EXCLUSIVE Our neighbour built TWO homes without planning permission... we're going to sit there with popcorn when they got bulldozed
The controversial semi-detached homes sprung up on the site of a former pub car park in Bradford, West Yorks, despite original planning permission having long since lapsed.
Now locals are demanding action over the 'cowboy' development, which they claim towers over surrounding heritage cottages and damages the area's character.
Residents have also called on council officials to make an example of rogue developers who flout planning laws and later seek retrospective approval.
It comes as MailOnline this weekend revealed further cases in Bradford where developments were constructed without proper permissions.
Helen Naylor, 50, said: 'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations.
'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.
'Cowboys come along, whack something up and just expect that the council will eventually sign it off.
'I think everyone around here has just had enough of it.'
The homes appeared in just under a year on the site of the long-disused pub car park in the Heaton area of the city, with one listed for sale online as a five-bedroom, three-storey property.
Although permission was granted in 2015 for a modest development, residents say that lapsed long before building began.
Now, both homes face potential demolition if Bradford Council refuses to approve the scheme in hindsight.
Neighbour Jane Loe, 68, said: 'It's quite funny in a way, but also horrible for those who live here.
'My neighbour and I said we're buying popcorn if and when they make them pull it down.
'We're going to sit out here and laugh.'
Ms Loe, who lives opposite the new houses with husband Nick Swift, 76, described the builder's behaviour as 'outrageous'.
She explained: 'The original design was unattractive but what they've actually built is even worse.
'We've watched them deviate from the plans in every way for the last year and a half.
'The build quality is terrible – we've seen people working with no helmets, no high-vis, no gloves.
'They even plugged power tools into a neighbour's living room and just ran a cable across the road.
'It's been a bunch of cowboys, basically. It's a monstrosity.'
The developer, named in council documents as Amjad Yaqoob, reportedly believed the 2015 approval still applied when he purchased the land. He has claimed to have been unaware that the consent had lapsed.
Bradford Council has confirmed that no valid permission was in place when the two homes were built. A decision on the retrospective application is expected in the coming weeks.
Neighbours close to the new-build homes say they hope the council will take firm action.
Eighty-year-old Janet Megson, who lives nearby with her husband Les, 76, said:
'The whole thing is an absolute disaster.
'I believe they didn't have planning permission but that doesn't seem to mean a thing these days.
'I want to see the council enforce the rules and bring it back to how it was. They should be forced to take the whole thing down.
'I don't know what sort of mentality the council planning department had in the first place to allow anyone to build on this site.
'There are little cottages round the back, it's narrow. There's nowhere to park. It's just out of character. It's out of place, altogether.
'I think anywhere else in the country, with something without permission like this, they'd immediately have to take the whole thing down.
'But I'm afraid round here, it's this sort of 'we'll go back to the planning department, and we'll see if there are amendments or compromises'.
'It's ridiculous.'
Mr Yaqoob, who runs a building company in Bradford, declined to comment when approached by MailOnline.
However, architects working on his behalf told Bradford Council that there was 'never any malicious intent to build something without approval', and claimed the development was 'very similar' to the previously approved plans.
The firm added: 'The materials used are sympathetic to the area, and there are no additional issues of overlooking or overbearing.
'We therefore feel the retrospective application should be approved.'
That assessment, however, brought short shrift when MailOnline visited the village.
Angry NHS worker Jane Megson, 52, said the idea of letting the build remain was 'disgusting'.
She said: 'It doesn't fit in, and the thought of retrospective planning, it's disgusting.
'Why do we bother having rules and regulations if they're just going to do what they like and then get retrospective planning?
'The council needs to make a show of these people and force them to take it down, to be honest.
'It's shocking the way they behave in Bradford, quite frankly.
'The thing that annoys me is that they, on the planning application, said it fits in with the surroundings.
'It does not fit in with the surroundings at all.'
'I really do hope they make an example because it's happening far too often in Bradford.
'People just do what they want and then put in the retrospective planning. Because the council can't be bothered, they just roll over and let them have their way.'
Helen Naylor, who lives yards from the unapproved homes, added: 'I think it's absolutely disgraceful, but it doesn't surprise me in the least.
'People in Bradford build exactly what they like, when they like, how they like. And to hell with all rules and regulations.
'The council needs to get its act together because in Bradford, nobody seems to care.'
Fran Jones, 60, joked that the houses looked ready to collapse.
She said: 'I think they might blow down when the wolf blows on them. I don't think they've got foundations – I think they're built on a concrete slab.
'They stand out a mile and the finish is cheap. I feel sorry for the people in the heritage cottages behind it. It's so awful.
'We saw them building it and we were all shaking our heads going: 'I'll huff, and I'll puff and I'll blow your house down'.
'The fact that it's now come up with no planning permission is no surprise to any of us.'
The developer's agents, P.N. Bakes Architectural Consultancy, argue that the homes are 'very similar' to the 2015 plans and say their client believed a 'material start' had already been made.
Bradford Council say enforcement action will be 'reviewed' once a decision is made.
A spokesman said: 'Our Planning Enforcement Team have investigated reports of these works being carried out without planning permission.
'As a planning application has now been submitted, the matter of enforcement will be reviewed once a decision on planning permission has been made, as is standard practice nationally.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
How a cowboy builder ripped off his customers – and got away with it
When the BBC exposed Russell McMaster as a cowboy builder last year, angry clients demanded he be 64-year-old had accepted about £220,000 from seven customers to complete home improvements over a two-year he left his customers tens of thousands out of pocket with half-built extensions and week, Ayrshire-based McMaster was due to face trial over an allegation he had defrauded a customer by pretending he would carry out construction work at his home four years he was acquitted on Wednesday when the Crown dropped the case. McMaster, it emerged, had handed back £3,000 he was alleged to have taken by did this happen – and what remedies do customers really have when left at the mercy of rogue traders? Retired social worker Jim McGinley reported McMaster to police in late 2022 after waiting more than a year for work to start at his home in Uddingston, North had paid the builder £3,000 to "secure his services" for internal a months-long wait for planning consent, Jim says that McMaster became "evasive" and stopped returning pair eventually fell out after Jim left a negative online review about his business, VJL that he had been "the victim of a con", he contacted said: "Police were very diligent and seemed very keen to present it at court… They felt that he was a fraudster, a bogus builder."McMaster – full name Alexander Russell McMaster – was charged with fraud, accused of obtaining the £3,000 by pretending he would carry out construction work at Jim's when the case called for trial at Hamilton Sheriff Court, prosecutors announced the case would be discontinued because McMaster had repaid the money in the weeks before said he had agreed to drop the case after discussions with the Crown."The reason we went to court was because we wanted to stop this happening to other people," he said."On discussion with the procurator fiscal, it became clear that perhaps taking the money was the best option. But in truth we felt, and it seems crazy, that we'd let people down." Customers left out of pocket This wasn't the first time McMaster, from Irvine, had been reported to least two of his former customers contacted Police Scotland in were among seven clients who contacted the BBC about McMaster, who traded under the company names VJL Builders and Alex McMaster those cases, customers who had contacted police were told their complaints were a "civil matter" and directed to trading Ayrshire trading standards confirmed it had received seven complaints about McMaster's businesses in of those complaints came from Chris we first interviewed him in the autumn of 2023, his loft space was a building site with exposed beams and tarpaulin covering roof we went back to his house in Bridge of Weir last week, not much had changed. Chris said McMaster was paid more than £30,000 for a loft conversion but abandoned the job midway through, leaving the Jardine family with a hole in the he also reported the matter to police and trading standards. He also had assurances from McMaster via his lawyer that he would be repaid £15, payment was made, and the loft remains as it – who is married with two children – took out extra loans to try and finish the work and said the affair had "crippled" his family's finances."It's hard to quantify how much money he owes us, because of the extra damage he did," he said."He has taken food out my kids' mouths. That's what really annoys me. It will affect us long-term because everything I do will be to pay back the debt he has left us with."Another customer, Grant Kilpatrick, told BBC Scotland News that McMaster left him with a half-finished extension and was owed between £15,000 and £20, said he reported McMaster to police and was also told it was a civil Scotland said each case was assessed on its own merits and that it provided "suitable advice" to both the Jardines and the Kilpatricks.A spokesperson said that in Grant Kilpatrick's case, inquiries had been carried out and no criminality was established. Civil action 'not always easy' The Jardines and Kilpatricks had both hired a company called VJL Builders in July 2022. The business was registered at Companies House a month both were pursuing the company, VJL was dissolved in January 2024. It had never filed Knowles, senior project lead for Advice Direct Scotland, said tackling rogue trade was challenging and that "civil action is not always easy"."Rogue traders frequently dissolve their companies to avoid liability leaving consumers with little recourse," she said."Consumers do have rights, including the ability to cancel contracts and claim refunds if they've been misled or pressured."They may also be entitled to compensation for distress - but these rights are only effective if consumers act quickly and seek advice."We urge anyone affected to report rogue trading to us and to contact their bank if money has been lost."Dr Nick McKerrell, senior law lecturer at Glasgow Caledonian University, said there was a greater chance of a successful prosecution where it could be shown that there was no intention or ability to carry out the work, something which could be seen as a "dishonest misrepresentation".However, it was more complicated if some work was done, because it becomes more difficult to show that the builder was never going to finish the said it was not a fair fight in many of the legal cases."It's an individual against a business organisation which can adopt a number of tactics to avoid private law actions," he said. McMaster has a string of businesses listed on Companies House under different variations of his name – most of them reporting by the Daily Record newspaper in 2006 and 2013 revealed how his old businesses left customers in debt after closing Alex McMaster Builders remains active. A note on the Companies House website states that a strike-off action had been temporarily suspended after someone objected to the attempt to dissolve the BBC attempted to contact the builder between December 2023 and February to answer allegations he was a rogue did not respond until he sent a text messages stating that he was "unavailable".However, we managed to approach McMaster in person outside court this asked whether he planned reimburse his other customers and whether he shut VJL Builders down to avoid paying them away with a friend, he made no comment.
Times
22 minutes ago
- Times
That noisy distraction in the office? They're called boomers
This just in from the buzzing boomer complaints line: yet another grievance with Gen Z concerning their office etiquette. No, it's not our limit-testing approach to appropriate office attire, nor our preference for working from home. What's bugging them now is the fact we are (checks notes) too chatty. Wait, wait — not just chatty. My apologies. Apparently our innocent deskside socialising is loud, disruptive and — more than anything else — quite annoying. A tribunal has just ruled that office oldies who are disturbed by 'noisy and disruptive' younger colleagues are not in fact victims of age discrimination. The ruling came after an administrator in her sixties brought a claim against her former employers, saying it had been hard to work in the office because of the 'extreme time-wasting' and loud socialising of her co-workers, who were mostly in their twenties and thirties. Well, as a representative of the younger generation, I'd like to issue this carefully considered response: pot, kettle. I sit in an open-plan office surrounded by forty, fifty and sixty-plus colleagues. Let me tell you: there is a good reason I have noise-cancelling headphones. • How rude can you be to your colleagues? Where to begin on the long list of communal workspace no-no's I witness (tolerate) on a day-to-day basis? The tech gap is probably the most triggering place to start. As one friend put it, many of her boomer colleagues 'need to go to internet school'. This fact would be forgiven if they didn't constantly make it our problem. There is a marked lack of adaptability that verges on laziness when it comes to computer users of a certain age in my office. I am regularly pulled away from my own work to help with enormous technical feats such as logging in, using the printer or — most dreaded of all — opening Slack. That's if they bother. Some senior colleagues, refusing to download certain essential workflow programs on their own computers, come and use them on mine instead while I am expected to — quite literally — stand by. I am probably too amenable, but I am also not someone who will say no to their boss, not even if it means giving up my chair. Then there are the phones. Why are they never on silent? Why are you taking the call at your desk? Ditto that Zoom meeting, without headphones on. We have plenty of private rooms for exactly these purposes. The rest of us don't need to listen in. It's arrogant and it's boring, and it's a reason why we occasionally prefer to work at home. • Do Gen Z just not understand work meeting etiquette? Noise, generally, is an issue. Boomer office volumes are obnoxious. Where colleagues my age use WhatsApp or internal messaging systems to communicate, our elders tend to just shout from one end to the other. There is also no respect for the fact that I am clearly trying to meet a project deadline. Having my headphones on seems to be an invitation to sit down and have a meandering chat. If I see my bosses are in head-down mode, I do my best to leave them alone and divert anyone who might be on their way to distract them. When the tables are turned, they see it as an opportunity to start telling me about their kitchen renovation. Nearly all fail to read the pained look in my eyes, and I can't help but feel they think my work is simply less important. Or perhaps they just have less to do. Also overheard at my office: very loud sneezing, grunting and snorting. Misogynist, inappropriate comments. Singing. For a long time at work, I wondered why I found it hard to concentrate and if perhaps I had undiagnosed ADHD. Then I started working from home a bit more and hiding away in private offices when I needed to meet deadlines. Turns out I just needed a quiet, boomer-free place to work.
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Brighton's Enciso to join Strasbourg
Strasbourg are closing in on a move worth a total of £17.3m for Brighton forward Julio Enciso, with a view that he will play for Chelsea after a year in France. The 21-year-old is expected to finalise terms over a contract in the coming days with Brighton including a sell-on clause in the deal. Strasbourg are linked to Chelsea through their BlueCo ownership, led by Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital, with the move for the Paraguay international potentially the most significant since the £65.2m takeover in 2023. There are significant connections between Chelsea and Strasbourg, who are managed by Englishman Liam Rosenior, with goalkeeper Mike Penders, Kendry Paez and Mamadou Sarr all on loan from Stamford have also signed multiple players from Chelsea, including Ishe Samuels-Smith, Mathis Amougou and Diego Moreira in the last two seasons while there is a host of ex-Premier League talent at the club from former Brighton defender Valentin Barco and former Southampton forward Sekou Alcase club qualified for the Conference League last season through a seventh-placed finish. Meanwhile, Enciso leaves Brighton having been left out of the squad for the opening day draw against Fulham. Enciso scored five goals for the Seagulls and spent the second half of last season on loan at Ipswich Town.
