing at Energy Voice John Proctor, former global director of special projects at Intergen with 43 years of experience in energy generation. He is now convener of Energy Scotland, an association of Scottish-based energy professionals focused on responding to Scotland's energy challenges Scotland has some of the highest energy bills in Europe. Why is this, when we have an abundance of energy resources at our fingertips? That is the central premise of the Energy Experts newsletter. Our three industry leaders, whose expertise spans renewables, oil and gas, will examine the biggest problems in the energy sector and how Scotland can respond to them – with a particular focus on the difference that independence could make. The newsletter will explore issues like: How do Scots respond to rising energy costs and make sure that we truly benefit from the renewables revolution? What's the story with the increasing hostility towards renewable developments in the Highlands and Islands? Why are we paying to turn off wind farms? Why don't politicians want zonal pricing? What policies should we turn to if we want to make the most of our energy-rich nation? After Grangemouth's closure, how can we ensure a genuinely just transition? Readers can also pop their questions on all things energy in the comments. Forrest will be the first of the experts to write the newsletter next week, and you can expect to receive your updates from the team on the last Friday of each month. Sign up here for free. Subscribers can also read the edition online or in print each month.

Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers
Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers

Wales Online

time2 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers

Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers Transport organisations have been left furious by the potential rise in next year's railway fares, which they have condemned as "outrageous". Could train tickets be rising again in the new year? (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne) Transport can be expensive whether that's air fare, petrol money or train travel. With the latter, passengers in the UK are being warning that ticket prices could rise by as much at 5.5% in the next round of price hikes. ‌ The July Retail Prices Index (RPI) figure, which is frequently used to calculate the annual rise in rail travel costs, will be revealed on Wednesday, August 20, and that could mean higher fares for passengers in England. Meanwhile, Transport for Wales are offering £1 rail fares for a short period of time, you can read more here. ‌ Transport organisations have been left furious by the potential rise in next year's railway fares, which they have condemned as "outrageous". ‌ Just last year the Department for Transport confirmed costs would rise by 4.6%,but it looks like they may rise again. RPI is an inflation measure - released monthly - which is utilised to gauge the change in the price of retail goods and services. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here . It wasn't employed in 2022 or 2023, but it was in 2024, when the Department for Transport confirmed costs would rise by 4.6% - one percentage point above last July's RPI figure. These alterations to fares took effect on March 2 this year. Article continues below The Government has yet to announce how it will calculate next year's railway fare increase, although banking firm Investec has predicted this year's July RPI figure at 4.5%, meaning costs could leap by 5.5% in March 2026. Bruce Williamson, of campaign group Railfuture, raged there was "no justification" for the massive increase. He said: "What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any." He continued: "It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and on to our congested road network, which is in no one's interest. ‌ "One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. "But I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to passengers, which I think is wrong." Around 45% of fares across Britain's railway network are regulated by either Westminster or the Scottish and Welsh governments. This encompasses season tickets for most commuter routes, certain off-peak return fares and flexible tickets for journeys around major urban areas. ‌ Railway operators determine increases for unregulated fares, though these are expected to closely mirror changes in regulated ticket costs. Ben Plowden, chief executive of Campaign for Better Transport, argued that costly fares were "putting people off" using trains. He continued: "Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. "Our survey found that 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise. ‌ "As the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways, it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable." Trains are integral to the everyday lives of commuters. (Image: Cathy Owen) An open return ticket from Cardiff Central to Edinburgh will set you back a whopping £239.50 (with a booking fee) if you buy the ticket in advance on Trainline. However, you can find return flights from Cardiff airport to Edinburgh airport with Ryan Air for over half of the price at £108 on Skyscanner. ‌ The Department for Transport has confirmed that "no decision" has been made regarding fares for the upcoming year. A spokesperson stated: "The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. "No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers." Article continues below

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store