Dr. Anthony Fauci draws large crowd of supporters and protestors in Sarasota
Dr. Anthony Fauci drew supporters and protestors while speaking at Sarasota's Van Wezel Performing Arts Hall.
Fauci was critical in the nation's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ringling College hosted his lecture, saying community members had the right to hear Fauci's story.
SARASOTA, Fla. - Some celebrate Dr. Anthony Fauci; others question him. None dispute that he played a significant role in the nation's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
On Monday, Fauci drew large crowds to Sarasota, some to hear him speak as part of the Ringling College Town Hall Lecture Series and others to protest him.
FOX 13 was not allowed to hear Fauci speak inside the Van Wezel Performing Arts Hall. Still, the Ringling College Library Association said they felt the community deserved the chance to listen to him talk about the lessons he's learned and his experiences.
The backstory
"I'm looking forward to hearing his story and his background. I've read about him. I do think he did a good job," said Barbara of Sarasota.
Audience members drove through protestors while parking at the arts center.
"Nothing in this world is perfect. Certainly, vaccines are not perfect; a vaccine that was put together in record time will have problems. We think it has a lot of problems, and we want people to know that," a protestor said.
RELATED: Dr. Anthony Fauci's security detail revoked by President Trump
It's not just the controversy over the vaccine. People also spoke out against Fauci's role in mask-wearing mandates and the shutdown of schools and businesses during the pandemic. The group V for Vaccine, based out of California, held a rally outside the Van Wezel.
"When Fauci was coming to Florida, we got contacted, and a lot of people said we don't want him to come here and just be able to come in and just be able to understand that there is another side," said co-founder Joshua Coleman.
Dig deeper
Barbara wanted to hear Fauci's story and learn more.
"Based on what I know about Fauci, he did the best he could under the circumstances. There was a lot of information flying around. I do believe he is a good person. He's got a solid background. It started way back when he admitted that he made a mistake during the AIDS pandemic or crisis," she said.
Agree or disagree with Fauci; he spoke to a sold-out audience. One thing both sides brought up.
"My hope is that we become united again, people are more kind and friendly, and that we look for facts supported by solid science and data, which seems to be questionable these days. I do my best to get facts," said Barbara.
"We all need a voice. We all need to hear, listen and communicate and there shouldn't be this hatred that sort of goes hand in hand with these sort of things," Joshua added.
CLICK HERE:>>>Follow FOX 13 on YouTube
What they're saying
"Since 1981, the Ringling College Library Association has gathered the community to hear from figures of national interest in entertainment, the arts, healthcare, science, athletics and more. Town Hall provides an invaluable opportunity to hear from world-class leaders right here in Sarasota.
Past speakers include U.S. Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton; ambassador Caroline Kennedy; travel personality Rick Steves; Olympian Michael Phelps; historian Jon Meacham and NFL player Rob Gronkowski.
Dr. Anthony Fauci has worked under seven Democrat and Republican U.S. presidents. He worked at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic, which ranks as one of the deadliest pandemics in the nation's history. We feel the people of this community deserve to hear directly from Dr. Fauci about his experiences and his lessons learned.
Tickets for this event sold out soon after the launch of sales, which shows there is high demand in this community to discuss these issues.
We celebrate the freedom of expression protected in our nation and here in Sarasota, and we feel the variety of perspectives on public health shows the importance of events such as Town Hall so the community can gather information, debate, discuss and come to independent conclusions on important issues."
The Source
FOX 13's Kimberly Kuizon collected the information in this story.
WATCH FOX 13 NEWS LIVE:
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 13 TAMPA:
Download the FOX Local app for your smart TV
Download FOX Local mobile app: Apple | Android
Download the FOX 13 News app for breaking news alerts, latest headlines
Download the SkyTower Radar app
Sign up for FOX 13's daily newsletter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
AAP recommends children receive COVID-19 vaccine
The American Academy of Pediatrics is recommending children as young as six months receive the COVID-19 vaccine, despite the Trump administration stating it is not necessary for healthy children. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 20 (UPI) -- The United States' leading pediatrics association is recommending that children as young as six months old be inoculated against COVID-19, going against the Trump administration, which stopped recommending healthy children receive the vaccine. The American Academy of Pediatrics made the recommendation Tuesday in the publication of its childhood and adolescent immunization schedule for this year. The report specifically recommends that children be inoculated against COVID-19 between the ages of six and 23 months, stating that those in this age range are at the highest risk of suffering the worst effects of the disease. "Children younger than 2 years old are especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and should be prioritized for vaccination unless they have a known allergy to the vaccine or its ingredients," the AAP said in a release accompanying the report. The AAP recommendation goes against that of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who in late May said the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was no longer recommending that "healthy children" be immunized against COVID-19. Kennedy, a known vaccine skeptic, cited "a lack of any clinical data" to support booster COVID-19 shots for children. That move prompted AAP and other leading medical groups to sue Kennedy in July for making "unilateral, unscientific changes" to federal vaccine policy, calling it an "assault on science public health and evidence-based medicine." "This administration is an existential threat to vaccination in America, and those in charge are only just getting started," Richard Hughes IV, partner at Epstein Becker Green and lead counsel in the case, said in a statement. "If left unchecked, Secretary Kennedy will accomplish his goal of ridding the United States of vaccines, which would unleash a wave of preventable harm on our nation's children." Kennedy in June also fired all members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and replaced them with his own appointees, including three who have spoken out against the COVID-19 vaccine, two of whom have served as witnesses in lawsuits against vaccine makers and one who served on the board of the nation's oldest anti-vaccine group.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dangerous hidden side effect of Covid infection revealed by new study
Covid may prematurely age blood vessels by around five years, according to a new study, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. Research published in the European Heart Journal revealed that a Covid infection could accelerate the ageing of blood vessels, particularly in women. Vaccinated individuals show less stiffening in their arteries and stabilised symptoms over time in comparison to those who had not been protected against Covid. Lead researcher Professor Rosa Maria Bruno, from Université Paris Cité, said: "We know that Covid can directly affect blood vessels. We believe that this may result in what we call early vascular ageing, meaning that your blood vessels are older than your chronological age and you are more susceptible to heart disease. 'If that is happening, we need to identify who is at risk at an early stage to prevent heart attacks and strokes." The new study tested nearly 2,500 people from across the world, categorising them based on whether they had Covid and whether they had been hospitalised for it, both in a general ward and in an intensive care unit. Tests were taken six months after an infection and again after 12 months. It measured each person's vascular age with a device that examines how quickly a wave of blood pressure travels between the artery in the neck and the legs. The higher the measurement meant the stiffer the blood vessels, indicating a higher vascular age. It found that all three groups of patients who had a Covid infection had stiffer arteries compared to those who hadn't been affected. The average increase in women was 0.55 meters per second for those who had mild Covid, 0.60 for those who had been hospitalised, and 1.09 for those in intensive care. According to researchers, an increase of around 0.5 meters per second is "clinically relevant" and equivalent to ageing around five years. It also increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, like heart attack, stroke or sudden cardiac arrest, in 60-year-old women by 3 per cent. The difference between men and women could come down to immune systems, Prof Bruno added. She said: 'Women mount a more rapid and robust immune response, which can protect them from infection. However, this same response can also increase damage to blood vessels after the initial infection.' She said the virus acts on specific receptors in the body that are in the lining of the blood vessels. The virus will use these receptors to enter and infect cells. Last month, it was reported that a new strain of Covid had spread across the UK, accounting for the highest proportion of cases - around 30 per cent. Experts warned the Stratus strain was resisting immunity and had a unique symptom of giving people a hoarse voice.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court overturns order that stripped some protections from pregnant Texas state workers
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court has upheld a law strengthening the rights of pregnant workers, vacating a judge's earlier order that had stripped those protections from Texas state employees. The ruling was a victory for advocates of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, a law that passed with bipartisan support in 2022 but quickly became embroiled in controversy over whether it covers workers seeking abortions and fertility treatments. A federal judge last year blocked enforcement of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act for Texas state employees, ruling that its passage was unconstitutional because a majority of House members were not physically present to approve the law as part of spending package in December 2022. In a 2-1 decision, the Fifth Circuit appeals court disagreed, finding that the law was properly passed under a COVID-19 pandemic-era Congressional rule allowing members to vote by proxy to meet the quorum requirement. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act strengthens the rights of women to receive workplace accommodation for needs related to pregnancy and childbirth, such as time off for medical appointments and exemptions from heavy lifting. Its passage came after a decades long campaign by women's advocacy groups highlighting the struggles of pregnant workers, especially those in low-wage roles, who were routinely forced off the job after requesting accommodations. The Texas case differed from other lawsuits that have narrowly focused on federal regulations stating that abortion, fertility treatments and birth control are medical issues requiring protection under the new law. The lawsuit, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, instead took aim at the entirety of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, drawing opposition from Republican lawmakers including former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who defended the pandemic-era proxy voting rule. Under the Trump administration, the Department of Justice has continued to fight Paxton's lawsuit, which if successful, could help open the door to legal challenges of other pandemic-era laws passed by proxy. Paxton's office did not reply to emails seeking comment, and it was not clear whether he would appeal Friday's ruling. The Justice Department declined to comment. 'This is a big win for women's rights. We are really happy to see that the Fifth Circuit agreed with us that the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was passed constitutionally and will continue to fight for the PWFA to stay legal,' said Inimai Chettiar, president of a Better Balance, an advocacy group that spearheaded the campaign for passage of the law. Texas state employees are not immediately protected, however, because the appeals court ruling doesn't become final for several weeks to give time for a possible appeal, Chettiar said. Conservative officials and religious groups, meanwhile, have been largely successfully in challenging the regulations passed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which established that workers seeking abortions are entitled accommodations. In May, a federal court struck down the abortion provisions of the EEOC regulations in response to lawsuits brought by states of Louisiana and Mississippi, and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Catholic University and two Catholic dioceses. The Trump administration is almost certain to comply with that ruling. President Donald Trump in January fired two of the EEOC's democratic commissioners, paving the way for him to quickly establish a Republican majority at the agency. EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, a Republican, has signaled her support for revising the regulations, arguing the agency exceeded its authority by including not only abortion but fertility treatments and birth control as medical needs covered by the law. Solve the daily Crossword
