
B.C. reports offer ‘road map' for repatriation of Indigenous historical items
The studies, developed in partnership between the First Peoples' Cultural Council and K'yuu Enterprise Corporation, call for changes including the creation of a centralized body to facilitate the work, a repatriation accreditation program for museums and other institutions, and 'substantial' funding and support from the provincial and federal government.
Gretchen Fox, an anthropologist and the council's acting heritage manager, said the growing interest in the moral and ethical requirement for repatriation shows resources are needed to set out steps that could be used in B.C. and in other provinces and territories.
'There was a need for a way forward, or a road map — what's involved in repatriation, what's the history of it,' she said.
Story continues below advertisement
'To have a really good understanding and documentation of what's been lost, where these ancestors and belongings are held today, and what kind of work specifically is involved in locating them.'
Researchers with the K'yuu Enterprise Corporation did a survey and found more than 2,500 B.C. First Nation human remains and upwards of 100,000 belongings are known to be held in 229 institutions — including museums and universities — around the world.
Fox said the survey had only a 50 per cent response rate.
'So, we know that the numbers are much higher, and those numbers are just for ancestors and belongings that are associated with B.C. First Nations,' she said.
2:11
Heiltsuk Nation celebrates 'powerful, emotional' return of historic chief's seat
The main report breaks down repatriation into a four-step process starting with planning and research, followed by repatriation itself and the long-term caretaking of the items or remains.
Story continues below advertisement
It says 60 per cent of B.C. First Nations surveyed have already spent more than $1 million on repatriation work to date.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'Since the Canadian government has yet to commit to dedicated repatriation legislation, policy and funding, many (B.C. First Nations) are reliant on grants and other mechanisms to support their repatriation work,' it says.
The report says when applying for grant programs that aren't dedicated to repatriation, nations are forced to focus on strict funding criteria and narrow timelines rather than their own needs.
In 2016, B.C. became the first province in Canada to offer a grant to help pay for repatriation. While the report calls that funding 'welcome,' it says the money has not kept pace with requests.
It says repatriation in Canada is 'severely underfunded.'
'For decades, B.C. First Nations have funded this work through piecemeal grants and heavy reliance on volunteer labour,' it says.
Fox said there are a range of costs, from paying personnel to the technology required to research where items are located or the cost to store them properly.
2:20
Totem's arrival on Nisga'a land reveals the full scope of the work ahead
A companion report offers what Fox calls a 'really high level' cost estimate.
Story continues below advertisement
It suggests that if all 204 B.C. First Nations were funded over five years to participate in repatriation at various stages it would cost an estimated $663 million.
Fox said the number is not a request for funding, but rather an attempt to test the model and 'show the monumental, significant, costs of this.'
The report says repatriation is also an economic and social driver with benefits like health and healing, jobs and community development.
'It has spiritual and cultural impacts of reconnecting with belongings and carrying out responsibilities to ancestors and It's so meaningful, even if it's engaged at a slower pace, or on a smaller scale,' Fox said.
She said having a First Nation-led centralized organizing body and programming to facilitate repatriation would be helpful to provide the opportunity to pool experience and resources.
'First Nations in B.C. are really leading the way in repatriation, and quite a few have quite a bit of expertise and experience around doing the work and also insights into the kinds of supports, whether it's legislation (or) policy,' she said.
Inviting museums and other holding institutions would also be beneficial, Fox said.
2:17
Sacred totem pole to return home to Bella Coola
In 2023, a totem pole that had been on display at the Royal B.C. Museum, was brought back to Bella Coola, located almost 1,000 kilometres northwest of Vancouver.
Story continues below advertisement
It was taken in 1913 and became part of the museum's collection.
Representatives of the Nuxalk Nation said at the time that they had been trying to get the totem and other artifacts back since 2019.
Also in 2023, a memorial totem pole belonging to members of the Nisga'a Nation was returned from the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh, where it has been for nearly a century.
Last year, the Heiltsuk Nation celebrated the return of a chief's seat that had been in the Royal BC Museum since 1911.
Fox said an accreditation program for institutions that hold First Nations' remains and belongings could teach about repatriation and the practices and protocols needed.
'There's not a lot of formal training for folks who are doing the work, so it makes sense for those who are experts to have an arena, to share that,' she said.
She said there is still work to be done, but over the last few decades more institutions are recognizing the 'moral and ethical imperative to make things right. That these belongings and ancestors were stolen or taken under duress from First Nations communities, and that the right thing to do is to facilitate their return.'
'At the same time, First Nations repatriation experts are training the next generations within their communities, and they're building relationships with institutions. And so we are seeing some significant movement and recognition that this is the right thing to do,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Observer
23 minutes ago
- National Observer
Canada Day festivities draw thousands, as Carney says values are under pressure
Canadians took to parks and civic squares across the country Tuesday to show unity on Canada Day amid American threats, economic uncertainty and Western alienation. "We've decided not to pull apart and fight, but to come together and to build. Because that's the Canadian way," Prime Minister Mark Carney said to thousands of Canadians gathered in Ottawa. This year's festivities at Ottawa's LeBreton Flats Park got the royal treatment, with Prince Edward praising Canada's unity and accomplishments. "Seeing this sea of red and white, there is only one sense that I have here," the Duke of Edinburgh said. "Today is truly a celebration of you, and your home and your land, strong and free." Leaders gave speeches interlaced with musical performances, Indigenous cultural demonstrations and multiple flypasts of Snowbirds military jets. The federal Heritage Department counted 8,000 people attending the afternoon ceremony. Gov. Gen. Mary Simon told the crowd that the country is on a journey of reconciliation that began by listening to each other, by honouring the past and "holding space for the pain and resilience" of Indigenous Peoples. "Kindness is the thread that weaves our communities together," she said. Canada Day celebrations draw thousands, as Carney says values are under pressure. #CanadaDay In Carney's first national holiday since taking office in March, the prime minister touched on moments in Canada's history of coming together, from the Battle of Vimy Ridge to the role of Gander, N.L., in supporting people whose flights were grounded after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. "Our economy is being attacked by a trade war we didn't start," he said, alluding to US President Donald Trump's series of tariffs on Canada. "Our values are being tested by attacks on democracy and freedoms — attacks that we must resist. And once again, as the world is becoming more divided and dangerous, Canadians are uniting." Carney used his speech to tout legislation his government passed to speed up the permitting of major projects, despite Bill C-5 attracting controversy from environmentalists, Indigenous groups and democracy advocates. He called on Canadians to show the same industrious spirit that got the St. Lawrence Seaway built and 1967 Expo in Montreal, and to "build, baby, build" in the face of US economic threats. Canada Day this year coincides with the 60th anniversary of the Canadian flag and the 45th anniversary of the official adoption of "O Canada" as the national anthem. The ceremony also marked the 45th anniversary of Terry Fox's Marathon of Hope. Federal Canadian Identity Minister Steven Guilbeault noted that Terry's younger brother Darrell was present, as part of a team of cyclists biking 7,000 kilometres from Vancouver to St. John's. He also noted the passing of "remarkable Canadians and Indigenous Peoples we lost" over the past year, including actor Donald Sutherland and the former head of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Murray Sinclair. "Their legacies live on, in the people they inspired, the change they sparked, and the Canada they helped build," Guilbeault said. Simon invested five individuals into the Order of Canada during the Ottawa ceremony, including actor Ryan Reynolds and musician Heather Rankin. An evening show was set to feature artists like Sarah McLachlan, Coeur de Pirate, Brenda Montana, Dear Rogue and Alex Wells. In Alberta, where talk of separation from Canada has dominated much of the political discussion following the Liberals win in April's federal election, hundreds soaked up the sun on the legislature grounds in Edmonton. "I'm proud to be Canadian and standing strong for Canada," said Alice Rutto, who noted talk of separation is what prompted her to come out for the celebrations. But Jack O'Brien had mixed views. While he said Canada Day is a day for "everyone to come together" and isn't the time for independence talk, his views about Canada will be different on July 2. "This is the time for us to celebrate Canada, correct? But if you ask me tomorrow about separation, it's a whole different story," said O'Brien, who lives in a rural community. "I'm not a fan of the Liberal government and I would think a majority of Albertans are not, and to be honest, if they wanted to separate and wanted my vote, they would get it." In Vancouver, hundreds gathered to take in live music on Granville Island, where local shop owner Jaskiran Kaur said she was proud to see the community marking the holiday, after a hiatus due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the announced discovery of graves at BC residential schools. "I think Granville Island was really consciously trying to be mindful when it came to residential school survivors and the recognition of Indigenous culture," Kaur said as she waited in line for her children to get their faces painted. "I think that was why it's been very toned down the past few years. And I think it coming back, across the board in the country, is very much to do with the 51st state rhetoric," she said, a reference to Trump's aspirations to make Canada an American state. In front of Toronto City Hall, hundreds gathered at Nathan Phillips Square to take pictures in front of the three-dimensional Toronto sign, while enjoying live music and dance performances. Phoenix Deluca said she drove in from Peterborough, Ont., with her friends visiting from Scotland so they could join the celebrations. "It's nice to show off Canada," she said. "I'm very proud to be Canadian." Carlos Gama immigrated to Canada three years ago from Brazil, and said he's spent every Canada Day since then in downtown Toronto. He said he'll be celebrating with "poutine and other Canadian foods." A few blocks away at Queen's Park, hundreds protested at an Idle No More rally, opposing Ontario's own major-projects legislation that has drawn loud opposition from Indigenous groups. "We have to come together. The Great Lakes are going to be dead within 10 years," Melanie vanDam, a member of Cutler First Nation, said to the crowd through tears.


Winnipeg Free Press
30 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Carney to meet with automotive sector CEOs as U.S. trade talks continue
OTTAWA – Prime Minister Mark Carney is set to meet with automotive sector CEOs this morning. The sector is a key front in the trade war between the United States and Canada. U.S. President Donald Trump has said repeatedly that the U.S. does not need Canadian cars and he wants to see automotive companies move all production to the U.S. The U.S. has imposed 25 per cent tariffs on vehicles manufactured in Canada, with a carve-out for components built in the U.S. through the highly integrated vehicle supply chain. Canada and the U.S. are back at the bargaining table after Trump called a halt to trade talks over Canada's plan to impose a digital services tax on multinational tech firms — a plan the Carney government called off Sunday evening. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Carney has said he wants a new Canada-U.S. trade deal in place by July 21 and if that deadline isn't met, he'll boost Canadian trade countermeasures. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025.

35 minutes ago
Is Canada beating ploughshares into swords with its NATO 5% pledge? Not likely
By anyone's measure, $150 billion a year is an eye-watering amount of money to spend on anything — let alone defence. While it pales in comparison to the inflation-adjusted appropriations of the Second World War, it is potentially, for this generation, the very definition of beating ploughshares into swords (new window) . Or is it? Following all of the political sound and fury and sticker shock of last week's NATO summit in The Hague, the question of what Prime Minister Mark Carney's government wants to accomplish with all of that money — on an annual basis — is coming into even sharper focus. On the surface, the Liberals have pledged to quickly and efficiently rearm the Canadian military. We are protecting Canadians against new threats. I wish we didn't have to, but we do have to and it is our core responsibility as government, Carney said at the summit. "The people who have been making sacrifices have been the men and women of the Canadian Armed Forces because they have not been paid to reflect what we are asking them to do. They haven't been operating with the right equipment in many cases. We're making up for that. WATCH | Procurement remains a challenge, says former officer: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? Don't get 'distracted' by 5% NATO target, former officer warns government | Power & Politics As Prime Minister Mark Carney commits to meet the new NATO spending target of five per cent of GDP by 2035, former vice-chief of the defence staff Guy Thibault tells Power & Politics he supports upping Canada's defence spending but warns the government should focus on improving procurement and supporting Canadian Forces personnel. But the reflex is strong within federal institutions to use military procurement as a tool of economic development. It has been thus for decades. At the same time, we keep getting told — by the prime minister nonetheless — that we are in extraordinary times and a national emergency. Much was made, both in the run-up and in the aftermath of the NATO summit, about the signing of a security and defence industry partnership between Canada and the European Union (new window) . Politically, it has been cast since last spring's election as a vehicle — if not the vehicle — to realize rearmament. There are a few steps to go before Canada can unlock the potential of buying military equipment in bulk with its allies. But when you look at the framework of the partnership, the rearmament potential is dwarfed by the economic opportunity for Canadian defence contractors to sell into Europe under the $1.25-trillion ReArm Europe plan. The approach seems to be that Canada wants both its guns and butter. Neither, outside great wars of the last century, has ever been mutually exclusive and they don't have to be. However, the material state of the Canadian military is such that the guns — to extend the metaphor — were needed yesterday. While a partnership with the Europeans makes good economic and geopolitical sense in the long term, it doesn't appear to be a solution to the immediate rearmament crisis. European industrial bases are simply not prepared at the moment for a protracted conflict, said Seth Jones, president of defence and security at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. If you look at European states, they still lack sufficient capabilities in combat support, in short-range air defence and long-range indirect fires, air lift. Jones also noted there are significant challenges with munitions stockpiles, with supply chain weaknesses [and] within the broader European and U.S. industrial bases workforce. If the Canadian government is serious about rearmament beyond a tool of economic development, the issue will come down to the question of where do you find a hot production line and how quickly can you acquire what the military says it needs. Poland, a member of the European Union since 2004, decided it wasn't going to put all of its eggs in the EU basket. Shortly after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the government in Warsaw embarked on a swift rearmament plan. Poland is NATO's top military spender — aiming to direct 4.7 per cent of its gross domestic product toward defence. It has tapped into production lines in both the United States and South Korea. Polish Defence Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz told Politico last winter that his government's strategy was to continue to buy from the U.S. in order to maintain economic relations. It's kind of an insurance policy, he said. The decision was made even though politically, and socially, many in Poland believe the U.S. is an unreliable ally and might not be there in a crisis with Russia. It is perhaps a lesson for Canada as the Liberal government crosses the treacherous political tightrope of still maintaining a defence relationship with the U.S. and explaining its decisions to a public still angry about the trade war and Trump's 51st state desires (new window) . The first test will come later this summer when a report by the Royal Canadian Air Force and the Department of National Defence about continuing with the F-35 purchase is presented. Carney and his team will have to decide whether to pivot away from the plan (accept only a limited number of the warplanes and fill out the rest of the order elsewhere) — or stick with what may be a politically indefensible position of carrying on. The prime minister said at the NATO summit that he had held discussions with European partners for the purchase of fighter jets and submarines. Speed vs. shift Carney has called for a shift away from Canada's economic and military reliance on the U.S. But how much of that is truly possible, if the stated goal is to rearm quickly and if Europe's defence industrial base is still in its own rebuilding phase? If the Liberal government does intend to move swiftly, there are existing mechanisms such as the National Security Exception (NSE), which allows the government to bypass certain trade agreement obligations when the equipment is deemed essential for national security. There's also the mechanism of the Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR), which can be used to acquire essential equipment on an accelerated timeline to meet a specific and immediate operational need of the Canadian Armed Forces. It can also use an Advance Contract Award Notice (ACAN), which indicates the Defence Department's intention to award a contract to a specific supplier and allows other potential suppliers to demonstrate what they can provide. At the end of the NATO summit, Carney was asked if he intends to use any of those tools at his disposal. It doesn't sound like it. The great question. The first thing we look to do is change the machinery of defence procurement, if I can put it that way, he said referring to the new defence procurement agency being set up by his government. Once the agency is built, Carney said they'll look to make adjustments to our ability to buy Canadian and our ability to buy more rapidly as appropriate. Murray Brewster (new window) · CBC News