
India orders its airlines to examine fuel switches on some Boeing models
on Monday ordered its airlines to examine fuel switches on several
Boeing
models, while
South Korea
said it would order a similar measure, as scrutiny intensified of fuel switch locks at the centre of
an investigation
into a deadly
Air India crash
.
The moves by India and South Korea came despite the plane maker and the US Federal Aviation Administration telling airlines and regulators in recent days that the fuel switch locks on Boeing jets are safe.
The locks have come under scrutiny following last month's crash of an Air India jet, which killed 260 people. A preliminary report found that the switches had almost simultaneously flipped from run position to cutoff shortly after take-off.
The report noted a 2018 advisory from the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which recommended, but did not mandate, operators of several Boeing models including the 787 to inspect the locking feature of fuel cutoff switches to ensure they could not be moved accidentally.
READ MORE
India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation said it had issued an order to investigate locks on several Boeing models including 787s and 737s, after several Indian and international airlines began making their own inspections of fuel switches.
The regulator oversees the world's third-largest and fastest-growing aviation market and its move raises the stakes for Boeing, whose aircraft are used by three of the country's four largest airlines.
A spokesperson for the South Korean transport ministry said checks there were in line with the 2018 advisory from the FAA, but did not give a timeline for them.
Boeing referred Reuters' questions to the FAA, which was not immediately available to comment outside regular hours. The company's shares were up 1.4 per cent in US premarket trading.
Some other global airlines were weighing their own inspections or had begun their own checks.
In a statement, Japan's JAL said safety was its top priority, adding: 'We are closely monitoring the investigation into the incident and will implement any necessary inspections based on its findings.'
Over the weekend, Air India Group started checking the locking mechanism on the fuel switches of its Boeing 787 and 737 fleets and has discovered no problems yet, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters.
About half the group's 787s have been inspected and nearly all its 737s, the source added, speaking on condition of anonymity. Inspections were set to be completed in the next day or two.
On Sunday, citing a document and sources, Reuters reported that the plane maker and the FAA had privately issued notifications to airlines and regulators that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes were safe and checks were not required.
The Air India crash preliminary report said the airline had not carried out the FAA's suggested inspections as the FAA's 2018 advisory was not a mandate.
It also said maintenance records showed that the throttle control module, which includes the fuel switches, was replaced in 2019 and 2023 on the plane involved in the crash.
In an internal memo on Monday, Air India chief executive Campbell Wilson said the investigation into the crash was far from over and it was unwise to jump to premature conclusions, following the release of the preliminary report. -Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Donald Trump says Coca-Cola will use cane sugar in US production of Coke
US President Donald Trump said Coca-Cola had agreed to sweeten its signature soft drink with cane sugar in the US, in what could represent a big shift from its decades-long use of high fructose corn syrup. In a social media post on Wednesday, the US president said he had been speaking to Coca-Cola about 'using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the US, and they have agreed to do so'. He hailed it as a 'good move' by the Atlanta-based company, adding: 'You'll see. It's just better.' Coca-Cola already uses cane sugar in Coke distributed in the European Union, including in Ireland. Mr Trump's unexpected announcement inserted the White House into a long-running debate about the effects on health of different types of sugar – and has the potential to delight or alienate farmers in regions of the country where he has strong support. READ MORE Neither Mr Trump nor Coca-Cola addressed questions about the shift late on Wednesday, including how Coca-Cola would source the volumes of cane sugar it would need or whether any cane-based cola would replace or complement current drink ingredients. Coca-Cola said: 'We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca-Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon.' While Coke's plans remained vague, Mr Trump's statement rippled through the beverage industry. Rival soft-drink maker PepsiCo was asked about it in an earnings call on Thursday morning. 'We're following the consumer,' Ramon Laguarta, Pepsi's chief executive, told analysts. 'If the consumer is telling us that they prefer products that have sugar and they prefer products that have natural ingredients, we will give the consumer products that have sugar and have natural ingredients.' US-produced Coca-Cola uses high fructose corn syrup, a highly processed sweetener whose effects on health in comparison with other forms of added sugars has long been a source of controversy. High fructose corn syrup is derived from corn, whose base of production is in midwestern farm states such as Illinois, Iowa and Nebraska in rural counties that largely voted for Trump in the 2024 presidential election. US sugar cane is principally grown in the warm Gulf Coast states of Florida and Louisiana, while additional cane sugar is imported under a tariff quota system. Shares of Archer Daniels Midland and Ingredion, two of the largest publicly traded corn processors, respectively plunged 6.3 per cent and 8.9 per cent in after-hours trading on Wednesday, but had pared most of their losses after Wall Street reopened on Thursday. Coke shares were up 0.8 per cent. John Bode, chief executive of the Corn Refiners Association, said: 'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit.' Coke's bottlers used cane sugar in US production until the 1980s and continue to use it in most foreign production, including in Mexico, which has resulted in so-called Mexican Coke being favoured by some US consumers. Its special Kosher for Passover variation, known for its yellow tops, is also coveted by some consumers because it too uses sugar rather than corn syrup. In a social media post, Coca-Cola said corn syrup was safe and had roughly the same calories as table sugar. 'The name sounds complex, but high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) – which we use to sweeten some of our beverages – is actually just a sweetener made from corn.' Mr Trump's announcement comes as his health secretary Robert Kennedy Jnr pursues a broader crackdown on highly processed foods. Earlier this week, the White House announced dozens of ice cream companies, representing more than 90 per cent of the ice cream volume sold in the US, had pledged to stop using certified artificial colours in their frozen dairy products. While Mr Kennedy has attacked high fructose corn syrup, he has also taken an aggressive line against sugar in general. At an event earlier this year, he declared 'sugar is poison', not qualifying whether it came from corn, cane or another crop. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

The Journal
10 hours ago
- The Journal
Simon Harris was having the time of his life today with Pearse Doherty's Supervalu mistake
The Journal / YouTube TÁNAISTE SIMON HARRIS appeared to be enjoying himself in the Dáil today when he got the opportunity to slag Sinn Féin's finance spokesperson for his Supervalu faux pas. On Tuesday, Sinn Féin were forced to explain their embarrassing mistake after Pearse Doherty and a number of other Sinn Féin TDs repeatedly referred in the Dáil to SuperValu being owned by United Natural Foods Inc., a US-based firm rather than the Irish Musgrave Group. The party put the mistake down to 'human error' due to a search by Sinn Féin staff into Google Finance turning up a different 'Supervalu' company based in the US. During Leaders' Questions today, Harris made sure not to spare Doherty's blushes. During a discussion on the cost of living, the Fine Gael leader saw his opportunity to strike and took it. Advertisement 'You spend a lot of your political career standing up here saying: 'you don't get it over here. You don't understand, you're out of touch. 'You know what I know? I know who owns Supervalu. And it's not an American multinational,' the Tánaiste jeered across the Dáil at a glum-faced Sinn Féin, receiving whoops of approval from the Government benches. 'I know who owns Supervalu, they sponsor the GAA, they sponsor the Tidy Towns. They're in towns and villages across the country, they're a proud Irish company. And you thought, you thought they were owned by an American multinational! 'And you want Paschal Donohoe's job?,' the Tánaiste said with a smile, while pointing at the Finance Minister sitting beside him. 'You want Paschal Donohoe's job and you don't even know who owns SuperValu? Or can't even use Google? Give me a break,' he concluded. Unintelligible shouts continued from the Sinn Féin benches, as the Tánaiste repeated: 'Give me a break, Pearse, give me a break.' Rising to her feet for her speaking slot, Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore was far from impressed with the scenes she had just witnessed. 'Anybody looking in on this debate today will have their head in their hands. They are worried about putting food on their table, they are worried about turning their lights on and we have this kind of behaviour going on? 'It's just — I actually don't think either of you get it,' the Wicklow TD said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
EU drawing up list of potential tariffs on US services
The EU is preparing a list of potential tariffs on US services, as well as export controls, as part of its possible retaliation if trade talks with Washington fail, two officials briefed on the negotiations said. The European Commission , which is assembling the list of measures as part of its response to US President Donald Trump's tariffs, still has to present the list to European Union (EU) countries. Mr Trump has announced he plans to hit the bloc with 30 per cent tariffs from August 1st. While Brussels has previously warned that it could expand the transatlantic trade war to services if talks to avoid those tariffs fail, it has not presented concrete measures to European capitals. One of the officials stressed the list would not only focus on US tech companies, which have strong lobbying power in Mr Trump's White House. [ Is Trump's tariffs plan working for the US? And where does it go next? Opens in new window ] Any EU move to put levies on US services will be of concern to Ireland, given the presence of most of the big American tech firms employing thousands of people here. The list would come on top of a proposal for retaliation against €72 billion of annual US imports that EU countries are already discussing and which includes tariffs on Boeing aircraft, cars and bourbon. A person familiar with the latest proposal said it would include levies on digital services. Commission president Ursula von der Leyen threatened this action in April. 'An example is you could put a levy on the advertising revenues of digital services,' she said at the time. Bernd Lange, the chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, who is frequently briefed on the talks, welcomed the move. The US has a deficit in goods with the EU but a surplus in services, making it more vulnerable to retaliation in that sector. 'It's not really foreseen that an acceptable balanced deal will be possible between the US and the EU. So it is important to prepare,' Lange said. 'The US tech giants generate a lot of their income in Europe and the US has an annual surplus in services of about $100 billion. 'So it is necessary also to prepare a third step on the escalation ladder; a levy on digital services.' The bloc could use its enforcement regulation to draw up the services list, which would require approval from member states. This latest package also includes the first export controls, which would add fees to the export of steel scrap and some chemicals. European scrap is sent to the US where it is melted in electric arc furnaces to be reused in new steel products. The EU and the US have been negotiating to secure a trade deal since April, when Mr Trump announced 20 per cent 'reciprocal' tariffs on EU imports. He then dropped them to 10 per cent to allow time for negotiations before a July 9th deadline, which has since been pushed back to August 1st. Then, on July 13th, he threatened he would increase the levies to 30 per cent on August 1st. According to the two officials, the EU could accept 10 per cent tariffs but wants to reduce separate sectoral tariffs of 25 per cent on cars in any deal. It also wants to guarantee an exemption from future sectoral tariffs promised by Mr Trump on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. The EU's trade chief Maros Sefcovic is in Washington for discussions with his US counterparts. On Monday, he warned that there was still 'quite a big gap' between the two sides. While the EU's preference is for a deal, he said 'all instruments' were being considered for retaliation measures. The commission has postponed until August 6th a separate plan to hit €21 billion of annual US imports – drawn up in response to Mr Trump's separate duties on imports of steel, aluminium and cars from the EU – to allow time for talks. The commission declined to comment. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025