US Olympic and Paralympic officials ban transgender athletes from women's sports
"The USOPC will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities, e.g., IOC, IPC, NGBs, to ensure that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201 and the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act," the USOPC said in an update to its Athlete Safety Policy.
The USOPC did not respond to a request for comment on the change.
USOPC President Gene Sykes and CEO Sarah Hirshland referenced Trump's executive order in a memo to the Team USA community sent out this week, ABC News reported, which said, "As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations."
Trump signed the "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" order in February in a bid to exclude transgender girls and women from female sports, a directive that supporters said will restore fairness but critics argue it infringes on the rights of a tiny minority of athletes.
The order directs the Department of Justice to make sure all government agencies enforce a ban on transgender girls and women from participating in female school sports under Trump's interpretation of Title IX, a law against sex discrimination in education.
Trump's order goes beyond high school and college sports, calling for the US government to deny visas for transgender females seeking to compete in the United States.
Trump also said he would not allow transgender athletes to compete in the Los Angeles Olympics in 2028.
The executive order instructed the State Department to pressure the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to change its policy, which allows trans athletes to compete under general guidance preventing any athlete from gaining an unfair advantage.
The order is expected to affect only a small number of athletes.
The president of the National Collegiate Athletics Association told a Senate panel in December he was aware of fewer than 10 transgender athletes among the 530,000 competing at 1,100 member schools.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
42 minutes ago
- LeMonde
European automakers stuck in an impasse
The automotive industry has always been cyclical. Boom periods have routinely been followed by spectacular drops in sales and profits, which are driven by economic conditions or phases when car models are renewed. The turmoil the sector is experiencing today, however, has little in common with its past upheavals. The current crisis is a structural one, and it is uncertain how French brands will manage to pull themselves out of this rut. While, up until recently, Renault and Stellantis (Peugeot, Citroën, Fiat, Chrysler, Opel, etc.) boasted about their profitability, which was unprecedented for the industry, both manufacturers posted heavy half-year losses of several billion euros in the first quarter. The setbacks have since mounted. Dealerships have their inventories pile up, and these cars must be cleared out at steep discounts, which undermines profits. Renault also faces the depreciation of its stake in the Japanese company Nissan, which is also going through a difficult period. The European car industry is also paying the price for not having prepared for the transition to electric vehicles and for the rapid rise of its Chinese competitors. This painful shift had been further exacerbated by the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump. With the specter of decline looming, car manufacturers have desperately scrambled to contain the crisis, which threatens millions of jobs. According to them, the main culprit was the European Union's decision to ban the sale of combustion-engine cars from 2035. This measure has been criticized as a purely political choice, disconnected from the market's realities, and the 2035 deadline has been targeted by intense lobbying efforts aimed at pushing it back. Automakers have already succeeded in postponing penalties for exceeding CO 2 emissions limits, as they were initially scheduled for 2025 before being pushed back to 2027. Everyone has understood that this is just a step, as the real goal is to challenge the entire regulatory timetable. Bargaining for a reprieve, and thereby focusing on the short term, has proven to be a strategic misstep. European carmakers had 15 years to prepare for the transition. That is the time it took for China's automotive industry to become the undisputed world leader in electric vehicles and achieve a decisive technological lead over Western companies. Those Western companies instead chose to keep one foot in the old world by continuing to sell large SUVs, which generate higher profit margins but are now too expensive for most consumers. The Chinese strategy was to go for mass production with affordable models, allowing them to achieve unbeatable production costs and a highly effective pace of innovation. European car manufacturers now argue that the European market is not meeting expectations. Yet, in about 10 countries where a favorable ecosystem has been created for electric vehicles, with tailored tax policies, available infrastructure and affordable charging costs, the percentage of electric vehicles in total sales is ahead of schedule. Rather than making the transition out to be a scapegoat for the sector's problems, car manufacturers should redirect their lobbying efforts to demanding public policies to support the transition. Pushing back regulatory deadlines would only widen the lag behind their Chinese competitors, who will not stop innovating simply because Europeans have decided to extend the life of outdated combustion technology at any cost. This backward-looking perspective only worsens the impasse in which the sector now finds itself.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
The EU holds its breath as 1 August US tariff deadline looms
A few days after the political agreement struck between the EU and the US, the European Commission is still awaiting executive orders from Washington setting in concrete the deal agreed by handshake by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and President Donald Trump — which would spare Europeans from higher tariffs. 'It is the clear understanding of the EU that the US will implement the agreed across-the-board tariff ceiling of 15%. It is also our clear understanding that the US will implement the exemptions to the 15% ceiling as outlined by President von der Leyen last Sunday,' Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said on Thursday. 'The US has made these commitments. Now it's up to the US to implement them. The ball is in their court,' he added. The Commission expects the White House to issue executive orders before 1 August replacing the current tariffs — 25% on EU cars and 10% on all EU imports — with the 15% rate agreed on 27 July. This would provide relief to a strategic sector like the automotive industry and avoid the 20% so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs Trump had threatened to apply at the beginning of April. However, the US tariffs of 50% on steel and aluminium are expected to remain in place, as this strategic sector is still under negotiation, with the EU hoping to obtain a quota system with lower tariffs. 'I don't expect this new quota system to be in place by tomorrow,' Gill said, 'we're working on it and our intention is to have something ready and workable as soon as possible.' Joint statement Among the exemptions, the EU has secured 0% rate for aircraft. Von der Leyen on Sunday also announced that zero-for-zero tariffs will apply to certain chemicals, generic drugs, semiconductor-making equipment, some agricultural products, some natural resources and critical raw materials. It remains to be seen whether all the products will be covered by the executive orders. The Commission said however on Thursday that wine and spirits will not be among the exemptions, negotiation on this strategic sector being still ongoing. A joint statement is also being negotiated. However, differing interpretations of the deal struck on Sunday between the EU and the US could delay its publication. Views diverge sharply across the Atlantic on what the US calls 'non-tariff barriers' to its exports, namely EU digital regulation and phytosanitary rules. While the US is pushing for these to be eased, the EU continues to firmly assert its sovereignty over its legislative powers. The wording of the EU's commitments to purchase US energy, weapons as well as its investment commitments is also expected to be the subject of tough negotiations.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Not even the EU knows if wine and spirits will be hit by US tariffs
The EU executive has touted the new asymmetric tariff agreement with the Donald Trump administration, announced on Sunday, as a step toward predictability. Yet, less than a day before the US is expected to implement a new tariff ceiling of 15% on EU industrial goods, crucial details for several sectors, including wine and spirits, remain unresolved. Industry stakeholders are still holding out hope for exemptions, but no official list has been released. A Commission spokesperson admitted on Thursday that wine and spirits are likely to be subject to the tariffs. 'It is not our expectation that wine and spirits will be included in the first group of exemptions announced by the US tomorrow,' the spokesperson said. 'We're still negotiating,' they added, noting that both sides are working to finalise a joint statement based on the agreement reached between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump. Securing an exemption for the wine and spirits industry remains a top priority for the EU negotiating team in Brussels. This industry is seen as strategic—especially for France, which, along with Italy, Spain, and Ireland, is actively lobbying for these products to be spared. 'We are continuing to negotiate with the Americans so that, if possible, spirits, perhaps wine, and other sectors can be exempted. It's a work in progress,' said French Economy Minister Éric Lombard in a radio interview on Wednesday. The US and China are the top export markets for European wine and spirits. In France alone, the industry supports nearly 550,000 jobs across its value chain. Chinese tariffs are already impacting the sector, and new US duties would be a further blow. Both EU and US trade officials, along with major industry associations such as the Distilled Spirits Council and the Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins, have advocated for a 'zero-for-zero' tariff arrangement on wine and spirits. However, the EU's negotiating position has weakened, and Brussels no longer has effective leverage over these products. The past ability to threaten retaliatory tariffs on iconic American exports like bourbon or Californian wine often kept EU wine and spirits off the US target list. That option disappeared with the latest agreement reached in Scotland, leaving the EU less inclined to jeopardise the broader deal over a single sector. Adding to the uncertainty, the Commission spokesperson declined to confirm whether tariffs would be imposed as early as Friday, saying only that they had a 'clear understanding' the US intends to proceed via executive order, possibly overnight.
