
Women in legislatures across the U.S. fight for ‘potty parity'
There are only two bathroom stalls for women on the third floor of the Kentucky Statehouse, where the House and Senate chambers are located. Female legislators — 41 of the 138 member Legislature — needing a reprieve during a lengthy floor session have to weigh the risk of missing an important debate or a critical vote.
None of their male colleagues face the same dilemma because, of course, multiple men's bathrooms are available. The Legislature even installed speakers in the men's bathrooms to broadcast the chamber's events so they don't miss anything important.
In a pinch, House Speaker David Osborne allows women to use his single stall bathroom in the chamber, but even that attracts long lines.
'You get the message very quickly: This place was not really built for us,' said Rep. Lisa Willner, a Democrat from Louisville, reflecting on the photos of former lawmakers, predominantly male, that line her office.
The issue of potty parity may seem comic, but its impact runs deeper than uncomfortably full bladders, said Kathryn Anthony, professor emerita at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's School of Architecture.
'It's absolutely critical because the built environment reflects our culture and reflects our population,' said Anthony, who has testified on the issue before Congress. 'And if you have an environment that is designed for half the population but forgets about the other half, you have a group of disenfranchised people and disadvantaged people.'
There is hope for Kentucky's lady legislators seeking more chamber potties.
A $300 million renovation of the 155-year-old Capitol — scheduled for completion by 2028 at the soonest — aims to create more women's restrooms and end Kentucky's bathroom disparity.
The Bluegrass State is among the last to add bathrooms to aging statehouses that were built when female legislators were not a consideration.
In the $392 million renovation of the Georgia Capitol, expanding bathroom access is a priority, said Gerald Pilgrim, chief of staff with the state's Building Authority. It will introduce female facilities on the building's fourth floor, where the public galleries are located, and will add more bathrooms throughout to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
'We know there are not enough bathrooms,' he said.
There's no federal law requiring bathroom access for all genders in public buildings. Some 20 states have statutes prescribing how many washrooms buildings must have, but historical buildings — such as statehouses — are often exempt.
Over the years, as the makeup of state governments has changed, statehouses have added bathrooms for women.
When Tennessee's Capitol opened in 1859, the architects designed only one restroom — for men only — situated on the ground floor. According to legislative librarian Eddie Weeks, the toilet could only be 'flushed' when enough rainwater had been collected.
'The room was famously described as 'a stench in the nostrils of decency,'' Weeks said in an email.
Today, Tennessee's Capitol has a female bathroom located between the Senate and House chambers. It's in a cramped hall under a staircase, sparking comparisons to Harry Potter's cupboard bedroom, and it contains just two stalls. The men also just have one bathroom on the same floor, but it has three urinals and three stalls.
Democratic Rep. Aftyn Behn, who was elected in 2023, said she wasn't aware of the disparity in facilities until contacted by The Associated Press.
'I've apparently accepted that waiting in line for a two-stall closet under the Senate balcony is just part of the job,' she said.
'I had to fight to get elected to a legislature that ranks dead last for female representation, and now I get to squeeze into a space that feels like it was designed by someone who thought women didn't exist — or at least didn't have bladders,' Behn said.
The Maryland State House is the country's oldest state capitol in continuous legislative use, operational since the late 1700s. Archivists say its bathroom facilities were initially intended for white men only because desegregation laws were still in place. Women's restrooms were added after 1922, but they were insufficient for the rising number of women elected to office.
Delegate Pauline Menes complained about the issue so much that House Speaker Thomas Lowe appointed her chair of the 'Ladies Rest Room Committee,' and presented her with a fur covered toilet seat in front of her colleagues in 1972. She launched the women's caucus the following year.
It wasn't until 2019 that House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones, the first woman to secure the top position, ordered the addition of more women's restrooms along with a gender-neutral bathroom and a nursing room for mothers in the Lowe House Office Building.
As more women were elected nationwide in the 20th century, some found creative workarounds.
In Nebraska's unicameral Legislature, female senators didn't get a dedicated restroom until 1988, when a facility was added in the chamber's cloakroom. There had previously been a single restroom in the senate lounge, and Sen. Shirley Marsh, who served for some 16 years, would ask a State Patrol trooper to guard the door while she used it, said Brandon Metzler, the Legislature's clerk.
In Colorado, female House representatives and staff were so happy to have a restroom added in the chamber's hallway in 1987 that they hung a plaque to honor then-state Rep. Arie Taylor, the state's first Black woman legislator, who pushed for the facility.
The plaque, now inside a women's bathroom in the Capitol, reads: 'Once here beneath the golden dome if nature made a call, we'd have to scramble from our seats and dash across the hall ... Then Arie took the mike once more to push an urge organic, no longer do we fret and squirm or cross our legs in panic.'
The poem concludes: 'In mem'ry of you, Arie (may you never be forgot), from this day forth we'll call that room the Taylor Chamber Pot.'
New Mexico Democratic state Rep. Liz Thomson recalled missing votes in the House during her first year in office in 2013 because there was no women's restroom in the chamber's lounge. An increase in female lawmakers — New Mexico elected the largest female majority Legislature in U.S. history in 2024 — helped raise awareness of the issue, she said.
'It seems kind of like fluff, but it really isn't,' she said. 'To me, it really talks about respect and inclusion.'
The issue is not exclusive to statehouses. In the U.S. Capitol, the first restroom for congresswomen didn't open until 1962. While a facility was made available for female U.S. Senators in 1992, it wasn't until 2011 that the House chamber opened a bathroom to women lawmakers.
Jeannette Rankin of Montana was the first woman elected to a congressional seat. That happened in 1916.
Willner insists that knowing the Kentucky Capitol wasn't designed for women gives her extra impetus to stand up and make herself heard.
'This building was not designed for me,' she said. 'Well, guess what? I'm here.'
Kruesi and Rush write for the Associated Press. AP writer Brian Witte in Annapolis, Md., contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Senate Confirms Susan Monarez as CDC Director
The Senate on July 29 in a party-line vote confirmed Susan Monarez as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fifty-one Republicans voted to confirm Monarez, while 47 Democrats or nominal independents who caucus with the Democrats voted in opposition. Two GOP senators missed the vote.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump tells Sen. Chuck Grassley to ‘step up,' get rid of ‘ridiculous custom' holding up judicial appointments
President Trump urged Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Tuesday to 'step up' and end a 'ridiculous custom' that allows senators to block judicial nominees for courts in their states. 'Chuck Grassley, who I got re-elected to the US Senate when he was down, by a lot, in the Great State of Iowa, could solve the 'Blue Slip' problem we are having with respect to the appointment of Highly Qualified Judges and U.S. Attorneys, with a mere flick of the pen,' Trump wrote in a lengthy Truth Social post. The president argued that under the 'blue slip' tradition, blue state Democratic senators 'have an ironclad stoppage of Great Republican Candidates.' Advertisement 3 President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to call on Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley to allow senators to block judicial nominees for courts in their states. AP 'Put simply, the President of the United States will never be permitted to appoint the person of his choice because of an ancient, and probably Unconstitutional, 'CUSTOM,'' Trump fumed. Since at least 1917, the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee has traditionally sent blue-colored forms to the two senators representing the home state of US attorney, circuit or district court nominees selected by the president. Advertisement Under the so-called 'blue slip' tradition, which has been applied inconsistently over the years, if the senators withhold the slips or return them with a negative review of the nominee, the president's pick is not considered by committee. For example, New Jersey Democratic Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim recently withheld their 'blue slips' to block the Senate Judiciary Committee from considering Trump's onetime personal attorney, Alina Habba, for the top prosecutor spot in the Garden State. Since she hasn't been confirmed, Habba is currently serving as acting New Jersey US attorney. 'The only way to beat this Hoax is to appoint a Democrat or, a weak and ineffective Republican,' Trump argued. Advertisement 3 Trump's lengthy post mentioned Grassley could solve this problem, 'with a mere flick of the pen.' Trump Truth Social 'Therefore, I would never be able to appoint Great Judges or U.S. Attorneys in California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Virginia, and other places, where there is, coincidentally, the highest level of crime and corruption — The places where fantastic people are most needed!' 'Senator Grassley must step up,' the president demanded, claiming that under former President Joe Biden the Senate Judiciary Committee 'openly broke' tradition 'at least two times.' Trump called on Grassley to scrap the 'blue slip' tradition 'IMMEDIATELY, and not let the Democrats laugh at him and the Republican Party for being weak and ineffective.' 3 President Trump wants Grassley to end the 'blue slip' tradition, which is the notion that if the senators withhold the slips or return them with a negative review of the nominee, the president's pick is not considered by the committee. AP Advertisement 'The Democrats have broken this ridiculous custom on us, it's time that we break it on them,' Trump reasoned. 'Chuck, I know you have the Courage to do this, DO IT!' A spokesperson for Grassley did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Senator Cory Booker in angry outburst says ‘complicit' Democrats need a ‘wake-up call'
The surprise Senate spat over bills that have broad bipartisan support — mental health resources and other help for police officers — strikes at the heart of the beleaguered Democratic party's dilemma in the second Trump era as they try to find a way back to power, and also their frustration as Republicans have pushed through legislation and nominations that they vehemently disagree with. Do they cooperate where they can, or do they fight everything, and shut down governance in the process? Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'A lot of us in this caucus want to f—— fight,' Booker said with an expletive as he left the Senate floor after the exchange. Advertisement Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, one of the two Democrats on the floor who tried to pass the law enforcement bills that raised Booker's ire, said she had a different view. 'We can do both,' she said afterward. 'Support our communities, keep them safe, and take on Donald Trump and his bad policies.' Booker's tirade began Tuesday afternoon when Cortez Masto tried to pass seven bipartisan bills by unanimous consent. But Booker objected to five of the seven bills, which would have directed resources to law enforcement agencies, arguing that the Trump administration is 'weaponizing' public safety grants by canceling them in many Democratic-leaning states like New Jersey. Advertisement 'Why would we do something today that's playing into the president's politics and is going to hurt the officers in states like mine?' Booker asked. Things escalated from there, with Cortez Masto and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., saying that Booker should have objected when the bill was passed unanimously out of committee. 'This is not the way to go about it,' Cortez Masto said. Klobuchar said to Booker: 'You can't just do one thing on Police Week and not show up and not object and let these bills go through and then say another a few weeks later on the floor.' 'I like to show up at the markups and I like to make my case,' Klobuchar said. Booker responded with a booming tirade. 'The Democratic party needs a wake up call!' he yelled, walking away from his desk and out into the aisle. 'I see law firms bending the knee to this president, not caring about the larger principles,' he said, along with 'universities that should be bastions of free speech.' He added: 'You want to come at me that way, you will have to take it on with me because there's too much on the line.' The arguments points to the tensions below the surface of the Democratic caucus as they head into important moments — both this week, as Republicans push to quickly confirm dozens of Trump administration nominees before the August recess, and this fall when Congress will have to pass bipartisan spending bills to avoid a government shutdown. Advertisement Democrats suffered a swift backlash from their base in the spring when Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., helped advance a Republican spending bill that kept the government open instead of forcing a shutdown. Schumer argued that shutting the government down would have been worse, and that they were both 'terrible' options. It is unclear whether Schumer and Democrats will want to force a shutdown in the fall if Republicans don't include some of their priorities in spending legislation. Booker did not have specific advice for his colleagues beyond the need to fight harder. But other senators say they will have to find a balance. Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut says he hears both things at home — 'why can't you all get along' and 'thank you for fighting.' 'Both are absolutely necessary at this moment in history,' Blumenthal said.