Saskatchewan is now carbon tax free, but some wonder the cost
Saskatchewan industrial carbon pricing system is set to end Tuesday, but the province has so far been unable to provide a clear answer on the financial consequences of the decision.
Saskatchewan's system is known as the Output-Based Performance Standards (OBPS) program and taxes large industrial emitters.
NDP finance critic Trent Wotherspoon says the $12-million surplus projected in the province's 2025-2026 budget is now gone and the document "isn't worth the paper it was printed on."
In its 2025-2026 budget, the province projected $431 million in revenue from its OBPS program. With that program paused, the state of the province's finances are unclear.
"Twelve minus 432 does not equal balance," Wotherspoon said on Monday.
End of the industrial carbon tax
Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is touting Tuesday as " Carbon Tax Freedom Day."
While all of Canada is marking the end of the federal price on consumer carbon on April 1, Saskatchewan made the additional decision to end its industrial carbon pricing on the same date.
"The people of the province, our governments have been very vocal from the start, being opposed to the carbon tax. So we were thrilled to have the opportunity to do what we did last week," Saskatchewan Finance Minister Jim Reiter said on Monday.
Moe and the Saskatchewan Party have been quick to share statements from organizations celebrating the end of the OBPS program.
Daryl Fransoo, the chair of the Wheat Growers Association, described farmers as the backbone of the province's economy and said they have been hit hard by trade disruptions and tariffs.
"This decision puts money back into farmers pockets," Fransoo said.
Other organizations like the Saskatchewan Farm Stewardship Association, Mosaic Canada, the Saskatchewan Heavy Construction Association and the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities have also released statements endorsing the decision.
WATCH| Sask. Premier Scott Moe to pause industrial carbon tax:
Sask. Premier Scott Moe to pause industrial carbon tax
5 days ago
Duration 3:10
The decision has not come without criticism.
Brett Dolter, an associate professor of economics at the University of Regina, told CBC News last week that the decision eliminates two of the three pillars central to the 2017 Saskatchewan climate change strategy, entitled Prairie Resilience.
With the end of the industrial carbon emissions tax and the decision to extend the lives of its coal-fired power plants, moving away from clean electricity goals, Dolter said the province is steering away from reducing its emissions.
The province's decision also doesn't end the ability for the federal government to implement its own industrial carbon pricing or "backstop."
Financial impact
Since Moe announced the policy change last week, no one from the government has been able to provide a clear answer on the financial impacts of the decision.
Moe refused to provide a yes or no answer when asked whether the move puts Saskatchewan in a deficit.
Reiter also wouldn't provide a yes or no response.
"The fact is that on any given day commodity prices rise and and fall. It all has an impact on the budget. So we're not going to rewrite the budget every time something like that happens," Reiter said.
Reiter stuck to his answer when it was pointed out that he was describing market factors and not a decision made by the provincial government.
Wotherspoon said the lack of clarity is infuriating.
"Whether or not he's just incompetent or he's not being honest with Saskatchewan people, he has to know that what he's presented to Saskatchewan people is not only nonsense, but also that it fails to step up to the challenges that they face," Wotherspoon said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Purchase and sale of all U.S.-produced alcohol resumes in Saskatchewan
The Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA) is set to resume the purchase of U.S.-made alcohol, walking back one of the province's tariff countermeasures announced earlier this spring. Article content In an email leaked to the Leader-Post, SLGA staff were informed on Monday afternoon that the Crown would resume the purchase and distribution of U.S.-produced alcohol, removing one of the province's planks in its response to the trade war with the United States. Article content Article content Article content The trade war started when U.S. President Donald Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods and 10 per cent on Canadian energy, which came into effect on March 4. Article content Article content On March 5, Premier Scott Moe unveiled Saskatchewan's response, which included direction to the SLGA 'to stop purchasing U.S.-produced alcohol.' The government amended that direction on March 24, providing an exemption for some 54 American brands that were at least partially made in Canada. Article content In an emailed response provided to the Leader-Post on Monday, SLGA spokesperson David Morris said the change will allow the Crown to sell off current inventories of U.S.-produced alcohol that were already paid and resume the purchase of new stock. Article content 'This change gives Saskatchewan people the option to choose whether they want to buy these products or consider alternatives,' stated Morris, adding the SLGA encourages people to buy Saskatchewan and Canadian products. Article content 'The Federal Government's 25 per cent tariff on U.S. alcohol remains in place, and this added cost is expected to be a significant factor.' Article content Article content This move comes a few days after Alberta made the same move, reversing a similar policy that was also in place as a response to U.S. tariffs. Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content On June 6, the U.S. further raised tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Article content 'Just days ago, Donald Trump doubled tariffs on Saskatchewan steel,' Saskatchewan NDP Leader Carla Beck said in an emailed statement criticizing the move to resume the purchase of U.S.-produced alcohol. Article content 'Instead of standing up to Trump and protecting our workers, Scott Moe and the Sask. Party sold them out,' she said. 'This is a betrayal of Canadian workers, especially our steelworkers.' Article content
Toronto Sun
5 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
BELL: Danielle Smith is playing nice with Carney, Poilievre is not
Alberta premier plays ball with Carney unless or until he screws over her province Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks as he attends a tour of the Fort York Armoury in Toronto on June 9, 2025 in Toronto, Canada. Prime Minister Carney has pledged to meet NATO's 2% spending pledge this year. (Photo byPierre Poilievre figures he's got Prime Minister Mark Carney's number. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account If an Albertan dials it, they will almost certainly not get what they want. On Monday, Poilievre raises the curtain on who he believes is the real Mark Carney. The Conservative leader says Carney recently made 'a very troubling comment.' He only heard it in French. 'The premiers will have a veto on pipelines.' B.C.'s NDP Premier David Eby is standing in the way of the bitumen pipeline Alberta Premier Danielle Smith would like to see going to the west coast, with product heading to ready and willing Asian customers. 'Is the prime minister effectively saying we're not going to get any pipelines built?' asks Poilievre. 'If you wait until everyone agrees on everything nothing will happen. We can't wait any longer. We have to get things done. It's going to take some backbone. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'We, as Conservatives, believe in pushing ahead with pipelines.' Read More Poilievre adds the shortest and easiest pipeline route is through northern B.C. to the west coast and the port of Prince Rupert. The Conservative leader says it is insane almost all the Alberta oil is sold to the U.S. at a discount 'to the exclusive benefit of American refineries and commodity traders.' He says 'giant leaps' are needed on this file and Liberal anti-oil policies also must be punted. Leader of the Conservative Party Pierre Poilievre speaks with reporters in the Foyer of the House of Commons, Monday, Jun 9, 2025 in Ottawa. Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press Meanwhile, Premier Danielle Smith plays nice with Carney, at least for now. In fact, she has had many kind words for the prime minister even when newshounds push the premier to see if she will dish some dirt on Carney. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Smith feels Carney wants to do the right thing. To Smith, he appears sincere. She believes Alberta is making progress with him. He is moving in the right direction. Yes, Smith says Carney is far better than former prime minister Justin Trudeau. A sea of change. She says many people are telling her to give this Liberal prime minister a chance. A recent nose count showed even some federal Conservative voters in Alberta are moderately impressed with Carney. Believe it or not! The premier goes further. She thinks Carney realizes he has to change course from the Trudeau years if he wants to survive politically. Smith thinks Carney is taking seriously the sentiment for Alberta independence. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith speaks at the First Ministers' Meeting at TCU Place. Photo taken in Saskatoon, Sask. on Monday, June 2, 2025. Michelle Berg/Saskatoon StarPhoenix Yes, Smith has had phone calls and returned texts from Carney. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. She feels if Alberta demonstrates the pipeline to the west coast is in the national interest the province will be able to get pipeline approval. On weekend TV, Smith is confronted with the fact Carney believes a pipeline thumbs-up will need the 'consensus' of the provinces. If a province doesn't want a pipeline you're out of luck and the B.C. government doesn't want Smith's pipeline to the west coast. When faced with Carney handing the B.C. government what amounts to a veto, the Alberta premier does not go after the prime minister. Smith figures Team Canada is going to prevail. She will try to convince the B.C. NDP premier to support the pipeline. Smith says she knows Eby is on Team Canada and she doesn't think Eby will go off Team Canada. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. B.C. Premier David Eby. B.C. Government We will know pretty soon where the chips will fall. The good news for Carney is Smith is not being a public thorn in the side of the prime minister. She is prepared to work with him at this time. No doubt she is trusting in the one thing we know about Liberals. They do not really believe in anything, One day they will give you the impression they stand for something. It is their principle. Here they stand. The next day, if the wind switches direction, they will stand for the exact opposite of where they stood and sound so sincere when they are advocating what they had previously attacked. That's why they can take much of the Conservative policy and say it is Liberal. That's why they can do the fear-mongering Elbows Up and then drop it when they no longer need to whip people up. They got their votes. Mission accomplished. Smith thinks Canadians are with Alberta on pipelines and Carney knows it. So Smith will play nice with Carney. If it all works out, and there are many who bet it will not work out, the Alberta premier can take a victory lap. If it doesn't work out, there is always a return to the old script. Another Liberal shafts Alberta. Then all hell will break loose. rbell@ Toronto Blue Jays World Olympics Editorial Cartoons Relationships
National Observer
9 hours ago
- National Observer
‘Harper's dreams coming true': MPs slam Carney's fast-tracking plan
Prime Minister Mark Carney's new bill to fast-track major projects will have to rely on Conservative votes to pass, with all other parties expressing major reservations. The legislation would allow the federal government to conditionally approve projects it deems 'in the national interest' before an environmental or impact assessment or other regulatory processes take place. Both the NDP and Greens have spoken out against it, while Patrick Bonin, Bloc Québécois environment and climate change critic, called Carney's plan to fast-track major projects 'highly problematic' at a French-language press conference on Monday. The federal government is seeking to give itself 'superpowers' to accelerate projects and weaken environmental protections, Bonin said. Some of the factors used to evaluate whether a project is in the national interest are vague, and there's no obligation for the government to adhere to it, he added. Then, there is the question of sovereignty and whether provinces can say no to projects in their jurisdiction. Last week, Carney said projects need consensus from provinces to move forward, but the legislation doesn't spell that out, leaving room for potential overreach on provincial jurisdiction, Bonin said. The Building Canada Act is part of an omnibus bill that also includes action to remove federal barriers to interprovincial trade, which is less controversial than the changes to major project approvals. On Monday, the Bloc Québécois called on the federal government to split the omnibus bill into two separate bills so the issues can be studied in the relevant federal committees. The federal Conservatives have not confirmed whether they will support the bill — Leader Pierre Poilievre said caucus will discuss it on Wednesday. For the Conservatives, the question is not whether legislation is perfect, but whether it is better than the way things are, Poilievre said on Friday. 'That's what we'll be looking at as we study this newly-introduced bill over the next few days.' 'We would vote in favour of accelerating even one project,' Poilievre said, indicating that he wants to see new pipelines in particular. 'Once a project is on that list, it's not a question of if it's going to move forward, but how,' Alexandre Boulerice, NDP critic for environment and climate change, said. 'It's like Stephen Harper's dreams coming true." Last week, BC Premier David Eby said he will not support Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's vision of building a new oil pipeline to BC's north coast. Poilievre made it clear he doesn't think provinces should get veto power over nationally important projects. 'We need a pipeline to the Pacific, and if the prime minister says he's going to wait till everyone agrees, then nothing will get done, which is what has been happening for the last decade,' Poilievre said at a press conference at Parliament Hill on Monday. If the Conservatives support Bill C-5, the Liberals will have the votes they need to get it through the House of Commons. The NDP says its members will vote against the bill, with one MP calling the major projects section 'really dangerous.' 'Once a project is on that list, it's not a question of if it's going to move forward, but how,' Alexandre Boulerice, NDP critic for environment and climate change, said in a phone interview with Canada's National Observer. 'It's like Stephen Harper's dreams coming true.' He said the NDP is currently exploring possible options to block the bill, but any action would likely require cooperation with the Bloc Québécois. Either way, Boulerice doesn't see how the federal government can rush the bill through by July 1, given that there are less than two weeks left before the House rises for the summer. 'It's a really capitalist logic that what we need to do is to provide certainty to investors and companies,' Boulerice said. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May also criticized the proposed legislation in a June 9 press release. 'Bill C-5 gives the federal Cabinet sweeping discretion to fast-track projects while weakening Indigenous rights and environmental protections,' May's statement reads. 'This is the first time in 40 years that Canadian environmental assessment law has been written to serve political deals first and environmental responsibility second.' Factors for determining national interest 'carefully worded' The bill lists some factors the government may consider when deciding whether a project will be listed for fast-tracking, one of which is whether it will 'contribute to clean growth and to meeting Canada's objectives with respect to climate change.' Another factor is whether it will 'advance the interests of Indigenous peoples.' Boulerice said these are nothing more than broad slogans. Mark Winfield, a professor of environmental governance at York University, was of the same mind. 'These are attempts to cover off points of potential vulnerability,' he said in a phone interview with C anada's National Observer. The bill does not have a clear definition of 'clean growth,' he said, which creates huge loopholes for approving projects or employing technologies that many Canadians wouldn't consider 'clean.' 'The government has been very liberal in its definition of 'clean' to include things like CCUS [carbon capture, utilisation and storage], critical minerals, [and] nuclear,' Winfield said. The bill raises serious questions about how the federal government will reconcile Canada's climate change obligations with all the talk of potential pipeline and fossil fuel export projects at the same time as northern Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario are going up in smoke, he added. 'Everybody thinks that it's an open door for pipelines, in fact, for oil and gas,' Boulerice said. 'It's not about solving the housing crisis with a big project of building millions of homes. It's about energy.' Carney has made repeated references to both clean and conventional energy, the latter of which refers to fossil fuels like oil and gas. Carney has referenced 'decarbonized' oil and used the Pathways Alliance's proposed multi-billion dollar carbon capture project as an example of projects that could be considered for fast-tracking. 'Oil is carbon. There's no such thing as decarbonized oil,' Angela Carter, an associate professor of political science at Memorial University of Newfoundland, said in a phone interview. 'We need to be very, very careful about this definition of clean growth. If it's a project that contributes to sustaining and growing oil production, well, that's not clean growth. It's very, very, very simple.' Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin said it's too early to say whether her party will support the bill. First, they want the government to respond to their request to split the bill into two parts, one for interprovincial trade and one for major projects. 'In a sense, this is taking what Stephen Harper tried to do with C-38 and putting it on steroids … The problem with trying to take shortcuts is it has a tendency to backfire and to make the underlying conflicts worse than ever,' Winfield said. 'Look what happened: Northern Gateway died, Energy East went nowhere, it took extraordinary steps to get Trans Mountain done.' The biggest challenge for Carney's government will likely be navigating Indigenous opposition and constitutional rights, said Michael Wernick, former clerk of the Privy Council. Indigenous Peoples have the most 'legal ability' to slow things down, he said, adding that it is not unsolvable for the Carney government but will be a key hurdle. Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak voiced her concerns with the bill on Friday and called an emergency meeting on it this week. Onlookers and experts who care about climate are looking on with 'considerable uncertainty' because the bill could allow for massive progress to be made on an east-west electricity grid or fast-tracking renewable energy infrastructure, but that may not be the case, James Rowe, an associate professor of environmental studies at the University of Victoria, said. 'Given the political economy of Canada as the fourth largest oil producer in the world … it's more likely those real powerful forces are going to get their way — and projects that might otherwise have been stopped by regulatory processes and consultations … are going to get fast-tracked,' he said.
