EXCLUSIVE Our neighbour built TWO homes without planning permission... we're going to sit there with popcorn when they got bulldozed
Fuming neighbours are ready to 'buy popcorn' and watch from their windows if bulldozers move in to tear down two huge homes – after it emerged they were built without planning permission.
The controversial semi-detached homes sprung up on the site of a former pub car park in Bradford, West Yorks, despite original planning permission having long since lapsed.
Now locals are demanding action over the 'cowboy' development, which they claim towers over surrounding heritage cottages and damages the area's character.
Residents have also called on council officials to make an example of rogue developers who flout planning laws and later seek retrospective approval.
It comes as MailOnline this weekend revealed further cases in Bradford where developments were constructed without proper permissions.
Helen Naylor, 50, said: 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations.
'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.
'Cowboys come along, whack something up and just expect that the council will eventually sign it off.
'I think everyone around here has just had enough of it.'
The homes appeared in just under a year on the site of the long-disused pub car park in the Heaton area of the city, with one listed for sale online as a five-bedroom, three-storey property.
Although permission was granted in 2015 for a modest development, residents say that lapsed long before building began.
Now, both homes face potential demolition if Bradford Council refuses to approve the scheme in hindsight.
Neighbour Jane Loe, 68, said: 'It's quite funny in a way, but also horrible for those who live here.
'My neighbour and I said we're buying popcorn if and when they make them pull it down.
'We're going to sit out here and laugh.'
Ms Loe, who lives opposite the new houses with husband Nick Swift, 76, described the builder's behaviour as 'outrageous'.
She explained: 'The original design was unattractive but what they've actually built is even worse.
'We've watched them deviate from the plans in every way for the last year and a half.
'The build quality is terrible – we've seen people working with no helmets, no high-vis, no gloves.
'They even plugged power tools into a neighbour's living room and just ran a cable across the road.
'It's been a bunch of cowboys, basically. It's a monstrosity.'
The developer, named in council documents as Amjad Yaqoob, reportedly believed the 2015 approval still applied when he purchased the land. He has claimed to have been unaware that the consent had lapsed.
Bradford Council has confirmed that no valid permission was in place when the two homes were built. A decision on the retrospective application is expected in the coming weeks.
Neighbours close to the new-build homes say they hope the council will take firm action.
Eighty-year-old Janet Megson, who lives nearby with her husband Les, 76, said:
'The whole thing is an absolute disaster.
'I believe they didn't have planning permission but that doesn't seem to mean a thing these days.
'I want to see the council enforce the rules and bring it back to how it was. They should be forced to take the whole thing down.
'I don't know what sort of mentality the council planning department had in the first place to allow anyone to build on this site.
'There are little cottages round the back, it's narrow. There's nowhere to park. It's just out of character. It's out of place, altogether.
'I think anywhere else in the country, with something without permission like this, they'd immediately have to take the whole thing down.
'But I'm afraid round here, it's this sort of 'we'll go back to the planning department, and we'll see if there are amendments or compromises'.
'It's ridiculous.'
Mr Yaqoob, who runs a building company in Bradford, declined to comment when approached by MailOnline.
However, architects working on his behalf told Bradford Council that there was 'never any malicious intent to build something without approval', and claimed the development was 'very similar' to the previously approved plans.
The firm added: 'The materials used are sympathetic to the area, and there are no additional issues of overlooking or overbearing.
'We therefore feel the retrospective application should be approved.'
That assessment, however, brought short shrift when MailOnline visited the village.
Angry NHS worker Jane Megson, 52, said the idea of letting the build remain was 'disgusting'.
She said: 'It doesn't fit in, and the thought of retrospective planning, it's disgusting.
'Why do we bother having rules and regulations if they're just going to do what they like and then get retrospective planning?
'The council needs to make a show of these people and force them to take it down, to be honest.
'It's shocking the way they behave in Bradford, quite frankly.
'The thing that annoys me is that they, on the planning application, said it fits in with the surroundings.
'It does not fit in with the surroundings at all.'
'I really do hope they make an example because it's happening far too often in Bradford.
'People just do what they want and then put in the retrospective planning. Because the council can't be bothered, they just roll over and let them have their way.'
Helen Naylor, who lives yards from the unapproved homes, added: 'I think it's absolutely disgraceful, but it doesn't surprise me in the least.
'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations.
'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.'
Fran Jones, 60, joked that the houses looked ready to collapse.
She said: 'I think they might blow down when the wolf blows on them. I don't think they've got foundations – I think they're built on a concrete slab.
'They stand out a mile and the finish is cheap. I feel sorry for the people in the heritage cottages behind it. It's so awful.
'We saw them building it and we were all shaking our heads going: 'I'll huff, and I'll puff and I'll blow your house down'.
'The fact that it's now come up with no planning permission is no surprise to any of us.'
The developer's agents, P.N. Bakes Architectural Consultancy, argue that the homes are 'very similar' to the 2015 plans and say their client believed a 'material start' had already been made.
Bradford Council say enforcement action will be 'reviewed' once a decision is made.
A spokesman said: 'Our Planning Enforcement Team have investigated reports of these works being carried out without planning permission.
'As a planning application has now been submitted, the matter of enforcement will be reviewed once a decision on planning permission has been made, as is standard practice nationally.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Industrial firms to face £685m property tax hit after energy support pledge
Industrial firms are to be hit with nearly £700 million in new property taxes, offsetting some of the Government's move to slash their energy bills to boost competitiveness, experts have warned. Just a week after the Government's industrial strategy revealed electricity costs for about 7,000 energy-intensive businesses would be cut by scrapping green levies, estimates suggest many of the larger firms are set to see their business rates bill soar. Around 4,300 large-scale industrial properties in England – across manufacturing sectors such as automotive, aerospace and chemicals – will face a new business rates levy costing them around £685 million a year, according to tax and software firm Ryan. The levy, which comes into effect in April, is part of next year's business rates revaluation and is being used to fund tax breaks for high street retail, leisure and hospitality sectors, Ryan said. Alex Probyn, a practice leader of property tax at Ryan, said that while the industrial strategy move to reduce energy bills was welcome, 'it's perverse to then ask those very same businesses to foot the bill for high street tax cuts through higher business rates from 2026, a year before the energy support will come into effect'. He added: 'If the goal is to boost UK competitiveness, we need a coherent strategy that tackles the total burden of fixed costs — not one that gives with one hand and then takes with the other.' It follows Sir Keir Starmer's 10-year industrial strategy, which includes a measure to cut bills by up to 25% to help firms compete with foreign rivals. Under the new plans, a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme from 2027 will cut costs by up to £40 per megawatt hour for over 7,000 manufacturing firms by exempting them from levies on bills including the renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs and the capacity market. Around 500 of the most energy-intensive firms, including the steel industry, chemicals and glass-making, will also see their network charges cut. They currently get a 60% discount through the British Industry Supercharger scheme, which will increase to 90% from 2026. But Ryan is calling for more coherence in strategy from the Government, cautioning that any benefit from lower energy bills risks being undermined by increased property taxation. UK firms already face the highest property taxes in the developed world and more than double the European Union average, according to the firm. Mr Probyn said: 'We're seeing two opposing policies rolled out simultaneously. One aims to support industry by reducing energy costs. 'The other increases a key fixed operational cost — property tax — on the very same businesses to subsidise other sectors. 'There is no coherent strategy; it's a contradiction.' A government spokesperson said: 'We are making it easier and quicker for businesses to invest and grow by cutting British industrial electricity costs with unprecedented new support which will cut electricity costs by around 20-25% for thousands of businesses. 'Our reform to the business rates system will also create a fairer business rates system that protects the high street, supports investment and levels the playing field. 'A new, permanently lower business rates in 2026 will benefit over 280,000 retail, hospitality and leisure business properties and will be sustainably funded by a new, higher rate on the 1% of most valuable business properties.'
Sky News
41 minutes ago
- Sky News
Concessions to welfare reforms revealed after Labour backbench rebellion forces government retreat
Changes to welfare reforms, forced on the government by rebel Labour MPs, are being revealed today ahead of a crucial vote. The original bill restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit (UC). The government, which insisted welfare costs were becoming unsustainable, was forced into a U-turn after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the bill at its first Commons hurdle. While the amendment is expected to be withdrawn, after changes that appeased some Labour MPs, others are still unhappy and considering backing a similar amendment to be tabled today. 2:59 Here are the main changes to the UC and pip bill: • current pip claimants will keep their benefits; stricter eligibility requirements will only apply to new claims from November 2026 • a review of the pip assessment, which will have input from disabled people • existing recipients of the health-related element of UC will have their incomes protected in real terms Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said in a statement that the legislation now aims to deliver a "fairer, more compassionate system" ahead of the second reading and vote on Tuesday. "We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. "That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. "This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances." On Saturday, Sir Keir Starmer said fixing the UK's welfare system was a "moral imperative". The government claimed cuts to sickness and disability benefits would shave £5bn off the welfare bill and get more people into work. The Resolution Foundation believes the concessions could cost as much as £3bn, while the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the changes make tax rises more likely. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News that welfare bill changes have put Labour in a much better position ahead of tomorrow's vote. On Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Mr Streeting said: "There were things that we didn't get right, we've put right, and there'll be a debate about future amendments and things, I'm sure, as it goes through in the usual way." On the same programme, shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately repeatedly refused to say whether the Conservatives would back the bill, but would review the proposals after the minister's statement later. "We have said that if there are more savings that actually bring the welfare bill down, if they'll get more people into work, and if they commit to using the savings to avoid tax cuts in the autumn, which looks highly unlikely at the moment, then they have our support." The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against the bill and have called for the government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Women's Euros forecast to boost UK economy with pubs hoping to serve more pints
Pubs being allowed to stay open later if England or Wales reach the final stages could also reel in more customers. The Uefa Women's Euro 2025 tournament kicks off in Switzerland on July 2, with England's Lionesses and Wales playing their first matches on Saturday July 5. Pubs are hoping to pull an additional 2.6 million extra pints during the tournament, the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) found, based on an estimated increase in pub beer sales during matches compared with the annual daily average. The pub has forever been regarded as a home away from home, especially for sports fans, so it's no surprise that fans will be flocking to the pub to cheer on our brilliant teams Emma McClarkin, chief executive of the BBPA The BBPA, whose members brew 90% of British beer and own nearly half of UK pubs, said this could deliver a £13 million boost to the economy. Furthermore, pubs could be allowed to stay open beyond their usual closing time if either of the two countries reach the semi-finals or final of the Euros, which will take place towards the end of July. Emma McClarkin, chief executive of the BBPA, said: 'The pub has forever been regarded as a home away from home, especially for sports fans, so it's no surprise that fans will be flocking to the pub to cheer on our brilliant teams.' However, Ms McClarkin renewed calls for the Government to 'level the playing field and reduce beer duty', with England and Wales paying the fourth-highest tax rate compared with other nations competing in the tournament, she said. Alcohol duty is paid by manufacturers when they make their products, and the duty is generally then passed on to consumers through prices. Duty on draught pints was cut by 1.7% earlier in the year – meaning a penny off a pint in the pub.
