Ronen Bar: ex-Shin Bet chief who incurred right-wing wrath
But he was sacked on Friday before he could depart himself, after incurring the wrath of the country's right wing over his positions, including on the attack.
The 59-year-old, with a salt and pepper buzz cut and beard, rose through the ranks to lead the internal security agency after three decades.
But he courted anger for speaking of "Jewish terrorism" and opening investigations that targeted those in power after his October 2021 appointment by the previous government.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cited a "persistent loss of professional and personal trust" for Bar's dismissal, due to take effect by 10 April.
Bar, an Arabic speaker, was a former member of the Israeli army's elite Sayeret Matkal unit, like Netanyahu, but their relationship was strained.
In a letter made public late Thursday, Bar described his dismissal as being motivated by Netanyahu's "personal interests".
The security chief referred to the conclusions drawn by his agency's probe into the unprecedented Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, which said "a policy of quiet had enabled Hamas to undergo massive military buildup".
He also pointed to alleged payments from Qatar to people close to the leader, as he vowed to defend himself to the "appropriate bodies".
- Operations -
Bar joined the internal security service in 1993 after obtaining degrees in political science and philosophy from Tel Aviv University and a master's degree in public administration from Harvard, according to Israeli media reports.
Born in 1965, Bar began as a field officer in the Shin Bet's operational unit, taking part in numerous operations in the Gaza Strip, the occupied West Bank and Lebanon.
In 2011, he was appointed head of the Shin Bet's Operations Division and took charge of the mission that led to the assassination of Ahmed Jabari, a leader of Hamas's military wing.
Three years later, he led search efforts for three Israeli teenagers kidnapped in the occupied West Bank and the hunt for their killers after their bodies were found.
In 2018 he was promoted to number two in the organisation. Then in late 2021, he took over as head of the Shin Bet for a five-year term.
His positions soon created opposition from within Netanyahu's government, which came back to power at the end of 2022, backed by the country's extreme right.
Bar claimed to fight against "Jewish terrorism" which he said helped fuel "Palestinian terrorism", according to his comments quoted by the Israeli media.
- Investigations -
In 2023, Bar warned far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir that police action in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem was creating a feeling of collective punishment and harassment among Palestinian residents.
He also asked Ben Gvir not to go to the Temple Mount, also known as the Haram al-Sharif, a highly sensitive site in the Old City of Jerusalem revered by both Muslims and Jews. The minister ignored his warnings.
In March 2023, amid protests against judicial reforms, he told Netanyahu there was a link "between security threats and the social situation in Israel", according to remarks reported by Israeli media.
His fate was ultimately sealed by implicating the government in the Hamas attack on October 7 and a probe into the "Qatargate" affair, said Yossi Shain, a professor of political science at Tel Aviv University.
The affair saw senior Netanyahu advisers accused of being paid to promote Qatari interests.
Bar had become the right-wing's "bete noire" and his dismissal was "a promise (Netanyahu) had made to Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich to secure his coalition", said Shain, referring to Israel's far-right Finance Minister.
Ben Gvir was reinstated as national security minister on Wednesday after leaving the government in January in protest against a truce agreed with Hamas.
That decision came three days after Netanyahu announced Bar's imminent dismissal.
dms/cyj/roc/phs/jfx/hmn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Large hostage release demonstrations criticized by Netanyahu
Thousands of Israelis expressed their solidarity on Sunday with the hostages held by Hamas and others militants in the Gaza Strip with strikes and protests across the country that were criticized by Israel's prime minister and others. Demonstrators blocked numerous roads across Israel, including a major highway in the coastal city of Tel Aviv. They waved blue-and-white Israeli national flags as well as yellow flags symbolizing solidarity with the hostages. More than 200,000 demonstrators gathered in Tel Aviv alone on Sunday evening, according to police estimates published by the organizers. Demonstrators loudly called for an end to the Gaza war and the immediate release of the Hamas hostages, journalists at the scene reported. Israeli President Isaac Herzog visited Hostage Square in central Tel Aviv and called on international decision makers to pressure Hamas to release the hostages. "I want to tell the world: Stop the hypocrisy!" Netanyahu, Smotrich criticize protesters The protests were criticized by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. "Those who are calling for an end to the war today without defeating Hamas, are not only hardening Hamas's stance and pushing off the release of our hostages, they are also ensuring that the horrors of the October 7 will recur again and again, and that our sons and daughters will need to fight again and again in an endless war," he told a Cabinet meeting. Smotrich described the protests in a post on X as a "bad and harmful campaign that plays into Hamas's hands." The protesters urged the Israeli government to reverse its decision to capture Gaza City and other areas of the Gaza Strip, as the hostage supporters believe this will endanger the some 20 hostages believed to still be alive. On Sunday, the Israeli military outlined its expansion plans. Hostage families speak out "The Israeli government never made a serious attempt to release the hostages through a comprehensive agreement," said Einav Zangauker, whose son Matan is one of 20 living hostages in the Gaza Strip, in her speech. "It turned the most justified war into a false one." "We will bring the country to a standstill," she said. The aunt of Israeli-German hostage Alon Ohel pleaded for his rescue, describing his dire condition: "He is bound in chains, severely wounded, and likely to lose his sight. He is suffering from severe head injuries and shrapnel throughout his body, and he is alone. He is hungry, hot and gasping for breath. His life is in imminent danger – save him!" During a rally at Hostage Square, the sister of an agricultural student from Nepal abducted to Gaza during the Hamas-led massacre on October 7, 2023, spoke publicly for the first time. Fighting back tears, she said the family has received no sign of life from him for almost two years. Several former Hamas hostages, released during a ceasefire in the spring, held a banner reading: "Bring them home now!" Big trade union sympathetic but not on strike Although the powerful Histadrut trade union federation did not join the strike, it expressed understanding for the action. Numerous businesses and municipalities went on strike as a show of solidarity. The two major theatres in Tel Aviv also halted their performances. More than 30 arrests were reported across Israel on Sunday. In Jerusalem, water cannons were used against protesters. The organization representing the families of the hostages had called for a nationwide strike on Sunday, the start of Israel's working week. Actress Gal Gadot meets with hostage relatives Israeli Hollywood actress Gal Gadot, 40, also visited the square in Tel Aviv to meet with relatives of the hostages. A video shared by the Hostage Families Forum showed Gadot comforting the wife of a hostage, holding her hands with a smile and then embracing her tightly. According to Israeli information, of the 50 abducted individuals, only 20 are still alive. Plans to expand Gaza offensive The Israeli government is preparing to expand its offensive in the Gaza Strip in the coming weeks. According to the Hamas-run Health Ministry, the war has already killed around 62,000 Palestinians. Israel's stated goal with the new offensive is to capture Gaza City and other areas of the coastal territory, in order to crush Hamas' remaining strongholds. Authorities have begun planning the relocation of civilians. The Israeli military body COGAT announced on X that deliveries of tents and other shelter equipment would resume on Sunday as part of preparations for evacuations from combat zones. Indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas over ending the war and releasing the hostages have so far failed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Why in the world is Trump punishing Moldova with tariffs?
President Trump's tariff blasts continue. The White House released its latest list on July 31 and it is clear that no nation is safe — not allies, enemies, neighbors or distant lands. No menacing power escapes the vigilance of the president's team, ever alert to those 'ripping off' the United States of America. Case in point: Moldova. Dominating both sides of the Dniester River — well, one side actually — this Eastern European colossus of 2.3 million people (about the size of Houston) could inflict mortal damage on the American economy. In 2024 alone, the U.S. bought nearly $136 million (with an 'm') worth of goods from the Moldovans, whereas they bought only $51 million from us. With the U.S. economy valued at more than $30 trillion (with a 'T') we could probably only bear such abuse for … well, forever. In a July 9 letter to Moldovan President Maia Sandu, Trump made clear that America will not be bullied by Moldova any longer. He imposed a tariff of 25 percent on every bottle of wine or fruit juice the Moldovans force us to buy. Calling the deficit with Moldova a 'major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security!' the president warned of even higher tariffs if Moldova retaliates or tries to send goods into the U.S. through transshipment. The letter accuses Moldova of taking advantage of us for 'many years.' Tariff rates are one of Trump's favorite weapons, employed under the dubious premise that the U.S. faces a trade deficit 'emergency.' The legality of such action aside — the Supreme Court has yet to rule — the president uses this weapon for a variety of non-economic goals. He has threatened Canada for indicating it might recognize a Palestinian state, and Brazil to try to save former President Jair Bolsonaro from prosecution. Moldova has committed no such offenses — at least none charged — but Trump wants trade with Moldova and a host of other countries to be based on 'reciprocity.' Whatever the precipitating dynamics, punishing Moldova for its involvement in international trade serves no reasonable Western security or broader policy interests. It undermines them. Sandwiched between Ukraine and Romania, Moldova has a long history of not being a country. The people of this region, who were unwillingly traded between Romania and Russia for nearly a century, gained independence from a collapsing Soviet Union in 1991. With a population that is 75 percent Moldovan-Romanian, some within the Russian and Ukrainian minorities feared the country's absorption into neighboring Romania. During a brief internal war in 1992, Moscow positioned a 'peacekeeping force' on the eastern side of Dniester River to guard the self-proclaimed state of Transnistria — which is still there, not recognized even by Russia. This force is small, locally recruited and considered less than formidable. But it is part of a sustained campaign by Moscow to prevent Moldova from embracing the West. This same motive drove Vladimir Putin to unleash a brutal invasion and occupation of much larger Ukraine. If victorious there, he is unlikely to be more accommodating toward Moldova. Moldova is the poorest country in Europe, and its elected leaders and population have been seeking stability. After Russia invaded Ukraine, Moldova applied to join the EU. It was quickly granted candidate status, and negotiations for membership began. In 2024, the country reelected pro-EU President Sandu and in a referendum enshrined the country's 'European course' in its constitution — despite massive Russian interference and disinformation. The EU has not been cowed by Moscow and developed a generous aid and development package. Most Moldovan goods enter the world's largest trading bloc duty-free, a policy that was further extended to agricultural products last month. Under President Biden, the U.S. had been similarly supportive, providing more than $400 million in military and humanitarian aid in part to help reduce the country's dependence on Russian gas. Trump sees no need for aid to Moldova, or indeed for most foreign assistance. Other moves supporting Trump's 'America First' orientation also penalize Moldova. Eliminating the U.S. Agency for International Development meant the loss of virtually all projects in Moldova — including for democracy promotion and economic and energy development. At the same time, cutting resources for election monitoring and an independent press leaves the field open for Russian interference. Such indifference, along with Trump's shifting attitude toward Ukraine and transactional foreign policy, leaves Moldova exposed. A study by the Stimson Center concluded, 'With a White House that seems increasingly eager to align its perspectives with Moscow at the expense of traditional allies, its willingness to support Moldova's democratic transformation in the face of Russian opposition is now uncertain.' Neighboring Romania, a member of both the EU and NATO, has a huge stake in the fate of Moldova. An intimidated or occupied satellite country — a second Belarus — on the Alliance's more than 400-mile border would dramatically change the strategic equation. This should get Washington's attention — at least of those willing to honor the American commitment to NATO. Preserving an independent and economically healthy Moldova thus serves European and American interests. Increasing the cost of doing business with the U.S. and damaging democratic efforts there does not. Supporting Moldova costs the U.S. very little. Excusing a tiny trade deficit to a strategically important democracy does not make Americans suckers. Helping Moldova does not require a military commitment. The country has been cooperating with NATO but is constitutionally neutral. Rather than punishing the country, the U.S. could and should offer support. This could be based on a view of the geopolitical map — or, even better, from an appreciation of a resilient people's desire for democratic choice. Ronald H. Linden is professor emeritus of political science at the University of Pittsburgh, where he directed the Center for European Studies and the Center for Russian and East European Studies. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Newsom lashes out at universities for agreeing to 'sell their soul' to Trump for federal funding
Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., accused major universities such as Columbia and Brown of "selling their souls" to the Trump administration after agreeing to multimillion-dollar settlements. Several universities had federal research grants cut or frozen either for failing to address antisemitism or for promoting so-called "woke" policies, according to the administration. Though some schools have agreed to pay large settlements to restore funding and close additional investigations, Newsom reiterated that the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) will not follow suit. "UCLA is not going to sell their soul like Harvard or Brown or Penn or Columbia," Newsom said on "Pod Save America" Thursday. "Shame on all of them. We're not. And we're going to fight like hell to protect our democracy, our liberties, our freedoms. I love Republicans. I love Democrats. I don't care what your party affiliation is. I honestly don't. I care about this country and our democracy. I care about the rule of law." He called out Harvard over reports suggesting the university was close to reaching a $500 million settlement to regain access to more than $2.6 billion in federal funding. "And let me make this crystal clear to everyone watching and make it crystal clear to the folks at Harvard," Newsom said. "We will never ever sell our soul to Donald Trump. Harvard, I pray you are listening. How could you? Of all institutions, on tens of billions of dollars, what's the point of your damn endowment if you cannot stand on principle?" While speaking in San Francisco earlier this month, Newsom made a similar declaration, insisting that UCLA would not pay a settlement under his watch. "We're not Brown, we're not Columbia, and I'm not going to be governor if we act like that," Newsom said. "Period. Full stop, I will fight like hell to make sure that doesn't happen." The Trump administration is seeking a $1 billion settlement from UCLA, along with the creation of a $172 million claims fund for alleged Title VII violations under the Civil Rights Act. UCLA has already paid $6 million to settle a lawsuit brought by Jewish students and faculty members over the school's handling of anti-Israel protests, including its failure to stop protesters from setting up what Jewish students and faculty described as a "Jew Exclusion Zone" on campus.
