logo
The controversy over Disney's new Christian character, briefly explained

The controversy over Disney's new Christian character, briefly explained

Vox04-03-2025

Disney has added an explicitly Christian character to Pixar's new series Win or Lose . That might not be head-turning in isolation, but it comes just months after nixing a transgender character's storyline from the same show, and amid a cultural wave of pushbacks to diversification, both for Disney and the country at large. Now fans online are speculating about exactly what this latest move might mean. Is Disney entering a new conservative era, or is this just all business as usual? Let's take a look.
Pixar's series, which debuted on Disney+ at the end of February, follows a team of preteen softball players, with each episode focusing on a different character. Reports about what actually happened to Win or Lose 's trans character seem to be in conflict. In December, the Hollywood Reporter reported that Disney characterized the changes as simply removing 'a few lines of dialogue that referenced gender identity' from one character's storyline. But as Deadline reported, Pixar had explicitly sought a trans voice actress to play the role, and she later described herself as 'very disheartened' by the change.
Some media reports have been oversimplistically juxtaposing the two decisions, either lamenting or celebrating the Christian character as a repudiation of the trans one, when of course, there can be overlap between religion and gender identity, and the Christianity portrayed in the show doesn't take a position on the issue.
Yet in a larger context, there are some grounds for questioning the company's motives. Disney has spent decades battling pushback from conservatives over its LGBTQ inclusivity, most recently over its hostile response to Florida's 'Don't Say Gay' law. The feud resulted in backlash on all sides, both for Florida and for then-Disney CEO Bob Chapek, who was subsequently given the boot in favor of his predecessor, Bob Igor.
Igor's second tenure over the company has been markedly less progressive. In November 2024, the Disney channel pulled an episode of the Marvelverse show Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur that featured a trans character. And this week, Disney+ canceled Tiana , a series sequel to animated film The Princess and the Frog, even though it had been underway since 2020. The film featured Disney's first Black princess (Anika Noni Rose, who was reprising her role) — but the Mouse said this decision was about moving away from long-form streaming content rather than pulling back from shows with diverse casts. (For other recent diverse examples across the Disney empire, see Moana 2 and Agatha All Along .)
That hasn't stopped audiences across the political spectrum from making connections to what they see as a bigger change afoot. One frustrated fan described the cancellation of Tiana as 'pure antiblackness.' 'Openly gay out. Openly Christian in,' was how another Twitter user framed Win or Lose ; yet another cheered the removal of the trans character and the portrayal of the Christian character as 'what winning looks like!'
In its current incarnation, however, Win or Lose isn't easily a 'win' for regressive politics. The show is not exactly pushing any barriers, but it's far from proselytizing. The first episode shows a kid, Laurie, praying out loud to 'Heavenly Father' as she waits for her turn to bat — but then she goes home and greets her tarot-reading, crystal-wearing mom. Meanwhile, there has been conservative upset online about another character: a Black mother who twerks.
What these character decisions add up to for the company's future is unclear. Ultimately, this doesn't seem like a situation where anyone has to win or lose. See More: Culture
Internet Culture
Life
Religion
TV

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter
Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter

Atlantic

time40 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter

There's a coincidental yet meaningful connection between two of this summer's buzziest movies. The new Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon are both remakes; beyond that, they're both live-action adaptations of animated films—each of which happened to have been co-directed by Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders. Lilo & Stitch has made a fortune at the box office since its late-May debut; How to Train Your Dragon, which opens today, seems similarly poised for success. The two features are, if a little lacking in visual stimulation compared with their forebears, reliably entertaining. But taken together, they signal something rather alarming in Hollywood's ongoing crisis of imagination: The timeline for nostalgia is growing shorter. Since Tim Burton's big-budget take on Alice in Wonderland grossed more than $1 billion in 2010, the live-action remake has become an inevitable, pervasive cinematic trend. Fifteen years later, it seems that capturing similar financial success requires a studio to look at progressively more recent source material to work with. Disney's attempt to update the nearly 90-year-old Snow White failed at the box office earlier this year; the company shuffled efforts such as a new Pinocchio and Peter Pan off to streaming, despite the recognizable directors and casts involved. The muted response to these modern takes on decades-old classics perhaps explains the move toward reviving properties that resonate with much younger generations instead. The original Lilo & Stitch is 23 years old; How to Train Your Dragon, produced by DreamWorks Animation, is only 15. Next year, a remake of Moana will hit theaters less than a decade after the original film's release. Is that even enough time to start feeling wistful about it? Clearly, the answer is yes, given how audiences have flocked to similar adaptations. The sentimental fervor around franchises such as How to Train Your Dragon is particularly unsettling to me, because the first entry premiered when I was fully an adult; the DreamWorks canon (which also includes such films as Shrek and Kung Fu Panda) was established when I was past the ideal age to become invested. However, I've seen How to Train Your Dragon many times because my daughter is a fan; that intense familiarity helped me out as I watched the live-action version, looking for anything that might feel different about it—which would thus justify its creation. Not so much. DeBlois, who also directed the two How to Train Your Dragon sequels, makes his live-action debut by adapting his own feature; as such, the end result is wildly similar to the earlier work. The new film is again set in a Viking village that is constantly besieged by different kinds of dragons. The plucky teen son of the chief, a boy named Hiccup (played by Mason Thames), befriends a sleek black dragon named Toothless and learns that fighting the beasts isn't the only answer. The actor who voiced Hiccup's father in the animated film, Gerard Butler, returns to perform the role on-screen; in all other cases, the film uses well-suited performers to replace the voice cast. To my own surprise, I liked the new version of How to Train Your Dragon about as much as I do its ancestor. Both, to me, are above-average bits of children's entertainment that struggle with the same problems: They start to sag near the end and suffer a little from their murky color palette. I got a little choked up at the exact same point that I do while watching the 2010 Dragon, when Hiccup and Toothless take to the sky together; the boy rides on a saddle he's made for his fire-breathing pal, and the composer John Powell's excellent score soars into inspirational mode, all strings and bagpipes. If there's a difference between these redone scenes and their inspirations, it's a remarkably minor one; only good theater decorum stopped me from pulling out my phone and running the two Dragon s side by side. Hollywood is struggling to get people to buy movie tickets, so I understand the impulse to offer something that a broad swath of viewers already knows and likes. But there's simply no sense of risk in making something like How to Train Your Dragon —nothing that will convince said theatergoers that the medium has a future beyond recycling. Yes, visual-effects technology is up to the task of re-creating a cartoon on a larger scale and dotted with real actors, and yes, these redos tend to turn a profit for their makers. These shouldn't be the only reasons for art to exist. Lilo & Stitch, at least, diverges somewhat from its source material. Because most of the characters are human beings, its world seems easier to translate to one composed of flesh and blood. The film, like How to Train Your Dragon, is about a shiftless youngster (Lilo, a Hawaiian girl who has been acting out since the death of her parents) bonding with a fantasy creature (Stitch, a blue alien experiment designed as a weapon of destruction). The director Dean Fleischer Camp's tweaks for his rendition didn't particularly click for me, however. One amusing character (another alien who is searching for Stitch) is absent entirely, and the revised ending has prompted some pushback, though Fleischer Camp has tried to defend it. In theory, I should be pro-change, given that I found the carbon-copy nature of How to Train Your Dragon so irksome—except that Lilo & Stitch doesn't really commit to its big alterations. The animated versions of Lilo and her older sister, Nani, forge a closer connection after meeting Stitch and his extraterrestrial hunters; the live-action Lilo enters the care of family friends at the end of the film, so that Nani can go off to study in California. These adjustments to the girls' relationship are a bit bold, because the prior film is so emotionally focused on their frayed sisterhood, yet the remake quickly undercuts their separation with the revelation that Nani can just visit Lilo anytime she wants, thanks to some space technology that Nani has borrowed. Such a cop-out is the underlying, depressing reality with all of these remakes: No change can be too daring, no update too significant. It's heartening that Sanders, a co-director of the original Dragon and Stitch, is one of the few people working in animation who's still committed to innovation. Last year, he directed The Wild Robot; much like How to Train Your Dragon, it is an adaptation of a children's book upon which Sanders found an exciting visual spin. The movie was a critical success, a box-office hit, and an Academy Award nominee. Cinema needs more entries like The Wild Robot —novel works that take chances and trust the audience to follow along. If nothing else, they provide fodder for more live-action remakes in the near future. Hollywood can't have these nostalgic adaptations without something to redo in the first place.

Pixar Announces New Original Film 'Gatto'
Pixar Announces New Original Film 'Gatto'

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Pixar Announces New Original Film 'Gatto'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors While Pixar is now more well-known for franchises like "Toy Story," "Cars," and most recently "Inside Out," they have often found success with new projects. More Entertainment: Pixar Reveals New 'Toy Story 5' Villain Individual films like "WALL-E," "UP," "Ratatouille," "A Bug's Life," and "Elemental" remain beloved by Disney fans of all ages. And it's looking like "Elio" may continue that success. 🚨 Tickets are on sale NOW for Disney and Pixar's #Elio! 🚨 See it in theaters & 3D June 20 🎟️: — Pixar (@Pixar) May 27, 2025 Now, DisneyPixar CCO Pete Docter has revealed a new original film from the same team that created the underrated "Luca." LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 17: (L-R) CCO of Pixar Pete Docter, Enrico Casarosa, Andrea Warren, and General Manager/President of Pixar Jim Morris arrive at the world premiere for LUCA, held at the El Capitan... LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 17: (L-R) CCO of Pixar Pete Docter, Enrico Casarosa, Andrea Warren, and General Manager/President of Pixar Jim Morris arrive at the world premiere for LUCA, held at the El Capitan Theatre in Hollywood, California on June 17, 2021. More Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images for Disney Prior to the Annecy Animation Festival presentation of "Elio," Docter gave exclusive looks at multiple upcoming projects, including the previously announced "Toy Story 5" and "Hoppers." However, a ton of attention has been given to a new original film that is set to release in theaters in 2027: "Gatto." JUST ANNOUNCED: Coming to theaters in 2027 is Disney and Pixar's "Gatto.' 🐈‍⬛ From 'Luca' director Enrico Casarosa, the film returns to Italy, following a black cat named Nero. Indebted to a feline mob boss, Nero finds himself forced to forge an unexpected friendship that may… — Pixar (@Pixar) June 13, 2025 "Coming to theaters in 2027 is Disney and Pixar's 'Gatto,'" Pixar announced on social media. "From 'Luca' director Enrico Casarosa, the film returns to Italy, following a black cat named Nero. "Indebted to a feline mob boss, Nero finds himself forced to forge an unexpected friendship that may finally lead him to his purpose..." Specifically, Nero's friend is a street artist who seemingly adopts him against his will, per Kevin Giraud of Variety. The film is taking on a unique hand-painted look that will separate itself from other Pixar movies and will utilize Casarosa's keen ability to bring a beautiful Italian city to life. More Entertainment: Best Films to Stream in Summer 2025 on Netflix, Paramount+, Prime Video Casarosa made his directorial debut with "Luca," a heartwarming and gorgeous film that had the unfortunate timing to release during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of this, "Luca" became the first Pixar film to be released directly to Disney+. It became the most-viewed streaming film of 2021, garnering over 10.6 billion minutes watched. It would later have a short run in theaters and garner multiple accolades, including a nomination for Best Animated Feature at the Academy Awards, eventually losing to fellow Disney film "Encanto." Needless to say, fans of "Luca" are ecstatic to see Casarosa bring the same kind of heart, fun, and artistry to another feature film. More Entertainment: 'Star Trek: Strange New Worlds' Canceled Best Netflix Original Films to Watch June 2025 'How To Train Your Dragon' Director Defends Live-Action Remake Changes 'A Minecraft Movie' Hits HBO Max for Free Streaming in June: What to Know For more Disney and entertainment news, head on over to Newsweek Entertainment.

I've Run 54 runDisney Races—Here's What You Need to Know Before Signing Up
I've Run 54 runDisney Races—Here's What You Need to Know Before Signing Up

Condé Nast Traveler

time2 hours ago

  • Condé Nast Traveler

I've Run 54 runDisney Races—Here's What You Need to Know Before Signing Up

Did you know you can run through Walt Disney World and Disneyland? No, I'm not talking about racing to your favorite attractions at rope drop, though that can be a grueling race too. Both of the parks regularly host Disney races where you, along with thousands of other runners and Disney fans, can participate in distance runs through the most iconic theme parks in the world, complete with entertainment and characters along the course. Writer Megan duBois has run more than 50 runDisney races. Megan duBois I've completed 54 races with runDisney, from 5Ks to 'challenges,' in which I completed multiple race distances in one weekend. There's nothing like crossing the finish line, seeing Mickey and Minnie Mouse cheering you on, and knowing your body can do hard things. If you're thinking about shaking up your next trip to Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida, or Disneyland in Anaheim, California, by participating in one of the extremely popular races, there are some things you need to know. Keep reading to learn more about runDisney, including what types of races you can participate in, how to register, and what exactly race entry covers. Where are runDisney races held? There are four themed runDisney race weekends at Disney World. The season begins in October with the Disney Wine & Dine Half Marathon Weekend, followed by the Walt Disney World Marathon Weekend in January, the Disney Princess Half Marathon Weekend in February, and concludes with the runDisney Springtime Surprise Weekend in April. My favorite race at Disney World is the runDisney Springtime Surprise Weekend, where the themes change every year. One year, I participated in throwback races, complete with a duo 5K and scavenger hunt through Disney's Animal Kingdom and a 10-miler themed to the Tower of Terror attraction, and another, I raced in a Guardians of the Galaxy—themed 5K. At the Disneyland Resort, there are currently two race weekends: the Disneyland Halloween Half Marathon Weekend in September and the Disneyland Half Marathon Weekend in January. Sadly, after the 2026 Disneyland Half Marathon Weekend, runDisney races at the Disneyland Resort will be paused due to construction projects for upcoming expansions. RunDisney also hosts virtual races, which runners can complete at home, with medals shipped to your doorstep. These include the runDisney Virtual Love on the Run 14-miler in spring and the runDisney Virtual Series in summer. The medals are an enticing enough reason to sign up for a Disney race. Aiden Craver What distances are available for each in-person race weekend? At Walt Disney World, the Disney Wine & Dine and Disney Princess Half Marathon Weekends offer you the chance to participate in a 5K, 10K, and half marathon. The Walt Disney World Marathon Weekend adds a full marathon to the mix. The runDisney Springtime Surprise Weekend offers a 5K, 10K, and 10-miler.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store