No evidence of fall in Covid rules compliance after Storey funeral, O'Neill says
Former Northern Ireland first minister Arlene Foster made the claim at the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday as it examined Stormont decisions made on test, trace and isolation.
The former DUP leader said there was a fall in compliance after Sinn Fein ministers, including Ms O'Neill, attended the large-scale funeral for the senior republican in west Belfast in June 2020, when there were restrictions on social gatherings.
'I don't think that we were slow to promote compliance because day after day at press conferences we were urging the public to comply,' Mrs Foster told the inquiry on Wednesday.
'There was a breakdown in compliance after the attendance of senior members of Sinn Fein at a high-ranking republican funeral at the end of June, which caused severe difficulties in Northern Ireland with compliance and adherence.'
She said that despite efforts made, including working with the PSNI and giving money to councils to employ Covid marshals, there was 'a difficulty which still hung over the Executive' around non-compliance because of the Storey funeral.
Asked about Mrs Foster's comments, Ms O'Neill told the inquiry: 'I think, unfortunately, I believe Arlene Foster raised that issue again today in the inquiry because the comments are politically motivated.
'I don't believe there is any evidence that suggests that actually is the case.'
Ms O'Neill apologised for having attended the funeral at the Covid inquiry in 2024.
Northern Ireland chief medical officer Michael McBride told the inquiry there was no evidence to support the claim that compliance dropped as a result of the Storey funeral.
'From a purely scientific and public health perspective, I'm not aware of any evidence that that's the case,' he said.
'I think the major driver of the increase in cases throughout that summer, into September, into October, were the relaxations in the non-pharmaceutical measures, which had been agreed by the Executive, that's what led to the increase in transmission.
'There was more mixing with more people coming together in a range of environments, and that led to an increase in the pandemic.'
Earlier on Wednesday, Mrs Foster said it was 'inhumane' that people had to die alone during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The former DUP leader said if she could change one thing from that period, it would be that families should have been allowed to make their own informed decisions on being with their dying loved ones.
Asked about whether black, Asian and minority ethnic groups suffered as a result of pre-existing inequalities, Mrs Foster said this was true 'of a number of different groups'.
'Young people, for example, were denied chances in life that they would have otherwise had,' she said.
'Those living alone were isolated and lonely, people who were dying alone in hospital and if I could change one thing, my lady, it would be that.
'We should have given families all of the information, told them about the risks, and allowed them to make the decisions as to whether they wanted to be with their loved ones as they were dying.
'Because I think it is quite inhumane, when one thinks about it, to allow someone to die alone in the way that so many people did.'
Mrs Foster and Ms O'Neill were also asked about the decision to pause contact tracing on March 12 2020.
It was reintroduced as a pilot on April 27 and introduced fully on May 18.
Mrs Foster said the decision was made after a Cobra meeting on March 12, at which she, Ms O'Neill, and then Health Minister Robin Swann had little opportunity to engage and were 'in receive mode'.
Both Mrs Foster and Ms O'Neill said they did not take it from the Cobra meeting that contact tracing was to stop.
Mrs Foster said: 'I didn't have the understanding after that Cobra meeting, clearly wrongly now, that we were going to stop contact tracing as a consequence of the discussions at that Cobra meeting. The Department of Health clearly did have that understanding and stopped the contact tracing.'
Mr McBride said it was 'clear' to him that a decision was made to stop contact tracing at the Cobra meeting.
Asked by the inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett whether Mrs Foster and Ms O'Neill 'didn't understand that was what the decision was', he said: 'I thought it was clear and it was clearly reflected in the minutes of the Cobra meeting.'
Mr McBride told the inquiry that testing capacity issues were behind the decision to stop community testing and that the ending of contact tracing was a 'second order' as a result.
He said: 'Even a week after March 12, we had less than 200 tests available to us in Northern Ireland on a daily basis, and even that was limited because of the lack of reagents that we had and swabs that we had because of global supply issues.'
Mr McBride said if they had more tests and testing capacity, they would have continued community testing and contact tracing for longer.
Mrs Foster said that test and trace was not initially seen as a 'significant' issue that warranted an Executive decision.
She said in hindsight it 'probably should have come to the Executive' but also added it 'probably would have made it slower'.
'I know that there was a very real concern at that time that the amount of work officials were being asked to do was quite significant, and I'm not suggesting that it didn't come to the Executive for this reason but it would have certainly slowed decision-making down at that time,' she said.
Ms O'Neill said she had raised concerns about ending contact tracing in March, as it went against the advice of the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Notes by Ms O'Neill, who was then the deputy First Minister, were read out from a meeting on March 16 where she wrote 'GB approach nightmare compared to rest of world'.
She told the inquiry it was 'absolutely' a decision by the Department of Health to stop contact tracing in mid-March and that she believed it 'wasn't the right approach'.
Ms O'Neill was asked by Baroness Hallett whether she was not listened to because of deep political divides in Northern Ireland.
'The fact that we live on an island, the fact that we were one single epidemiological unit, that wasn't factored into decision-making.
'That's not a political point, that's just a logical point. I didn't feel like that was being taken on board.
'I think perhaps that, at times, could be seen as I wanted to follow everything in the south. I didn't. I wanted to follow everything that worked, and I didn't mind where it came from, as long as it worked for the people that we represented.'
Also appearing before the inquiry was former health minister Robin Swann, who said he remembers being challenged on the decision to end contact tracing in March 2020, but not being told to change course.
He said the first minister and deputy first minister have the power to call any decision made by a minister to the Executive 'for a different approach to be taken'.
'My reading, my understanding of that conversation and their statements is that none of them thought we had taken that step too early,' Mr Swann said of ending contact tracing in mid-March 2020.
'In regards to the comments 'test, test, test', I think (it) was an easy soundbite because it didn't match actually our capacity in regards to the tests that we had.'
He added: 'There was challenge, there was questioning, there was robust debate around the direction we were taking, but there was no direction from the Executive, first or deputy first minister, actually to change course.
'That approach for saying 'test, test, test', just because you say it doesn't mean to say tests will miraculously appear, reagents will appear, swabs will appear, or the machines that were necessary across the labs would suddenly materialise.'
Asked about Hazel Gray, whose mother and father died of Covid and who had contacted Mr Swann in 2020, he expressed his sympathies with the family.
Mr Swann said: 'If I had had the ability to test everyone regularly when they wanted it, as they required it, I can assure you, my lady, and this inquiry and the members that I would have been doing that from the very beginning.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
6 hours ago
- NBC News
How RFK Jr. is quickly changing U.S. health agencies
WASHINGTON — In just a few short months, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has begun to transform U.S. health policy: shrinking staff at health agencies, restructuring the focus of some regulators and researchers, changing Covid vaccine regulations and reshaping the mission of his department to focus more on alternative medicine. The directives are all part of the same issue set that drove a slice of health-conscious, left-leaning Americans to eventually vote for a Republican president whose favorite meal is from McDonald's, Trump and Kennedy catered to a type of voter who has grown distrustful of America's health care establishment — but possibly fomented a new type of distrust in federal health policy along the way. Bernadine Francis, a lifelong Democrat who backed Joe Biden for president in 2020 before supporting Donald Trump in 2024, told NBC News in an interview that she approves of Kennedy's efforts so far, despite his 'hands being tied' by entrenched forces in the administration and in Congress. 'From what I have seen so far with what RFK has been trying to do,' she said, 'I am really, really proud of what he's doing.' Francis is among the voters who left the Democratic Party and voted for Trump because 'nothing else mattered' apart from public health, which they — like Kennedy — felt was going in the wrong direction. Concerns about chemicals in food and toxins in the environment, long championed by Democrats, has become a galvanizing issue to a key portion of Trump's Republican Party, complete with an oversaturation of information that in some cases hasn't been proven. It's wrapped up, as well, in concerns about the Covid vaccine, which was accelerated under Trump, administered under Biden and weaponized by anti-vaccine activists like Kennedy amid lockdowns and firings in the wake of the devastating pandemic. 'We knew in order to get RFK in there so he can help with the situation that we have in the health industry, we knew we had to do this,' said Francis, a retired Washington, D.C., public school administrator, who said she left her 'beloved' career because she had refused the vaccine. 'It seemed to me, as soon as [Biden] became president, the vaccine was mandated, and that was when I lost all hope in the Democrats,' Francis told NBC News, referring to vaccination mandates put in place by the Biden administration for a large portion of the federal workforce during the height of the pandemic. There are not currently any federal Covid vaccine mandates. There have been 1,228,393 confirmed Covid deaths in the United States since the start of the pandemic, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How RFK Jr.'s picks are changing public health agencies Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy's hand-picked commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and a John Hopkins scientist and researcher, told NBC News in an interview that he wants to transform the agency, which he said faced 'corruption' over influence from the pharmaceutical and food industries. 'I mean, you look at the food pyramid, it was not based on what's best for you, it was based on what companies wanted you to buy,' he said, referring to the 1992 and later iterations of official government nutritional guidance. He said there would be 'entirely new nutrition guidance' released later this year, as soon as this summer. He praised the FDA's mission of research and regulation, saying the agency is 'incredibly well-oiled, and we've got the trains running on time.' He also highlighted the 75-page 'Make America Healthy Again' commission report — which focused on ultraprocessed foods and toxins in the environment — as having set 'the agenda for research' at the FDA, HHS and agencies overseeing social safety net programs such as Medicare and food stamps moving forward. (The MAHA report initially cited some studies that didn't exist, a mistake that Kennedy adviser Calley Means said was a 'great disservice' to their mission.) 'I think there's a lot we're going to learn. For example, the microbiome, which gets attention in the MAHA report, needs to be on the map. We don't even talk about it in our medical circles,' Makary said. 'The microbiome, food is medicine, the immune response that happens when chemicals that don't appear in nature go down our GI tract.' Pressed on other areas of the administration, like the Environmental Protection Agency, making decisions that run counter to the pro-regulatory ideas presented in the MAHA report, Makary said he can 'only comment on the FDA' where they are 'committed to Secretary Kennedy's vision.' But Kennedy's public health agenda goes beyond looking at the food supply and chemicals. Recently, Kennedy said in a video posted on X last month that the Covid vaccine is no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, a change in CDC guidance that skipped the normal public review period. Days later, after critics questioned the decision and raised concerns over a lack of public data behind the move, the administration updated its guidance again, urging parents to consult with their doctors instead. Pressed about the confusion and whether Americans are now trading one side of public distrust in the health system for another, Makary defended Kennedy, who has been criticized for spreading misinformation. 'My experience with Secretary Robert F. Kennedy is that he listens. He listens to myself, he listens to Jay Bhattacharya, listens to Dr. Mehmet Oz, he listens to a host of scientists that are giving him guidance,' Makary argued, referring to the director of the National Institutes of Health and the administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, respectively. 'So he may have big questions, but the questions he's asking are the questions most Americans are asking.' The intersection of medicine and healthy lifestyle choices Dr. Dawn Mussallem, a breast cancer oncologist and integrative medicine doctor — a physician who combines conventional treatments with research-based alternative therapies — has tried to help her patients wade through medical misinformation they encounter online and in their social circles. Mussallem has an incredible story of personal survival: While in medical school, she was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer and, after conventional therapies like chemo saved her life, was diagnosed with heart failure. After undergoing a heart transplant, Mussallem ran a 26-mile marathon just one year later. 'I learned a lot in medical school, but nothing compared to what I learned being a patient,' said Mussallem, who dedicates, on average, 90 minutes each in one-on-one sessions with her patients. 'This is not about any one political choice. But we know lifestyle matters.' For example, a new study from the American Society of Clinical Oncology that finds eating food that lowers inflammation in the body may help people with advanced colon cancer survive longer. Mussallem's mission, along with her colleagues, is to elevate the modern medicine that saved her life, as well as encouraging her patients to live healthy lifestyles, including regular exercise, minimally processed foods, less screen time, more social connection and better sleep. But politics do get in the way for millions of Americans who are inundated daily with social media influencers and 'nonmedical experts,' as Mussallem puts it, who stoke fear in her patients. 'Patients come in with all these questions, fears,' she said. 'I've heard this many times from patients, that their nervous system is affected by what they're seeing happening in government.' Mussallem acknowledges that 'a lot of individuals out there' have questioned traditional medicine. For her, it isn't one or the other — it's both. 'We have to trust the conventional medicine,' she said. 'With the conventional care that marches right alongside more of an integrative modality to look at the root causes of disease, as well as to help to optimize with lifestyle, is where we need to be.'
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
FBI director Kash Patel reveals bombshell breakthrough that'll have Anthony Fauci trembling: 'We're on to him'
The Trump administration has allegedly 'found' the cell phone Dr Anthony Fauci used during the Covid pandemic, the president's intelligence head revealed. FBI director Kash Patel revealed on the latest episode of the Joe Rogan Experience that he and leaders like Senator Rand Paul have been on the hunt for any devices Fauci used while advising Americans during the pandemic. Patel said while Paul and health secretary Robert F Kennedy 'are doing a great job' finding the origins of Covid, the team had struggled for years to find Fauci's phone and other devices. But this week, the team 'had a great breakthrough.' Patel told Rogan the FBI had just found a phone Fauci used at the time, mere days before the podcast was filmed. It's unclear exactly when the phone was used and how they verified it belonged to Fauci. Patel did not specify how they seized it or what the team's 'multiple investigations' thus far on the origins of Covid have found. He also cautioned Americans 'shouldn't jump to the conclusion that everything's in there' and that incriminating data could have been deleted. However, he called the bombshell 'a victory for the American people' and said his team is immediately working to comb through any data on the device. Patel said: 'We found it, and at least we can tell the American people we've been looking because it is of public importance to figure out, did that guy lie? Did he intentionally mislead the world and cause countless deaths? 'We owe those answers to the American people, and the best evidence ever is always the people's evidence who created it. So now we're going to go and exploit those hard drives.' 'We did find it, we're not done, we're still looking and we're on the case.' Patel did not specify how his team got the old phone or how they verified it was Fauci's. Generally, a warrant is required to seize a cell phone, even for a government official. There are no publicly available warrants out against Fauci currently. Mounting evidence has suggested Covid may have originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, with some reports estimated '80 to 95 percent certainty.' The Chinese government has always denied the lab-leak theory and maintained Covid was the product of an animal spillover. American agencies like the FBI and CIA believe a lab leak is the most likely possibility. Patel did not say on the podcast what he thinks. Dr Richard Ebright, a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University, previously told 'The main points are clear: All informed persons - without exception - knew by early 2020 that SARS-CoV-2 likely entered humans through a research-related incident in Wuhan. 'But most chose to lie or to stay silent.' Fauci has denied all accusations of Covid being 'covered up' or originating from a lab. Patel said: 'My mission has always been to put out the truth, whatever the consequences, whoever it's against.
Wales Online
7 hours ago
- Wales Online
Cardiff Council leader confirms he will seek to run in the 2026 Senedd elections
Cardiff Council leader confirms he will seek to run in the 2026 Senedd elections The leader of Cardiff Council, Cllr Huw Thomas, has previously refused to say whether or not he will run in the 2026 Senedd elections Huw Thomas has confirmed his plans (Image: Cardiff Council ) The leader of Cardiff Council has confirmed that he will be putting his name forward for consideration as a Labour candidate in the next Senedd election. Cllr Huw Thomas refused to say whether or not he would stand in the 2026 Senedd election when asked in September 2024. All four Labour constituency members of the Senedd in Cardiff have ruled themselves out of the running. The Local Democracy Reporting Service asked Cllr Thomas what his plans were for next year's elections Cllr Thomas, who was attending a topping out ceremony for a new block of council flats in Grangetown, said: "I will be putting my name forward for consideration, yes." For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . Cllr Thomas became the youngest leader of Cardiff Council in May 2017 at the age of 31. Originally from Aberystwyth, the ward councillor for Splott was first elected to the local authority in 2012. The current constituency member of the Senedd for Cardiff West, Mark Drakeford, is best known for leading Wales as the First Minister during the Covid-19 pandemic. Article continues below Mr Drakeford, who currently serves as the Welsh Government's cabinet secretary for finance and Welsh language, has said he will not be running for re-election. Vaughan Gething's time as First Minister was short lived. The current constituency member of the Senedd for Cardiff South and Penarth quit four months into the job following pressure over donations he received in the Welsh Labour leadership contest. Mr Gething then announced in September 2024 that he will not seek re-election in 2026. The other two constituency members of the Senedd in Cardiff, Jenny Rathbone for Cardiff Central and Julie Morgan for Cardiff North have also announced that they won't seek re-election. Ms Rathbone, who has served as an MS since 2011, sits on the climate change, environment and rural affairs committee and the public accounts committee. Ms Morgan has also been an MS since 2011. Over the years, she has been on a number of committees and served as the deputy health minister at one point. Before her time in Cardiff Bay, she also served as a politician in Westminster for 13 years after being elected as the MP for Cardiff North in 1997. The Senedd will undergo a number of major changes next year. Article continues below When people go to the polls in May 2026, they will be using a new voting system and there will be 16 new constituencies. On top of this, the Senedd will be expanded to 96 members instead of the 60 that currently sit and anyone standing for election must live in Wales.
