Ronen Bar: ex-Shin Bet chief who incurred right-wing wrath
The days of Ronen Bar as Israel's Shin Bet chief were already numbered after Hamas's deadly attack on October 7, 2023, having hinted he would resign to take responsibility for failing to prevent it.
But he was sacked on Friday before he could depart himself, after incurring the wrath of the country's right wing over his positions, including on the attack.
The 59-year-old, with a salt and pepper buzz cut and beard, rose through the ranks to lead the internal security agency after three decades.
But he courted anger for speaking of "Jewish terrorism" and opening investigations that targeted those in power after his October 2021 appointment by the previous government.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cited a "persistent loss of professional and personal trust" for Bar's dismissal, due to take effect by 10 April.
Bar, an Arabic speaker, was a former member of the Israeli army's elite Sayeret Matkal unit, like Netanyahu, but their relationship was strained.
In a letter made public late Thursday, Bar described his dismissal as being motivated by Netanyahu's "personal interests".
The security chief referred to the conclusions drawn by his agency's probe into the unprecedented Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, which said "a policy of quiet had enabled Hamas to undergo massive military buildup".
He also pointed to alleged payments from Qatar to people close to the leader, as he vowed to defend himself to the "appropriate bodies".
- Operations -
Bar joined the internal security service in 1993 after obtaining degrees in political science and philosophy from Tel Aviv University and a master's degree in public administration from Harvard, according to Israeli media reports.
Born in 1965, Bar began as a field officer in the Shin Bet's operational unit, taking part in numerous operations in the Gaza Strip, the occupied West Bank and Lebanon.
In 2011, he was appointed head of the Shin Bet's Operations Division and took charge of the mission that led to the assassination of Ahmed Jabari, a leader of Hamas's military wing.
Three years later, he led search efforts for three Israeli teenagers kidnapped in the occupied West Bank and the hunt for their killers after their bodies were found.
In 2018 he was promoted to number two in the organisation. Then in late 2021, he took over as head of the Shin Bet for a five-year term.
His positions soon created opposition from within Netanyahu's government, which came back to power at the end of 2022, backed by the country's extreme right.
Bar claimed to fight against "Jewish terrorism" which he said helped fuel "Palestinian terrorism", according to his comments quoted by the Israeli media.
- Investigations -
In 2023, Bar warned far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir that police action in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem was creating a feeling of collective punishment and harassment among Palestinian residents.
He also asked Ben Gvir not to go to the Temple Mount, also known as the Haram al-Sharif, a highly sensitive site in the Old City of Jerusalem revered by both Muslims and Jews. The minister ignored his warnings.
In March 2023, amid protests against judicial reforms, he told Netanyahu there was a link "between security threats and the social situation in Israel", according to remarks reported by Israeli media.
His fate was ultimately sealed by implicating the government in the Hamas attack on October 7 and a probe into the "Qatargate" affair, said Yossi Shain, a professor of political science at Tel Aviv University.
The affair saw senior Netanyahu advisers accused of being paid to promote Qatari interests.
Bar had become the right-wing's "bete noire" and his dismissal was "a promise (Netanyahu) had made to Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich to secure his coalition", said Shain, referring to Israel's far-right Finance Minister.
Ben Gvir was reinstated as national security minister on Wednesday after leaving the government in January in protest against a truce agreed with Hamas.
That decision came three days after Netanyahu announced Bar's imminent dismissal.
dms/cyj/roc/phs/jfx/hmn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
Iran rulers' playing for time is one big reason Trump shouldn't give them any
Hmm: Hours after the world learned that President Donald Trump would take 'up to two weeks' to decide whether to send in US warplanes to drop bunker-busters on Fordow, Tehran's last main nuclear site, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi vomited up some fresh bluster. That makes it obvious the regime intends to just string this out for as long as possible, hoping that Europe and/or Congress will somehow get Trump to tell Israel to stop its campaign. Which means the president needs to pay even more heed to the risks of holding off on a decisive intervention. That includes not just the possible loss of public support that's built over the last week, but the chance that some unforeseen development will raise the stakes beyond a straightforward strike on a single nuke site. To be clear, Trump can still hope for a negotiated end to Iran's nuclear program, but Araqchi's ploy reeks of the same bogus game that Hamas has been playing ever since the end of the Gaza ceasefire the prez imposed as he was taking office. A game the Iranian was plainly pushing as he met Friday in Geneva with a passel of European diplos trying to 'de-escalate' the conflict. Meanwhile, some in Congress are maneuvering to tie Trump's hands, insisting he shouldn't act without votes in the House and Sente explicitly authorizing any strikes — a precedent that would likely permanently limit not just this president, but all future holders of the Oval Office. For what it's worth, Trump plainly isn't holding off only because the ayatollah might see reason: He's also considering the full impact of a US strike, and seeing what else may develop. For example: Maybe Israel can take out Fordow without our help, whether with repeated waves of smaller bombs or (conceivably) the most ambitious commando raid ever. He's reportedly also worried about Iran descending into total chaos, as Libya did after President Barack Obama arrogantly decided he could show the world how 'regime change' should be done. Yet that raises another angle that argues against Trump taking his time: Israel's ongoing total humiliation of the Islamic Republic's rulers (and its killing of many of them) could trigger a Libya-style 'regime collapse' even without a Fordow takeout. So a fast elimination of all Tehran's nuclear assets, allowing Israel to stand down, is arguably the best hope for the region to stabilize. Khamenei and his advisers care only about protecting their own power, so they'll use every hour Trump gives them searching for some way out of the trap they put themselves in by ignoring Trump's last deadline. Trump has to look at the bigger picture, including the risks (seen and unseen) of letting Tehran keep playing games.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students
A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students, delivering the Ivy League school another victory as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. The order from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston preserves the ability of Harvard to host foreign students while the case is decided. Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security in May after the agency withdrew the school's certification to host foreign students and issue paperwork for their visas. The action would have forced Harvard's roughly 7,000 foreign students — about a quarter of its total enrollment — to transfer or risk being in the U.S. illegally. New foreign students would have been barred from coming to Harvard. The university called it illegal retaliation for rejecting the White House's demands to overhaul Harvard policies around campus protests, admissions, hiring and other issues. Burroughs temporarily halted the action hours after Harvard sued. Less than two weeks later, in early June, Trump moved to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard, citing a different legal justification. Harvard challenged the move and Burroughs temporarily blocked that effort as well. The stops and starts of the legal battle have unsettled current students and left others around the world waiting to find out whether they will be able to attend America's oldest and wealthiest university. The Trump administration's efforts to stop Harvard from enrolling international students have created an environment of 'profound fear, concern, and confusion,' the university said in a court filing. Countless international students have asked about transferring from the university, Harvard immigration services director Maureen Martin said. Trump has been warring with Harvard for months after it rejected a series of government demands meant to address conservative complaints that the school has become too liberal and has tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Trump officials have cut more than $2.6 billion in research grants, ended federal contracts and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. In April, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem demanded that Harvard turn over a trove of records related to any dangerous or illegal activity by foreign students. Harvard says it complied, but Noem said the response fell short and on May 22 revoked Harvard's certification in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. The sanction immediately put Harvard at a disadvantage as it competed for the world's top students, the school said in its lawsuit, and it harmed Harvard's reputation as a global research hub. 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard,' the suit said. The action would have upended some graduate schools that recruit heavily from abroad. Some schools overseas quickly offered invitations to Harvard's students, including two universities in Hong Kong. Harvard President Alan Garber previously said the university has made changes to combat antisemitism. But Harvard, he said, will not stray from its 'core, legally-protected principles,' even after receiving federal ultimatums. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Howard Levitt: A union should stand up for its members, not a foreign regime hostile to organized labour
Earlier this week, a flyer began circulating online promoting a June 22 rally against the war between Israel and Iran. 'Hands off Iran,' the flyer said, and invited protesters to gather outside the U.S. consulate in Toronto. An accompanying social media post called for 'building and preserving unity in confronting Zionism' and pledged support for the Palestinian and Iranian people, and 'all people across the world who continue to resist imperialist and Zionist domination.' The lead sponsor of the event, it turns out, is the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). The union drew immediate criticism and condemnation from politicians, the media and many of its own members. The flyer was taken down, and CUPE issued a statement saying it was 'an early unapproved draft version' and that an approved flyer 'would be shared shortly.' However, they have issued no such new version, and the demonstration is going ahead. The mishandling of promotional material for such an obviously contentious event (if it was mishandled, which I question), should alone raise alarm bells about CUPE's leadership. But the fact that the union is involved in this event at all is beyond the pale. Iran has the world's worst human rights record, and a well-known history of torturing and murdering its dissidents, raping female prisoners, persecuting minorities and sponsoring terrorism around the world. It is also famously opposed to organized labour, and CUPE itself has previously condemned the Iranian regime for persecuting labour activists. So why is Ontario CUPE organizing a rally in support of Iran, a country recognized by Canada (and others) as a state supporter of terrorism? Does it hate Jews so much that it would ally itself with a regime that, other than antisemitism, opposes everything the union ostensibly stands for? For years, I have had Jewish union members complaining to me about antisemitism in their unions, particularly public sector ones. This dramatically exacerbated after Oct. 7 when unions, along with universities and the radical left, organized and came out to support the pro-Hamas rallies that ubiquitously took over Canadian streets. Their Jewish members, unsurprisingly, felt discriminated against, disenfranchised by their unions' public position supporting groups calling for their extermination. Remember, CUPE's legal obligation is to represent its members, not discriminate against them. Similarly, as unions conducted DEI seminars, Jewish members felt excluded — not only because the seminars failed to recognize them as a group that, according to Statistics Canada, experienced dramatically more discrimination than any other, but because the DEI trainers characterized Jews as residing at the top of the hierarchical pyramid, part of the 'white oppressor class.' This is similar to the experience of Jewish employees compelled to attend corporate DEI seminars with the same anti-semitic messaging, but seemed even worse because their unions were ostensibly there to protect them against just such discrimination. Ontario CUPE's sponsorship of this weekend's rally supporting Iran takes this to ludicrous heights. Why are unions permitted to use their Jewish members' monies to oppress them and to organize around a regime that poses such an obvious existential threat? CUPE and its leader, Fred Hahn, are already being sued by Jewish members for antisemitic conduct. That lawsuit has obviously not dissuaded them. This is the same Fred Hahn who tweeted his support of Oct. 7 at the time, and the same CUPE that asked one of its locals at York University to hijack their classes and teach on 'Israeli oppression' instead. We do not see CUPE or other unions concerning themselves with states that have no democratic foundation at all and routinely violate human rights. If they did, the world's most egregious violator is Iran. What is telling is that, when it came time to put its foot on the scale to either fight discrimination or support antisemitism, CUPE came out unequivocally in favour of the latter. Unions receive taxpayer subsidies and compulsory union dues, ostensibly for the purpose of assisting them in their collective bargaining. One can understand how some expenses beyond those of strict collective bargaining can be justifiable, such as lobbying for worker-friendly political parties, or on behalf of causes supportive of workers' collective bargaining gains. But supporting Hamas or Iran, beyond discriminating against some of their members, cannot possibly assist unions in obtaining higher wages, benefits or other terms of employment for their members, which is a unions' legal purpose, Yet there is no legal restraint on unions' spending membership and taxpayer money on whatever their hearts desire. This is not only of concern to union members but to taxpayers, since we all subsidize unions. Union dues are tax deductible, and strike pay and union investment funds are not taxed. So, what can be legally done? Legislation should be passed limiting money obtained from compulsory union dues or government tax subsidies to non-collective bargaining purposes and have that be audited. If unions wish to spend money for other purposes, it should only use funds collected from their members voluntarily for those purposes. Ideally, CUPE would know that if it were the law, virtually no member would contribute their wages for such union picadilloes. As for the aggrieved union members, they should organize to decertify CUPE for a union that does not violate its obligations to them. In the meantime, expose the union's behaviour on social media, organize against it, make clear that they will not participate in its activities and will continue to work if CUPE calls a strike. They could also commence a lawsuit, potentially a class-action one, against the union for intentional infliction of mental stress, conspiracy to injure, intimidation and defamation. Another option is to petition the union to cease its activities, and, if they do not receive a response, publish the letters on social and other media. They could also file an application with the labour relations board, on the grounds that the union has breached its duty of fair representation in a manner that was discriminatory and in bad faith toward Jewish members. Howard Levitt: Is unionization good for employees? A side-by-side comparison Howard Levitt: When employers play games with severance packages, they often lose There are remedies. It is past time to utilize them and for government to pass the necessary legislation. Howard Levitt is senior partner of Levitt LLP, employment and labour lawyers with offices in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. He practices employment law in eight provinces and is the author of six books, including the Law of Dismissal in Canada. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
