'My assistance dog helps me be part of life'
Canine Partners, based in Leicestershire, has now issued an urgent appeal for people to come forward to train puppies who will go on to become assistance dogs for people with physical disabilities.Mr Miles had not considered an assistance dog until a chance encounter with another wheelchair user and their canine companion while shopping in the Meteor Centre in Derby.He said: "We were chatting, comparing notes because we were both in chairs and the penny dropped, because I'd never thought about it."
Mr Miles applied to the charity but, with lockdowns due to the Covid-19 pandemic, he was unable to spend the required two weeks at its base in Osgathorpe, near Loughborough.Instead, Canine Partners moved Rolo into his home and visited daily for training, and the two have never looked back.Mr Miles said: "He's trained to pick things up for me - my keys, my gloves. "If I'm out in the workshop doing some jobs, he'll pick up a screwdriver or something."And for me, it may sound quite a minor thing for the onlooker, but actually when you're in a wheelchair and you drop something, it's a real pain."Rolo also opens and closes doors for Mr Miles but said he provided more than practical help."When you're involved in a life-changing accident or you have an illness that comes and changes your ability to be mobile you sometimes sort of step back and let life go by," he explained."Because I've got a dog, I've got responsibility. A canine partner help you be part of life. They don't let you watch the world go by."
Canine Partners had about 100 people on its waiting list when it closed to new applicants.Its volunteers look after puppies until they are about 15 months old, teaching them basic obedience and socialisation skills.The dogs are then paired with their new companions, who they will live with, and begin specialist training, which costs about £50,000 per animal.Assistance dog trainer Steph Dainty said: "Volunteers really do start the dog's first chapter off for us and get them to the amazing standard they need to be to then come in to do the assistance dog stuff."They can really go on to do some amazing things. "People are always shocked by what our dogs can do - and then want one for themselves."Lucy Eldred, chief executive of the charity, added: "Other than the time and the commitment, you don't need any specialist skills or experience."We're looking for anything that anyone would offer any normal dog in puppyhood, which is a loving, caring home and basic obedience and basic socialisation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
13 hours ago
- BBC News
What's your favourite pudding?
What's your favourite British pudding? Bread and butter pudding, treacle tart, jam roly-poly?If none of these take your fancy, you're not alone. According to charity, English Heritage, classic British puddings are less popular with young people and people are making them less and once upon a time a home-made pudding may have been part of the meal two or three times a week, now it's once a month or never at want to know what your favourite is - have a look at this list or add your own to the comments below. For the research the charity English Heritage defined puddings as cooked sweet courses which follow a main includes crumbles and pies as well as the classic steamed research found these remain popular with around a third of people naming them as their cold desserts are more commonly eaten, with fresh fruit the most widely eaten followed closely by ice cream.
BBC News
18 hours ago
- BBC News
Exodus of Samaritans volunteers after Kent branch closure
Over 85% of volunteers at a Kent branch of Samaritans that closed in April have now quit the charity. Former volunteers at the Folkestone branch told the BBC they turned down the option to move to another base further away or work remotely for logistical reasons, but also felt that they had been treated poorly by the charity. Samaritans refuted this claim "in the strongest possible terms". A spokesperson said the branch closed as it was "not being run in-line with the high standards of Samaritans". Founded in 1953, Samaritans focuses on preventing suicides by connecting trained volunteers with people who are July, Samaritans announced that it would close over 100 branches across the UK and Ireland - but said the Folkestone office's closure "had nothing to do with the recent proposals to secure the future of our charity".Asked about the large number of volunteers who had quit the charity following the closure of the Folkestone branch, a Samaritans spokesperson said: "The circumstances of one individual branch are not a predictor of outcomes elsewhere."The services at the Folkestone branch were paused in January before it was permanently closed in April. The charity said the closure was "related to issues regarding leadership, quality, and compliance matters". Former volunteer Nicola Joyce said news of the closure was a shock. "We were left just not really knowing what was going on," she said. "It felt very baffling."The Edwardian house that the branch was based in went on the market on Tuesday for £277,500. Ms Joyce said the building offered a real sense of community that felt very "homely". The 83 volunteers based at the Samaritans centre in Folkestone were offered the opportunity to relocate to offices in Canterbury or Ashford, but only nine transferred while two chose to work Watson, 81, said he turned down the offer to work from home because he did not have the appropriate IT skills. A former headteacher, he had been a volunteer at Samaritans for 21 years and said leaving the charity had left "a big gap" in his life and "that feeling that you're no longer helping people".He said the closure was done in a very "cruel way". Ms Joyce turned down the opportunity to work at another branch because she couldn't leave her dog at home for long hours, but also said that after the closure she no longer wanted to volunteer for the organisation."One of the things that upsets me most is how disposable we all felt," she said."At no point did the central charity formally acknowledge us or thank us."Some of us had volunteered for years, for decades. One member of our branch for over 50 years."We cared so deeply and gave so much. It felt brutal."A spokesperson from Samaritans said individual volunteers were contacted personally by phone call and letter in January and again in April "to fully explain the situation". They were also offered "emotional support" and a coffee morning. "Samaritans absolutely appreciates and values the efforts of all our 20,000 plus volunteers," the spokesperson added."While we understand how disappointed Folkestone volunteers will have been in the eventual outcome, we would never treat any volunteers in the manner being suggested." Nicola Ellingham, who volunteered at the Folkestone branch as IT support, said volunteering was "not just about answering the call, it's about being part of that local community".She said working in a bigger, centralised branch would not offer that and could feel anonymous. Remote working would not work, she said, because some calls could be "extraordinarily harrowing" and it was important to be in the same room as someone else "just to be together and to talk through what's happened". Samaritans chief executive Julie Bentley previously told the BBC: "Samaritans provides a life-saving service, day and night, 365 days a year but the changing needs of our callers and volunteers mean thinking differently about the way our services need to work."We are engaging with our volunteers on proposed improvements that will mean we are able to answer more calls, have more volunteers on duty and be there for more people in their darkest moments."Samaritans volunteers are hugely dedicated to being there for our callers and they remain at the heart of our service, but it has become increasingly clear that having over 200 branches, varying in size from 10 to 300 volunteers, is not sustainable and hinders us providing the best possible service to people who need us."
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
The 180-ton ‘wet wipe island' that's clogging up the Thames
To a casual observer, the pair of mechanical excavators raking through the mulch on the Thames's southern foreshore might well signify little. It's a quiet spot at the foot of London's Hammersmith Bridge, overlooked by a towpath and a few passing swans. But something major is happening here: the first-of-its-kind mechanised removal of what has been locally dubbed ' wet wipe island '. Surveys suggest this stomach-churning build-up of detritus has changed the very course of the river. Yet, until now, the work of tackling it has largely been left to volunteers for Thames21, an environmental charity. In Wellington boots and protective gloves, they have stalked the exposed shore at low tide, picking out wet wipes that Londoners have flushed down toilets – and which have, over the years, amalgamated into something far more gruesome than the sum of their parts. The numbers alone are grim: in the past eight years, volunteers have collected more than 140,000 wet wipes spewed into the river when storm overflows discharge sewage during periods of heavy rainfall. Thames Water clears 3.8 billion wipes from its network every year, at an annual cost of £18m. The 'island' of these that has formed near Hammersmith Bridge, where the river bends and the water moves slowly, is roughly the size of two tennis courts. According to modelling by the Port of London Authority (PLA), which has now taken the lead on the expensive clean-up operation, it weighs 180 tons, or the same as 15 double-decker buses. It's mostly composed of wet wipes clumped up with twigs, and has grown as high as a metre in some places. '[An] embarrassment to the capital,' the PLA has said. Were it to appear in a Don DeLillo novel, this outsized agglomeration would offer a discomfiting metaphor for how we live: as rapacious consumers who bury our waste beneath our city, creating an underworld we'd rather not consider. And for some years, indeed, the dogged, strong-stomached volunteers have shouldered the burden of doing so. 'When [they] are there, they [realise] it's worse than they expected,' says Liz Gyekye from Thames21, which has monitored this side of the bridge since 2017. 'You do hear people saying, 'I didn't know how bad the problem is…' Once you get onto the foreshore, [you can see the wet wipes] are everywhere.' It is feared they can harm wildlife and ecology locally, as well as further afield. The problem, she says, is that the wipes contain plastic, which breaks down into microplastics. These can then make their way into the stomachs of animals, according to studies. 'It will flow into oceans eventually and fish will be eating it and we eat the fish,' says Gyekye. Despite this unappetising prospect, we continue to flush the wipes down our toilets when they should be disposed of in the bin. Even better, Gyekye adds, is not buying them at all. 'We've always put out the message, 'bin it, don't flush it',' she says. '[And] we urge people to use alternatives. They're convenient but the best thing is not to use them.' Although wet wipes were invented in the middle of the 20th century, their widespread use – and hence the problem of their disposal – is a relatively recent phenomenon. 'In the 1970s and 1980s, people used cotton wool and water to wipe their babies' bottoms,' says Gyekye. 'It's only from the 1990s they started marketing this innovation. People aren't just using them for babies but to remove make-up.' Some 11 billion are used every year in the UK, with about 90 per cent containing plastic. In London, so-called 'nappy valley' areas like Battersea are responsible for particularly high usage, Gyekye suggests. This summer, inspired by the charity's action, the PLA is trying a different method to clear away the wet wipe island, deploying specially commissioned excavators to rake the foreshore, gather up the wipes and remove them, after which they will be taken to a skip and disposed of. The work, mostly funded by the PLA and started this week, will take a month and is thought to be costing hundreds of thousands of pounds. The excavators are being stored on the grounds of the adjacent independent St Paul's School while not in use. 'Frankly it is disgusting,' says Mark Anderson, the PLA's head of corporate affairs, of the wet wipe island. 'We are just as frustrated as anybody, and have wanted to see this addressed for years.' The completion of a new ' super sewer ' (the Thames Tideway Tunnel), the interest and financial commitment 'have now aligned to get this going', he adds. If it's emblematic of our throwaway culture, and the mountains of waste we generate, it is also arguably a sign of how poorly we care for our waterways. Last year, a report from The Rivers Trust found that no single stretch of river in England or Northern Ireland was in good overall health, and that toxic chemicals that remain in ecosystems for decades pollute every stretch of English rivers. Untreated sewage spills were found to blight most of our rivers. In the capital, the sewerage system was historically designed to discharge into the rivers, to prevent sewage from backing up into people's homes. Before Joseph Bazalgette created the network for Victorian London, raw sewage flowed into the Thames, from where London drew its drinking water supply. 'A portion of the inhabitants of the metropolis are made to consume, in some form or another, a portion of their own excrement, and moreover, to pay for the privilege,' observed microbiologist Arthur Hassall in 1850. Cholera epidemics served to illustrate the toll this took on people's health, although at the time the disease was believed to be airborne, carried by the stench of the river. Bazalgette engineered his way out of this, but his system was not designed to cope with a population the size of the capital's current one. After huge growth in the 19th century, there were 6.5 million people in London by the start of the 20th century. Today that figure is closer to nine million, and the city once again seems overwhelmed by its own waste. In 2023, at least 14.2 billion litres of sewage ended up in the Thames, according to figures obtained by the Liberal Democrats. Work is under way to reduce this. In February this year the Thames Tideway Tunnel became fully connected. It is expected to reduce sewage discharges into the tidal Thames by 95 per cent, including at the location where the island has formed. Thames Water, which has been criticised for its handling of the general problem, has promised £9.5bn (in 2022-23 prices) of investment over the next five years to safeguard the environment and improve river health. The water company and the Environment Agency are working with the PLA to tackle wet wipe island. 'We continue to work with partners to create a better River Thames for people and wildlife,' says Charlie Wood, the London director of the Environment Agency. The Government also plans to ban wet wipes containing plastic, something Thames21 has campaigned for. 'This is part of our wider plan to rebuild the water system, which includes a record £104bn investment to halve sewage spills by 2030 and a new, powerful regulator responsible for the entire water sector – created by abolishing Ofwat and merging four water regulators into one,' says a spokesman for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Back near Hammersmith Bridge, a couple of passers-by look on as the excavators continue to rake away at the wet wipe problem. London continues to go about its business, consuming and then discarding material things in frightening numbers. But DeLillo's Underworld, in which waste is a central theme, carries a haunting warning. As one character tells Nick Shay, the novel's protagonist: 'What we excrete comes back to consume us.'
