River tributary reconnected to floodplain
Tipalt Burn, near Haltwhistle, Northumberland, has been reconnected to its floodplain after the watercourse had been historically straightened and dredged to increase productivity of the surrounding land.
That resulted in worsening water quality, loss of a wildlife habitat and increased the risk of flooding to communities living downstream, the Tyne Rivers Trust charity said.
Now, the burn has been reconnected to its floodplain, meaning water will flow more slowly, reducing flood risk and improving water quality.
Trees have also been planted and ponds and wetlands created.
It is hoped the project, led by the charity, will once again provide a habitat for salmon and trout, as well as wetland areas for breeding waders such as curlew.
Tyne Rivers Trust chief scientist and technical director Jack Bloomer said the charity "worked with nature to restore the Tipalt Burn to how it used to be".
"The restoration of natural features will have major benefits for aquatic species, including Atlantic salmon and brown trout, as well as an array of other species that rely on these waters both in the river and on the wetlands."
The project cost £120,000 and was jointly funded by the Environment Agency's Water Environment Improvement Fund (WEIF) and Northumbrian Water's South Tyne Holistic Water Management fund.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Send your story ideas here.
Plan to clean river of mining waste revealed
Saltmarsh restoration planned for two river sites
Tyne Rivers Trust
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warning over ‘decade of decline' for one of England's precious chalk streams
Surveying shows one of England's important chalk streams has suffered 'a decade of decline', campaigners warn as they call for more action to protect the globally rare habitat. Monitoring at five sites on the River Avon, which flows through Wiltshire and Hampshire, over the past 10 years by conservation charity WildFish has found a significant decline in wildlife such as freshwater shrimps, mayflies, caddisflies, beetles and aquatic bugs. WildFish said the declines in invertebrates showed the Government was not doing enough to protect precious chalk streams – even ones such as the Avon, which have the highest conservation status. The charity is calling for government bodies such as the Environment Agency and Natural England to 'raise the bar' by setting more ambitious environmental standards to assess the health of what should be wildlife-rich chalk streams. The monitoring, carried out in partnership with the Wiltshire Fishery Association as part of the SmartRivers citizen science project, reveals the diversity of invertebrates fell by 17% and numbers were down by more than three quarters (77%) in average annual counts between 2015 and 2024. The situation for riverflies, which are sensitive to pollution and a good indicator for the wider health of the river ecosystem, was even worse, with the monitoring revealing the diversity of the Avon's riverfly species had fallen by 25% and average abundance of the insects was down 83% in 10 years. Despite the declines, official assessments under the statutory water framework directive found the monitored sites all scored as high quality for invertebrates in 2015 and were still high or good quality in 2024. WildFish's Dr Janina Gray warns the statutory standards set the bar too low to reflect the high levels of invertebrate life which a healthy chalk stream should support. As a result, the official monitoring can conclude all is well in the river despite major declines in key species, and make action and investment to protect them more difficult, she warned. Chalk streams, with their clear, flowing water fed from underground chalk aquifers and springs, provide habitat for an array of wildlife including Atlantic salmon, brown trout and water crowfoot, as well as water resources for people. There are only around 200 in the world, most of them found in the southern half of England, making them an internationally rare habitat. But they are suffering from 'death by a million cuts', according to Dr Gray, with pressures on water quality driven by nutrient pollution, sediment and chemicals from water treatment works, agriculture, and road run-off. They are also threatened by over-abstraction of water, reducing the flows in the river and making pollution more concentrated. Dr Gray, head of science and policy at WildFish, told the PA news agency: 'The Avon is a SAC, it's the most protected river we have, and yet the abundance drops that we're seeing are dramatic in that time period. 'It's just about hanging in there.' She added: 'It just shows that the bar is not set high enough to properly protect chalk streams.' And she warned: 'These ecosystems are globally rare and ecologically critical, but without immediate action, we risk causing irreversible damage to the very characteristics that make them so important.' All chalk streams should be designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), WildFish argues, joining the handful of such waterways which already have the classification. And current assessments and protections do not go far enough and need to be properly enforced. 'We would like the Environment Agency and Natural England to revise the standards for chalk streams to raise the bar to protect them,' Dr Gray said. A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said: 'Within this new government, our top priority is to clean Britain's rivers and restore them from years of damage. Chalk stream restoration is a vital part of this effort. 'We have secured £2 billion of funding from water companies to start cleaning them, while modernising the abstraction licensing system to ensure water is used sustainably and to stop damaging abstraction practises to the environment – a problem particularly pronounced in chalk streams. 'This is part of our wider plan to rebuild the water system, including a record £104 billion investment to halve sewage spills by 2030 and the creation of a new, powerful regulator.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Photos of the Week: River Canyon, Mountain Brook, Cliff Bookstore
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Atlantic
4 days ago
- Atlantic
The Centuries-Old Quest for 'Genius'
This is an edition of Time-Travel Thursdays, a journey through The Atlantic 's archives to contextualize the present. Sign up here. 'When Paul Morphy plays seven games of chess at once and blindfold, when young Colburn gives impromptu solution to a mathematical problem involving fifty-six figures, we are struck with hopeless wonder,' J. Brownlee Brown wrote in 1864. His Atlantic article had a simple headline: 'Genius.' Only seven years after the founding of this magazine, its writers were already addressing one of the greatest questions of the 19th century: How should we define genius, that everyday word we use to denote the extraordinary? Brown's two geniuses are largely forgotten today. Morphy was a chess wizard from New Orleans who grew tired of the game and gave up playing seriously at just 22. He reportedly died in his bath at age 47. Zerah Colburn's story is even more tragic: As a child, he wasn't thought to be particularly gifted until his father overheard him repeating multiplication tables after only a few weeks' schooling. The little boy from Vermont was then dragged around Europe as a 'mental calculator,' ruling on whether large numbers were primes or not, and sent to an expensive school thanks to the patronage of an earl. But like many child prodigies, his adult life was a comparative disappointment. He died of tuberculosis at 34. While researching my new book, The Genius Myth, I spent a lot of time exploring how we tell stories of exceptional achievement, and what the changing definition of genius reveals about the history of Western thought. The word itself comes from Latin, where it was used to mean a person's spirit—the inner essence that gave them their unique characteristics. 'Every man, says the oracle, has his daemon, whom he is bound to obey; those who implicitly follow that guidance are the prophetic souls, the favorites of the gods,' Frederic Henry Hodge wrote in The Atlantic in 1868. 'It is this involuntary, incalculable force that constitutes what we call genius.' Well into the 20th century, The Atlantic used this older definition, writing about people who possessed a genius, rather than those who were one. Individuals whom this magazine has described as being or having a genius include Richard Strauss, Leo Tolstoy, George Gershwin, Cormac McCarthy, Alice Munro, and Edith Wharton, that last accolade having been delivered by Gore Vidal. Oh, plus the 23-year-old hockey player Bobby Orr, the children's cartoon Rugrats, and the shopping channel QVC. This proclamation makes for great copy, because it is deeply subjective. Christopher Hitchens was prepared to call the poet Ezra Pound a genius, but not the acclaimed mystery author Dorothy L. Sayers, whose work he dismissed as 'dismal pulp.' (I know whose work I would rather read.) In 1902, a female writer for this magazine airily declared that there were no great women writers to compare with Juvenal, Euripides, and Milton. 'George Eliot had a vein of excellent humor, but she never shares it with her heroes,' argued Ellen Duvall, adding that Jane Austen's male heroes were 'as solemn as Minerva's owl.' The science-fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke once wrote that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Something similar is true of geniuses. An earlier age would have attributed Paul Morphy and Zerah Colburn's gifts to divine providence, but in the more secular 19th-century America, another explanation was needed. 'We seek in vain for the secret of this mastery,' wrote Brown of his subjects. 'It is private,—as deeply hidden from those who have as from those who have it not.' For the genius-hunters, one encouraging source for exceptional talent was inheritance. At the time Brown was writing about Morphy and Colburn, academics throughout the Western world were wrestling with the theory of evolution by natural selection, proposed by Charles Darwin only six years earlier. The study of what would later be called genetics promised new methods of understanding genius, that quicksilver quality that seemed so resistant to explanation. The first edition of Hereditary Genius, by Darwin's half-cousin Francis Galton, was published in America in 1870. Galton's work aimed to classify all men into lettered bands, depending on their mental faculties and lifetime achievements. The Atlantic reviewed Hereditary Genius that year, noting that the difference between the men in the upper part of Galton's highest band and those in his lowest band 'represents the difference between Shakespeare and the most degraded idiot mentioned in medical literature.' This was a coldly rational view of genius—more scientific in appearance, but also less humane. Galton went on to coin the term eugenics. His unpublished utopian novel, The Eugenic College of Kantsaywhere, imagined a world where people were allowed to marry only after extensive tests of their fitness to reproduce, and where those who failed were shipped off to labor colonies. Thanks to the popularity of eugenics at the time, what started as an attempt to identify geniuses eventually led the U.S. Supreme Court to justify the forced sterilization of the 'feeble minded' in Buck v. Bell in 1927. Thousands of Americans were subsequently denied the right to have children—an idea that also took hold in Nazi Germany, where an estimated 400,000 people were sterilized under the Hitler regime in the name of 'racial hygiene.' From the start, Galton's ideas about genius were presented in explicitly racial terms: He believed that Europeans were intellectually superior to Africans, and that ancient Athenians were superior to both. The Atlantic, a proudly abolitionist magazine, ran an article that contested this bigotry. In 1893, Havelock Ellis argued that many in the contemporary canon of geniuses had mixed ancestry, from what he called the 'negro blood' that was 'easy to trace in the face of Alexandre Dumas, in certain respects, to the Iroquois blood in Flaubert.' The popular novelist Olive Schreiner's heritage was 'German, English, and Jewish,' Ellis observed, while Thomas Hardy believed his paternal great-grandmother to have been Irish. (Neither Jews nor Irish people would have been considered white, according to popular beliefs of the time.) Today, most modern geneticists acknowledge that intelligence is partially heritable—it can be passed down by parents—but that does not account for the making of a genius. 'We can no more produce a whole race of Newtons and Shakespeares than we can produce perpetual motion,' the anonymous author of the Hereditary Genius review wrote in 1870. A 'genius' can pass on some of their genes, but not their personality—nor the social conditions in which their success happened. That matters. While talking about my book, I've found that acknowledging the role of luck in success makes some people nervous. They think that any discussion of broader historical forces is a covert attempt to debunk or downplay the importance of individual talent or hard work. But even 19th-century Atlantic writers could see the importance of good timing. 'A given genius may come either too early or too late,' William James wrote in 1880. 'Cromwell and Napoleon need their revolutions, Grant his civil war. An Ajax gets no fame in the day of telescopic-sighted rifles.' As we get closer to the present, a note of sarcasm creeps into the word's usage: In the 2000s, the writer Megan McArdle used the recurrent headline 'Sheer Genius' for columns on businesses making terrible errors. But she was far from the first Atlantic writer to use the word sardonically. One of my favorite essays on genius from the archives is a satirical squib from 1900, which masquerades as an ad for a Genius Discovery Company. 'This country needs more geniuses,' the anonymous author wrote. 'Everybody knows it. Everybody admits it. Everybody laments it.' The article urged any reader who wondered whether they might be a genius to write in, enclosing a five-dollar fee, 'and we will tell you the truth by return mail.'
